Case: Moser v. Anderson

1:93-cv-00634 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire

Filed Date: Dec. 3, 1993

Closed Date: Oct. 16, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1993, Plaintiff, represented by several private attorneys, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, challenging the strip search policies in effect in the jails of Merrimack County, Carroll County, and Strafford County, New Hampshire. Plaintiff claimed that the challenged policies, which required that all inmates be strip searched upon admission to jail, were unconstitutional. Plaintiff requested class certification in addi…

In 1993, Plaintiff, represented by several private attorneys, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, challenging the strip search policies in effect in the jails of Merrimack County, Carroll County, and Strafford County, New Hampshire. Plaintiff claimed that the challenged policies, which required that all inmates be strip searched upon admission to jail, were unconstitutional. Plaintiff requested class certification in addition to other relief.

Our information on this case is limited to the PACER docket and one published opinion. We do not have copies of pleadings filed with the Court.

According to the docket, the District Court (Judge Paul J. Barbadoro) certified the case as a class action on September 30, 1996. The parameters of the class were not set out in the docket entries. A discovery schedule was set and it appears that the Court ordered that the case proceed in phases, with Phase I presumably dealing with liability issues.

Strafford County moved for summary judgment, which the Court denied, finding that the County's blanket policy of strip searching all inmates upon admission to the jails was unconstitutional. Moser v. Anderson, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22637 (D.N.H. Nov. 25, 1996). The remaining Phase I issues were resolved on April 10, 1998 when Judge Barbadoro granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs.

Settlement negotiations ensued, with the parties agreeing to mediation. The case was ultimately settled and the settlement was preliminarily approved by the court on August 20, 1999. Judge Barbadoro issued a final order approving the settlement on January 14, 2000. The precise settlement terms are not apparent from the docket, but news accounts reported that the case settled for $3 million. Claims were paid on an agreed point system. It was estimated that there were 2,000 class members, 356 of whom made claims for a participation rate of 17.8%. The Court also awarded 33.3% of the settlement fund for attorney's fees, litigation costs, and claims administration expenses.

A final report on settlement administration was filed in April 2000 and the case was then closed.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (2/23/2008)

People


Judge(s)

Barbadoro, Paul J. (New Hampshire)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Barron, Bruce E. (New Hampshire)

Bigg, Dort S. (New Hampshire)

Hamilton, Joseph L. (New Hampshire)

Attorney for Defendant

Gardner, Donald E. (New Hampshire)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:93-cv-00634

Docket (PACER)

Oct. 16, 2001

Oct. 16, 2001

Docket
94

1:93-cv-00634

Order [Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment]

Nov. 25, 1996

Nov. 25, 1996

Order/Opinion

1996 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 22637

Docket

Last updated Dec. 19, 2024, 11:35 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: New Hampshire

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 3, 1993

Closing Date: Oct. 16, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons subjected to the strip-search policies of the strip search policies of jails operated by Merrimack County, Carroll County and Strafford County, New Hampshire.

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Merrimack County (Merrimack), County

Carroll County (Carroll), County

Strafford County (Strafford), County

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Unreasonable search and seizure

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Search policies

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Strip search policy (facilities)