Case: DOJ Investigation of Liberty County Sheriff's Office

171-19-24 | No Court

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This action is a memorandum of understanding resulting from a complaint received by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging that the (Delaware) Liberty County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO) conducted a racially discriminatory traffic stop. On May 18, 2022, the DOJ received a complaint from Delaware State University, alleging that LCSO discriminated against its hired driver, athletic coach, and students on the basis of race when it conducted a traffic stop of a bus chartered by the scho…

This action is a memorandum of understanding resulting from a complaint received by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging that the (Delaware) Liberty County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO) conducted a racially discriminatory traffic stop. On May 18, 2022, the DOJ received a complaint from Delaware State University, alleging that LCSO discriminated against its hired driver, athletic coach, and students on the basis of race when it conducted a traffic stop of a bus chartered by the school. The University also alleged that the subsequent searches of the passengers’ personal belongings, conducted using a drug-sniffing dog, violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. 

The DOJ thereafter opened an investigation and conducted numerous interviews, including with individuals involved in the April 20, 2022 stop, reviewed information provided by LCSO, viewed body camera footage from multiple officers present during the stop, and reviewed publicly available documents. Although LCSO conducted its own investigation and concluded that its officers acted in accordance with applicable law, it nonetheless entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the DOJ on May 15, 2023 in order to modernize its operations. 

Under the agreement, LCSO agreed to review and, where appropriate, revise its policies to better ensure that its prohibition against discriminatory law enforcement action, particularly with respect to traffic enforcement, was clearly stated and consistent with Title VI. LCSO’s proposed policy revisions were to be provided to the DOJ for review and comment. LCSO also offered to meet with the students, driver, and coaches involved in the traffic stop, and the DOJ agreed to help LCSO select a trained and qualified facilitator if the offer was accepted. LCSO also committed to consulting with the DOJ’s Community Relations Service (CRS) to discuss best practices for working with the community, building partnerships, and improving communication with the community to resolve disputes. Mandatory training on non-discriminatory and anti-bias policing was to be conducted on an annual basis for LCSO employees and contractors. LCSO was to provide its proposed training materials to the DOJ for review and comment. LCSO also agreed to mandate that officers collect data on all vehicle stops, whether or not they resulted in the issuance of a citation or arrest. The data was to be analyzed on a quarterly and annual basis to look for possible individual-level, unit-level, or systemic problems. If any review or analysis of the data indicated that a particular officer, unit, or detail was engaging in racial profiling or unlawful searches or seizures, or that there may be systemic problems, LCSO committed to taking reasonable steps to investigate the situation. The agreement was to terminate after two years, assuming substantial compliance, and LSCO was required to meet with the DOJ on a quarterly basis throughout that period to update the DOJ on implementation.

 

Summary Authors

Simran Takhar (6/27/2023)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 1:29 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Georgia

Case Type(s):

Policing

Special Collection(s):

Traffic Stop Litigation

Key Dates

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division.

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Liberty County Sheriff's Office, County

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Unreasonable search and seizure

Equal Protection

Special Case Type(s):

Out-of-court

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Training

Issues

General/Misc.:

Incident/accident reporting & investigations

Racial profiling

Record-keeping

Records Disclosure

Search policies

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Policing:

Improper use of canines

Inadequate citizen complaint investigations and procedures

Traffic Stops