Case: United States v. Winnice J.P. Clement

63-09334 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

Filed Date: 1963

Closed Date: July 14, 1964

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about whether state officials deprived citizens of the right to register to vote in Webster Parish, Louisiana, without distinction of race or color. On February 18, 2023, the U.S. Attorney General filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Division. Plaintiff sued the Registrar of Voters of Webster Parish, Louisiana and the State of Louisiana under the Civil Rights Act of 1957, as amended and sought injunctions against D…

This case is about whether state officials deprived citizens of the right to register to vote in Webster Parish, Louisiana, without distinction of race or color. On February 18, 2023, the U.S. Attorney General filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport Division. Plaintiff sued the Registrar of Voters of Webster Parish, Louisiana and the State of Louisiana under the Civil Rights Act of 1957, as amended and sought injunctions against Defendants from engaging in any actions depriving any citizen in Webster Parish of the right to register and the right to vote and from adopting or applying to Black applicants for registration different and more stringent requirements than those applied to white applicants. 

Between January, 1957 and September, 1962, the Registrar administered an oral test on the interpretation of the State or Federal Constitution to Black applicants applying to register to vote. The Registrar introduced this test in 1963 (a time where large numbers of Black persons applied and successfully completed citizenship tests) and did not administer this test to white applicants. The Registrar also engaged in other procedures to delay and hinder the registration of Black applicants but did not impose such procedures on white applicants. Such procedures included requiring Black applicants to produce two witnesses for identification before allowing them to register. On September 13, 1962, the Registrar began using a multiple-choice "citizenship" test. Between September 13, 1962 and June 25, 1963, the Registrar used the application form to discriminate against Black applicants. The application form was used as a test for Black applicants, with twenty four Black applicants rejected (out of 178 applicants) based on "errors" on their application form, even though all these applicants passed the multiple-choice test. In comparison, only one white applicant (out of 527 white applicants) was rejected based on the application form.

The case was assigned to Chief Judge Ben C. Dawkins. On July 14, 1964, the Court found that the Registrar and her deputy engaged in acts and practices which deprived Black citizens of Webster Parish of the rights secured by the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by 42 U.S.C. 1971(a), and that such deprivations were pursuant to a pattern of racial discrimination. The Court enjoined the defendants and their agents, officers, employees, successors in office and all persons in active concert with them from engaging in any act or practice which involves or results in distinctions of race or color in the registration of voters in Webster Parish. Each defendant was specifically enjoined from (a) applying different and more stringent registration qualifications, requirements, procedures and standards to Black applicants compared to white applicants and (b) using the application form in any manner or for any purpose different from and more stringent than that for which it is used in registering white persons in Webster Parish. The Court also ordered the Registrar to notify each rejected application of the specific reason for rejection, and to produce a report to the Clerk of the Court and to the plaintiff on or before the tenth day of every month setting forth the process in receiving and processing applications during the preceding calendar month.

The case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On March 14, 1966, the case was related to another voter registration case: United States of America v. Joseph Walton Crawford. The order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana was upheld.

Summary Authors

Claire Pollard (8/30/2025)

People


Attorney for Plaintiff

Adler, Paul S. (District of Columbia)

Doar, John (District of Columbia)

Dunbaugh, Frank M. III (District of Columbia)

Kauder, Louis (District of Columbia)

Kennedy, Robert (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

63-09334

Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, and Decree

United States v. Clement

Jan. 1, 1963

Jan. 1, 1963

Pleading / Motion / Brief

63-09334

Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decree

United States v. Clement

Jan. 19, 1963

Jan. 19, 1963

Pleading / Motion / Brief

63-09334

Opinion

July 14, 1964

July 14, 1964

Order/Opinion

231 F.Supp. 913

63-09334

Opinion

Dec. 3, 1964

Dec. 3, 1964

Order/Opinion

36 F.R.D. 174

22492

Brief for Appellant

United States v. Clement

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

July 15, 1965

July 15, 1965

Pleading / Motion / Brief

63-09334

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

March 14, 1966

March 14, 1966

Order/Opinion

358 F.2d 89

63-09334

Complaint

United States v. Clement

None

Complaint

Resources

Title Description External URL Date / External URL

Beware the Minority Block Vote

Winter’ and Williams' campaign for Mississippi’s 1967 gubernatorial elections. Winter lost to John Bell Williams in the second primary by a count of 371,815 to 310,527. The loss is attributed to Wint…

6 Updated Questions to Elemental Knowledge of the Constitution and Government

In the 1960s, literacy tests were used as a tool to prevent Black Americans and other minorities from voting, despite the fact that they were ostensibly designed to ensure an educated electorate. The…

Updated Newspaper Article

Unknown

Political campaign ad for John Bell Williams for Mississippi governor July 1, 1967

July 1, 1967

Questions Evidence Elemental Knowledge of the Constitution and Government 1965

In the 1960s, literacy tests were used as a tool to prevent Black Americans and other minorities from voting, despite the fact that they were ostensibly designed to ensure an educated electorate. The… Feb. 8, 1965

Feb. 8, 1965

November 2 1959 Form of Application for Registration

Office of Registrar of Voters

In the post-Reconstruction era, Louisiana enacted several discriminatory voter registration practices as part of its 1898 constitution, specifically designed to disenfranchise Black Americans. The co… Nov. 2, 1959

Nov. 2, 1959

Form of Application for Registration

In the post-Reconstruction era, Louisiana enacted several discriminatory voter registration practices as part of its 1898 constitution, specifically designed to disenfranchise Black Americans. The co… Nov. 2, 1959

Nov. 2, 1959

Ouachita Parish 1959 Application for Registration Form

Ouachita Parish

In the post-Reconstruction era, Louisiana enacted several discriminatory voter registration practices as part of its 1898 constitution, specifically designed to disenfranchise Black Americans. The co… Sept. 11, 1959

Sept. 11, 1959

November 16 1956 Form of Application for Registration

In the post-Reconstruction era, Louisiana enacted several discriminatory voter registration practices as part of its 1898 constitution, specifically designed to disenfranchise Black Americans. The co… Nov. 16, 1956

Nov. 16, 1956

Docket

Last updated March 6, 2024, 3 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Louisiana

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: 1963

Closing Date: July 14, 1964

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

U.S. Attorney General

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Winnice J. P. Clement (Webster), County

State of Louisiana, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Civil Rights Act of 1957/1960, 52 U.S.C. § 10101 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 1971)

Other Dockets:

Western District of Louisiana 63-09334

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 22492

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

Affected Race(s):

Black

Voting:

Election administration

Voter qualifications

Voter registration rules