Case: United States. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Robert Luna

2:25-cv-09323 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 30, 2025, the United States filed a civil rights complaint against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Robert Luna in his official capacity, alleging systematic deprivation of Second Amendment rights through deliberate delays in processing concealed carry license applications. On March 27, 2025, pursuant to its authority under 34 U.S.C. § 12601, the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced a pattern or practice investigation into the Los Angeles C…

On September 30, 2025, the United States filed a civil rights complaint against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Robert Luna in his official capacity, alleging systematic deprivation of Second Amendment rights through deliberate delays in processing concealed carry license applications.

On March 27, 2025, pursuant to its authority under 34 U.S.C. § 12601, the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced a pattern or practice investigation into the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to determine "whether it is engaging in a pattern or practice of depriving ordinary, law-abiding Californians of their Second Amendment rights." The Department stated on its website that it intended to examine potential infringements on the Second Amendment by LASD, primarily regarding delays or other burdens in acquiring concealed handgun licenses.

The investigation was opened in the wake of California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, a civil rights suit filed in 2023 by the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), Second Amendment advocates who claimed they were made to wait up to eighteen months for decisions on concealed carry permits within L.A. County. Read more about that case here. Ruling for the plaintiffs, Judge Sherilyn P. Garnett concluded it was likely that at least two of the individuals represented had their Second Amendment rights violated by like denials or delays. Following this suit, and in light of continued delays regarding CCW decisions, the CRPA sent this open letter to the LA Sheriff's Office demanding that all resources necessary be diverted to mitigating wait times. The results of this suit, as well as the office's continued noncompliance, reportedly attracted the attention of the Trump administration, bringing about the investigation.

The complaint alleges that between January 2024 and March 2025, LASD received 3,982 applications for new concealed carry licenses but approved only two—a 0.05% approval rate. The Department charges that applicants face an average wait of 281 days before LASD takes any action on their applications, with a median delay of 372 days and some applicants waiting up to 1,030 days (nearly three years). These delays far exceed California's statutory requirement that licensing authorities provide initial determinations within 90 days. As of May 2025, approximately 2,768 applications remained pending, with interviews scheduled as late as November 2026. An additional 1,210 applicants withdrew their applications, often after waiting months without progress. The United States contends that this constitutes a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives law-abiding individuals of their Second Amendment rights as incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment, in violation of 34 U.S.C. § 12601. The government seeks declaratory relief establishing that defendants' delays and approval practices violate the Second Amendment, as well as a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from implementing California's concealed carry licensing regime in a manner that violates constitutional protections.

 

Summary Authors

Ben Hefter (7/29/2025)

Jack Buckfire (12/1/2025)

Related Cases

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Central District of California (2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71497550/parties/united-states-v-los-angeles-county-sheriffs-department/


Judge(s)

Scarsi, Mark Christopher (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hamill, Julie Ann (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

U.S. Department of Justice Announces Second Amendment Pattern-orPractice Investigation into California’s Los Angeles County

DOJ Pattern or Practice Investigation of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department

No Court

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

Press Release
1

2:25-cv-09323

Complaint

United States of America v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Complaint
3

2:25-cv-09323

Notice of Related Cases

United States of America v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
2

2:25-cv-09323

Civil Cover Sheet

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Other
7

2:25-cv-09323

Order Re Transfer (Related Cases)

Oct. 17, 2025

Oct. 17, 2025

Order/Opinion
13

Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only

Nov. 18, 2025

Nov. 18, 2025

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71497550/united-states-v-los-angeles-county-sheriffs-department/

Last updated Dec. 3, 2025, 12:29 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attorney Julie Ann Hamill added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Clearinghouse
3

NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff United States of America. Related Case(s): 2:23-cv-10169-SPG-ADS (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

Sept. 30, 2025

Sept. 30, 2025

Clearinghouse
4

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2025)

Oct. 8, 2025

Oct. 8, 2025

5

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2025)

Oct. 8, 2025

Oct. 8, 2025

6

Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2025)

Oct. 8, 2025

Oct. 8, 2025

7

ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:23-cv-10169-SPG-ADSx. Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver and Judge Mark C. Scarsi to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:25-cv-09323-SPG-ADSx. Signed by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (aco) (Entered: 10/17/2025)

Oct. 17, 2025

Oct. 17, 2025

Clearinghouse
8

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

Oct. 27, 2025

Oct. 27, 2025

RECAP
9

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 10/27/2025)

Oct. 27, 2025

Oct. 27, 2025

RECAP
10

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request 8, 9 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s) initials are missing. The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached."Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (iv) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

Oct. 28, 2025

Oct. 28, 2025

RECAP
11

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff United States of America. upon Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/28/2025, answer due 12/29/2025. Waiver of Service signed by Ryan Chabot. (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

Nov. 3, 2025

Nov. 3, 2025

12

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff United States of America. upon Robert Luna waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/28/2025, answer due 12/29/2025. Waiver of Service signed by Ryan Chabot. (Hamill, Julie) (Entered: 11/03/2025)

Nov. 3, 2025

Nov. 3, 2025

13

STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) (Entered: 11/18/2025)

Nov. 18, 2025

Nov. 18, 2025

RECAP
14

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Andrew Michael Darlington counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Adding Andrew Darlington as counsel of record for United States of America for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attorney Andrew Michael Darlington added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Darlington, Andrew) (Entered: 11/22/2025)

Nov. 22, 2025

Nov. 22, 2025

RECAP
15

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney William Joseph Hanrahan counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Adding William J. Hanrahan as counsel of record for United States of America for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attorney William Joseph Hanrahan added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Hanrahan, William) (Entered: 11/24/2025)

Nov. 24, 2025

Nov. 24, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Policing

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations By the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

United States Department of Justice (Civil Rights Division)

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (Los Angeles), County

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act, 34 U.S.C. § 12601 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 14141)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Second Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 2:25-cv-09323

Special Case Type(s):

Out-of-court

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Pattern or Practice

Wait lists