Case: Patchette v. Nix

4:90-cv-80230 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Filed Date: April 24, 1990

Closed Date: 1991

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On October 11, 1989, prisoners from the Iowa State Penitentiary in Fort Madison, Iowa filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the Iowa State Penitentiary's Warden and the Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The plaintiffs, represented by court-appointed counsel, alleged that prison overcrowding produced conditions that made incarceration cruel and unusual punishment and that new visitation policies and pract…

On October 11, 1989, prisoners from the Iowa State Penitentiary in Fort Madison, Iowa filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the Iowa State Penitentiary's Warden and the Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The plaintiffs, represented by court-appointed counsel, alleged that prison overcrowding produced conditions that made incarceration cruel and unusual punishment and that new visitation policies and practices violated the inmates' liberty interest in visitation.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (Judge Charles R. Wolle) refused the plaintiff's request for a Temporary Restraining Order on October 11, 1989. On April 24, 1990, the court held that the change in visitation hours violated due process by limiting rather than applying inmates' rights, but declined to conclude that overcrowded conditions violated the Eighth Amendment. Both parties appealed.

On November 29, 1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Judge Howard F. Sachs) affirmed the lower court's ruling. Pachette v. Nix, 952 F.2d 158 (8th Cir. 1991). The Eighth Circuit held that the Iowa Administrative Code 21.5(1) created a liberty interest in visitation by mandating specific visiting hours, which the prison violated by reducing visitation hours to cope with volitional overcrowding. In addition, the court found that there was insufficient evidence to show that overcrowding endangered prison security or led to inadequate food, medical care, and sanitation. The court noted that a 50% shortage of toilets might be considered cruel and unusual punishment if corrective action was not already planned.

We do not have the pleadings or any information on subsequent proceedings.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Chilcoat (6/1/2006)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9442803/parties/patchette-v-nix/


Judge(s)

Bowman, Pasco Middleton II (Missouri)

Gibson, John R. (Missouri)

Attorney for Defendant

Achen, Susan M. (Iowa)

Allen, Gordon E. (Iowa)

Hill, William A. (Iowa)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:90-cv-80230

Docket (PACER)

April 27, 1992

April 27, 1992

Docket

4:89-cv-80656

Docket (PACER)

June 1, 1993

June 1, 1993

Docket

90-01853

90-01868

Reported Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Nov. 29, 1991

Nov. 29, 1991

Order/Opinion

952 F.2d 158

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9442803/patchette-v-nix/

Last updated Nov. 3, 2026, 7:52 a.m.

Docket for: Patchette v. Nix
ECF Number Date Description Link
3 Oct. 11, 1989

MOTION by plaintiff William Leroy Patchette, plaintiff Wayne Pickerell, plaintiff Frank Longstreet, plaintiff Don Steel, plaintiff Steve Kick, plaintiff Richard Taylor to proceed in forma pauperis before Honorable Charles R. Wolle (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
7 Oct. 26, 1989

INITIAL REVIEW ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis before Honorable Charles R. Wolle [3-1] Request for TRO denied (cc: all counsel) (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
20 Dec. 5, 1989

ANSWER by defendant Crispus C. Nix, defendant Paul W Grossheim re: complaint [2-1] (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
Feb. 13, 1990

TRANSCRIPT filed of Hrng. held 11/17/89 @ ISP (rh) (Entered: 05/23/1996)

PACER
1 April 24, 1990

INITIAL REVIEW ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle; permission to proceed in forma pauperis granted; service of process to issue; motion for appointment of counsel denied. (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
2 April 24, 1990

COMPLAINT (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
61 April 24, 1990

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: AND DECREE DISMISSING IN PART GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF by Honorable Charles R. Wolle (cc: all counsel) OJ (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
8 May 17, 1990

ANSWER by defendant Crispus C. Nix, defendant Paul Grossheim, defendant Paul Hedgepeth re: complaint [2-1] (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
73 May 22, 1990

NOTICE OF APPEAL by plaintiff William Leroy Patchette, plaintiff Wayne Pickerell, plaintiff Frank Longstreet, plaintiff Don Steel, plaintiff Steve Kick, plaintiff Richard Taylor from Dist. Court decision [61-1] (cc: all counsel) (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
74 May 23, 1990

NOTICE OF APPEAL by defendant Crispus C. Nix, defendant Paul W Grossheim of final order dated 5/16/90 from Dist. Court decision [61-1] (cc: all counsel) (sm) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

