Case: County of Santa Clara v. Trump

3:17-cv-05813 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Oct. 10, 2017

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This lawsuit, brought on October 10, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenged President Trump's revocation of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The plaintiffs were Santa Clara County and a labor union representing thousands of county employees, and they sought to enjoin the government from ending the program. Not only did the DACA recipients stand to lose benefits and security they had relied upon, but the plaintiffs argued that their emp…

This lawsuit, brought on October 10, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenged President Trump's revocation of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The plaintiffs were Santa Clara County and a labor union representing thousands of county employees, and they sought to enjoin the government from ending the program. Not only did the DACA recipients stand to lose benefits and security they had relied upon, but the plaintiffs argued that their employers and communities stood to lose the benefits these recipients provided to them. As a result, the plaintiffs contended that revoking DACA violated Fifth Amendment due process, equal protection, and the Administrative Procedure Act. They sought equitable estoppel, injunctive relief, and a declaratory judgment.

In 2012, the Obama administration created the DACA program via DHS policy statements. The program offered work permits and temporary protection from deportation to undocumented immigrants who had been brought to the United States as children. As of 2017, there were an estimated 800,000 DACA recipients. On September 5, 2017, President Trump announced that he was ending the program in March unless Congress acted within the next six months. As the complaint highlights, the Obama administration promoted DACA by making key promises to immigrants: that any information they provided in the application process would not be used for immigration enforcement, and that barring criminal activity or fraud in their DACA applications, DACA recipients would be able to renew their status and keep their benefits.

The plaintiff Santa Clara stated that 38% of its residents are born outside of the U.S., and that its high immigrant population meant that DACA’s rescission would be particularly harmful to the county. The other plaintiff, Service Employees International Union Local 521 (Local 521), was a labor union that represents over 10,000 individuals employed by Santa Clara county. Local 521 joined the suit to protect the rights of its current and future members, and to act on their behalf. The plaintiffs argued that DACA recipients had come to rely on the program and on the assurances that their private application information would not be used against them, but that both their ability to receive important benefits and be safe from deportation were put in danger. The plaintiffs further argued that the government did not provide sound rationale for its decision to rescind DACA, and that this decision was clearly driven by racial animus.

The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. On October 16, the case was related to the other DACA cases under Judge William Alsup. This case was also reassigned to him. The related cases are: State of California v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 17-cv-5235), Garcia v. USA (No. 17-cv-5380), City of San Jose v. Trump (No. 17-cv-05329), and Regents of the University of California v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 17-cv-05211); all of which are in this Clearinghouse.

On October 6, in a related challenge led by Regents of University of California before this judge, the government filed the administrative record, available here, which included a series of government documents pertaining to DACA—from its inception to the decision to rescind it. On October 17, after the University in the related case moved to compel the defendants to complete the administrative record, the court ordered them to do so in all related cases, including this one. The court found that the defendants did not produce all documents leading to the rescission, specifically documents that Acting Secretary Duke did not directly review. On October 18, the defendants moved to stay further proceedings at this court in light of their intent to appeal this ruling to the Ninth Circuit. The court declined to enter a stay, and the defendants appealed by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus to the district court and emergency motion for stay. On October 23, the district court replied to the Ninth Circuit's invitation to answer the government's petition stating it would not stay proceedings in light of the narrow window of time until the DACA was scheduled to end on March 5, 2018.

On November 16, the Ninth Circuit denied the defendants' motion for a writ of mandamus and vacated the stay of discovery and record expansion that had been entered. The District Court immediately ordered the federal government to file an augmented administrative record by November 22. On November 17, the federal government filed an emergency motion noting that it intended to file an application for mandamus with the Supreme Court, and requesting that the Ninth Circuit stay its order pending the Supreme Court's resolution of the forthcoming petition. On November 21, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the federal government's motion, noting that jurisdiction was with the District Court and instructing the federal government that further relief must be sought in a new petition for mandamus.

Meanwhile, in the District Court, Judge Alsup on November 20 agreed to stay all discovery until December 22, at which point the augmented administrative record was due.

On December 1, 2017, the government filed notice that they appealed the Ninth's Circuit denial of mandamus relief and applied for a stay to the Supreme Court. On December 21 in a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's denial and remanded the case, arguing that the district court should have stayed implementation of the October 17 order compelling the government to complete the administrative record. The Supreme Court stated that the lower court should have "first resolved the Government’s threshold arguments" (that the Acting Secretary’s determination to rescind DACA was unreviewable because it was "committed to agency discretion," 5 U.S.C. §701(a)(2), and that the Immigration and Nationality Act deprived the District Court of jurisdiction). "Either of those arguments, if accepted, likely would eliminate the need for the District Court to examine a complete administrative record." 138 S.Ct. 443 (2017). The same day, the district court stayed the order compelling the government to complete the administrative record.

On January 9, 2018, the court denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction from November 2017 and provided provisional relief to the plaintiffs. The order indicated the court would separately dismiss the government's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The court ordered a nationwide preliminary injunction, ordering that DACA remain in effect on the same terms and conditions that existed prior to the rescission. However, the government did not need to process new applications from individuals who never before received deferred action. The court then granted in part and denied in part the government's motion to dismiss on January 12, dismissing the plaintiffs' Regulatory Flexibility Act and equitable estoppel claims, as well as the individual plaintiffs' declaratory relief claims. The court sustained the plaintiffs' APA, due process, and equal protection claims (with a few exceptions from the various complaints of the related cases).

The government appealed to the Ninth Circuit one week later. The government also sought certiorari from the Supreme Court on January 18 while the Ninth Circuit appeal was pending, arguing that the Supreme Court's immediate review was warranted because of how long the appeal would take in the Ninth Circuit and how time sensitive the issue was. The Supreme Court denied cert without prejudice on February 26, 2018, indicating the justices assumed "that the Court of Appeals will proceed expeditiously to decide this case."

The related cases were consolidated in the Ninth Circuit for the purposes of appeal. In February and March 2018, the parties and amici filed their briefs, which can be found here.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings on November 8, 2018. The panel held that the government's decision to rescind DACA was reviewable because it was based on a belief that law foreclosed any alternative because the agency lacked authority rather than an exercise of discretion. The panel further concluded the decision was reviewable because the government based rescission only on the belief that DACA went beyond DHS' authority and so the APA's bar did not apply, and the decision did not fall within the three discrete occasions when the INA bars judicial review of DHS decisions. As to the merits of preliminary injunction, the panel held that "DACA was a permissible exercise of executive discretion" and the government's belief that DACA was illegal was wrong. 908 F.3d 476. Thus, the panel concluded the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in showing that the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the APA. The panel also held that a nationwide injunction was appropriate because it "promotes uniformity in immigration enforcement, and is necessary to provide the plaintiffs here with complete redress." Id.

The defendants petitioned the Supreme Court of the U.S. for a writ of certiorari on Nov. 5, 2018.

On June 28, 2019, the Supreme Court granted writs of certiorari in three DACA cases: Regents of University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen, and NAACP v. Trump, all of which were pending before different circuit courts of appeal. The Court consolidated the three cases (No. 18-587).

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 12, 2019, on the issues of whether DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy is judicially reviewable and whether DHS’s decision to rescind DACA is lawful. On June 18, 2020, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor), the Court held that the DACA rescission was subject to judicial review under the APA, that the DHS secretary had offered insufficient justification to rescind the program, and that the rescission was unlawful, arbitrary, and capricious in violation fo the APA. 140 S. Ct. 1891.

Following the Supreme Court's decision, in another case challenging the DACA recession, Casa De Maryland v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Fourth Circuit issued a mandate to reinstate DACA and set aside the recession memo on a nationwide basis on June 30, 2020. On July 17, 2020, the District Court of Maryland ordered DHS to reinstate DACA as it existed before the issuance of the recession memo and ordered DHS to resume accepting initial DACA applications.

However, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf instead issued a memorandum entitled "Reconsideration of the June 15, 2012 Memorandum Entitled 'Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children" on July 28, 2020 ("Wolf Memorandum"). In this memo, Acting Secretary Wolf stated that he would reconsider DACA's future in light of the Supreme Court's decision. In the interim, the memo instructed USCIS to reject all initial requests for DACA, to only grant advance parole to current DACA beneficiaries in exceptional circumstances, and grant DACA renewals for only one-year, rather than two-year, periods. Later in August, Deputy Director for Policy for USCIS Joseph Edlow issued a memorandum implementing the Wolf Memorandum.

