Case: Miller v. City of Dallas

3:98-cv-02955 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Dec. 16, 1998

Closed Date: Sept. 6, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 16, 1998, a group of 12 African American residents of the Cadillac Heights neighborhood of Dallas brought suit against the City of Dallas in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that the City had provided, and continued to provide, municipal services in the neighborhood in a racially- and ethnically-discriminatory manner. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 27, 1999, in which they specifically alleged the following: the City had refused to ex…

On December 16, 1998, a group of 12 African American residents of the Cadillac Heights neighborhood of Dallas brought suit against the City of Dallas in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that the City had provided, and continued to provide, municipal services in the neighborhood in a racially- and ethnically-discriminatory manner. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 27, 1999, in which they specifically alleged the following:

  • the City had refused to extend the Trinity River levee system to protect Cadillac Heights from flooding and had taken no steps to provide for flood protection in the neighborhood despite approval of a bond issue in 1995 that included funding for such projects; 
  • the City's industrial zoning practices had resulted in disproportionate harm to African American populations in Dallas, including Cadillac Heights where a portion of the neighborhood was subjected to blighting influences due to being zoned for heavy industrial use;
  • the City had refused to take steps to protect Cadillac Heights residents from the harmful effects of two lead smelters that formerly operated in the area despite using its zoning powers and municipal authority to protect predominately white neighborhoods from these effects;
  • the City had allowed two illegal landfills to operate within Cadillac Heights;
  • the streets and storm water drainage facilities in Cadillac Heights are below standards, thus causing flooding;
  • there were no sidewalks on many residential streets in Cadillac Heights;
  • the City had not used federal funding, including funding from the Community Development Block Grant, to improve conditions in Cadillac Heights; and
  • the City had implemented housing and community development programs targeted for low-income neighborhoods and persons in a racially disparate manner.

Plaintiffs alleged that the City's discrimination in the provision of flood protection, zoning, environmental controls, infrastructure, and remedial housing and community development had caused Cadillac Heights to become blighted and undesirable. Moreover, Plaintiffs alleged they had suffered from a decrease in property values, fear of harm from the conditions, the physical impacts of being subjected to substandard neighborhood conditions, and the stigma of living in a neighborhood with blighted conditions. Plaintiffs asserted the City's actions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; § 1981; and provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. They sought to recover damages, including for mental and emotional suffering and pain; punitive damages; court costs, litigation expenses, and attorney's fees; and injunctive relief including appropriate relief for the Trinity River flooding, a complete environmental cleanup, the elimination of the landfills, infrastructure improvements, new housing units, housing rehabilitation programs, back zoning to prevent future adjoining industrial uses and the expansion of existing uses, and monitoring and strict enforcement of environmental quality and pollution requirements.

Throughout January 2001, four of the 12 plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims against the City. Thereafter, in June 2001, the City moved for summary judgment, and on February 14, 2002, District Judge Sidney A. Fitzgerald issued a memorandum opinion and order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. 2002 WL 230834. Judge Fitzgerald granted summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' claims related to housing and community development. Judge Fitzgerald also granted summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' claims for damages for emotional harm and for punitive damages. However, Judge Fitzgerald denied summary judgment on Plaintiffs' flood protection claims; Plaintiffs’ zoning, industrial nuisance, and landfill practices-related claims; and Plaintiffs' streets and drainage-related claims. Moreover, Judge Fitzgerald denied summary judgment on the question of damages stemming from the diminution in value of plaintiffs’ property.

On August 14, 2002, the Dallas City Council unanimously approved setting aside $535,000 to settle the suit. On September 4, 2002, the remaining plaintiffs formally agreed to settle their suit against the City. As part of the terms of the settlement, the City agreed to purchase Plaintiffs' homes in the Cadillac Heights neighborhood for a total of $270,000. The City also agreed to pay $265,000 in attorney's fees. On September 6, 2002, Judge Fitzgerald granted the parties' joint motion to dismiss. 

