Case: Faheem-El v. Klincar

1:84-cv-02561 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: March 27, 1984

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.)

This class-action lawsuit from the mid 1980s challenged the adequacy of Illinois' parole revocation procedures.

Related Cases

King v. Walker, Northern District of Illinois (2006)

People


Judge(s)

Bauer, William Joseph (Illinois)

Coffey, John Louis (Wisconsin)

Cudahy, Richard Dickson (Illinois)

Cummings, Walter Joseph (Illinois)

Easterbrook, Frank Hoover (Illinois)

Flaum, Joel Martin (Illinois)

Kanne, Michael Stephen (Indiana)

Manion, Daniel Anthony (Indiana)

Moran, James Byron (Illinois)

Posner, Richard Allen (Illinois)

Judge(s)

Bauer, William Joseph (Illinois)

Coffey, John Louis (Wisconsin)

Cudahy, Richard Dickson (Illinois)

Cummings, Walter Joseph (Illinois)

Easterbrook, Frank Hoover (Illinois)

Flaum, Joel Martin (Illinois)

Kanne, Michael Stephen (Indiana)

Manion, Daniel Anthony (Indiana)

Moran, James Byron (Illinois)

Posner, Richard Allen (Illinois)

Ripple, Kenneth Francis (Indiana)

Wood, Diane Pamela (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:84-cv-02561

Memorandum and Order

600 F.Supp. 1029

Dec. 4, 1984

Dec. 4, 1984

Order/Opinion

1:84-cv-02561

Memorandum and Order

620 F.Supp. 1308

Oct. 25, 1985

Oct. 25, 1985

Order/Opinion

0:85-03008

Opinion

Faheem-EL v. Klincar

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

814 F.2d 461

March 18, 1987

March 18, 1987

Order/Opinion

0:85-03008

Opinion

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

841 F.2d 712

Feb. 25, 1988

Feb. 25, 1988

Order/Opinion
5

1:84-cv-02561

Consent Decree

None

None

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 9, 2022, 3:18 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 27, 1984

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Special Case Type(s):

Habeas

Availably Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Issues

General:

Habeas Corpus

Parole grant/revocation