Case: Doe v. Hunt

1:95-cv-02117 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: April 6, 1995

Closed Date: May 28, 1997

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case was brought by "Jane Doe" on April 6, 1995 against the City of Chicago and various law enforcement officials in the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiff, represented by People's Law Offices, claimed violations of the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution arising out of a police search of her home and person incident to her arrest at her home for a traffic ticket.Specifically, Plaintiff claimed a detective and p…

This case was brought by "Jane Doe" on April 6, 1995 against the City of Chicago and various law enforcement officials in the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiff, represented by People's Law Offices, claimed violations of the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution arising out of a police search of her home and person incident to her arrest at her home for a traffic ticket.

Specifically, Plaintiff claimed a detective and police officers broke in her front door, searched her home and broke in her bathroom door. They refused to show her a warrant. They then took her to the police station where, in the presence of male officers, she was subjected to an intrusive strip search.

The case was referred to a magistrate (Mag. Judge Edward A. Bobrick) for report and recommendations on the Defendants' motions to dismiss various of Plaintiff's claims. On October 2, 1995, the Magistrate recommended dismissal of the Fifth and Ninth Amendment portions of Plaintiff's Third Count. Jane Doe (1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14517)

On January 18, 1996, the magistrate (Mag. Judge Edward A. Bobrick) issued recommendations as to the Defendant process server's motion for summary judgment. The Court (Judge Bucklo) adopted the recommendation as to summary judgment in favor of the defendant on Plaintiff's 4th Amendment claim, but found that her claim for conspiracy to use excessive force in making the arrest.

On March 14, 1996, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint.

On May 6, 1997, the remaining parties reached a settlement and the case was dismissed.

Summary Authors

Denise Heberle (3/22/2012)

People


Judge(s)

Bobrick, Edward A. (Illinois)

Bucklo, Elaine E. (Illinois)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

McCarthy, James Patrick (Illinois)

Susler, Janis M. (Illinois)

Taylor, G. Flint (Illinois)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Baldwin, Sharon (Illinois)

Barber, Robert W. (Illinois)

Bode, Dawn Eileen (Illinois)

Caminer, Irene Schild (Illinois)

Carey, Margaret Ann (Illinois)

Judge(s)

Bobrick, Edward A. (Illinois)

Bucklo, Elaine E. (Illinois)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

McCarthy, James Patrick (Illinois)

Susler, Janis M. (Illinois)

Taylor, G. Flint (Illinois)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Baldwin, Sharon (Illinois)

Barber, Robert W. (Illinois)

Bode, Dawn Eileen (Illinois)

Caminer, Irene Schild (Illinois)

Carey, Margaret Ann (Illinois)

Kendall, Patricia Jo (Illinois)

Sher, Susan S. (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:95-cv-02117

Docket [PACER]

Doe v. City of Chicago

May 28, 1997

May 28, 1997

Docket
28

1:95-cv-02117

Opinion

Jane Doe v. City of Chicago

Oct. 2, 1995

Oct. 2, 1995

Order/Opinion
57

1:95-cv-02117

Opinion

Doe v. City of Chicago

July 3, 1996

July 3, 1996

Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated Sept. 2, 2022, 3:04 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of G. Flint Taylor Jr., Janis M. Susler as attorney(s) for plaintiff Jane Doe with Rule 39 affidavits ( original and 6 copies summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-5) (cdh) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

April 6, 1995

April 6, 1995

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 4/6/95 in the amount of $ 120.00, receipt # 452889. (cdh) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

April 6, 1995

April 6, 1995

2

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Chgo, Cty of, defendant James Contino, defendant Hardin-Hunt, defendant McCary, defendant Donald V Norton on 4/7/95 (Attachment). (cdh) (Entered: 04/13/1995)

April 11, 1995

April 11, 1995

3

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Chgo, Cty of by Sharon Baldwin, Patricia Jo Kendall, Margaret Ann Carey, Irene Schild Caminer, Susan S. Sher (cdh) (Entered: 04/26/1995)

April 25, 1995

April 25, 1995

4

MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/95 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Bobrick for all pretrial management, to be returned for trial if the parties fail to consent to trial and entry of judgment by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 USC 636 (c). Mailed notice (cdh) (Entered: 05/01/1995)

April 28, 1995

April 28, 1995

5

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for James Contino, Hardin-Hunt, McCary by Robert W. Barber, James Patrick McCarthy, Dawn Eileen Bode (cdh) (Entered: 05/01/1995)

April 28, 1995

April 28, 1995

6

REFERRAL ORDER of 5/1/95: Case referred to Hon. Edward A. Bobrick from Judge Elaine E. Bucklo pursuant to General Rule 2.41(b). Conduct hearings and enter appropriate orders on the following pretrial motion/matter: Pretrial conference under Rule 16. All discovery motions. Discovery supervision. Mailed notice (cdh) (Entered: 06/05/1995)

May 2, 1995

May 2, 1995

SCHEDULE set on 5/9/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing before Magistrate Judge Bobrick in Courtroom 1812 is set for 5/18/95 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 05/09/1995)