Summary Authors

Logan Moore (3/28/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11402171/parties/miller-v-city-of-dallas/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Beshara, Laura Beth (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Bock, Amy K (Texas)

Bowers, Christopher David (Texas)

Bright, Gerald V (Texas)

Bryza, Mark Laurence (Texas)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:98-cv-02955

Amended Complaint

May 27, 1999

May 27, 1999

Complaint

3:98-cv-02955

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Feb. 14, 2002

Feb. 14, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 WL 230834

128

3:98-cv-02955

Settlement Agreement and Release

Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11402171/miller-v-city-of-dallas/

Last updated Oct. 23, 2025, 12:50 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed; Filing Fee $ 150.00 Receipt # 107750 (9) (lag) (Entered: 12/16/1998)

Dec. 16, 1998

Dec. 16, 1998

2

Notice of lawsuit and REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service as to City of Dallas 12/14/98 Waiver of Service due by 1/13/99 for City of Dallas (1) (lag) (Entered: 01/20/1999)

Dec. 16, 1998

Dec. 16, 1998

PRELIMINARY ASSIGNMENT TO Magistrate Judge Paul Stickney (lag)

Dec. 16, 1998

Dec. 16, 1998

3

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to City of Dallas 1/12/99 Answer due on 3/15/99 for City of Dallas (1) (lag) (Entered: 01/20/1999)

Jan. 19, 1999

Jan. 19, 1999

4

Original DEMAND for jury trial by defendant City of Dallas (lag) (Entered: 03/15/1999)

March 12, 1999

March 12, 1999

5

ORDER REQUIRING PROPOSAL for Contents of Scheduling Order. Proposed scheduling order due 4/19/99 <SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS>(signed by SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 03.18.99 Page(s): 3 (lag) (Entered: 03/18/1999)

March 17, 1999

March 17, 1999

6

Entry/NOTICE of attorney appearance for defendant City of Dallas by Arthur L Walker, Gerald Vincent Bright (2) (lag) (Entered: 04/05/1999)

April 2, 1999

April 2, 1999

7

Rpt of parties' planning mtg/PROPOSAL FOR CONTENTS of scheduling and discovery order by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Louise Davis, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, defendant City of Dallas (3) (lag) (Entered: 04/19/1999)

April 19, 1999

April 19, 1999

8

STATUS REPORT ORDER. Status report due on 6/1/99 <SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS> (signed by SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 04.22.99 Page(s): 4 (lag) (Entered: 04/22/1999)

April 21, 1999

April 21, 1999

9

MOTION with memorandum in support by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Louise Davis, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams for leave to file 1st amd complaint/ to amend [1-1] complaint (12) (lag) (Entered: 05/27/1999)

May 26, 1999

May 26, 1999

10

ORDER granting [9-1] motion for leave to file 1st amd complaint/ to amend [1-1] complaint ( signed by SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 05.27.99 Page(s) 1 (lag) (Entered: 05/27/1999)

May 27, 1999

May 27, 1999

11

Amended COMPLAINT by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Louise Davis, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, (Answer due 6/7/99 for City of Dallas ) amending [1-1] complaint (10) (lag) (Entered: 05/27/1999)

May 27, 1999

May 27, 1999

12

Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Status of Settlement Negotiations by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Louise Davis, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, defendant City of Dallas (3) (lag) (Entered: 06/04/1999)

June 3, 1999

June 3, 1999

13

Unopposed MOTIONS by defendant City of Dallas to substitute new counsel Christopher David Bowers & withdraw Arthur L Walker, Jr, Gerald Bright of the law firm of Walker Bright & Whittington & Mark Bryza of the City Atty's Office (4) (lag) (Entered: 06/25/1999)

June 24, 1999

June 24, 1999

14

ORDER granting [13-1] motion to substitute new counsel Christopher David Bowers & withdraw Arthur L Walker, Jr, Gerald Bright of the law firm of Walker Bright & Whittington & Mark Bryza of the City Atty's Office ; terminated Arthur L Walker Jr & Gerald Bright of the law firm of Walker Bright & Whittington & Mark Bryza (signed by SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 06.28.99 1 (lag) (Entered: 06/28/1999)

June 25, 1999

June 25, 1999

15

Designation of Experts by defendant City of Dallas (9) (lag) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

Nov. 1, 1999

Nov. 1, 1999

16

TRIAL SETTING ORDER set docket call for 1/8/01 <SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS> (signed by SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 12.22.99 Page(s) 5 (lag) (Entered: 12/22/1999)

Dec. 21, 1999

Dec. 21, 1999

17

MOTION with memorandum in support by plaintiffs Charles Miller, et al to extend Discovery Deadline (2) (lch) (Entered: 01/28/2000)

Jan. 27, 2000

Jan. 27, 2000

18

ORDER granting [17-1] motion to extend Discovery Deadline reset discovery due for 11/1/00 ( signed by Judge SAFitzwater) Copies to counsel: 1/28/00 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 01/28/2000)

Jan. 27, 2000

Jan. 27, 2000

19

Unopposed MOTION by defendant City of Dallas to extend time/to extend the deadline to file mtns for sumjgm (3) (jrb) (Entered: 04/21/2000)

April 21, 2000

April 21, 2000

20

ORDER granting [19-1] motion to extend the deadline to file mtns for sumjgm reset motion filing deadline for 10/1/00 ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 4/24/00 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

April 21, 2000

April 21, 2000

21

JOINT MOTION For a New Pre-trial Schedule by plaintiffs, defendant (3) (lch) (Entered: 07/18/2000)

July 17, 2000

July 17, 2000

22

ORDER granting [21-1] joint motion For a New Pre-trial Schedule reset docket call for 6/18/01 see order for specifics ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 7/19/00 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 07/19/2000)

July 18, 2000

July 18, 2000

23

NOTICE of attorney appearance for defendant City of Dallas by Amy Kristin Bock (2) (lch) (Entered: 10/02/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000

Sept. 29, 2000

24

PROPOSAL FOR CONTENTS of NEW scheduling and discovery order by defendant City of Dallas (2) (lch) (Entered: 10/02/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000

Sept. 29, 2000

25

PROPOSAL FOR CONTENTS of scheduling and discovery order by plaintiff Charles Miller, et al (3) (lch) (Entered: 10/03/2000)

Oct. 2, 2000

Oct. 2, 2000

26

STATUS REPORT ORDER. Status report due on 3/30/01 ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 10/6/00 Page(s): 2 (lch) (Entered: 10/06/2000)

Oct. 5, 2000

Oct. 5, 2000

27

MOTION with memorandum in support by plaintiff, Charles Miller, et al Motion to substitute Ronnie Miller for Plainitff Charles Miller who is deceased (2) (lch) (Entered: 11/01/2000)

Oct. 31, 2000

Oct. 31, 2000

28

RESPONSE by defendant City of Dallas to [27-1] motion Motion to substitute Ronnie Miller for Plainitff Charles Miller who is deceased (2) (lch) (Entered: 11/28/2000)

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

29

ORDER denying without prejudice [27-1] Motion to substitute Ronnie Miller for Plainitff Charles Miller who is deceased ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 12/14/00 Page(s) 1 (lch) Modified on 12/19/2000 (Entered: 12/15/2000)

Dec. 14, 2000

Dec. 14, 2000

30

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams to dismiss claims (2) (lch) (Entered: 01/16/2001)

Jan. 12, 2001

Jan. 12, 2001

31

MOTION by plaintiff Velma Harper to dismiss claims (3) (lch) (Entered: 01/16/2001)

Jan. 12, 2001

Jan. 12, 2001

32

ORDER granting [31-1] Plaintiff Velma Harper's motion to dismiss claims without prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 1/17/01 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

Jan. 16, 2001

Jan. 16, 2001

33

ORDER granting [30-1] Plaintiff Lessie Hollin's motion to dismiss claims without prejudice. All parties will bear their own costs. ( signed by Judge Fitzwater) Copies to counsel: 1/17/01 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

Jan. 16, 2001

Jan. 16, 2001

34

Designation of Experts by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Louise Davis, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper (2) (lch) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

Jan. 16, 2001

Jan. 16, 2001

35

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff Louise Davis to dismiss claims of Louise Davis (3) (lch) (Entered: 01/25/2001)

Jan. 24, 2001

Jan. 24, 2001

36

UNOPPOSED AMENDED MOTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPPORT to substitute party Ronnie Miller for plaintiff Charles Miller who is deceased by plaintiff Charles Miller, plaintiff Erma Cooper, et al referring to [27-1] Motion to substitute Ronnie Miller for Plainitff Charles Miller who is deceased (7) (lch) (Entered: 01/25/2001)

Jan. 24, 2001

Jan. 24, 2001

37

ORDER granting [35-1] motion to dismiss claims of Louise Davis in this lawsuit without prejudice. All parties will bear its own costs. ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 1/26/01 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 01/26/2001)

Jan. 25, 2001

Jan. 25, 2001

38

ORDER granting [36-1] amended motion to substitute party Ronnie Miller for plaintiff Charles Miller who is deceased ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 1/26/01 Page(s) 2 (lch) (Entered: 01/26/2001)

Jan. 25, 2001

Jan. 25, 2001

39

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff Erma Cooper to dismiss claims (3) (lch) (Entered: 02/01/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001

Jan. 31, 2001

40

ORDER granting [39-1] Plaintiff Erma Cooper's motion to dismiss her claims without prejudice against the defendant. Each party to bear its own costs. ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 2/2/01 Page(s) 1 (lch) (Entered: 02/02/2001)

Feb. 1, 2001

Feb. 1, 2001

(lch)

Feb. 1, 2001

Feb. 1, 2001

41

Unopposed MOTION by defendant City of Dallas to extend time/deadline to exchange rebuttal expert reports (3) (jas) (Entered: 02/28/2001)

Feb. 27, 2001

Feb. 27, 2001

42

ORDER granting [41-1] motion to extend time/deadline to exchange rebuttal expert reports, extended to 3/12/01. ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 3/1/01 Page(s) 1 (jas) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

Feb. 28, 2001

Feb. 28, 2001

43

Designation of Rebuttal Expert Witnesss by defendant City of Dallas (2) (djd) (Entered: 03/13/2001)

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

44

MOTION with memorandum in support by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey (10/exhibit not imaged) (djd) (Entered: 03/21/2001)

March 20, 2001

March 20, 2001

45

RESPONSE by defendant City of Dallas to [44-1] motion for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey (13/exhibits not imaged) (djd) (Entered: 03/22/2001)

March 21, 2001

March 21, 2001

46

ORDER OF REFERENCE: [44-1] motion for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney for determinatino. <see order for specifics> ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 3/22/01 Page(s): 1 (djd) (Entered: 03/22/2001)

March 21, 2001

March 21, 2001

47

ORDER setting hearing: Motion hearing set for 3:00 3/28/01 for [44-1] motion for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey <see order for specifics> (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney) Copies to counsel: 3/26/01 Page(s): 2 (djd) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

March 23, 2001

March 23, 2001

57

Minute order: Telephone conference Held before Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney; Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, filed 3/20/01 (44) Court Reporter: Electronic (grj) (Entered: 04/12/2001)

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

Motion hearing re: [44-1] motion for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey (grj)

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

48

Unopposed MOTION by defendant City of Dallas for continuance (4) (djd) (Entered: 03/30/2001)

March 29, 2001

March 29, 2001

49

Joint STATUS REPORT by plaintiffs & defendant (2) (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

50

Agreed MOTION to extend time for discovery by plaintiffs and defendant (4) (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

51

MOTION with memorandum in support by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) (14) (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

52

APPENDIX by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller in support of [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) (15+/not imaged) (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