PACER
29 July 30, 1990

CLERK'S COURT MINUTES: on hearing on preliminary injunction held 7/26/90 at Fort Madison. courtroom clerk: none; court reporter: none; (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
31 Aug. 3, 1990

AMENDED and substituted petition [2-1] by plaintiff (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
34 Sept. 26, 1990

ANSWER by defendant re: complaint [31-1] (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
36 Feb. 27, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle ; Status report ddl 3/27/91 (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 02/27/1991)

RECAP
37 March 28, 1991

STATUS REPORT by defendant Crispus C. Nix, defendant Paul Grossheim, defendant Paul Hedgepeth (sd) (Entered: 04/01/1991)

RECAP
38 April 3, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle ; Trial 2:00 p.m. 5/29/91 at Ft. Madison before Judge Wolle (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 04/03/1991)

RECAP
39 April 19, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle ; Trial continued, ; Status report ddl 4/29/91 setting forth the expected length of trial, the witnesses, and the dates the parties will be available for trial (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

RECAP
40 April 24, 1991

STATUS REPORT by defendant Paul Hedgepeth, defendant Paul Grossheim, defendant Crispus C. Nix (sd) (Entered: 04/25/1991)

RECAP
41 April 29, 1991

NOTICE by plaintiff Jeffery S Riggen of change of address (sd) (Entered: 04/29/1991)

RECAP
42 June 4, 1991

NOTICE by plaintiff William Leroy Patchette of change of address with statement of case and witness list (sd) (Entered: 06/05/1991)

RECAP
43 June 14, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle ; Trial Ft. Madison on 7/19/91 at 3:00 (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 06/14/1991)

RECAP
44 July 22, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle ; Brief ddl 7/29/91 for post-trial briefs, ; Trial held 7/19/91 (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 07/23/1991)

RECAP
45 July 30, 1991

POST TRIAL briefs submitted by defendant Paul Hedgepeth, defendant Paul Grossheim, defendant Crispus C. Nix (sm) (Entered: 07/30/1991)

RECAP
46 July 30, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff Brian S Eckley, plaintiff James D Hester, plaintiff Jeffery S Riggen, plaintiff Johnny P Briones, plaintiff William Leroy Patchette to extend to file a post-trial brief before Honorable Charles R. Wolle (sm) (Entered: 07/30/1991)

RECAP
47 July 31, 1991

ORDER by Honorable Charles R. Wolle granting motion to extend to file a post-trial brief to and including 8/14/91 [46-1] (cc: all counsel) (sd) (Entered: 08/01/1991)

RECAP
48 Aug. 15, 1991

BRIEF FILED by plaintiff (gk) (Entered: 08/15/1991)

RECAP
49 Sept. 11, 1991

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: by Honorable Charles R. Wolle re [2-1], re [31-1] (cc: all counsel) OJ 199-86 (gk) (Entered: 09/13/1991)

RECAP
50 Sept. 11, 1991

JUDGMENT: The plaintiffs have not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that they are entitled to any relief form the defendants. Judgment is in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. This action is dismissed with prejudice. signed by G.kampling, Deputy Clerk re [49-1] dismissing case (cc: all counsel) OJ 199-50 (gk) (Entered: 09/13/1991)

RECAP
75 Nov. 20, 1991

NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 90- 1868SI (sm) (Entered: 11/20/1991)

PACER
76 Nov. 20, 1991

NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 90- 1853SIDM (sm) (Entered: 11/20/1991)

PACER
Dec. 2, 1991

REMARK - Courtesy copy of Opinion affirmining district court's decision. (sm) (Entered: 12/03/1991)

PACER
77 Jan. 15, 1992

MANDATE from Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the decision of the District Court [74-1] affirming the decision of the District Court [73-1] (sm) (Entered: 01/15/1992)

PACER
Jan. 15, 1992

REMARK - 5 volumes of transcripts returned. (sm) (Entered: 01/15/1992)

PACER
April 27, 1992

REMARK -- after the proper notification and time passed, the exhibits in this case have been disposed. (rh)

78 June 1, 1993

COPY of Appellate Court Order: 50% of the transcript cost be assessed against defendants. (gk) (Entered: 06/01/1993)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Iowa

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 24, 1990

Closing Date: 1991

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Prisoners contending that they had liberty interest in existing visitation regulations and that changing those regulations and overcrowding prison conditions violated their constitutional rights

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

State

Iowa Department of Corrections

Iowa State Penitentiary

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Iowa 4:90-cv-80230

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 90-01853

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 90-01868

Southern District of Iowa 4:89-cv-80656

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Sanitation / living conditions

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Visiting

Recommended Citation