On August 4, 2020, the Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further action consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

In response to the Wolf Memorandum, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November 2, 2020. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs substituted some of the defendants to reflect new individuals occupying the relevant roles and to add additional responsible officials, including Deputy Director for Policy Edlow. The amended complaint argued that Acting Secretary Wolf's actions were invalid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Action, Homeland Security Act, and the Appointments Clause of the Constitution because he lacked proper authority to issue the Wolf Memorandum. In addition, the plaintiffs argued that the Wolf Memorandum and Edlow Memorandum violated the APA because Wolf and Edlow acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief and an injunction preventing the defendants from altering or limiting DACA program and vacating the Wolf and Edlow Memoranda.

Before any additional activity on the amended complaint in this case, on December 4, the court in another case challenging the Wolf Memorandum,Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen and State of New York v. Trump, ordered DHS to fully reinstate DACA as it existed prior to the attempted recession in September 2017 after it found that Acting Secretary Wolf was not lawfully serving as Acting Secretary. The order required DHS to accept initial DACA applications, accept advance parole applications, and grant DACA renewals for two-years. On December 7, 2020 USCIS updated their website and indicated that effective that day, USCIS would accept initial applications, extend one-year DACA renewals to two-years, and accept applications for advance parole.

Then, in early 2021, President Biden took office. On the day of his inauguration (January 20, 2021), President Biden signed a memorandum directing DHS and the Attorney General “to preserve and fortify DACA.” In light of potential additional agency action to implement the memorandum, the parties filed a joint stipulation to stay further proceedings and vacate pending deadlines on March 22, 2021. They agreed to provide the court with status updates every 60 days. The first is due May 24, 2021. This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Virginia Weeks (11/8/2018)

Sam Kulhanek (2/27/2019)

Eva Richardson (5/19/2019)

Sam Kulhanek (2/14/2020)

Emily Kempa (5/14/2021)

Related Cases

State of New York v. Trump, Eastern District of New York (2017)

Regents of University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Northern District of California (2017)

State of California v. Department of Homeland Security, Northern District of California (2017)

City of San Jose v. Trump, Northern District of California (2017)

Garcia v. United States of America, Northern District of California (2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6179844/parties/county-of-santa-clara-v-trump/


Judge(s)

Alito, Samuel A. Jr. (District of Columbia)

Alsup, William Haskell (California)

Gould, Ronald Murray (Washington)

Kavanaugh, Brett M. (District of Columbia)

Kim, Sallie (California)

Lloyd, Howard R. (California)

Roberts, John Glover Jr. (District of Columbia)

Sotomayor, Sonia (District of Columbia)

Thomas, Clarence (District of Columbia)

Wardlaw, Kim McLane (California)

Judge(s)

Alito, Samuel A. Jr. (District of Columbia)

Alsup, William Haskell (California)

Gould, Ronald Murray (Washington)

Kavanaugh, Brett M. (District of Columbia)

Kim, Sallie (California)

Lloyd, Howard R. (California)

Roberts, John Glover Jr. (District of Columbia)

Sotomayor, Sonia (District of Columbia)

Thomas, Clarence (District of Columbia)

Wardlaw, Kim McLane (California)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Berger, Justin Theodore (California)

Brown, Eric (California)

Davidson, Jeffrey Michael (California)

Ellison, Keith (Minnesota)

Frey, Aaron M (Maine)

Frosh, Brian E. (Maryland)

Gorsuch, Neil M. (District of Columbia)

Hansen, Greta Suzanne (California)

Kieschnick, Hannah (California)

Leyton, Stacey M. (California)

Passe, Julianna F. (Minnesota)

Patwardhan, Kimberly L (Maine)

Quinones, Marcelo (California)

Rodriquez, Matthew (California)

Rosenbaum, Mark Dale (California)

Sullivan, Steven M. (Maryland)

Trice, Laura Susan (California)

Weissglass, Jonathan (California)

Williams, James Robyzad (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Boynton, Brian M (District of Columbia)

Pezzi, Stephen M. (District of Columbia)

Rosenberg, Brad P. (District of Columbia)

Other Attorney(s)

Dettmer, Ethan D. (California)

Leheny, Emma (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket [PACER]

July 3, 2019 Docket
1

Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Oct. 10, 2017 Complaint
12

Order Re Motion to Complete Administrative Record

The Regents of the University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security

2017 WL 4642324

Oct. 17, 2017 Order/Opinion

Order

United States of America v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

875 F.3d 1200

Nov. 16, 2017 Order/Opinion
45

Order [Supreme Court]

Supreme Court of the United States

86 U.S. 4009, 138 S.Ct. 443, 199 L.Ed.2d 351

Dec. 21, 2017 Order/Opinion
48

Order Denying FRCP 12(b)(1) Dismissal and Granting Provisional Relief

The Regents of the University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Jan. 9, 2018 Order/Opinion
53