53

ORDER granting [48-1] motion for continuance reset docket call for two-week docket of 9/17/01, and that the scheduling order be amended as follows: reset motion filing deadline for no later than 6/15/01 ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 4/2/01 Page(s) 1 (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

March 30, 2001

March 30, 2001

54

Agreed ORDER granting [50-1] joint motion to extend time for discovery reset discovery due for 4/30/01 ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 4/2/01 Page(s) 1 (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

55

ORDER OF REFERENCE: [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney for determination. <see order for specifics> ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 4/2/01 Page(s): 1 (djd) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

April 2, 2001

April 2, 2001

56

ORDER denying [44-1] motion for protective order to City notices for the depositions of Metzger & McCluskey ( Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney ) Copies to counsel: 4/9/01 Page(s) 1 (djd) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

April 6, 2001

April 6, 2001

58

RESPONSE by defendant City of Dallas to [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended 30(b)(6) notice of deposition (15+) (djd) (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 19, 2001

April 19, 2001

59

APPENDIX by defendant City of Dallas in support of [58-1] motion response (15+/not imaged) (djd) Modified on 04/20/2001 (Entered: 04/20/2001)

April 19, 2001

April 19, 2001

60

ORDER setting hearing: Motion hearing set for 9:00 5/28/01 for [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) <see order for specifics> ( Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney ) Copies to counsel: 4/24/01 Page(s): 2 (djd) (Entered: 04/24/2001)

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

61

REPLY by plaintiffs to response to [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) (10/exhibit not imaged) (djd) (Entered: 05/03/2001)

May 2, 2001

May 2, 2001

62

Amended ORDER setting hearing: Motion hearing set for 2:00 5/25/01 for [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) <see order for specifics> ( Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney ) Copies to counsel: 5/22/01 Page(s): 2 (djd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

May 21, 2001

May 21, 2001

63

SECOND AMENDED ORDER setting hearing: Motion hearing set for 2:00 6/4/01 for [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) <see order for specifics> ( Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney ) Copies to counsel: 5/22/01 Page(s): 2 (djd) (Entered: 05/22/2001)

May 22, 2001

May 22, 2001

65

Minute order: Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney on Motion to Compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to Pla's Amended Notice of Dep filed 3/30/01. All counsel of record present. Court Reporter: Electronic (1) (jyg) (Entered: 06/08/2001)

June 4, 2001

June 4, 2001

Tele-conference held on motion to compel (jyg)

June 4, 2001

June 4, 2001

64

ORDER denying [51-1] motion to compel the City to designate a person or persons to testify pursuant to pltfs' amended notice of deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). <see order for specifics> Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney ) Copies to counsel: 6/6/01 Page(s) 1 (djd) (Entered: 06/07/2001)

June 6, 2001

June 6, 2001

66

**UNFILED PER ORDER ENTERED ON 06/18/01**MOTION with memorandum in support by defendant City of Dallas for summary judgment (15+) (djd) Modified on 06/19/2001 (Entered: 06/18/2001)

June 15, 2001

June 15, 2001

67

UNOPPOSED MOTION by defendant City of Dallas for leave to file amended motion for summary jgm and amended brief in support of motion for summary jgm (15+) (exhibits not imaged) (vdf) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 18, 2001

June 18, 2001

68

UNOPPOSED MOTION by defendant City of Dallas to enlarge time to file appendix to amended brief in support of summary judgment (4) (vdf) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 18, 2001

June 18, 2001

69

ORDER unfiling [66-1] motion for summary judgment by defendant City of Dallas due to the following deficiency: The motion and brief are combined, there is no appendix, and the brief does not cite the appendix by specific page number. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) Copies to counsel: 06/19/01 (signed by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater ) Page(s) 1 (vdf) (Entered: 06/19/2001)

June 18, 2001

June 18, 2001

70

ORDER denying [67-1] motion for leave to file amended motion for summary jgm and amended brief in support of motion for summary jgm ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 6/20/01 Page(s) 1 (jrb) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

71

MOTION by defendant City of Dallas for summary judgment (2) (vdf) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

72

BRIEF by defendant City of Dallas in support of [71-1] motion for summary judgment (15+) (vdf) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

73

APPENDIX by defendant City of Dallas in support of [72-1] support memorandum (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (vdf) (Entered: 06/20/2001)

June 19, 2001

June 19, 2001

74

NOTICE of attorney appearance for defendant City of Dallas by James B Pinson (Amy Bock designated lead counsel) (2) (djd) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

June 28, 2001

June 28, 2001

75

Unopposed MOTION by plaintiffs to extend deadline for filing a reply to the City's motion for summary judgment to 7/12/01 (2) (djd) Modified on 07/06/2001 (Entered: 07/06/2001)

July 5, 2001

July 5, 2001

76

Agreed ORDER granting [75-1] motion to extend deadline for filing a reply to the City's motion for summary judgment to Response to motion reset to 7/12/01 for [71-1] motion for summary judgment ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 7/6/01 Page(s) 1 (djd) (Entered: 07/06/2001)

July 5, 2001

July 5, 2001

77

***unfiled per order of 7/23/01***RESPONSE by plaintiff to [71-1] motion for summary judgment (15+/USC) (djd) Modified on 07/24/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

78

***unfiled per order of 7/23/01***MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller in support of [77-1] motion response (15+) (djd) Modified on 07/24/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

79

VOLUME 1 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC)(Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

80

VOLUME 2 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC)(Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

81

VOLUME 3 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

82

VOLUME 4 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

83

VOLUME 5 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

84

VOLUME 6 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) Modified on 07/13/2001 (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

85

VOLUME 7 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

86

VOLUME 8 APPENDIX by plaintiffs in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

87

VOLUME 9 APPENDIX by plaintiff in support of [77-1] motion response (15+/USC) (Not Imaged) (djd) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 12, 2001

July 12, 2001

88

ORDER unfiling [77-1] motion response, unfiling [78-1] support memorandum...dft's reply brief shall not be due until 15 days after plaintiffs file the required pleadings. ( Signed by Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater ) Copies to counsel: 7/24/01 Page(s) 3 (jrb) (Entered: 07/24/2001)

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

89

ANSWER by defendant City of Dallas to first amended complaint and jury demand (6) (djd) (Entered: 07/31/2001)

July 30, 2001

July 30, 2001

90

RESPONSE by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller to [71-1] motion for summary judgment (2) (djd) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

Aug. 6, 2001

Aug. 6, 2001

91

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Fred Crawford, plaintiff Mable Hayden, plaintiff George Thomas, plaintiff Dorothy Thomas, plaintiff Mattie Cooper, plaintiff L T Cooper, plaintiff Lessie Hollins, plaintiff John Adams, plaintiff Velma Harper, plaintiff Ronnie Miller in opposition to [71-1] motion for summary judgment (15+) (djd) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

Aug. 6, 2001

Aug. 6, 2001

92

MOTION by defendant City of Dallas to continue trial (4) (jrb) (Entered: 08/16/2001)

Aug. 15, 2001

Aug. 15, 2001

93

RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to [92-1] motion to continue trial (2) (jyg) (Entered: 08/21/2001)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

94

RULE 26(a)(3) DISCLOSURES/EXHIBIT LIST by plaintiffs (15+) (Exhibit not imaged.) (mlh) (Entered: 08/21/2001)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

95

Pretiral Witness list by defendant City of Dallas (3) (cxj) (Entered: 08/21/2001)

Aug. 20, 2001

Aug. 20, 2001

96

Exhibit list by defendant City of Dallas (6) (mlh) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

Aug. 21, 2001

Aug. 21, 2001

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Environmental Justice

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 16, 1998

Closing Date: Sept. 6, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A group of African-American homeowners in the Cadillac Heights neighborhood of Dallas.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of Dallas, City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Texas 3:98-cv-02955

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: $535,000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Housing

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black