Case: Farmer v. Haas

3:89-cv-00524 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: 1989

Closed Date: Nov. 8, 1993

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is closely related to Farmer v. Brennan, in which the plaintiff sued prison officials with the Federal Bureau of Prisons under the Eighth Amendment. Litigation in the lower court was identical across Brennan and Haas. Following litigation in Farmer v. Brennan, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants in an unpublished order submitted on March 10, 1991. The district court conducted a trial which produced a verdict for the defendants…

This case is closely related to Farmer v. Brennan, in which the plaintiff sued prison officials with the Federal Bureau of Prisons under the Eighth Amendment. Litigation in the lower court was identical across Brennan and Haas. Following litigation in Farmer v. Brennan, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants in an unpublished order submitted on March 10, 1991. The district court conducted a trial which produced a verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

In this appeal, the plaintiff raised only the question whether the district court should have granted her motion to request a lawyer to represent her at her trial. In its opinion published on April 2, 1993, the Seventh Circuit rejected the plaintiff’s argument. 990 F.2d 319. The plaintiff asked the court to appoint a lawyer before Jackson v. County of Maclean was decided, so the court did not apply the threshold requirement established in that case. Rather, the Seventh Circuit panel reviewed the district court’s decision for reasonableness and found that it was not unreasonable. 

First, the court noted that the plaintiff had litigated for three years before requesting counsel and had already pursued a successful appeal—that is, Farmer v. Brennan. Likewise, the court agreed with the district court’s perception that the trial was likely to be a straightforward swearing contest, with few of the “legal issues [and] pitfalls” that might frustrate the ordinary pro se litigant. Finally, the court reviewed the trial transcript and thought that it disclosed “a shrewd cross-examination by [the plaintiff] of one of the defendants.” For these reasons, the court did not think that this case was one of those extreme cases “in which it should have been plain beyond reasonable doubt before the trial began that the difficulty of the issues relative to the capabilities of the litigant would make it impossible for him to obtain any sort of justice without the aid of a lawyer and he could not procure a lawyer on his own.” Thus, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision not to appoint counsel at trial for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear the case in an order published on November 8, 1993.

Summary Authors

Hank Minor (12/27/2022)

Related Cases

Farmer v. Brennan, Western District of Wisconsin (1991)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9044568/parties/farmer-dee-v-haas-dr/


Judge(s)

Easterbrook, Frank Hoover (Illinois)

Pell, Wilbur Frank (Indiana)

Posner, Richard Allen (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bogenrief, Darcy J. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Cameli, Mark A. (Wisconsin)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

90-01088

Order

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

March 1, 1991

March 1, 1991

Order/Opinion

927 F.2d 607

91-02484

Seventh Circuit Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

April 2, 1993

April 2, 1993

Order/Opinion

990 F.2d 319

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9044568/farmer-dee-v-haas-dr/

Last updated Sept. 22, 2026, 8:45 p.m.

Docket for: FARMER, DEE v. HAAS, DR.
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 30, 1989

ORDER TO PROCEED ifp GRANTED; S&C TO BE DELV'D TO USM FOR SERVICE. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 05/30/1989)

RECAP
2 May 30, 1989

COMPLAINT (Entered: 05/30/1989)

RECAP
3 May 30, 1989

BRIEF BY PLTF IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT. (Entered: 05/30/1989)

RECAP
May 30, 1989

NORTC

May 30, 1989

SUMMONS, COMPLAINT & BRIEF DELV'D TO USM FOR SERVICE.

4 June 9, 1989

SUMMONS. (Entered: 06/09/1989)

RECAP
5 Aug. 4, 1989

ANSWER OF DEFTS. (Entered: 08/04/1989)

RECAP
6 Aug. 8, 1989

SCHEDULING ORDER. JS: 11/6/89. JT: 11/9/89. CC. MLD. (Entered: 08/08/1989)

RECAP
7 Sept. 15, 1989

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by deft. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
8 Sept. 15, 1989

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by deft. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
9 Sept. 15, 1989

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of mo/sj. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
10 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF Robert Askelson. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
11 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF L.E. DEBOIS (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
12 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF EDWARD BRENNAN. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
13 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF DENNIS SCHIMMEL. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
14 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES W. REED, JR., M.D. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
15 Sept. 15, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD HAAS. SIGNED REC'D 9/20/89. (Entered: 09/15/1989)

RECAP
16 Sept. 19, 1989

MOTION BY PLTF. ENLARGMENT OF TIME. (Entered: 09/19/1989)

RECAP
17 Sept. 19, 1989

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. (Entered: 09/19/1989)

RECAP
18 Sept. 19, 1989

INTERROGATORY OF PLTF. (FIRST SET ) (Entered: 09/19/1989)

RECAP
19 Sept. 20, 1989

ORDER granting Pltf's Req. for Ext. of time. Deft. Response by 10/18/89 & Pltf. Reply by 10/30/89. cc mld. (Entered: 09/20/1989)

RECAP
20 Oct. 4, 1989

MOTION for Enlargement of Time by Pltf. (Entered: 10/04/1989)

RECAP
21 Oct. 5, 1989

ORDER EXTENDING UNTIL 10/10/89 FOR PLTF TO FILE MO/S.J. & OPP. BRIEF; SETTING REMAINING BRFG SCHEDULE. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 10/05/1989)

RECAP
22 Oct. 13, 1989

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME BY PLTF. (Entered: 10/13/1989)

RECAP
23 Oct. 13, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF DEE FARMER. (Entered: 10/13/1989)

RECAP
24 Oct. 13, 1989

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY BY PLTF. (Entered: 10/13/1989)

RECAP
25 Oct. 16, 1989

PPTC REPORT BY Deft's. (Entered: 10/17/1989)

RECAP
26 Oct. 17, 1989

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS by Deft's. (Entered: 10/18/1989)

RECAP
27 Oct. 17, 1989

PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT by Deft's. (Entered: 10/18/1989)

RECAP
28 Oct. 17, 1989

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS by Deft's. (Entered: 10/18/1989)

RECAP
29 Oct. 20, 1989

ORDER DENYING PLTF'S MO/COMPEL DISCOVERY; GRANTING PLTF'S MO/EXTENSION OF TIME; EXTENDING BRIEFING ON SJ. CC. MLD. (Entered: 10/20/1989)

RECAP
30 Oct. 23, 1989

RESPONSE TO Pltf's Interrog's by Deft. (Entered: 10/24/1989)

RECAP
31 Oct. 25, 1989

RESPONSE BY DEFT TO PLTF'S MO/COMPEL DISCOVERY. SO ORDERED. JCS. REVISING BRFG SCHEDULE. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 10/27/1989)

RECAP
32 Oct. 27, 1989

DECLARATION OF JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ (Entered: 10/27/1989)

RECAP
33 Oct. 27, 1989

DECLARATION OF KATYY PIERCE. (Entered: 10/27/1989)

RECAP
34 Oct. 27, 1989

MOTION for Sanctions by Govt. (Entered: 10/30/1989)

RECAP
35 Oct. 27, 1989

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of Mo/Sanctions by Govt. (Entered: 10/30/1989)

RECAP
36 Oct. 31, 1989

ORDER GRANTING DEFTS' MO/S.J. & DISM'G CASE W/PREJ. & COSTS. (Entered: 10/31/1989)

RECAP
37 Oct. 31, 1989

JUDGMENT ENTERED. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 10/31/1989)

RECAP
38 Nov. 1, 1989

PROPOSED Amendments to Complaint by Pltf. (Entered: 11/01/1989)

RECAP
39 Nov. 1, 1989

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION of Deft's Mo/SJ by Pltf. (Entered: 11/01/1989)

RECAP
40 Nov. 1, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF Dee Farmer. (Entered: 11/01/1989)

RECAP
41 Nov. 1, 1989

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Pltf. (Entered: 11/01/1989)

RECAP
42 Nov. 1, 1989

ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING BELATED RESPONSE FROM PLTF & ALLOWING DEFT UNTIL 11/2/89 TO REPLY TO MERITS OF PLTF'S RESPONSE.CCMD (Entered: 11/01/1989)

RECAP
43 Nov. 2, 1989

BRIEF IN REPLY TO PLTF'S RESPONSE TO DEFTS' MO/SJ. (Entered: 11/02/1989)

RECAP
44 Nov. 3, 1989

ORDER DENYING PLTF'S CROSS MO/S.J.; AFFIRMING JUDGMENT; DENY- ING PTTF'S MO/AMEND COMPLAINT. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 11/03/1989)

RECAP
45 Nov. 6, 1989

MOTION for Appt. of Counsel by Pltf. (Entered: 11/06/1989)

RECAP
46 Nov. 6, 1989

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of Pltf's Opposition to Deft's Mo/Sanctions. (Entered: 11/06/1989)

RECAP
47 Nov. 6, 1989

PRETRIAL REPORT by Pltf. (Entered: 11/06/1989)

RECAP
48 Nov. 6, 1989

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS by Pltf. (Entered: 11/06/1989)

RECAP
49 Nov. 6, 1989

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS by Pltf. (Entered: 11/06/1989)

RECAP
50 Nov. 16, 1989

MOTION for Reconsideration by Pltf. (Entered: 11/16/1989)

RECAP
51 Nov. 16, 1989

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of Mo/Reconsideration by Pltf. (Entered: 11/16/1989)

RECAP
52 Nov. 16, 1989

AFFIDAVIT OF Dee Farmer. (Entered: 11/16/1989)

RECAP
53 Dec. 18, 1989

ORDER DENYING PLTF'S MOTIONS FOR APPTMT OF COUNSEL, RECONSI- DERATION & FOR SANCTIONS. CPYS MLD. (12/15/89) (Entered: 12/18/1989)

RECAP
54 Jan. 10, 1990

NOTICE OF APPEAL by pltf of order of 12/15/90. No fee pd. No J.S. filed. S.R. sent. CC mld. (Entered: 01/10/1990)

RECAP
Jan. 22, 1990

APPEAL #90-1088

April 20, 1990

RECORD ON APPEAL PREPARED

Jan. 9, 1991

RECORD SENT TO USCA

55 March 27, 1991

ORDER (cert copy) from USCA that case is REVERSED & REMANDED. RECORD RETURNED (Entered: 03/27/1991)

RECAP
March 27, 1991

Jams Import Utility Entry

56 April 3, 1991

ORDER SCHEDULING; JS-5/6/91; JT-5/9/91. CPYS MLD. (3/29/91) (Entered: 04/03/1991)

RECAP
57 April 12, 1991

MOTION to Amend Damages by Pltf. (Entered: 04/12/1991)

RECAP
58 April 12, 1991

MOTION to Renew Mo/SJ by Pltf. (Entered: 04/12/1991)

RECAP
59 April 15, 1991

GOVT'S SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSED VOIR DIRE. (Entered: 04/15/1991)

RECAP
60 April 15, 1991

GOVT'S SUPPL. PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT. (Entered: 04/15/1991)

RECAP
61 April 15, 1991

GOVT'S SUPPL. PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. (Entered: 04/15/1991)

RECAP
62 April 15, 1991

GOVT'S SUPPL. PRETRIAL REPORT. (Entered: 04/15/1991)

RECAP
63 April 17, 1991

ORDER GRANTING PLTF'S MOT. TO AMEND REQ. FOR DAMAGES; DENYING PLTF'S REQ. TO RENEW S/J MOT. (4/16/91) cc mld. (Entered: 04/17/1991)

RECAP
65 April 17, 1991

DEFTS' AMENDED SUPPL. PRETRIAL REPORT. (Entered: 04/18/1991)

RECAP
64 April 18, 1991

ORDER to issue writ for pltf's appearance at trial 5/6/91 and 5/9/91. (Entered: 04/18/1991)

RECAP
April 18, 1991

WRIT ISSUED, DELIVERED TO MARSHAL SERVICE FOR PLTF'S APPEAR. AT J.SEL. AND TRIAL.

