Case: Rahim v. State of Alabama Department of the Secretary of State Election Committee

2:18-cv-01348 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: Aug. 21, 2018

Closed Date: Dec. 18, 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

A pro se plaintiff filed a complaint against the State of Alabama Department of the Secretary of State Election Committee, claiming violations of the Civil Rights Act, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on August 21, 2018. Plaintiff claimed his affirmative action rights were violated because he did not have a chance to be on the ballot for the office of governor of Alabama. He believed that the Republican-controlled state government had rigged the state election pro…

A pro se plaintiff filed a complaint against the State of Alabama Department of the Secretary of State Election Committee, claiming violations of the Civil Rights Act, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on August 21, 2018. Plaintiff claimed his affirmative action rights were violated because he did not have a chance to be on the ballot for the office of governor of Alabama. He believed that the Republican-controlled state government had rigged the state election process against a non-white, independent candidate such as himself. He sought the governor position and federal government regulation of the state election process. 

On October 18, 2018, the District Court dismissed his case without prejudice due to a finding that the claim lacked basis in either law or fact, given that the facts showed he took none of the necessary steps to be included on the ballot for the governor race. The Plaintiff appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which also dismissed the case on December 18, 2018 for want of prosecution because the Plaintiff failed to pay required filing and docketing fees.

Summary Authors

Matthew Gerber (11/19/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13567967/parties/rahim-v-state-of-alabama-department-of-the-secretary-of-state-election/


Judge(s)

Kallon, Abdul K. (Alabama)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Rahim, Hiram Girard (Alabama)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

2:18-cv-01348

Complaint for a Civil Case

Rahim v. The State of Alabama

Aug. 21, 2018

Aug. 21, 2018

Complaint
5

2:18-cv-01348

Order

Rahim v. State of Alabama

Oct. 18, 2018

Oct. 18, 2018

Order/Opinion
12

2:18-cv-01348

18-14448

Entry of Dismissal

Rahim v. State of Alabama

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Dec. 18, 2018

Dec. 18, 2018

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13567967/rahim-v-state-of-alabama-department-of-the-secretary-of-state-election/

Last updated Aug. 9, 2025, 9:09 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against State of Alabama Department of the Secretary of State Election Committee, State of Alabama Governor of the State of Alabama, filed by Hiram Girard Rahim.(AFS) (Entered: 08/21/2018)

Aug. 21, 2018

Aug. 21, 2018

Clearinghouse
2

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Hiram Girard Rahim. (AFS) (Entered: 08/21/2018)

Aug. 21, 2018

Aug. 21, 2018

PACER
3

ORDER 2 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 8/23/2018. (AFS) (Entered: 08/23/2018)

Aug. 23, 2018

Aug. 23, 2018

PACER
4

RESPONSE to Order 3 filed by Hiram Girard Rahim. (KEK) (Entered: 10/17/2018)

Oct. 17, 2018

Oct. 17, 2018

PACER
5

ORDER - The court dismissed Rahims case without prejudice because the court found that his claims lacked a basis in either law or fact. At this juncture, however, Rahim did not allege any violation of his federal constitutional rights. See doc. 1. Indeed, Rahim did not allege any facts to indicate that he filed, or attempted to file, a signature petition to appear on the ballot for governor of Alabama as an independent candidate, nor did he allege any facts to suggest that the State prevented him from doing so. See id. Therefore, as discussed in the courts prior order, Rahims complaint against the State and its governor lacks an arguable basis in law and fact. As a result, the court DENIES Rahims motion to reconsider, doc. 4. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 10/18/2018. (KEK) (Entered: 10/18/2018)

Oct. 18, 2018

Oct. 18, 2018

Clearinghouse
6

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 5 Order by Hiram Girard Rahim. (AFS) (Entered: 10/22/2018)

Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

PACER
7

TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO USCA re 6 Notice of Appeal (AFS) (Entered: 10/22/2018)

Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

PACER
8

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 6 Notice of Appeal (AFS) (Entered: 10/22/2018)

Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

PACER
9

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in Appeal by Hiram Girard Rahim. (AFS) (Entered: 10/22/2018)

Oct. 22, 2018

Oct. 22, 2018

PACER
10

USCA Case Number 18-14448-D and Notification for 6 Notice of Appeal filed by Hiram Girard Rahim. (JLC) (Entered: 10/24/2018)

Oct. 24, 2018

Oct. 24, 2018

PACER
11

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Rahim is ADVISED that he may file an application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis directly with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 11/9/2018. (AFS) (Entered: 11/09/2018)

Nov. 9, 2018

Nov. 9, 2018

PACER
12

ORDER of USCA ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Hiram Girard Rahim has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules, effective 12/18/2018 as to 6 Notice of Appeal filed by Hiram Girard Rahim. (AFS) (Entered: 12/18/2018)

Dec. 18, 2018

Dec. 18, 2018

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 21, 2018

Closing Date: Dec. 18, 2018

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Hiram Girard Rahim, an individual non-white resident of the State of Alabama

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State of Alabama, State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Race, unspecified

Voting:

Election administration