Case: United States v. City of New York

1:25-cv-04084 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: July 24, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about New York City’s alleged obstruction of federal immigration enforcement through its sanctuary city policies. On July 24, 2025, the United States filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The United States sued the City of New York and its Mayor; the New York City Council and its Speaker; the New York City Department of Correction and its Commissioner; the New York City Department of Probation and its Commissioner; and the New York City…

This case is about New York City’s alleged obstruction of federal immigration enforcement through its sanctuary city policies. On July 24, 2025, the United States filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The United States sued the City of New York and its Mayor; the New York City Council and its Speaker; the New York City Department of Correction and its Commissioner; the New York City Department of Probation and its Commissioner; and the New York City Police Department and its Commissioner under the Supremacy Clause. Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr. was assigned to the case. 

Represented by government counsel, the United States sought declaratory and injunctive relief to bar the City from enforcing specific provisions that restricted cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including New York City Administrative Code §§ 9-131, 9-205, 14-154, 10-178, and NYPD Operations Order No. 4.

Plaintiffs claimed that these policies obstructed federal efforts to detain individuals unlawfully present in the country, leading to numerous criminals being released who should have been held for immigration removal. They alleged that a national emergency existed due to unlawful entry and that sanctuary cities created safe havens with dangerous consequences, citing incidents involving violence against federal officers. Plaintiffs argued that the restrictions interfered with the federal government’s exclusive authority to enforce immigration law, citing the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Laken Riley Act, which permit DHS to issue immigration detainers and prohibit state and local entities from restricting communication with DHS regarding an individual's immigration status. Plaintiffs also alleged that New York City's provisions discriminated against the federal government by singling out federal immigration authorities for disfavored treatment.

This case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Victoria Tan (7/31/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70906146/parties/united-states-v-city-of-new-york/


Judge(s)

Reyes, Ramon E. (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Perez, Elianis N (New York)

Reno, Catherine (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Selvin, Karen B. (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-04084

Complaint

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70906146/united-states-v-city-of-new-york/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 11:55 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against Adrienne E. Adams, Eric L. Adams, City of New York, Juanita N. Holmes, Lynelle Maginley-Liddie, New York City Council, New York City Department of Correction, New York City Department of Probation, New York City Police Department, Jessica S Tisch Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit A: Letter from David M. Carr, Council Member, et al., to Attorney General Pamela Bondi (May 7, 2025), # 4 Exhibit Exhibit B: Statistics and Compliance, ICE Reports, NYC Dept. of Correction, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit C: Stats, Civil Immigration Detainers, NYPD, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit D: ICE Administrative Arrest Statistics, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit E: Rep. of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration, Nov. 2, 2011, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit F: Report of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration, Feb. 26, 2013, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit G: Report of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration, Oct. 20, 2014, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H: NYPD Operations Order 4) (Reno, Catherine) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Proposed Summons

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Exhibit A: Letter from David M. Carr, Council Member, et al., to Attorne

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit Exhibit B: Statistics and Compliance, ICE Reports, NYC Dept. of Correcti

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Exhibit C: Stats, Civil Immigration Detainers, NYPD

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit Exhibit D: ICE Administrative Arrest Statistics

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Exhibit E: Rep. of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration,

View on PACER

8 Exhibit Exhibit F: Report of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Exhibit G: Report of the Governmental Affairs Div., Comm. on Immigration

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Exhibit H: NYPD Operations Order 4

View on RECAP

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

Proposed Summons. by United States of America (Reno, Catherine) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER
3

Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (CV) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER
4

Summons Issued as to Adrienne E. Adams, Eric L. Adams, City of New York, Juanita N. Holmes, Lynelle Maginley-Liddie, New York City Council, New York City Department of Correction, New York City Department of Probation, New York City Police Department, Jessica S Tisch. (CV) (Main Document 4 replaced on 7/24/2025) (CV). (Entered: 07/24/2025)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER
5

This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CV) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

RECAP
6

NOTICE of Appearance by Elianis N Perez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Perez, Elianis) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

RECAP

NOTICE: INCOMPLETE INITIAL CASE OPENING DOCUMENT SUBMISSION. Please file the Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Proposed Summons and pay the Civil Filing Fee for the following case so that it may be processed. Initial Case Opening Documents Should be Filed at The Time a Case Number is generated! (CV)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV)

July 24, 2025

July 24, 2025

PACER
7

SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held in this case on November 13, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By November 7, 2025, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan. Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendants are aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 7/25/2025. (RO) (Entered: 07/25/2025)

July 25, 2025

July 25, 2025

RECAP
8

NOTICE of Appearance by Karen B. Selvin on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Selvin, Karen) (Entered: 08/07/2025)

Aug. 7, 2025

Aug. 7, 2025

PACER
9

SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Adrienne E. Adams served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025; Eric L. Adams served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025; City of New York served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025; Juanita N. Holmes served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025; Lynelle Maginley-Liddie served on 7/31/2025, answer due 8/21/2025; New York City Council served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025; New York City Department of Correction served on 7/31/2025, answer due 8/21/2025; New York City Department of Probation served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025; New York City Police Department served on 8/1/2025, answer due 8/22/2025; Jessica S Tisch served on 8/1/2025, answer due 8/22/2025. (Reno, Catherine) (Entered: 08/08/2025)

Aug. 8, 2025

Aug. 8, 2025

RECAP
10

Extension of Time to File Answer

Aug. 14, 2025

Aug. 14, 2025

RECAP

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

Aug. 15, 2025

Aug. 15, 2025

PACER

Case Details