66 April 19, 1991

MOTION to file doc's out of time by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
67 April 19, 1991

PETITION FOR WRIT OF H.C. AD TESTIFICANDUM OF PLTF BY PLTF. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
68 April 19, 1991

PETITION OF WRIT OF H.C. AD TESTIFICANDUM OF KEVIN GATHERS BY PLTF. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
69 April 19, 1991

PRETRIAL REPORT by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
70 April 19, 1991

PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
71 April 19, 1991

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
72 April 19, 1991

MOTION to Amend Pretrial Report by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
73 April 19, 1991

OBJECTIONS TO POSTPONEMENT OF TRIAL by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
74 April 19, 1991

MOTION IN LIMINE by Pltf. (Entered: 04/19/1991)

RECAP
75 April 19, 1991

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED PARTY BY GOVT. (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
76 April 22, 1991

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2nd) by Deft's. (4/19/91) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
77 April 22, 1991

BRIEF IN SUPPORT of Deft's 2nd Mo/SJ. (4/19/91) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
78 April 22, 1991

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Deft's. (4/19/91) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
79 April 22, 1991

AFFIDAVIT OF E.J. Brennan (copy). (4/19/91) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
80 April 22, 1991

AFFIDAVIT OF Richard D. Haas (copy). (4/19/91) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
81 April 22, 1991

ORDER GRANTING PLTF'S MO/FILE MATERIALS LATE; DENYING REQUEST FOR WRIT 14 DAYS PRIOR & FOR WRIT FOR KEVIN GETHERS;SEE ORDE (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
82 April 22, 1991

ORDER GRANTING DEFT LEAVE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED PLTF. CPYS MLD. (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
83 April 22, 1991

NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF INCARCERATED PLTF DEE FARMER ON 5/1/91 @ DANE CTY JAIL. SUBPOENA ISSUED. (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
84 April 22, 1991

RESPONSE TO PLTF'S MOTION IN LIMINE. (Entered: 04/23/1991)

RECAP
85 April 22, 1991

MOTION IN LIMINE, FIRST, BY DEFTS. (Entered: 04/23/1991)

RECAP
86 April 23, 1991

ORDER RESERVING RULING ON DEFTS' 2ND MOT. FOR S/J BASED ON QUALIFIED IMMUNITY UNTIL TRIAL. (4/22/91) cc mld. (Entered: 04/23/1991)

RECAP
87 April 25, 1991

AFFIDAVIT OF L.E. DUBOIS. (Entered: 04/25/1991)

RECAP
88 April 29, 1991

MOTION FOR APPT. OF COUNSEL BY PLTF. (Entered: 04/29/1991)

RECAP
89 April 29, 1991

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS BY PLTF. (Entered: 04/29/1991)

RECAP
90 May 2, 1991

MOTION BY PLTF. TO WEAR PERSONAL CLOTHING AT TRIAL. (Entered: 05/02/1991)

RECAP
91 May 2, 1991

MOTION BY PLTF. FOR WRIT OF H/C FOR WITNESS FRANK HERNANDEZ. (Entered: 05/02/1991)

RECAP
92 May 2, 1991

STATEMENT BY PLTF. WITNESS HERNANDEZ RE VOLUNTARY APPEAR. AT TRIAL. (Entered: 05/02/1991)

RECAP
93 May 2, 1991

ORDER DENYING PLTF'S MO/APPT. OF CNSL; THAT DEFT. SERVE PLTF. COPY OF DEFT'S PRETRIAL REPORT. cc mld. (Entered: 05/02/1991)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wisconsin

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Indigent Defense

Key Dates

Filing Date: 1989

Closing Date: Nov. 8, 1993

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff was an incarcerated transgender woman, proceeding pro se, who sued prison officials over prison conditions.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Bureau of Prisons

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Other Dockets:

Western District of Wisconsin 3:89-cv-00524

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 91-02484

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 90-01088

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Amount Defendant Pays: 0

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Recommended Citation