Case: Z. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

1:26-cv-01510 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 30, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) Filed on April 30, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, this putative class action was brought by six detained noncitizens against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and their respective agency heads. The named plaintiffs each had pending immigration relief applications within USCIS's exclusive or initia…

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.)

Filed on April 30, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, this putative class action was brought by six detained noncitizens against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and their respective agency heads.

The named plaintiffs each had pending immigration relief applications within USCIS's exclusive or initial jurisdiction, including Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS), T and U Visas, asylum-based petitions, and adjustment of status claims. On December 5, 2025, DHS announced it would no longer collect biometric information from detained noncitizens with pending USCIS benefit requests, ending a prior intradepartmental agreement under which ICE had collected such biometrics on USCIS's behalf. Because biometrics submission is a required step in USCIS applications, and because detained individuals cannot attend outside biometrics appointments while USCIS refuses to reschedule them on account of detention, plaintiffs alleged that the policy created a jurisdictional trap resulting in the denial or abandonment of their applications — a consequence each named plaintiff had already experienced or was facing imminently.

The complaint asserted five causes of action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause, alleging that the Biometrics Policy was contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious, issued without required notice-and-comment rulemaking, and deprived class members of liberty and property interests without due process. Plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, a stay and vacatur of the policy, injunctive relief compelling biometrics collection, class certification, and attorneys' fees.

This case is ongoing.

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73277892/parties/z-v-united-states-department-of-homeland-security/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Caldarone, Richard P. (District of Columbia)

Georgevich, Mary (District of Columbia)

Goldstein, Elena (District of Columbia)

Swift, Alethea Anne (District of Columbia)

Wolfson, Paul R.Q. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:26-cv-01510

Complaint

April 30, 2026

April 30, 2026

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73277892/z-v-united-states-department-of-homeland-security/

Last updated May 7, 2026, 4:47 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12393997) filed by Luis Felipe Estrada Trejo, Y. P., R. M., M. C., J. Z., H. A.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons)(Goldstein, Elena) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

6 Summons

View on PACER

7 Summons

View on PACER

8 Summons

View on PACER

9 Summons

View on PACER

April 30, 2026

April 30, 2026

Clearinghouse
2

SEALED MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by H. A., M. C., R. M., Y. P., J. Z. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration J.Z., # 2 Declaration R.M., # 3 Declaration Y.P., # 4 Declaration M.C., # 5 Declaration H.A., # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldstein, Elena) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

April 30, 2026

April 30, 2026

3

NOTICE of Appearance by Richard P. Caldarone on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Caldarone, Richard) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

May 1, 2026

May 1, 2026

4

NOTICE of Appearance by Keren Hart Zwick on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Zwick, Keren) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

May 1, 2026

May 1, 2026

5

NOTICE of Appearance by Alethea Anne Swift on behalf of H. A., M. C., LUIS FELIPE ESTRADA TREJO, R. M., Y. P., J. Z. (Swift, Alethea) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

May 1, 2026

May 1, 2026

6

NOTICE of Appearance- Pro Bono by Mary Georgevich on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Georgevich, Mary) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

May 1, 2026

May 1, 2026

7

NOTICE of Appearance by Paul R.Q. Wolfson on behalf of H. A., M. C., LUIS FELIPE ESTRADA TREJO, R. M., Y. P., J. Z. (Wolfson, Paul) (Entered: 05/01/2026)

May 1, 2026

May 1, 2026

8

Notice of Appearance

May 4, 2026

May 4, 2026

9

Appear Pro Hac Vice

May 6, 2026

May 6, 2026

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 30, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-01510

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Recommended Citation