Case: Shapiro v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

1:25-cv-00998 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: June 4, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Trump Administration's termination of a food assistance program which used 100% of its funds to buy food from local farmers that was then distributed through Pennsylvania's charitable food network to people and communities experiencing hunger. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) determined in March 2025 that the Local Food Purchase Assistance 2025 Cooperative Agreement (LFPA) no longer effectuated its priorities, and thus defunded it, but provided no reasoning or …

This case challenged the Trump Administration's termination of a food assistance program which used 100% of its funds to buy food from local farmers that was then distributed through Pennsylvania's charitable food network to people and communities experiencing hunger. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) determined in March 2025 that the Local Food Purchase Assistance 2025 Cooperative Agreement (LFPA) no longer effectuated its priorities, and thus defunded it, but provided no reasoning or justification for this determination. Originally funded by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, LFPA was supplemented in 2022 by a USDA subcorporation; Pennsylvania received almost $30 million of funding between those two years. By May 2025, Pennsylvania reported it had only $30,000 of that funding left. Pennsylvania had used that money to buy over 5 million meals for its neediest residents. Plaintiffs alleged that USDA's termination of LFPA violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Fifth Amendment.

On June 4, 2025, the Governor of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, and its Secretary filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, its Secretary, and the Agricultural Marketing Service. Plaintiffs sought a declaration that USDA's termination was unlawful, vacatur of that termination, and attorneys' fees. The case was assigned to Judge Joseph F. Saporito Jr.

On June 26, 2025, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction; defendants filed their response opposing that motion on July 17, 2025. On July 28, 2025, defendants moved to dismiss this case. 

The court's rulings on the above motions remain pending; this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Matt Petrillo (7/31/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70452516/parties/shapiro-v-us-department-of-agriculture/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Boyer, Jacob (Pennsylvania)

Fischer, Michael (Pennsylvania)

Howard, John H. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

Euliss, Richard D (Pennsylvania)

Judge, Timothy S. (Pennsylvania)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-00998

Complaint

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70452516/shapiro-v-us-department-of-agriculture/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 2:49 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-7013765), filed by Josh Shapiro, Russell Redding, The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit(s) 1, # 3 Exhibit(s) 2, # 4 Exhibit(s) 3, # 5 Exhibit(s) 4, # 6 Exhibit(s) 5)(aaa) (Entered: 06/04/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit(s) 1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit(s) 2

View on PACER

4 Exhibit(s) 3

View on PACER

5 Exhibit(s) 4

View on PACER

6 Exhibit(s) 5

View on PACER

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: # 1 Summons Packet) (aaa) (Entered: 06/04/2025)

1 Summons Packet

View on PACER

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
3

NOTICE of Appearance by Richard D Euliss on behalf of All Defendants (Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 06/10/2025)

June 10, 2025

June 10, 2025

PACER
4

NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S. Judge on behalf of All Defendants (Judge, Timothy) (Entered: 06/10/2025)

June 10, 2025

June 10, 2025

PACER
5

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Josh Shapiro, Russell Redding. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Boyer, Jacob) (Entered: 06/26/2025)

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

PACER
6

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josh Shapiro, Russell Redding, The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. All Defendants. (Boyer, Jacob) (Entered: 06/27/2025)

June 27, 2025

June 27, 2025

PACER
7

BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Josh Shapiro, Russell Redding. (Attachments: # 1 Table of Contents, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14)(Boyer, Jacob) (Entered: 07/03/2025)

July 3, 2025

July 3, 2025

PACER
8

Unopposed MOTION to Exceed Page Limitation by Brooke Rollins, The Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Concurrence, # 2 Proposed Order)(Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 07/15/2025)

July 15, 2025

July 15, 2025

PACER
9

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages Signed by District Judge Joseph F Saporito, Jr on 7/16/25 (ms) (Entered: 07/16/2025)

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

PACER
10

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Brooke Rollins, The Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1)(Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 07/17/2025)

1 Exhibit(s) 1

View on PACER

July 17, 2025

July 17, 2025

RECAP
11

MOTION to Dismiss by Brooke Rollins, The Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 07/28/2025)

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
12

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Brief in Excess of 5,000 Words by Brooke Rollins, The Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 07/28/2025)

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

PACER
13

ORDER granting 12 Motion for Leave to File excess pages Signed by District Judge Joseph F Saporito, Jr on 7/29/25 (ms) (Entered: 07/29/2025)

July 29, 2025

July 29, 2025

PACER
14

BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Brooke Rollins, The Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.(Euliss, Richard) (Entered: 07/30/2025)

July 30, 2025

July 30, 2025

PACER
15

REPLY BRIEF re 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Russell Redding, Josh Shapiro, The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Boyer, Jacob) (Entered: 07/31/2025)

July 31, 2025

July 31, 2025

PACER
16

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Russell Redding, Josh Shapiro, The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.(Boyer, Jacob) (Entered: 08/13/2025)

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Grant/Contract rescissions, Defunding or Other Threats against Private Entities )

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 4, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The Governor of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, and the Pennsylvania Secretary of Agriculture.

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

U.S. Department of Agriculture (- United States (national) -), Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Funding

Benefits (Source):

American Rescue Plan (ARP)