Case: Stanley v. Ivey

03-CV-2024-900649 | Alabama state trial court

Filed Date: May 1, 2024

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about forced prison labor in Alabama. In 2022, Alabama voters approved a new state Constitution that banned slavery and involuntary servitude without exceptions for prison labor. In January 2023, after a widespread labor strike in the prisons, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed an executive order that allowed prisons to penalize incarcerated people for not working by removing their good-time credits and making it harder to get good-time credits in the future. On May 1, 2024, six in…

This is a case about forced prison labor in Alabama. In 2022, Alabama voters approved a new state Constitution that banned slavery and involuntary servitude without exceptions for prison labor. In January 2023, after a widespread labor strike in the prisons, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed an executive order that allowed prisons to penalize incarcerated people for not working by removing their good-time credits and making it harder to get good-time credits in the future.

On May 1, 2024, six incarcerated persons represented by the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a complaint in the Montgomery County Circuit Court against the governor of Alabama and the commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC), alleging that the executive order (and subsequent legislation and prison policies implementing it) imposed involuntary servitude on them in violation of the Alabama Constitution. The plaintiffs alleged that the ADOC had punished incarcerated people who missed work with loss of good-time credits as well as other punishments. The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees. The case was heard by Judge James H. Anderson.

On August 1, 2024, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. First, the court held that sovereign immunity prevented the plaintiffs from suing Alabama. Second, the court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the relevant laws and policies. On November 19, 2024, the plaintiffs appealed the ruling to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals (docket no. CL-2024-0710). The appeal is ongoing as of December 2024.

Summary Authors

Ted Molina (11/3/2024)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

03-CV-2024-900649

Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

May 1, 2024

May 1, 2024

Complaint

Resources

Docket

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 1, 2024

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Six incarcerated people in Alabama

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State of Alabama, State

Alabama Department of Corrections, State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)

Confinement/isolation

Good time

Visiting

Work release or work assignments