Case: National Fair Housing Alliance v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

1:25-cv-01965 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: June 24, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Congress amended the Fair Housing Act (FHA) in 1992 to establish the Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) which provides grants to certain private, nonprofit fair housing organizations to facilitate enforcement of the FHA. Under the Trump Administration, the U.S. Department of Housing and Development (HUD) began to refuse to implement the second and third years of existing multi-year FHIP awards nor award new grants from pending application cycles. On June 24, 2025, the National Fair Housing…

Congress amended the Fair Housing Act (FHA) in 1992 to establish the Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) which provides grants to certain private, nonprofit fair housing organizations to facilitate enforcement of the FHA. Under the Trump Administration, the U.S. Department of Housing and Development (HUD) began to refuse to implement the second and third years of existing multi-year FHIP awards nor award new grants from pending application cycles.

On June 24, 2025, the National Fair Housing Alliance and the Tennessee Fair Housing Council filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the HUD and its Secretary to challenge the withholding of FHIP grant money. This case was assigned to Judge Sparkle L. Sooknann. The plaintiffs sought to certify a class consisting of all other fair housing organizations who received multi-year Private Enforcement Initiative (PEI) awards in 2023 or 2024 but who have been unable to negotiate their second or third years with HUD.

The following claims were brought in the complaint:

  1. HUD's refusal to administer FHIP grants violates the mandatory language in the FHIP provisions of the FHA and the FY2024 Appropriations Act. This would mean that the grant money is being unlawfully withheld under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
  2. HUD's refusal to administer FHIP grants violates the plaintiffs' constitutional rights. It is also arbitrary and capricious under the APA.
  3. HUD exceeds the Executive Branch's constitutional authority and encroaches on the legislature's powers.
  4. The PEI plaintiffs claimed a separate violation of their due process rights.

The plaintiffs sought class certification, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs asked that the court declare the refusal to administer FHIP grants unlawful and to order HUD to ensure all funds are dispersed.

On June 24, the plaintiffs moved to expedite the production of the administrative record and limited discovery for an upcoming summary judgement motion. This motion was submitted due to urgent need for FY2024 funds to be administered before the plaintiff organizations were forced to cease operations. This motion was denied on June 28, 2025. The court encouraged the plaintiffs to seek another form of emergency relief instead.

The plaintiffs then moved for a temporary restraining order (TRO) on July 24, 2025.  The court granted a TRO regarding the claims concerning new grants. In regards to the claims concerning multi-year grants, the court claimed that it believed "relief is warranted but will reserve judgements given the Plaintiffs' request that it [delay] resolution of these claims until later this week."

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Jinan Abufarha (7/2/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70620442/parties/national-fair-housing-alliance-v-department-of-housing-and-urban/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Colfax, Reed (District of Columbia)

Hunter, Robert William (District of Columbia)

Miller, Lila (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Gonzalez, Heidy L (District of Columbia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Hill, Brook Allarick (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-01965

Class Action Complaint

June 24, 2025

June 24, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70620442/national-fair-housing-alliance-v-department-of-housing-and-urban/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 1:24 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SCOTT TURNER ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11774162) filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 06/24/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

June 24, 2025

June 24, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE of Appearance by Reed Colfax on behalf of NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL (Colfax, Reed) (Entered: 06/24/2025)

June 24, 2025

June 24, 2025

PACER
3

MOTION to Expedite Production of the Administrative Record, Limited Discovery, and Summary Judgment by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Requests for Production of Documents, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Interrogatory, # 3 Exhibit Proposed Deposition Notice, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 06/24/2025)

1 Exhibit Proposed Requests for Production of Documents

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Proposed Interrogatory

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Proposed Deposition Notice

View on PACER

4 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 24, 2025

June 24, 2025

RECAP
4

SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 06/25/2025)

June 25, 2025

June 25, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

June 25, 2025

June 25, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan. (zmtm)

June 25, 2025

June 25, 2025

PACER
5

NOTICE of Appearance by Heidy L Gonzalez on behalf of All Defendants (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 06/26/2025)

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

PACER

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER. After review of the Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and 3 Emergency Motion to Expedite Production of the Administrative Record, Limited Discovery, and Summary Judgment, the Court ORDERS the Parties to meet, confer, and file a Joint Status Report addressing the following issues by 12:00 PM on Friday, June 27, 2025: (1) a proposed schedule for discovery and summary judgment briefing, and (2) two proposed dates and times for a hearing on any summary judgment motion. The Parties may also address any other issues that they believe will be helpful to the Court. Any disagreements should be noted in the Joint Status Report. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 6/26/2025. (lcrk)

June 26, 2025

June 26, 2025

PACER
6

Joint STATUS REPORT by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Miller, Lila) (Entered: 06/27/2025)

June 27, 2025

June 27, 2025

PACER

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion to Expedite

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER denying the Plaintiffs' 3 Emergency Motion to Expedite. When considering motions to expedite discovery, courts in this District generally consider the "reasonableness of the request in light of all surrounding circumstances." Am. Fedn of Lab. & Cong. of Indus. Orgs. v. Dept of Lab., No. 25-cv-339, 2025 WL 1142495, at *2 (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2025) (cleaned up). These circumstances include: "(1) whether a preliminary injunction is pending; (2) the breadth of the discovery requests; (3) the purpose for requesting the expedited discovery; (4) the burden on the defendants to comply with the requests; and (5) how far in advance of the typical discovery process the request was made." Id. The second, third, and fourth factors all weigh in favor of the Plaintiffs. But because the first and fifth factors weigh strongly in favor of the Defendants, the Court exercises its "discretion" to deny the 3 motion. Id.The first factor favors the Defendants because the Plaintiffs have not sought preliminary injunctive relief. See, e.g., In re Fannie Mae Derivative Litig., 227 F.R.D. 142, 142-43 (D.D.C. 2005) (finding request for expedited discovery unreasonable where the plaintiff moved "for expedited discovery to enable him to make a record upon which to base a motion for preliminary injunction"). The Plaintiffs argue that their request for expedited summary judgment briefing counts as the "functional equivalent of a preliminary injunction motion." ECF No. 3 at 6 (citing "Morton v. District of Columbia, 38 F. Supp. 57, 62 (D.D.C. 2014)"). The Court assumes the Plaintiffs intended to cite Morris v. District of Columbia, 38 F. Supp. 3d 57 (D.D.C. 2014), to support this proposition. But Morris merely states that courts treat a preliminary injunction motion as a summary judgment motion when the preliminary injunction motion "disposes of the entire complaint." Id. at 63. It does not support expedited discovery in the absence of a preliminary injunction motion. The Plaintiffs also argue that "[c]ourts have weighed the first factor in plaintiffs' favor as long as the motion was forthcoming and the purpose of expedited discovery was to facilitate resolution of the coming motion." ECF No. 3 at 6 (citing Legal Tech. Grp., Inc. v. Mukerji, No. 17-cv-631, 2017 WL 7279398, at *3 (D.D.C. June 5, 2017); Am. Fedn of Lab. & Cong. of Indus. Orgs., 2025 WL 1142495). But the Plaintiffs have not indicated that a preliminary injunction motion is forthcoming. And in one of the cases it cites, the plaintiffs had already filed a TRO motion. See Am. Fedn of Lab. & Cong. of Indus. Orgs., 2025 WL 1142495, at *3 ("[P]laintiffs' two TRO motions have revealed the factual and legal issues critical to the impending preliminary injunction motion."). So this argument is not on point either.The fifth factor also favors the Defendants because the Plaintiffs seek discovery so far in advance of the typical discovery process that the Defendants have not yet filed their anticipated motion to dismiss. See Guttenberg v. Emery, 26 F. Supp. 3d 88, 99 (D.D.C. 2014) (saying request for expedited discovery came "well in advance of typical discovery" where it was filed while a motion to dismiss was pending (cleaned up)); Landwehr v. FDIC, 282 F.R.D. 1, 4 (D.D.C. 2010) (same); see also ECF No. 6 at 2 ("Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss[.]"). The Plaintiffs cite two cases to counter this conclusion. See ECF No. 3 at 8 (citing All. for Retired Ams. v. Bessent, No. 25-cv-313, 2025 WL 1114350, at *3-4 (D.D.C. Mar. 20, 2025); New Mexico v. Musk, 770 F. Supp. 3d 192, 196-97, 203 (D.D.C. 2025)). But the first case held that this factor was "ambivalent" despite the fact that the expedited discovery motion preceded any motion to dismiss only because the court had already "resolved threshold arguments about its subject-matter jurisdiction that arose during the [c]ourt's consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction." All. for Retired Ams., 2025 WL 1114350, at *4. And in the second case, "[t]he parties concede[d] that the fifth factor--whether discovery occurs in advance of the typical process--support[ed] Defendants." New Mexico, 770 F. Supp. 3d at 203.The Plaintiffs are free to seek emergency relief from the Court at any time. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 6/28/2025. (lcas)

