Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
158 cases, 1,267 documents
Ordered by
JAIL CONDITIONS
John Does 1-100 v. Boyd

4:84-cv-00378 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: April 20, 1984

Four anonymous pretrial detainees brought a section 1983 action against the Dakota County Sheriff, complaining that the county jail's indiscriminate strip search policy was unconstitutional as applied to them and to similarly situated individuals, specifically pretrial detainees arrested for traffic offenses, regulatory offenses, bench warrants, and misdemeanors. On July 31, 1985, the District Court in Minnesota (Judge Harry MacLaughlin) granted plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against …
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY (FACILITY)
Welsch v. Likins

4:72-cv-00451 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Aug. 30, 1972

Closed Date: Aug. 26, 1987

In 1972, six residents with intellectual disabilities of Minnesota state hospitals filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Minnesota Hospitalization and Commitment Act against the state of Minnesota in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The plaintiffs, represented by the Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis, argued that their rights were being abridged because they were not receiving a minimal level of care and because they were being committed to state inst…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Harvey v. Schoen

3:72-cv-00073 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: March 8, 1972

Closed Date: 1999

In 1972, a class of incarcerated and former inmates at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater filed a lawsuit against the Minnesota Department of Corrections. The complaint alleged that disciplinary rules and regulations at the prison violated their rights under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments and federal and state statutes. The plaintiffs were represented by private counsel. The parties entered into an agreement regarding disciplinary policies. Judge Phillip …
PRISON CONDITIONS
Hines v. Anderson

4:73-cv-00387 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Aug. 7, 1973

Closed Date: 2007

In August 1973, inmates at the Minnesota State Prison filed this class action lawsuit in the District of Minnesota against the Minnesota State Prison and all related officials. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and claimed that the medical care and facilities at the Minnesota State Prison were inadequate, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. In May 1977, the District Court (Judge Earl R. Larson) accepted a consent agreement reached by t…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

0:99-cv-00386 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: March 10, 1999

Closed Date: 2001

The Minneapolis office of the EEOC brought this suit against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company in March 1999, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. After nearly two years of discovery, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement in January 2001. Information about the nature of the complaint and the Settlement Agreement is not known for certain because these documents are unavailable. The docket suggests that the case was brought under Title VII.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY dba CP RAIL SYSTEM

0:99-cv-00940 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: June 21, 1999

Closed Date: April 27, 2003

The EEOC's Milwaukee district office sued Soo Line Railroad Company, a Northern-Midwest railroad subsidiary of the Canadian Pacific Rail System, on June 21, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The EEOC's complaint alleged that Soo Line violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to hire a man based on his prior history of disability (a prior ankle and neck injury) due to a company medical system which screens out numerous people with histories of disabili…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. PARK NICOLLET HEALTH SERVICES f/k/a Health System Minnesota

0:04-cv-01711 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: April 22, 2004

Closed Date: July 18, 2008

The EEOC's Milwaukee office sued Park Nicollet Health Services, a Minnesota health care provider operating the Park Nicollet Clinic, on April 22, 2004 in the U.S. District Court for the district of Minnesota. The EEOC's complaint is not available, however the intervenor's complaint (intervened in July 2004) states that the cause of action was the clinic's violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act when it failed to reasonably accommodate the intervenor's disability (viral encephalitis) s…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Midwest Asphalt Co.

0:97-cv-02295 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Oct. 14, 1997

Closed Date: 1997

The EEOC's Milwaukee district office sued Midwest Asphalt Corporation, a Midwest asphalt contractor, on October 14, 1997. The docket is the only document for this case and the EEOC's complaint is unknown. The docket suggests that the case was brought under Title VII. The parties entered into a consent decree on October 15, 1997.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. TARGET STORES, INC.

0:01-cv-01646 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Sept. 6, 2001

Closed Date: Feb. 4, 2006

In September 2001, the Milwaukee District Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against Target Stores, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations are unknown. However, the consent decree indicates the EEOC alleged the defendant discriminated against the complainant, an employee with multiple sclerosis, by failing to make reasonable accommodation for the complainant in violation of the Americans with…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION

0:99-cv-01477 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 1999

Closed Date: 2001

The EEOC's Minneapolis district office sued Federal Express Corporation on September 28, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The EEOC alleged that Federal Express violated the Americans with Disabilities Act when it terminated an employee based on a physical disability (AIDS). FedEx filed a motion for summary judgment in September 2000, followed by the EEOC and intervenor, who intervened in February 2000, filing a motion for summary judgment in October 2000. Both …