Case: United States of America v. Oneida County Board of Election

6:21-cv-00793 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York

Filed Date: July 12, 2021

Closed Date: March 31, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about the Oneida County Board of Elections not processing timely-filed voter registration applications before the 2020 election. New York’s voter registration deadline for the 2020 election was October 9, 2020. However, the Oneida County Board of Elections stopped processing online voter registrations—including those submitted and received electronically from the DMV—beginning on September 25, 2020. As a result, the Board failed to add approximately 2,418 applicants who registered …

This case is about the Oneida County Board of Elections not processing timely-filed voter registration applications before the 2020 election. New York’s voter registration deadline for the 2020 election was October 9, 2020. However, the Oneida County Board of Elections stopped processing online voter registrations—including those submitted and received electronically from the DMV—beginning on September 25, 2020. As a result, the Board failed to add approximately 2,418 applicants who registered at the DMV to the official list of eligible voters for the 2020 election. After the election, the Board rejected nearly 1,800 provisional ballots without reviewing or otherwise canvasing them. The Board did not disclose its failure to process the timely filed DMV applications until January 6, 2021.

On July 12, 2021, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. The DOJ sued the Oneida County Board of Elections under Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), 52 U.S.C. § 20507, and Section 302 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), 52 U.S.C. § 21082. The DOJ sought an order 1) declaring that the Board had violated Section 8 of the NVRA and Section 302 of the HAVA; 2) permanently enjoining the Board from failing to process voter registration applications or failing to notify voter applicants as to the disposition of their registration applications; 3) permanently enjoining the Board to promptly verify all provisional ballots; and 4) directing the Board to submit a remedial plan to ensure future compliance with the NVRA and HAVA. The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino.

On July 13, 2021, the parties agreed to the entry of a consent decree. The consent decree provided all the relief sought by the DOJ and detailed the requirements for the Board’s remedial plan. On January 17, 2025, following the 2024 election, the Board provided a compliance report to the DOJ. On March 19, 2025, the DOJ informed the Board that it had demonstrated compliance with the consent decree. On March 31, 2025, both parties stipulated that it was appropriate to terminate the consent decree, which the court approved.

Summary Authors

John McGinnis (5/5/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60053970/parties/united-states-v-oneida-county-board-of-elections/


Judge(s)

D'Agostino, Mae Avila (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Evans, Rachel R. (New York)

Heard, Bradley E (New York)

Hoggan, John D. (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Rayhill, Peter M. (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

6:21-cv-00793

Complaint

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Complaint
4

6:21-cv-00793

Consent Decree

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

Order/Opinion
8

6:21-cv-00793

Joint Stipulation for Termination of Consent Decree

United States of America v. Oneida County Board of Elections

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60053970/united-states-v-oneida-county-board-of-elections/

Last updated Sept. 19, 2025, 8:22 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Oneida County Board of Elections filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. {Filing fee is waived} (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjh, ) (Entered: 07/13/2021)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

Clearinghouse
2

MOTION for Entry of Consent Decree filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Motion returnable before Judge Mae A. D'Agostino (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (pjh, ) (Entered: 07/13/2021)

July 12, 2021

July 12, 2021

PACER
3

Summons Issued as to Oneida County Board of Elections. (pjh, ) (Entered: 07/13/2021)

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

PACER
4

CONSENT DECREE/ORDER. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/13/21. (ban)

July 13, 2021

July 13, 2021

Clearinghouse
5

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Bradley E. Heard filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Response to Motion due by 4/29/2022 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (Evans, Rachel) (Entered: 04/08/2022)

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

PACER
6

TEXT ORDER: Granting 5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Bradley E Heard is hereby terminated. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 4/8/2022. (kmc) (Entered: 04/08/2022)

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

PACER

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

April 8, 2022

April 8, 2022

PACER
8

Order

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 12, 2021

Closing Date: March 31, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Department of Justice

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Oneida County Board of Elections (Oneida County, Oneida), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

National Voter Registration Act ("Motor Voter law"), 52 U.S.C. § 20501 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg)

Help America Vote Act (HAVA), 52 U.S.C. § 20901 et seq (previously 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq)

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Vote Counting

Voting Process Changes

Voter Registration

Issues

Voting:

Election administration

Voter registration rules

Voting: General & Misc.