Case: American Oversight v. U.S. Department of Government Efficiency

1:25-cv-01251 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 23, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Trump Administration’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) practice of using ephemeral platforms such as Signal and Google Docs to transact official government business, allegedly in contravention of the record-keeping and disclosure requirements of the Federal Records Act (FRA) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Plaintiff American Oversight, a nonpartisan nonprofit seeking to advance democracy and transparency by enforcing public rights to go…

This case challenged the Trump Administration’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) practice of using ephemeral platforms such as Signal and Google Docs to transact official government business, allegedly in contravention of the record-keeping and disclosure requirements of the Federal Records Act (FRA) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Plaintiff American Oversight, a nonpartisan nonprofit seeking to advance democracy and transparency by enforcing public rights to government documents, brought this case under FOIA and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), further alleging that defendants failed to conduct adequate searches for responsive records to FOIA requests and wrongfully withheld non-exempt records.

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on April 23, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit named DOGE, its leader Elon Musk, several other DOGE officials, the National Archives & Records Administration (NARA), and NARA’s acting archivist Marco Rubio as defendants. Plaintiff sought a declaration that use of Signal and Google Docs was subject to the FRA and that failure to preserve and record such documents constituted a violation of the FRA and of the APA. Plaintiff also sought an order compelling DOGE to comply with its FOIA requests and an injunction preventing DOGE from continued withholding of FOIA-covered materials. Plaintiff finally sought attorneys’ fees. The case was assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras.

On July 1, 2025, defendants moved to dismiss the case. Defendants argued that DOGE (officially the United States DOGE Service, or USDS) was not an "agency" sufficiently independent of the President to be subject to FOIA; that plaintiff did not have a right of action under the FRA; that plaintiff's claim against NARA was conclusory and failed to allege that defendants used Signal unlawfully; and that some of plaintiff's claims were barred under the APA because FOIA itself provided a remedy.

On July 22, 2025, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The complaint preserved the same parties and claims as the original, but significantly expanded the factual allegations underpinning their case. Defendants' response is pending.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Matt Petrillo (7/31/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69930055/parties/american-oversight-v-us-department-of-government-efficiency/


Judge(s)

Contreras, Rudolph (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Haddix, Elizabeth (District of Columbia)

Kronig, David (District of Columbia)

Swomley, Joanna (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Eckrote, Kaitlin Kerry (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-01251

Complaint

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

Complaint
14

1:25-cv-01251

First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

July 22, 2025

July 22, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69930055/american-oversight-v-us-department-of-government-efficiency/

Last updated Sept. 11, 2025, 11:15 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against STEVEN DAVIS, AMY GLEASON, ELON MUSK, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY, U.S. DOGE SERVICE, U.S. DOGE SERVICE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11637672) filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 Summons USAO, # 8 Summons AG, # 9 Summons DOGE, # 10 Summons USDS, # 11 Summons USDS Temp, # 12 Summons Musk, # 13 Summons Davis, # 14 Summons Gleason, # 15 Summons Rubio, # 16 Summons NARA)(Kronig, David) (Entered: 04/23/2025)

1 Exhibit Ex. 1

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Ex. 2

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Ex. 3

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Ex. 4

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Ex. 5

View on PACER

6 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

7 Summons USAO

View on PACER

8 Summons AG

View on PACER

9 Summons DOGE

View on PACER

10 Summons USDS

View on PACER

11 Summons USDS Temp

View on PACER

12 Summons Musk

View on PACER

13 Summons Davis

View on PACER

14 Summons Gleason

View on PACER

15 Summons Rubio

View on PACER

16 Summons NARA

View on PACER

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Kronig, David) (Entered: 04/23/2025)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER
3

SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (znmw)

April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025

PACER
4

NOTICE of Appearance by Kaitlin Kerry Eckrote on behalf of All Defendants (Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 05/19/2025)

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

PACER
5

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/24/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/23/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit US Attorney, # 2 Exhibit AG, # 3 Exhibit Dep't of Govt. Efficiency, # 4 Exhibit USDS, # 5 Exhibit USDSTO, # 6 Exhibit Musk, # 7 Exhibit Davis, # 8 Exhibit Gleason, # 9 Exhibit Rubio, # 10 Exhibit NARA)(Kronig, David) (Entered: 05/19/2025)