Order Granting in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(b)(6)

The Regents of the University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security

298 F.Supp.3d 1304

Jan. 12, 2018 Order/Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California

Supreme Court of the United States

140 S.Ct. 1891

June 18, 2020 Order/Opinion
87

Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Nov. 2, 2020 Complaint
318

Stipulation Re: Vacation of Deadlines and Stay of Proceedings Pending Defendants' Actions Pursuant to January 20, 2021 Presidential Memorandum Re: DACA

The Regents of the University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

March 22, 2021 Settlement Agreement

Resources

Title Description External URL

Preserving and Fortifying Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)

Executive Office of the President

In 2012, during the Obama-Biden Administration, the Secretary of Homeland Security issued a memorandum outlining how, in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, the Department of Homeland Security… Jan. 25, 2021 https://www.federalregister.gov/...

Refugee Reception and Perception: US Detention Camps and German Welcome Centers

Valeria Gomez & Karla Mari McKanders

The reception of refugees and asylum seekers has emerged as one of the most critical contemporary global issues. In 2015, the world experienced the most forced migrants since World War II. This essay… March 31, 2017 https://papers.ssrn.com/...

Sanctuary: K-12 School Districts in Agricultural Communities

Cecilia Barnes

This comment was initiated some eight months after the Executive Order was issued and well after the Executive Order’s enforcement had been challenged by multiple lawsuits on constitutional grounds. … Jan. 1, 2017 http://www.sjcl.edu/...

Libraries Keep a Resourceful Eye on the President

George H. Pike

From the earliest times, libraries have had a mission to collect, curate, organize, and disseminate knowledge and information as broadly as possible for the benefit of the societies they serve. Libra… June 6, 2017 http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/...

Executive Orders on Travel and Immigration Create a Far-from-Ordinary Semester in Michigan Law's Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Julie Aust, Jamie Kessler, and Virginia Weeks

President Donald J. Trump's second travel ban for nationals from a group of predominantly Muslim countries was scheduled to take effect on March 16, 2017—until it was enjoined the day before by the U… March 16, 2017 None

Re: Implementing the President's Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies (Final, 2/20/2017)

DHS Secretary John Kelly

Feb. 20, 2017 https://www.dhs.gov/...

Executive Order 13768: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States

President Donald Trump

Jan. 25, 2017 https://www.gpo.gov/...

Re: Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the National Interest (Final, 2/20/2017)

DHS Secretary John Kelly

Feb. 20, 2017 https://www.dhs.gov/...

Executive Order 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

President Donald Trump

Jan. 27, 2017 None

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6179844/county-of-santa-clara-v-trump/

Last updated May 28, 2022, 3:16 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for Discovery (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2017)

Sept. 26, 2017 PACER
1

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-11783372.). Filed byCounty of Santa Clara, SEIU Local 521. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Eric) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Oct. 10, 2017 RECAP
2

Certificate of Interested Entities by County of Santa Clara, SEIU Local 521 (Brown, Eric) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Brown, Eric) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
4

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/24/2017. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
5

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
6

Summons Issued as to Donald J. Trump, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
7

Summons Issued as to Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
8

Summons Issued as to Elaine Duke, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
9

Summons Issued as to, U.S. Attorney's office for the Northern District of Calfiornia Attn: Civil Process Clerk and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) (Entered: 10/10/2017)

Oct. 10, 2017 PACER
10

ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/16/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017) (Entered: 10/16/2017)

Oct. 16, 2017 PACER

Related cases: Create association to 3:17-cv-05211-WHA. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Oct. 16, 2017 PACER

Related cases: Create association to 3:17-cv-05235-WHA. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Oct. 16, 2017 PACER

Related cases: Create association to 3:17-cv-05380-WHA. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Oct. 16, 2017 PACER

Related cases: Create association to 3:17-cv-05329-WHA. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Oct. 16, 2017 PACER
11

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings pursuant to Order Relating Cases. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibilityf or Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017) (Entered: 10/17/2017)

1 Notice of Eligibilityf or Video Recording

View on PACER

Oct. 17, 2017 PACER
12

ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPLETE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Judge William Alsup granting in part and denying in part (65) Motion Complete Administrative Record in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017) (Entered: 10/17/2017)

Oct. 17, 2017 RECAP
13

ORDER TO COMPILE SUPPLEMENT FORTHWITH re (12 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/18/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2017) (Entered: 10/18/2017)

Oct. 18, 2017 PACER
14

NOTICE of Appearance by Brad Prescott Rosenberg (Rosenberg, Brad) (Filed on 10/18/2017) (Entered: 10/18/2017)

Oct. 18, 2017 PACER
15

ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS by Judge William Alsup granting (82) Stipulation in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2017) (Entered: 10/19/2017)

Oct. 19, 2017 PACER

Terminate Hearing re (15 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Order on Stipulation, (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2017)

Oct. 19, 2017 PACER
16

ORDER RE MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS by Judge William Alsup denying (81) Motion to Stay in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2017) (Entered: 10/19/2017)

Oct. 19, 2017 PACER
17

NOTICE by Elaine Duke, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security of Filing of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Attachments: # 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus)(Rosenberg, Brad) (Filed on 10/20/2017) (Entered: 10/20/2017)

1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

View on PACER

Oct. 20, 2017 PACER
21

USCA Case Number 17-72917 USCA 9th Circuit re Petition for Writ of Mandamus (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2017) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 20, 2017 PACER
22

ORDER of USCA re Petition for Writ of Mandamus (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2017) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 20, 2017 PACER
18

ANSWER BY DISTRICT COURT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/23/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017) (Entered: 10/23/2017)

Oct. 23, 2017 PACER
19

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting (91) Unopposed Administrative Motion for Additional Pages for Joint Discovery Letter Brief in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 24, 2017 PACER
20

ORDER RE: DEPOSITION OF ACTING SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY DUKE by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim (Re: (88) Discovery Letter Brief in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA). (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 24, 2017 PACER
23

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE MOTION SCHEDULE Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/25/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017) (Entered: 10/25/2017)

Oct. 25, 2017 PACER
24

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING AMICUS BRIEFING AS MODIFIED by Judge William Alsup granting as modified (101) Stipulation in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017) (Entered: 10/25/2017)

Oct. 25, 2017 RECAP
30

ORDER of USCA regarding oral arguments and amicus briefs as to (21 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA, 38 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 95 in 317-cv-05211-WHA, 47 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 34 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017) (Entered: 11/03/2017)

Oct. 26, 2017 PACER
25

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO AMEND PAGE LIMITS IN CONNECTION WITH MOTION FOR PROVISIONAL RELIEF by Judge William Alsup granting (103) Administrative Motion to alter page limits in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2017) (Entered: 10/27/2017)

Oct. 27, 2017 PACER
26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by County of Santa Clara, Service Employees International Union Local 521 re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 8 Summons Issued as to USA, 1 Complaint, 9 Summons Issued as to USA, 6 Summons Issued as to USA, 7 Summons Issued as to USA (Brown, Eric) (Filed on 10/27/2017) (Entered: 10/27/2017)

Oct. 27, 2017 PACER
31

ORDER of USCA regarding amicus briefs as to (21 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA, 38 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 95 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 47 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 34 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017) (Entered: 11/03/2017)

Oct. 31, 2017 PACER
27

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting (115) Motion for Protective Order in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2017) (Entered: 11/01/2017)

Nov. 1, 2017 PACER
28

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS by Judge William Alsup granting (110) Administrative Motion leave to file amicus curiae brief in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA.Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 3:17-cv-05813-WHA(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2017) (Entered: 11/01/2017)

Nov. 1, 2017 PACER
29

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Leave to File Amicus Brief filed by National Education Association Of The United States, Association of California School Administrators, Berkeley Unified School District, Moreno Valley Unified School District, San Diego Unified School District, West Contra Costa Unified School District, California Faculty Association, California Federation of Teachers, California School Boards Association, California Teachers Association, Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools, Los Angeles County Board of Education, Los Angeles Unified School District, Oakland Unified School District, Sacramento City Unified School District. Responses due by 11/6/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amicus Curiae Brief)(Leheny, Emma) (Filed on 11/1/2017) (Entered: 11/01/2017)

1 Exhibit Amicus Curiae Brief

View on PACER

Nov. 1, 2017 PACER
32

ORDER RE MOTION TO MAINTAIN ANONYMITY by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part (125) Administrative Motion maintain anonymity; granting in part and denying in part (126) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2017) (Entered: 11/08/2017)

Nov. 8, 2017 PACER
33

ORDER TO FILE COMPLETED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND PROPOSE SCHEDULE Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/16/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2017) (Entered: 11/16/2017)

Nov. 16, 2017 PACER
34

TENTATIVE ORDER RE MOTIONS TO STAY DISCOVERY AND COMPLETION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/20/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Tentative Order)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017) (Entered: 11/20/2017)

1 Tentative Order

View on PACER

Nov. 20, 2017 PACER
35

ONE-MONTH CONTINUANCE OF DUE DATE FOR AUGMENTED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND TEMPORARY STAY OF DISCOVERY by Judge Alsup re (190) Motion to Stay; re (191) Motion to Stay; re (192) Stipulation in case 3:17-cv-05211-WHA. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017) (Entered: 11/20/2017)

Nov. 20, 2017 PACER
36

ORDER of USCA denying petition (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017) (Entered: 11/21/2017)

Nov. 21, 2017 PACER
37

ORDER of USCA Dismissing Motion for Stay filed by government. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017) (Entered: 11/21/2017)

Nov. 21, 2017 PACER
38

ORDER of USCA regarding Motion for Stay. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017) (Entered: 11/21/2017)

Nov. 21, 2017 PACER
39

Memorandum of USCA regarding Administrative Record. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017) (Entered: 11/21/2017)

Nov. 21, 2017 PACER
40

ORDER of USCA denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2017) (Entered: 11/22/2017)

Nov. 22, 2017 PACER
41

NOTICE by Elaine Duke, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security of Filing of Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay in the United States Supreme Court (Attachments: # 1 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, # 2 Application for a Stay)(Rosenberg, Brad) (Filed on 12/1/2017) (Entered: 12/01/2017)

1 Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

View on PACER

2 Application for a Stay

View on PACER

Dec. 1, 2017 PACER
42

NOTICE OF FILING OF STATEMENT OF DISTRICT COURT IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR A STAY Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/6/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2017) (Entered: 12/06/2017)

Dec. 6, 2017 PACER
43

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William Alsup: Motion Hearing held on 12/20/2017 re 114 MOTION to Dismiss All N.D. Cal. DACA Cases and Memorandum in Support filed by Elaine Duke, United States Department of Homeland Security; 111 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction -- Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Relie filed by UC Regents, Janet Napolitano. Motions are submitted. Total Time in Court: 3 Hours; 40 Minutes. Court Reporter: Lydia Zinn. Plaintiff Attorneys: Jeffrey Davidson, Megan Crowley, Alexander Berengaut, Mark Lynch, Lanny Breuer, James Zahradka, Brian Danitz, Mark Rosenbaum, Ethan Dettmer, Eric Brown. Defendant Attorneys: Brad Rosenberg, Kate Bailey, Brett Shumate. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 12/20/2017) (Entered: 12/20/2017)

Dec. 20, 2017 PACER
44

Transcript of Proceedings held on 12/20/2017, before Judge William Alsup. Court Reporter/Transcriber Lydia Zinn, telephone number (415) 531-6587. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (222 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Transcript Order, (220 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Transcript Order ) Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/22/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/21/2018. (Zinn, Lydia) (Filed on 12/21/2017) (Entered: 12/21/2017)

Dec. 21, 2017 PACER
45

PER CURIAM of Supreme Court of the United States on Petition for Writ of Mandamus vacating judgment of USCA and remanding case. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2017) (Entered: 12/21/2017)

Dec. 21, 2017 PACER
46

STAY OF NOVEMBER 20 ORDER 197 . Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/21/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2017) (Entered: 12/21/2017)

Dec. 21, 2017 PACER
47

ORDER of USCA regarding Government's threshold arguments and certification for appeal (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2017) (Entered: 12/27/2017)

Dec. 27, 2017 PACER
48

ORDER DENYING 114 FRCP 12(b)(1) DISMISSAL AND GRANTING 111 PROVISIONAL RELIEF (granting 227 ) by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018) (Entered: 01/09/2018)

Jan. 9, 2018 PACER
49

CLERK'S NOTICE: Discovery Hearing set for 1/10/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Personal appearances are preferred, but given the short notice counsel may appear by telephone. Only one attorney per party to speak if appearing by telephone, although other attorneys for the same party may listen to the hearing. Attorneys wishing to participate by telephone shall contact the Court by email to SKCRD@cand.uscourts.gov to request the dial-in information. In the email, counsel shall identify which party they represent and the name(s) of the attorney(s) that will be appearing. The Court will issue a follow up order with specific topics to be addressed during the hearing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018) (Entered: 01/10/2018)

Jan. 10, 2018 PACER
50

CLERK'S NOTICE Correcting Date/Time of Discovery Hearing: Discovery Hearing set for 1/11/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018) Modified on 1/10/2018 (mklS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/10/2018)

Jan. 10, 2018 PACER
51

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY HEARING ON 1/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 1/10/2018. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018) (Entered: 01/10/2018)

Jan. 10, 2018 PACER
52

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim: Discovery Hearing held on 1/11/2018. The Court and parties discuss the status of discovery. Further Discovery Hearing set for 1/30/2018 09:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Defense counsel may appear by telephone. (FTR Time: 10:32-10:41.) Plaintiff Attorney: Jeffrey Davidson; James Zahradka; Eric Brown; Justin Berger; Kelsey Helland. Defendant Attorney: Brad Rosenberg (by telephone). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/11/2018) (Entered: 01/11/2018)

Jan. 11, 2018 PACER
53

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 114 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FRCP 12(b)(6) by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2018) (Entered: 01/12/2018)

Jan. 12, 2018 PACER
54

NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Appeal of Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction 48, Order on Motion to Dismiss 53 (Appeal fee FEE WAIVED.) (Rosenberg, Brad) (Filed on 1/16/2018) (Entered: 01/16/2018)

Jan. 16, 2018 PACER
55

CLERK'S NOTICE: The Discovery Hearing currently set for 1/30/2018 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim is vacated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2018) (Entered: 01/22/2018)

Jan. 22, 2018 PACER
56

ORDER GRANTING (246) STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS AND TO SEEK LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINTS by Judge William Alsup.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018) (Entered: 01/23/2018)

Jan. 23, 2018 PACER
57

USCA Acknowledgment of Receipt of Permission to Appeal 18-80004 USCA 9th Circuit for (89 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, (241 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States Department of Homeland Security, (72 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (66 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (54 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018) (Entered: 01/26/2018)

Jan. 26, 2018 PACER
58

USCA Case Number 18-15072 USCA 9th Circuit for 54 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2018) (Entered: 01/29/2018)

Jan. 29, 2018 PACER
59

Judgment of Supreme Court of United States Washington DC re Writ of Mandamus (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018) (Entered: 01/31/2018)

Jan. 31, 2018 PACER
60

USCA Case Number 18-80007 USCA 9th Circuit for Acknowledgment of Receipt for Permission to Appeal. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018) (Entered: 01/31/2018)

Jan. 31, 2018 PACER
61

USCA Case Number 18-80008 USCA 9th Circuit acknowledgment receipt of Petition for Permission to Appeal. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018) (Entered: 01/31/2018)

Jan. 31, 2018 PACER
62

ORDER of USCA granting petition for permission to appeal as to (92 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 251 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 75 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 69 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 57 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) USCA Case Number 18-80004 (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
63

ORDER of USCA granting petition for permission to appeal as to (253 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 73 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 60 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA, 95 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 78 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) USCA Case Number 18-80007 (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
64

ORDER of USCA granting petition for permission to appeal as to (79 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 96 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 61 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA, 74 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 254 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) USCA Case Number 18-80008 (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
65

USCA Case Number 18-15128 USCA 9th Circuit and Time Schedule Order (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
66

USCA Case Number 18-15133 USCA 9th Circuit and Time Schedule Order (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
67

USCA Case Number 18-15134 USCA 9th Circuit and Time Schedule Order (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
68

ORDER of Supreme Court of U.S. Washington DC re filing of petition for writ of certiorari as to (92 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 251 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 75 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA, 69 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 57 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) USCA Case Number,,, (62 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA, 97 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA, 75 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA, 255 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA, 80 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) USCA Order, (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2018) (Entered: 02/01/2018)

Feb. 1, 2018 PACER
69

NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Jonathan David Weissglass (Weissglass, Jonathan) (Filed on 2/2/2018) (Entered: 02/02/2018)

Feb. 2, 2018 PACER
70

U.S. Supreme Court Receipt acknowledging Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed on 1/18/18 as No. 17-1003. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2018) (Entered: 02/22/2018)

Feb. 22, 2018 PACER
71

ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO MOVE FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINTS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/8/2018. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) (Entered: 03/08/2018)

March 8, 2018 PACER
72

ORDER of USCA re motion and panel of Ninth Circuit Judges. (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2018) (Entered: 03/19/2018)

March 19, 2018 PACER
73

USCA Acknowledgment of Receipt for Permission to Appeal: Case Number 18-80037 USCA 9th Circuit (sxbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2018) (Entered: 03/22/2018)

March 22, 2018 PACER
74

ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 4/4/2018. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2018) (Entered: 04/04/2018)

April 4, 2018 PACER
75

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/26/2018. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2018) (Entered: 06/26/2018)

June 26, 2018 PACER
76

USCA JUDGMENT as to (89 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, (241 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States Department of Homeland Security, (72 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (66 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (54 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump (ddkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2018) (Entered: 11/21/2018)

Nov. 8, 2018 PACER
77

MANDATE of USCA as to (89 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, (241 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States Department of Homeland Security, (72 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (66 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (54 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2019) (Entered: 02/27/2019)

Feb. 25, 2019 PACER
78

NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Eric Prince Brown (Brown, Eric) (Filed on 7/3/2019) (Entered: 07/03/2019)

July 3, 2019 PACER
79

U.S. Supreme Court JUDGMENT as to (89 in 3:17-cv-05235-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, (241 in 3:17-cv-05211-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States Department of Homeland Security, (72 in 3:17-cv-05329-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (66 in 3:17-cv-05380-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald J. Trump, (54 in 3:17-cv-05813-WHA) Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, Donald J. Trump. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020) (Entered: 07/22/2020)

July 22, 2020 PACER
80

ORDER of USCA re 18-15065 in 17-cv-05211-WHA; 18-15069 in 17-cv-05235-WHA; 18-15070 in 17-cv-05329-WHA; 18-15071 in 17-cv-05380-WHA; 18-15072 in 17-cv-05813-WHA. In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020), we remand these cases to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Courts opinion, which held that the Department of Homeland Securitys rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program "was arbitrary and capricious in violation of the [Administrative Procedure Act]," id. at 1915. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020) (Entered: 08/04/2020)

Aug. 4, 2020 PACER
81

MANDATE of USCA. Nos. 18-15068, 15-15069, 18-15070, 18-15071, 18-15072, 18-15128, 18-15133, 18-15134.The judgment of this Court, entered August 04, 2020, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020) (Entered: 08/04/2020)

Aug. 4, 2020 PACER
82

CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2020 at 12:00 PM. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-684-8852Access Code: 3707514The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)11(amd2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2020) Modified on 9/1/2020 (amd2S, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/1/2020 (amd2S, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/01/2020)

Sept. 1, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Telephonic Hearing (AT&T)

Sept. 1, 2020 PACER
83

ORDER of USCA No. 18-80037.Petitioners' unopposed motion to withdraw this petition is granted. The petition is withdrawn. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2020) (Entered: 09/11/2020)

Sept. 11, 2020 PACER
84

CLERK'S NOTICE. The Further Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2020 is continued to 10/22/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amd2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020) (Entered: 09/23/2020)

Sept. 23, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice

Sept. 23, 2020 PACER
85

NOTICE of Appearance by Hannah Meredith Kieschnick (Kieschnick, Hannah) (Filed on 10/14/2020) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

Oct. 14, 2020 PACER
86

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William Alsup: Further Case Management Conference held on 10/22/2020 via AT&T Conference line. There were no objections to the Case Management Statement submitted by the parties on a joint basis. The Court will issue a Scheduling Order based on the Case Management Statement. Total Time in Court: 5 minutes. Court Reporter: Debra Pas. Attorney for Plaintiffs UC Regents and Janet Napolitano: Jeffrey Davidson. Attorney for Plaintiffs/Movant States: James Zahradka. Attorney for Plaintiff/Movant City of San Jose: Justin Berger. Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Movant Individuals: Ethan Dettmer / Mark Rosenbaum. Attorney for Plaintiff/Movant County of Santa Clara: Stacey Leyton.Attorneys for Defendants Dept. of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielson, United States of America, Donald Trump, Jefferson Sessions: Brad Rosenberg / Stephen Pezzi. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amd2S, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/22/2020) (Entered: 10/23/2020)

Oct. 22, 2020 PACER

Case Management Conference - Further

Oct. 23, 2020 PACER
87

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants. Filed by Service Employees International Union Local 521, County of Santa Clara. (Leyton, Stacey) (Filed on 11/2/2020) (Entered: 11/02/2020)

Nov. 2, 2020 RECAP
88

Notice of Change In Counsel

Sept. 15, 2021 PACER
89

Notice of Appearance

May 23, 2022 PACER