Case: Department of Education OCR Title IX Investigation of Virginia Commonwealth University

11-11-2031 | No Court

Filed Date: Dec. 3, 2010

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 3, 2010, a complaint was filed with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) against the university on behalf of a current student who had filed a complaint with the Virginia Commonwealth University after she was sexually assaulted by a male student. The complaint alleged that the university's sexual misconduct policies and procedures were discriminatory on the basis of sex. The university held a hearing, and the panel at the hearing ruled against the complaina…

On December 3, 2010, a complaint was filed with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) against the university on behalf of a current student who had filed a complaint with the Virginia Commonwealth University after she was sexually assaulted by a male student. The complaint alleged that the university's sexual misconduct policies and procedures were discriminatory on the basis of sex. The university held a hearing, and the panel at the hearing ruled against the complainant. Following the hearing, the university refused to provide the student information as to how it reached its decision and did not allow her to appeal its decision. The student also requested documents that had been used in the hearing process, and was told that the documents had been shredded. The complaint also alleged that the student was discriminated against on the basis of race and age.

In an interview with the student on January 13, 2011, the complainant told OCR that she intended for sex discrimination and race discrimination to be included as bases for her complaint, but that she no longer wished for age discrimination to be included as a basis for her complaint. On February 9, 2011, OCR dismissed the allegation of racial discrimination because there was not enough information to suggest that racial discrimination had occurred, only that most of the panel members were of the same race as the accused student. OCR also determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the university's decision in the student's individual hearing because the alleged assault took place in a location not owned by the university during an activity not sponsored by the university. OCR determined that it did have jurisdiction to determine whether the university's sexual misconduct and sexual harassment policies complied with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and opened an investigation into this allegation.

On September 29, 2011, the university entered into a voluntary Resolution Agreement. The university was required to update its Student Sexual Misconduct Policy and its University Guidelines on Prohibition of Sexual Harassment. The updates were to specify that both the accuser and the accused may appeal a decision of the University Hearing Board, the university must maintain documentation and records from all complaints and proceedings, the University Hearing Board should resolve all complaints using a "preponderance of evidence" standard of proof, all parties should be notified in writing of the outcome of all appeals, and the university would take reasonable steps to prevent any recurrence of discrimination. The university agreed to ongoing monitoring by OCR until it had fully complied with the terms of the agreement and was in compliance with the regulation implementing Title IX.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Heise (12/1/2018)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

11-11-2031

[Notification letter and data request for Virginia Commonwealth University]

Feb. 9, 2011

Feb. 9, 2011

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-11-2031

[Notification letter for Virginia Commonwealth University]

Feb. 9, 2011

Feb. 9, 2011

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-11-2031

Resolution Agreement

Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

Settlement Agreement

11-11-2031

[Virginia Commonwealth University Letter of Findings]

Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

Findings Letter/Report

11-11-2031

[Virginia Commonwealth University Letter of Findings]

Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

Findings Letter/Report

11-15-2237

[Notification letters and data request for Virginia Commonwealth University]

July 14, 2015

July 14, 2015

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-16-2012

[Notification letter and data request for Virginia Commonwealth University]

Dec. 8, 2015

Dec. 8, 2015

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-16-2014

[Notification letter for Virginia Commonwealth University]

Dec. 8, 2015

Dec. 8, 2015

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-16-2234

[Notification letter for Virginia Commonwealth University]

March 27, 2017

March 27, 2017

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

11-16-2234

[Notification letter and data request for Virginia Commonwealth University]

March 27, 2017

March 27, 2017

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 3:30 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Virginia

Case Type(s):

Education

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 3, 2010

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A university student who alleged that the Virginia Commonwealth University had discriminated against her after a male student sexually assaulted her.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Virginia Commonwealth University

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Other Dockets:

No Court 11-11-2031

No Court 11-16-2234

No Court 11-16-2014

No Court 11-16-2012

No Court 11-15-2237

Special Case Type(s):

Out-of-court

Available Documents:

Findings Letter/Report

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Monitoring

Issues

General/Misc.:

Assault/abuse by residents/inmates/students

Records Disclosure

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation