Case: Logan v. Shealy

1:80-cv-00210 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: March 4, 1980

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

None

People

Judge(s)

Haynsworth, Clement Furman Jr. (South Carolina)

Lewis, Oren Ritter (Virginia)

Phillips, James Dickson Jr. (North Carolina)

Rehnquist, William Hubbs (District of Columbia)

Winter, Harrison Lee (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Ahern, Albert J. (Virginia)

Dolan, William D. III (Virginia)

Guidoboni, Thomas A. (Virginia)

Hilton, Claude M. (Virginia)

Tonnessen, Peter T. (Virginia)

Judge(s)

Haynsworth, Clement Furman Jr. (South Carolina)

Lewis, Oren Ritter (Virginia)

Phillips, James Dickson Jr. (North Carolina)

Rehnquist, William Hubbs (District of Columbia)

Winter, Harrison Lee (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Ahern, Albert J. (Virginia)

Dolan, William D. III (Virginia)

Guidoboni, Thomas A. (Virginia)

Hilton, Claude M. (Virginia)

Tonnessen, Peter T. (Virginia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Emrich, Jerry K. (Virginia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:80-cv-00210

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Logan v. Shealy, et al.

Sept. 30, 1980

Sept. 30, 1980

Order/Opinion

80-01815

Opinion

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Oct. 7, 1981

Oct. 7, 1981

Order/Opinion

81-00480

Opinion [Granting Temporary Stay]

Clements v. Logan

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 1981

Dec. 9, 1981

Order/Opinion

81-01042

Opinion [Vacating Stay of 12/09/1981)

Clements v. Logan

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 9, 1981

Dec. 9, 1981

Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated Aug. 28, 2022, 3:19 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Virginia

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 4, 1980

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff was arrested for driving while intoxicated, and she refused to take a breathalyzer test. She was later strip-searched at the Alrington County sheriff's office and allegedly not allowed to speak with an attorney.

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Arlington County (Arlington), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Unreasonable search and seizure

Availably Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Unknown

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Unknown

Issues

General:

Search policies

Strip search policy

Affected Gender:

Female

Type of Facility:

Government-run