Filed Date: July 21, 2025
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding complete
The plaintiffs in this case are three Cuban nationals who were apprehended while entering the United States and processed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Under Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the plaintiffs were subject to mandatory detention until the conclusion of their removal proceedings. The plaintiffs allege that ICE unlawfully deviated from this mandatory detention scheme and released them under an improper classification that denied them parolee status. This misclassification excluded the plaintiffs from eligibility for immigration benefits, including adjustment of status under the Cuban Adjustment Act (CAA). The plaintiffs further allege that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) refused to adjudicate their adjustment of status applications due to ICE’s misrepresentation of their legal custody status.
The plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its Secretary; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); the President of the United States; and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO). The complaint raised the following claims:
The plaintiffs sought a declaration that their classification via I-220A documentation is unlawful, an injunction preventing ICE from systematically misrepresenting their immigration status, and a permanent injunction barring the defendants from re-detaining them based on their current immigration status. They also request that their right to seek lawful permanent residency under the CAA be preserved.
On July 21, the plaintiffs moved for preliminary relief, asking the court to "prevent defendants from continuing unlawful enforcement actions... based on misclassified or manipulated immigration records." The court delayed ruling on the motion and ordered the defendants to combine their pending motion to dismiss with their opposition to the plaintiffs’ request for emergency relief.
This case is ongoing.
Summary Authors
Jinan Abufarha (8/6/2025)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70870317/parties/hernandez-v-noem/
HERNANDEZ, DANIS ELY (District of Columbia)
HERNANDEZ, TONY HOYOS (District of Columbia)
LEYVA, GREICEL AVILA (District of Columbia)
Hudak, Brian P. (District of Columbia)
Valdivia, Diana Viggiano (District of Columbia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70870317/hernandez-v-noem/
Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, noon
State / Territory: District of Columbia
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government
Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Immigration Enforcement)
Key Dates
Filing Date: July 21, 2025
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Three Cuban nationals who were apprehended near the border filed this suit.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: Yes
Class Action Sought: Yes
Class Action Outcome: Pending
Defendants
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (- United States (national) -), Federal
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (- United States (national) -), Federal
United States (- United States (national) -), Federal
Enforcement and Removal Operations (- United States (national) -), Federal
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Constitutional Clause(s):
Due Process: Procedural Due Process
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: None Yet / None
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Issues
Immigration/Border: