Case: Smith v. Mcgowan

3:16-cv-00080 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: March 14, 2016

Closed Date: May 24, 2016

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about a private African American citizen who alleged that his right to appear on the Arkansas state ballot for State Representative was violated by the State of Arkansas and a State Judge because the Judge found him ineligible to appear on the ballot due to a pending felony charge that was later dismissed. On March 14, 2014, an African American Arkansas voter and citizen filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Jonesboro Division against Geo…

This is a case about a private African American citizen who alleged that his right to appear on the Arkansas state ballot for State Representative was violated by the State of Arkansas and a State Judge because the Judge found him ineligible to appear on the ballot due to a pending felony charge that was later dismissed.

On March 14, 2014, an African American Arkansas voter and citizen filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Jonesboro Division against Georgia Judge Mary McGowan. The plaintiff claimed that on April 9, 2012, the Judge improperly denied him the right to appear on the ballot for State Representative and therefore also denied him the right to exercise his right to vote for the candidate of his choice (himself). The plaintiff alleged that the denial violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as well as other allegations including racketeering and conspiracy. Represented pro se, the plaintiff sought $300,000 in compensatory damages, $300,000 in punitive damages, and an additional $300,000 in exemplary and emotional damages, as well as attorney’s fees.

On May 24, 2016, District Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. was assigned to the case and granted an order for a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On the same day, Judge Marshall dismissed the case with prejudice because the plaintiff was facing a felony conviction at the time of his application to run for State Representative. The court cautioned the plaintiff that he cannot keep filing federal lawsuits about issues that have either been decided or lack merit.

Summary Authors

LFAA (8/19/2025)

Related Cases

Smith v. Secretary of State, Eastern District of Arkansas (2016)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5563905/parties/smith-v-mcgowan/


Judge(s)

Marshall, Denzil Price (Arkansas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Pordy, Hope Allison (Arkansas)

Smith, Frederick (Arkansas)

Attorney for Defendant

Merritt, Jennifer L. (Arkansas)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
2

3:16-cv-00080

Complaint

Smith v. McGowan

March 14, 2016

March 14, 2016

Complaint
4

3:16-cv-00080

Judgment

Smith v. McGowan

May 24, 2016

May 24, 2016

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5563905/smith-v-mcgowan/

Last updated June 13, 2025, 4:08 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick Smith. (jak) (Entered: 03/14/2016)

March 14, 2016

March 14, 2016

PACER
2

COMPLAINT against Mary McGowan, filed by Frederick Smith.(jak) (Entered: 03/14/2016)

March 14, 2016

March 14, 2016

Clearinghouse
3

ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. The Court cautions Smith that he cannot keep filing federal lawsuits about issues either that have been decided or lack merit. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/24/2016. (jak) (Entered: 05/24/2016)

May 24, 2016

May 24, 2016

PACER
4

JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/24/2016. (jak)

May 24, 2016

May 24, 2016

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory: Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 14, 2016

Closing Date: May 24, 2016

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A male, African American private citizen who believes his right to be on the State House of Representatives ballot was denied, as was his ability to vote for himself on said ballot.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State of Arkansas (Arkansas), State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Voting Rights Act, unspecified, 52 U.S.C. § 10301 et seq (previously 42 U.S.C § 1973 et seq.)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Voting:

Candidate qualifications

Voter qualifications