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

PACER
6

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. STEVEN DAVIS served on 4/30/2025; AMY GLEASON served on 4/30/2025; ELON MUSK served on 4/30/2025; NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION served on 4/29/2025; MARCO RUBIO served on 4/25/2025; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY served on 4/30/2025; U.S. DOGE SERVICE served on 4/30/2025; U.S. DOGE SERVICE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION served on 4/30/2025, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/28/2025. (See Docket Entry 5 to view document). (znmw) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

PACER
7

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Joanna Swomley, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-11703546. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Swomley Decl., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kronig, David) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

May 20, 2025

May 20, 2025

PACER

Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant AND Summons Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General

May 20, 2025

May 20, 2025

PACER
8

NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Haddix on behalf of AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Haddix, Elizabeth) (Main Document 8 replaced on 5/22/2025) (znmw). (Entered: 05/21/2025)

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

PACER

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2, it is hereby ORDERED that Joanna Ruth Swomley be admitted to represent Plaintiff pro hac vice in this case. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Click for instructions. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/21/2025. (lcrc1)

May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

PACER
9

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, by STEVEN DAVIS, AMY GLEASON, ELON MUSK, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY, U.S. DOGE SERVICE, U.S. DOGE SERVICE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

May 22, 2025

May 22, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to 1 Plaintiff's Complaint on or before July 1, 2025. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/23/2025. (lcrc1)

May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines

May 28, 2025

May 28, 2025

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 7/1/2025. (tj)

May 28, 2025

May 28, 2025

PACER
10

ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Appearance by Joanna Swomley on behalf of AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Swomley, Joanna) Modified on 5/30/2025 (znmw). (Entered: 05/29/2025)

May 29, 2025

May 29, 2025

PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Joanna Swomley on behalf of AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Swomley, Joanna) (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/2/2025) (znmw). (Entered: 05/30/2025)

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

PACER

Notice of Error

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

PACER

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 10 Notice of Appearance. The following error(s) need correction: Missing case number. Missing Signature. Form is fillable. Please refile. (znmw)

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

PACER
12

MOTION to Dismiss by STEVEN DAVIS, AMY GLEASON, ELON MUSK, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY, U.S. DOGE SERVICE, U.S. DOGE SERVICE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

PACER
13

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kronig, David) (Entered: 07/07/2025)

July 7, 2025

July 7, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting 13 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until July 25, 2025 to oppose Defendants' motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/8/2025. (lcrc1)

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER
14

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Kronig, David) (Entered: 07/22/2025)

1 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit 3

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 5

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 6

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit 7

View on RECAP

July 22, 2025

July 22, 2025

RECAP
15

MOTION to Stay by STEVEN DAVIS, AMY GLEASON, ELON MUSK, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, MARCO A. RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY, U.S. DOGE SERVICE, U.S. DOGE SERVICE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION. (Eckrote, Kaitlin) (Entered: 08/05/2025)

Aug. 5, 2025

Aug. 5, 2025

RECAP
16

ERRATA by Joanna Swomley by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT re 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Corrected Decl Supporting PHV Mtn, # 2 Notice to Counsel/Party Corrected Notice of Appearance)(Haddix, Elizabeth) (Entered: 08/06/2025)

1 Declaration Corrected Decl Supporting PHV Mtn

View on PACER

2 Notice to Counsel/Party Corrected Notice of Appearance

View on PACER

Aug. 6, 2025

Aug. 6, 2025

PACER
17

Memorandum in opposition to motion

Aug. 19, 2025

Aug. 19, 2025

RECAP
18

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Aug. 20, 2025

Aug. 20, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Aug. 20, 2025

Aug. 20, 2025

PACER
19

Reply to opposition to motion

Sept. 9, 2025

Sept. 9, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 1.0 & 2.0 FOIA cases

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 23, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

American Oversight, a nonpartisan nonprofit committed to vindicating the American public's right of access government records.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (- United States (national) -), Federal

National Archives and Records Administration (- United States (national) -), Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Confidentiality

Record-keeping

Records Disclosure

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency)