Filed Date: 2020
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding in progress
NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker.
According to their summary as of September 1, 2020,
The Complaint challenges two Minnesota voting-by-mail requirements: (1) each absentee ballot be witnessed by a registered Minnesota voter, a notary, or person otherwise authorized to administer oaths (the “Witness Requirement”), Minn. Stat. § 203B.07, and (2) unless a voter is located in a town/county with fewer than 400 registered voters without a physical polling place, a voter must apply for an absentee ballot online, by mail, or by email. Minn. Stat. § 203B.04, Subd. 1. The Complaint allges that both requirements violate the Right to Vote and equal protection guaranteed by Minnesota Constitution Art. I § 2 and Article VII, § 1. Plaintiffs seek to invalidate Minn. Stat.§ 203B.07, subdiv. 3, Minn. Stat. § 204B.45 - .46, and Minn. Admin. R.8210.3000, to prohibit defendant (Minnesota Secretary of State) from enforcing these laws, and to order defendant to mail ballots to all registered voters without the need for registration.
Callais, Amanda R. (District of Columbia)
Clark, Samuel J. (Minnesota)
Coleman, Craig S (Minnesota)
Crosland, E. S. (District of Columbia)
Curtis, Charles G. Jr. (Wisconsin)
Callais, Amanda R. (District of Columbia)
Crosland, E. S. (District of Columbia)
Curtis, Charles G. Jr. (Wisconsin)
Elias, Marc Erik (District of Columbia)
Ellison, Benjamin L (Minnesota)
Gore, John M. (District of Columbia)
Justman, Jeffrey P. (Minnesota)
Leiendecker, Hannah M (Minnesota)
Last updated Dec. 16, 2024, 8:45 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: Minnesota
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Healthy Elections COVID litigation tracker
Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project
Key Dates
Filing Date: 2020
Case Ongoing: Yes