Case: McCormick v. Lawrence
1:03-cv-02195 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed Date: April 22, 2003
Closed Date: July 18, 2008
Clearinghouse coding in progress
Case Summary
[This is a draft while we research the case.]
This case involved alleged retaliation for protesting by Lawrence, Kansas police officers. On April 22, 2003, a private citizen and self-identified civil rights activist filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas against the City of Lawrence and both city and state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Initially pro se (though later represented by private counsel), the plaintiff alleged that the City and the police violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights when they took retaliatory action against the plaintiff for protesting and recording police officers. More specifically, he alleged retaliation for his protests of traffic stops through fabricated charges and that the City of Lawrence maintained an unconstitutional policy in its police force of encouraging officers to prohibit or impede First Amendment rights. The plaintiff sought equitable relief. The case was assigned to Judge John W. Lungstrum.
Summary Authors
Ruby Napora (3/17/2025)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11866248/parties/mccormick-v-city-of-lawrence-kansas/
VanBebber, George Thomas (Kansas)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11866248/mccormick-v-city-of-lawrence-kansas/
Last updated Aug. 25, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Docket for: McCormick v. City of Lawrence, Kansas
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 22, 2003
Closing Date: July 18, 2008
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Private citizens and self-identified civil rights advocates
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: Yes
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Private Entity/Person
Police officers
State
City of Lawrence
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Unreasonable search and seizure
Other Dockets:
District of Kansas 1:03-cv-02195
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 05-03279
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Defendant
Relief Granted:
Source of Relief:
Issues
Policing:
Case Summary of McCormick v. Lawrence, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/45691/ (last updated 3/17/2025).