Case: Gober v. Collins

1:25-cv-00714 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 10, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a challenge to the second Trump administration's mass firings of federal employees classified as "probationary." (To see the Clearinghouse's collection of civil-service-related legal challenges to actions by the second Trump administration, click here.) On March 11, 2025, eight probationary employees previously employed by various federal agencies filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, naming the agency heads of the Department of Veteran…

This is a challenge to the second Trump administration's mass firings of federal employees classified as "probationary." (To see the Clearinghouse's collection of civil-service-related legal challenges to actions by the second Trump administration, click here.)

On March 11, 2025, eight probationary employees previously employed by various federal agencies filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, naming the agency heads of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Commerce, and the Government Services Administration as defendants. They were represented by the Center for Employment Justice. Plaintiffs challenged the termination of their employment and brought the lawsuit on behalf of "all probationary employees of the Defendant Agencies terminated between January 20, 2025, to the present that received a termination communication stating that termination was due to poor performance, poor conduct, or performance not in the public interest, without any evidence of said poor performance, poor conduct, or performance not in the public interest." They alleged that their termination violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act. Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief. 

On March 13, 2025, the case was assigned to District Judge Rudolph Contreras. Judge Contreras already had before him Schechter v. Collins, another case challenging the firing of a federal employee as "probationary" and for "poor performance."

Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 21, 2025. It included an additional individual plaintiff, as well as the agency heads of the Navy and the Office of Personnel Management as defendants. 

On March 27, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a preliminary injunction motion, which was denied on May 8. The district court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs' claims because they have a remedy available to them per the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)—review by the Office of Special Counsel. While the court acknowledged that its analysis could stop there, it stated that, even if the court were to consider the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims, it would likely reject them for the following reasons: (1) the court is not convinced that Plaintiffs have a viable cause of action under the APA for Count III because of the limits on judicial review per the APA and precedent in the D.C. Circuit; (2) the court is not persuaded that Plaintiffs would succeed on the merits of their “constitutional” claim in Count I because they have not pointed to any case where a court found a constitutional due process violation for defamatory speech where defendants were not the speakers; (3) Plaintiffs' "constitutional" claim in Count II effectively constitutes a claim that Defendants violated federal regulations, not the Constitution, which must be brought pursuant to the CSRA, if at all; and (4) Plaintiffs presented no argument why mandamus—a "drastic" remedy "available only in extraordinary situations"—is appropriate.

On May 5, 2025, one of the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed his claims. On June 3, 2025, four more of the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims.

On June 26, 2025, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Defendants first argued that since all plaintiffs employed by the Treasury and U.S. Navy had voluntarily dismissed their claims, those defendants should be dismissed from the case. Defendants further argued that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, that plaintiffs did not have a judicially protectable property interest in their employment, and that the mandamus they sought was too extraordinary and unjustified a remedy. The court's ruling on that motion is pending.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Lacie Melasi (3/23/2025)

Matt Petrillo (6/30/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69723263/parties/gober-v-collins/


Judge(s)

Contreras, Rudolph (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Keith, Pamela M. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Eckrote, Kaitlin Kerry (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-00714

Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

Complaint
4

1:25-cv-00714

First Amended Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

March 21, 2025

March 21, 2025

Complaint
6

1:25-cv-00714

Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
25

1:25-cv-00714

Memorandum Opinion

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1360434

27

1:25-cv-00714

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

June 3, 2025

June 3, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
28

1:25-cv-00714

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69723263/gober-v-collins/

Last updated Sept. 19, 2025, 10:52 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11532340) filed by JESSICA GOBER. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover SHeet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3 to the Complaint, # 3 Exhibit Notice of Related Case, # 4 Summons Dept of Commerce Summons, # 5 Summons GSA Summons, # 6 Summons HHS Summons, # 7 Summons Treasury Summons, # 8 Summons USATTY Summons, # 9 Summons VA Summons, # 10 Summons DOJ Summons)(Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover SHeet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3 to the Complaint

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit Notice of Related Case

View on PACER

4 Summons Dept of Commerce Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons GSA Summons

View on RECAP

6 Summons HHS Summons

View on RECAP

7 Summons Treasury Summons

View on PACER

8 Summons USATTY Summons

View on PACER

9 Summons VA Summons

View on PACER

10 Summons DOJ Summons

View on PACER

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. Case related to Case No. 1:25-cv-00551. (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 03/11/2025)

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error- New Case

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR re [1-3] Exhibit Notice of Related Case. The following error(s) need correction: Related Case form filed as attachment. Please file using the event Notice of Related Case. (zsl)

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER
3

SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 03/13/2025)

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

PACER

ENTERED IN ERROR.....Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zmtm) Modified on 3/13/2025 - case directly assigned to Judge Cooper as related case (zmtm). Modified on 3/13/2025 (zmtm).

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmtm)

March 13, 2025

March 13, 2025

PACER
4

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by JESSICA GOBER, LEVI PRESTON. (Attachments: # 1 Summons Summons for OPM, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 4-10, # 4 Exhibit Exhibits 11-12, # 5 Exhibit Exhibits 13-14)(Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

March 21, 2025

March 21, 2025

Clearinghouse
5

SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CHARLES EZELL. (znmw) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

March 21, 2025

March 21, 2025

PACER
6

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by JESSICA GOBER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-12)(Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 03/27/2025)

1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-12

View on PACER

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

Clearinghouse
7

NOTICE of Appearance by Kaitlin Kerry Eckrote on behalf of All Defendants (Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 03/28/2025)

March 28, 2025

March 28, 2025

PACER
8

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR, SCOTT BESSENT, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, STEPHEN EHIKIAN, CHARLES EZELL, CARLOS DEL TORO, DOUGLAS A. COLLINS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' response to 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be filed on or before April 16, 2025; and that Plaintiffs' reply shall be filed on or before April 30, 2025. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/31/2025. (lcrc1)

March 31, 2025

March 31, 2025

PACER
10

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DOUGLAS A. COLLINS served on 3/27/2025 (Keith, Pamela) Modified party served on 4/3/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 04/02/2025)

April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025

PACER
11

ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/31/2025. (Keith, Pamela) Modified on 4/3/2025; refiled as docket entry 13 (znmw). (Entered: 04/02/2025)

April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025

PACER
12

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/27/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/26/2025. (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 04/02/2025)

April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025

PACER
13

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. STEPHEN EHIKIAN served on 3/31/2025 (Keith, Pamela) Modified party served on 4/3/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 04/02/2025)

April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025

PACER
9

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. HOWARD LUTNICK served on 3/28/2025 (Keith, Pamela) Modified party served on 4/3/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 04/02/2025)

April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025

PACER
14

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHARLES EZELL served on 4/1/2025 (Keith, Pamela) Modified party served on 4/3/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 04/03/2025)

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 14 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant, 9 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant, 13 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant, 10 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant. The following error(s) have been corrected as a courtesy: When filing a return of service, select the defendant served, not the plaintiff. Future filings will be entered in error. (znmw)

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

PACER
15

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR served on 3/31/2025 (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

April 14, 2025

April 14, 2025

PACER
16

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SCOTT BESSENT served on 3/31/2025 (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

April 14, 2025

April 14, 2025

PACER
17

RESPONSE re 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by SCOTT BESSENT, DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, CARLOS DEL TORO, STEPHEN EHIKIAN, CHARLES EZELL, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR, HOWARD W. LUTNICK. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Matt Mrnak, # 2 Declaration Sherrie Watford, # 3 Declaration Danielle Ellis, # 4 Declaration Anne Burnham, # 5 Declaration Max Wyche, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 04/16/2025)

1 Declaration Matt Mrnak

View on PACER

2 Declaration Sherrie Watford

View on PACER

3 Declaration Danielle Ellis

View on PACER

4 Declaration Anne Burnham

View on PACER

5 Declaration Max Wyche

View on PACER

6 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025

PACER
18

ENTERED IN ERROR.....REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE on Departemtn of the Navy filed by JESSICA GOBER. Related document: 1 Complaint,, filed by JESSICA GOBER, 4 Amended Complaint, filed by JESSICA GOBER, LEVI PRESTON.(Keith, Pamela) Modified on 4/28/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 04/27/2025)

April 27, 2025

April 27, 2025

PACER
19

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE for Carlos Del Toro Secretary of the Navy filed by JESSICA GOBER. Related document: 1 Complaint,, filed by JESSICA GOBER.(Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error

April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 18 Request for Summons to Issue. The following error(s) need correction: Other- Department of the Navy is not a named defendant. Please refile summons for named defendant. (znmw)