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER: In light of the 6 Joint Status Report, the Court orders the Defendants to file their motion to dismiss by July 4, 2025. The Plaintiffs shall file their response by July 11, 2025, and the Defendants shall file any reply by July 18, 2025. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 6/28/2025. (lcas)

June 28, 2025

June 28, 2025

PACER
7

MOTION to Dismiss by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/04/2025)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 4, 2025

July 4, 2025

PACER
8

MOTION for Relief from Local Rule 7(n) re 7 MOTION to Dismiss by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/04/2025)

July 4, 2025

July 4, 2025

PACER
10

RESPONSE re 9 Emergency MOTION for Briefing Schedule filed by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/07/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 7, 2025

July 7, 2025

PACER
11

Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/07/2025)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

3 Exhibit

View on PACER

4 Exhibit

View on PACER

5 Exhibit

View on PACER

6 Exhibit

View on PACER

7 Exhibit

View on PACER

8 Exhibit

View on PACER

9 Exhibit

View on PACER

10 Exhibit

View on PACER

11 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 7, 2025

July 7, 2025

PACER
9

Emergency MOTION for Briefing Schedule by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a Briefing Schedule)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/07/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a Briefing Schedule

View on PACER

July 7, 2025

July 7, 2025

RECAP

Order on Motion for Briefing Schedule AND Set/Reset Deadlines AND Set/Reset Hearings

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting in part the Plaintiffs' 9 Emergency Motion for Briefing Schedule. Having considered the Defendants' 10 Response to the Plaintiffs' 9 Emergency Motion for Briefing Schedule, the Court ORDERS the Defendants to file their response to the 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by July 16, 2025, and the Plaintiffs to file their reply by July 21, 2025. The Court further directs the Parties to appear for oral argument on July 24, 2025, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 14 before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan. The Court's briefing schedule for the Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss remains unchanged. See Minute Order (June 28, 2025). Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 7/8/2025. (lcas)

July 8, 2025

July 8, 2025

PACER
12

Memorandum in opposition to re 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/11/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

View on PACER

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

PACER
13

Memorandum in opposition to re 8 MOTION for Relief from Local Rule 7(n) re 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Relief from Local Rule 7(n))(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/11/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Relief from Local Rul

View on PACER

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

PACER
14

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert William Hunter on behalf of NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL (Hunter, Robert) (Entered: 07/11/2025)

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

RECAP
15

RESPONSE re 11 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Kevin R. Cooke, Jr., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/16/2025)

1 Affidavit of Kevin R. Cooke, Jr.

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

PACER
16

REPLY to opposition to motion re 7 Motion to Dismiss filed by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/18/2025)

July 18, 2025

July 18, 2025

PACER
17

REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Motion for Relief from Rule 7(n) filed by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/18/2025)

July 18, 2025

July 18, 2025

PACER
18

REPLY to opposition to motion re 11 Motion for TRO, filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Second Declaration of Erin Kemple)(Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/21/2025)

July 21, 2025

July 21, 2025

PACER
19

ENTERED IN ERROR..... MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief by LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit [Proposed] Amicus Brief)(Hill, Brook) Modified on 7/22/2025; entered in error at the request of counsel (zdp). (Entered: 07/21/2025)

July 21, 2025

July 21, 2025

PACER
20

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief by LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, FRED FREIBERG. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit [Proposed] Amicus Brief)(Hill, Brook) Modified on 7/22/2025 to add party/ correct docket text(zjm). (Entered: 07/21/2025)

July 21, 2025

July 21, 2025

PACER

Motion Hearing AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for Motion Hearing held before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 7/24/2025. Oral arguments submitted on Plaintiffs' Motion 11 for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion taken under advisement; forthcoming Order. The Defendant is directed to file a Status Report by 12:00 pm on Friday, July 25, 2025. (lsj)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting the 20 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief. The Court will treat the motion's attachment, ECF No. 20-2, as the amicus brief. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 7/24/2025. (lcas)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER
21

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan held on July 24, 2025; Page Numbers: 1-84. Date of Issuance: July 25, 2025. Court Reporter/Transcriber Sonja L. Reeves, RDR, CRR, Telephone number (202) 354-3246, Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 8/15/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/25/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/23/2025.(Reeves, Sonja) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

July 25, 2025

July 25, 2025

PACER
22

STATUS REPORT Pursuant to the Court's July 24, 2025 Minute Order by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

July 25, 2025

July 25, 2025

PACER
23

RESPONSE re 22 Status Report filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

July 25, 2025

July 25, 2025

PACER
24

MEMORANDUM OPINION re the Plaintiffs' 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See the attached document for details. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 7/28/2025. (lcas)

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

RECAP
25

ORDER granting in part the Plaintiffs' 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See the 24 Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 7/28/2025. (lcas) (Entered: 07/28/2025)

July 28, 2025

July 28, 2025

RECAP
26

Joint STATUS REPORT Pursuant to the July 28, 2025 Memorandum Opinion and Order, ECF No. 25, by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 07/29/2025)

July 29, 2025

July 29, 2025

RECAP
27

STATUS REPORT by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Miller, Lila) (Entered: 07/30/2025)

July 30, 2025

July 30, 2025

PACER
28

STATUS REPORT by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

Aug. 1, 2025

Aug. 1, 2025

PACER
29

STATUS REPORT by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 08/04/2025)

Aug. 4, 2025

Aug. 4, 2025

RECAP
30

RESPONSE re 29 Status Report filed by NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, TENNESSEE FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL. (Miller, Lila) (Entered: 08/06/2025)

Aug. 6, 2025

Aug. 6, 2025

RECAP
31

MOTION for Leave to Appear by Telephone or Video for August 11, 2025 Status Conference by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 08/07/2025)

Aug. 7, 2025

Aug. 7, 2025

RECAP

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Hearings

Aug. 7, 2025

Aug. 7, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Defendants' 29 Status Report and the Plaintiffs' 30 Response, the Court directs the Parties to appear for a status conference on August 11, 2025, at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 14 before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/7/25. (lcdl)

Aug. 7, 2025

Aug. 7, 2025

PACER

.Order

Aug. 8, 2025

Aug. 8, 2025

PACER

MINUTE ORDER granting the Defendants' 31 Motion to Appear via Videoconference. The Defendants' counsel may appear at the hearing set for Monday, August 11, 2025, via Zoom. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/8/2025. (lcdl)

Aug. 8, 2025

Aug. 8, 2025

PACER
32

STATUS REPORT by SCOTT TURNER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. (Gonzalez, Heidy) (Entered: 08/11/2025)

Aug. 11, 2025

Aug. 11, 2025

RECAP
33

ORDER: In light of the Parties' 26 Joint Status Report and the hearing held on August 11, 2025, the Court grants in part preliminary injunctive relief to the Plaintiffs. See the attached document for details. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/11/2025. (lcas) (Entered: 08/11/2025)

Aug. 11, 2025

Aug. 11, 2025

RECAP

Status Conference

Aug. 11, 2025

Aug. 11, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for hybrid Status Conference held before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/11/2025. Forthcoming Order. (Court Reporter: Elizabeth Davila) (lsj)

Aug. 11, 2025

Aug. 11, 2025

PACER
34

Notice (Other)

Aug. 12, 2025

Aug. 12, 2025

RECAP
35

Transcript

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

PACER

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Hearings

Aug. 13, 2025

Aug. 13, 2025

PACER
36

Status Report

Aug. 18, 2025

Aug. 18, 2025

PACER
37

Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney

Aug. 20, 2025

Aug. 20, 2025

PACER
38

Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant

Aug. 20, 2025

Aug. 20, 2025

PACER
39

Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant

Aug. 20, 2025

Aug. 20, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Public Housing

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Spending Freezes/Cuts)

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Grant/Contract rescissions, Defunding or Other Threats against Private Entities )

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 24, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs are two fair housing non-profits seeking to certify a a class consisting of all other fair housing organizations who received multi-year Private Enforcement Initiative (PEI) awards in 2023 or 2024 but who have been unable to negotiate their second or third years with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Attorney Organizations:

Relman, Dane & Colfax

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (- United States (national) -), Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General/Misc.:

Funding

Government services

Housing assistance