Case: Maneely v. City of Newburgh

7:01-cv-02600 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: March 27, 2001

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 27, 2001, several arrestees, represented by private counsel, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the City of Newburgh's blanket policy of strip searching all individuals who entered the City Jail, regardless of the crime for which they were charged and despite the absence of reasonable suspicion to believe that the individuals were concealing weapons or contraband. Plaintiffs alleged that the polic…

On March 27, 2001, several arrestees, represented by private counsel, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the City of Newburgh's blanket policy of strip searching all individuals who entered the City Jail, regardless of the crime for which they were charged and despite the absence of reasonable suspicion to believe that the individuals were concealing weapons or contraband. Plaintiffs alleged that the policy violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and sought a preliminary and permanent injunction, monetary damages, and class certification.

Plaintiff moved simultaneously for class certification and summary judgment. In response, Defendants requested that the court defer issuing a ruling on the question of liability until the class certification issue was resolved. The District Court (Judge Colleen McMahon) agreed to defer the liability issue, but granted class certification on the limited issue of whether Defendants maintained an unconstitutional strip search policy. Maneely v. City of Newburgh, 208 F.R.D. 69 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).

By order dated April 8, 2003, Judge McMahon denied Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, finding that (a) the City's written strip search policy was not unconstitutional on its face and that (b) fact issues existed as to whether the City had a policy of strip searching pre-arraignment detainees without determining whether reasonable suspicion existed to do so. Maneely v. City of Newburgh, 256 F.Supp.2d 204 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

On December 22, 2003, the City of Newburgh filed a third-party complaint against its insurance carrier, United National Insurance, seeking declaratory judgment that the carrier would be responsible for covering any damages paid in the lawsuit.

The case was subsequently referred to mediation, and settlement negotiations ensued. The parties eventually entered into a proposed Settlement Agreement to resolve both the class action lawsuit against the City and the third-party complaint against the City's insurance carrier. The District Court (Judge Charles L. Brieant) preliminarily approved the settlement on March 29, 2005 and granted final approval on July 21, 2005.

Under the Agreement, the City agreed to pay up to $1,783,670.20 to settle all class claims. Of that amount, the Court awarded $550,000 (30.84%) as attorneys' fees and $33,670.20 (1.88%) for litigation costs. The Court also approved an incentive bonus of $25,000 to the class representative. After deducting attorneys' fees, litigation costs, and the incentive bonus, up to $1.2 million would remain for distribution to class members. The City also agreed to pay $324,000 for the costs of claims administration. The Agreement provided that each class member would receive $1,000 regardless of the number of strip searches they claimed to have been subjected to. If less than 1,200 claims were made, the remainder was to revert back to the City. If more than 1,200 claims were made, the $1,000 award would be reduced on a pro rata basis.

On September 6, 2005, the City of Newburgh secured voluntary dismissal (with prejudice) of its third-party complaint against United National Insurance Company. It is unknown whether the insurance carrier funded all or part of the settlement.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (2/26/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6248571/parties/maneely-v-the-city-of-newburgh/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Acevedo, Michael (New York)

Aristotelidis, George W (New York)

Ayala, Alvar (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Matthew B. (New York)

Badura, William S. (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Acevedo, Michael (New York)

Aristotelidis, George W (New York)

Ayala, Alvar (New York)

Barnum, Nicole Christine (New York)

Barrios, Dawn M. (New York)

Bonner, Adam Cabral (New York)

Bonner, Charles A. (New York)

Borrello, Robert John (New York)

Bridge, Matthew (New York)

Brooks, Molly A. (New York)

Dinan, Christine Tschiderer (New York)

Edwards, John Reid (New York)

Edwards, Catharine Elizabeth (New York)

Einhorn, Robert Mitchell (New York)

Friedman, Howard (New York)

Garner, Paul C. (New York)

Gaskin, Jenee (New York)

Glassroth, Drew H. (New York)

Hall, Eric D. (New York)

Hawley, Jonathan E (New York)

Hodges, Charlotte P. (New York)

Jalbert, Christine M. (New York)

Kingsdorf, Bruce S. (New York)

Lechtenberger, Kirk F (New York)

Lee, Ryan (New York)

Lichten, Stuart Lloyd (New York)

Longoria, Marguerite M. (New York)

LoPalo, Christopher R. (New York)

Lopez, Rodrigo (New York)

Marritz, Nicholas Cooper (New York)

Metz, Kevin Harris (New York)

Moccia, Nicholas M (New York)

Monroe, James Edward (New York)

Moser, Steven John (New York)

Nesbit, Charles L (New York)

Parent, Bruce D (New York)

Peralta, Nady Leticia (New York)

Reyes, Richard P. (New York)

Rosen, Georgi J. (New York)

Russomanno, Herman Joseph (New York)

Sandoval-Moshenberg, Simon Yehuda (New York)

Shavitz, Gregg I. (New York)

Smith, Sam J. (New York)

Sussman, Dana G. (New York)

Swartz, Justin M. (New York)

Traficante, Claudia Irma (New York)

White, Nnika Evangeline (New York)

Williams, Christopher J. (New York)

Wool, Zachary Logan (New York)

Zarco, Roberto (New York)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

7:01-cv-02600

Docket [PACER]

Maneely v. The City of Newburgh

Sept. 6, 2005

Sept. 6, 2005

Docket
25

7:01-cv-02600

Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Class Certification

Maneely v. The City of Newburgh

May 16, 2002

May 16, 2002

Order/Opinion

208 F.R.D. 69

7:01-cv-02600

Memorandum Order and Decision Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Maneely v. The City of Newburgh

April 8, 2003

April 8, 2003

Order/Opinion

256 F.Supp.2d 204

179

7:01-cv-02600

Order for Preliminary Approval of Settlement

March 29, 2019

March 29, 2019

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6248571/maneely-v-the-city-of-newburgh/

Last updated Dec. 19, 2024, 11:35 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 27, 2001

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

ALL persons who were strip searched before arraignment by the Newburgh Police Department between March 27, 1998 and March 27, 2001.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

The City of Newburgh, City

The City of Newburgh Police Department, City

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Unreasonable search and seizure

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2005 - 0

Issues

General/Misc.:

Search policies

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Strip search policy (facilities)