April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025

PACER
20

SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CARLOS DEL TORO. (znmw) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

PACER
21

REPLY to opposition to motion re 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by JESSICA GOBER. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits to Plaintiffs' Reply Brief)(Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 04/30/2025)

April 30, 2025

April 30, 2025

PACER
22

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CARLOS DEL TORO served on 5/1/2025 (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 05/02/2025)

May 2, 2025

May 2, 2025

PACER
23

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JASON MALDONADO (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 05/05/2025)

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

RECAP
24

ORDER denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/8/2025. (lcrc1) (Entered: 05/08/2025)

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER
25

MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/8/2025. (lcrc1) (Entered: 05/08/2025)

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

Clearinghouse

Set/Reset Hearings: Motion Hearing set for 5/8/2025 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 23A- In Person before Judge Rudolph Contreras. (tj)

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER

Set/Reset Hearings

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER

Preliminary Injunction

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rudolph Contreras: Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 5/8/2025. Oral argument heard, and the court takes the motion under advisement. (Court Reporter: Tim Miller.) (tj)

May 8, 2025

May 8, 2025

PACER
26

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 4 Amended Complaint, by SCOTT BESSENT, DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, CARLOS DEL TORO, STEPHEN EHIKIAN, CHARLES EZELL, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR, HOWARD W. LUTNICK. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 05/13/2025)

May 13, 2025

May 13, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

May 13, 2025

May 13, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 26 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to 4 Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint on or before June 26, 2025. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/13/2025. (lcrc1)

May 13, 2025

May 13, 2025

PACER
27

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JESSICA GOBER (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 06/03/2025)

June 3, 2025

June 3, 2025

Clearinghouse
28

MOTION to Dismiss by SCOTT BESSENT, DOUG COLLINS, CARLOS DEL TORO, STEPHEN EHIKIAN, CHARLES EZELL, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR, HOWARD W. LUTNICK. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 06/26/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

Clearinghouse
29

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 28 MOTION to Dismiss by JESSICA GOBER, TIFFANY HO, BENZA KENDRICK-LITHO, JASON MALDONADO, SEAN MCCLARY, ANGUSTIA PECK, LEVI PRESTON, ANDREA SASSARD, DEVEN TINES. (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 29 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' deadline to file a response to 28 Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be August 22, 2025. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/1/2025. (lcrc1)

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

PACER
30

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 28 MOTION to Dismiss by JESSICA GOBER, TIFFANY HO, BENZA KENDRICK-LITHO, JASON MALDONADO, SEAN MCCLARY, ANGUSTIA PECK, LEVI PRESTON, ANDREA SASSARD, DEVEN TINES. (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 08/22/2025)

Aug. 22, 2025

Aug. 22, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Aug. 22, 2025

Aug. 22, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' deadline to file a response to 28 Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be August 26, 2025. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/22/2025. (lcrc3)

Aug. 22, 2025

Aug. 22, 2025

PACER
31

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File 4 Amended Complaint, by SEAN MCCLARY, ANGUSTIA PECK, LEVI PRESTON, ANDREA SASSARD, DEVEN TINES. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EX1 Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Redline Comparison of SAC, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 1-7 to SAC, # 4 Exhibit Exhibits 14-21 to SAC)(Keith, Pamela) Modified event on 8/27/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 08/26/2025)

Aug. 26, 2025

Aug. 26, 2025

PACER
32

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by TIFFANY HO (Keith, Pamela) (Entered: 08/26/2025)

Aug. 26, 2025

Aug. 26, 2025

PACER
33

Errata

Aug. 27, 2025

Aug. 27, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to File AND Order on Motion to Dismiss

Aug. 27, 2025

Aug. 27, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint: It is hereby ORDERED that [31-1] Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint shall be DEEMED FILED. Accordingly, 28 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/27/2025. (lcrc3)

Aug. 27, 2025

Aug. 27, 2025

PACER
34

Extension of Time to File Answer

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 10, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Nine probationary employees previously employed by various federal agencies on behalf a class "of similarly situated federal probationary employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of the Treasury, Department of Commerce, Department of Health and Human Services, and the Government Services Administration."

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Department of the Treasury (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Department of Commerce (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Government Services Administration (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Office of Personnel Management (- United States (national) -), Federal

U.S. Navy (- United States (national) -), Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

General/Misc.:

Discharge & termination plans

Disciplinary procedures

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Civil Service