May 9, 1995

May 9, 1995

SCHEDULE set on 5/18/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Plaintiff's motion for leave to file complaint as Jane Doe is granted in part and denied in part. All documents will be entitled Jane Doe other than the ones stated in court (e.g. Subpoenas and Depositions). Defendant's oral motion for leave to reinstate the motion to file complaint as Jane Doe at an appropriate time in the future is granted as stated in open court. Defendant, City of Chicago's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead by May 30, 1995 is granted as stated in open court. Agreed motion to extend the time in which defendants James Contino, Lynette Harding, Denise Hunt and Katrina McCary may answer or otherwise plead by May 30, 1995 is granted as stated in open court. Non-federal parties are to answer plaintiff's discovery by 6/30/95. Status hearing held and continued to 7/5/95 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 05/18/1995)

May 18, 1995

May 18, 1995

7

MOTION by plaintiff Jane Doe for leave to file complaint as Jane Doe ; notice of motion. (cdh) (Entered: 05/19/1995)

May 18, 1995

May 18, 1995

8

MOTION by defendant Chgo, Cty of for extension time to answer or otherwise plead ; amended notice of motion. (cdh) (Entered: 05/19/1995)

May 18, 1995

May 18, 1995

9

AGREED MOTION by defendants' to extend time in which defendant James Contino, Lynette Harding, Denise Hunt and Katrina McCarthy may answer or otherwise plead ; notice of motion. (cdh) (Entered: 05/19/1995)

May 18, 1995

May 18, 1995

10

MOTION by defendant Chgo, Cty of for leave to file ansner instanter ; notice of motion. (cdh) (Entered: 06/09/1995)

June 8, 1995

June 8, 1995

11

MOTION by James Contino, Hardin-Hunt, McCary to dismiss counts I, III, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's complaint (Exhibits); notice of motion. (cdh) (Entered: 06/09/1995)

June 8, 1995

June 8, 1995

12

MINUTE ORDER of 6/8/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Granting defendant, City of Chicago's motion for leave to file ansner instanter [10-1]. Plaintiff's response to defendants' motion to dismiss counts I, III, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's complaint [11-1] is due 7/10/95. Defendants' reply to answer brief due 7/28/95. Defendant Contino is not to be deposed until after ruling on the motion to dismiss. Mailed notice (cdh) Modified on 10/18/1995 (Entered: 06/09/1995)

June 8, 1995

June 8, 1995

13

ANSWER, affirmative defenses, by defendant Chgo, Cty of; and jury demand (cdh) (Entered: 06/09/1995)

June 8, 1995

June 8, 1995

14

MOTION by Donald V Norton to dismiss plaintiff's complaint . (maf) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

July 5, 1995

July 5, 1995

15

NOTICE by Donald V Norton regarding motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint [14-1] (maf) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

July 5, 1995

July 5, 1995

ORAL MOTION by plaintiff to extend time to file their response to the defendants' moiton to dismiss (filed on 06/08/95) . (maf) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

July 5, 1995

July 5, 1995

16

MINUTE ORDER of 7/5/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Brief in support of defendant Norton's motion to dismiss [14-1] is due 07/25/95; answer brief due 08/23/95; reply brief due 09/13/95. Status hearing held; continued to 09/13/95 at 10:00 a.m. Granting plaintiff's oral motion to extend time [0-1] to file their response to the defendants' moiton to dismiss (filed on 06/08/95) [11-1] as stated in open court. Plaintiff's response is due 07/17/95. Defendants' reply is due 08/04/95. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

July 5, 1995

July 5, 1995

17

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Jane Doe and response in opposition to motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint [14-1], motion to dismiss counts I, III, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's complaint [11-1] ; Notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 07/18/1995)

July 17, 1995

July 17, 1995

18

AGREED MOTION by Donald V Norton to extend time to file memorandum in support of his motion to dismiss . (maf) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

Aug. 1, 1995

Aug. 1, 1995

19

NOTICE by Donald V Norton regarding motion to extend time to file memorandum in support of his motion to dismiss [18-1]. (maf) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

Aug. 1, 1995

Aug. 1, 1995

20

MINUTE ORDER of 8/1/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset to 09/21/95 at 10:00 a.m. Granting defendant Norton's agreed motion to extend time to file memorandum in support of his motion to dismiss [18-1] as stated in open court. Defendant's memorandum in support of motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint [14-1] is due by 08/08/95. Plaintiff's response is due by 09/07/95. Defendant's reply is due 09/21/95. Mailed notice (maf) Modified on 09/07/1995 (Entered: 08/01/1995)

Aug. 1, 1995

Aug. 1, 1995

21

AFFIDAVIT of defendant Donald Norton. (maf) (Entered: 08/09/1995)

Aug. 8, 1995

Aug. 8, 1995

22

MEMORANDUM by Donald V Norton in support of motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint [14-1]. (maf) (Entered: 08/09/1995)

Aug. 8, 1995

Aug. 8, 1995

23

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file supplemental authority in response to the individual defendants' motion to dismiss (Attachments); Notice of motion. (maf) (Entered: 08/09/1995)

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

ORAL MOTION by defendant for leave to file a reply by 08/18/95 . (maf) (Entered: 08/09/1995)

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

24

MINUTE ORDER of 8/9/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Granting plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplemental authority to the individual defendants' motion to dismiss [23-1] as stated in open court. Granting defendant's oral motion for leave to file a reply by 08/18/95. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 08/09/1995)

Aug. 9, 1995

Aug. 9, 1995

25

MOTION by plaintiff for extension of time to answer defendant Norton's motion to dismiss ; Notice of motion. (maf) (Entered: 09/06/1995)

Sept. 6, 1995

Sept. 6, 1995

ORAL MOTION by defendant for leave to file reply by 09/11/95 . (maf) (Entered: 09/06/1995)

Sept. 6, 1995

Sept. 6, 1995

26

MINUTE ORDER of 9/6/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to answer defendant Norton's motion to dismiss [25-1] is granted as stated in open court. Federal defendant's response [14-1] is due 0-9/14/95. Plaintiff's reply is due 09/28/95. Defendant Police Officers, Contino, et al.'s oral motion for leave to file thier reply by 09/11/95 [0-1] is granted as stated in open court. Status hearing set for 09/21/95 is stricken. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 09/06/1995)

Sept. 6, 1995

Sept. 6, 1995

27

ANSWER by plaintiff to defendant Norton's motion to dismiss [14-1] (Attachments); Notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 09/20/1995)

Sept. 14, 1995

Sept. 14, 1995

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION concerning motion to dismiss counts I, III, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's complaint [11-1]. (maf) (Entered: 10/04/1995)

Oct. 2, 1995

Oct. 2, 1995

29

MINUTE ORDER of 10/2/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick: Status hearing reset to 10/19/95 at 10:00 a.m. Report and Recommendation regarding motion of defendants James Contino, Denise Hunt, Lynette Hardin, and Katrina McCarty to dismiss Count I, III, IV, V and VI of the complaint of plaintiff Jane Doe is hereby submitted to Judge Bucklo. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 10/04/1995)

Oct. 2, 1995

Oct. 2, 1995

30

MOTION by defendant Norton for summary judgment ; Notice of motion. (maf) (Entered: 10/12/1995)

Oct. 11, 1995

Oct. 11, 1995

32

MINUTE ORDER of 10/11/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick: Answer brief to motion for summary judgment [30-1] due 10/31/95. Reply to answer brief due 11/15/95. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 10/12/1995)

Oct. 11, 1995

Oct. 11, 1995

ORAL MOTION by plaintiff for extension of time to file a response to Federal defendant Norton's motion for summary judgment . (maf) (Entered: 10/20/1995)

Oct. 19, 1995

Oct. 19, 1995

33

OBJECTIONS by James Contino to Magistrate Bobrick's Report and Recommendation of 10/02/95 [28-1] (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (maf) (Entered: 10/20/1995)

Oct. 19, 1995

Oct. 19, 1995

34

MINUTE ORDER of 10/19/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick: Status hearing held; continued to 12/15/95 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff did not receive a copy of the R&R issued on 10/02/95. Plaintiff received a copy in open court today, and the court acknowledges receipt as of 10/19/95. Plaintiff's oral motion for extension of time to file a response to Federal defendant Norton's motion for summary judgment [0-1] is granted as stated in open court. Plaintiff's response [30-1] is due 11/28/95. Defendant's reply is due 12/15/95. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 10/20/1995)

Oct. 19, 1995

Oct. 19, 1995

35

OBJECTIONS by plaintiff to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [28-1]; Notice of filing. (maf) (Entered: 10/30/1995)

Oct. 27, 1995

Oct. 27, 1995

36

RESPONSE by defendant James Contino to the magistrate's ruling on the claim of emotional distress (Exhibit); Notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 11/14/1995)

Nov. 13, 1995

Nov. 13, 1995

37

MOTION by plaintiff Jane Doe for leave to file instanter her response to defendant Norton's motion for summary judgment ; Notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 12/04/1995)

Dec. 1, 1995

Dec. 1, 1995

38

MINUTE ORDER of 12/1/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Granting plaintiff's motion for leave to file instanter her response to defendant Norton's motion for summary judgment [37-1] notice (fce) (Entered: 12/04/1995)

Dec. 1, 1995

Dec. 1, 1995

39

RESPONSE by plaintiff Jane Doe to defendant Norton's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint [14-1] (fce) (Entered: 12/04/1995)

Dec. 1, 1995

Dec. 1, 1995

40

RESPONSE by plaintiff Jane Doe to defendant Norton's Rule 12(M) statement of material facts and statement of additional facts pursuant to Rule 12(N) (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 12/04/1995)

Dec. 1, 1995

Dec. 1, 1995

SCHEDULE set on 12/15/95 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 3/14/96 . Fact discovery ordered closed on 3/14/96 . Tentative status hearing set for 10:00 12/26/95 to check on whether parties have exchanged information about defendants' names. No notice (or) (Entered: 12/15/1995)

Dec. 15, 1995

Dec. 15, 1995

41

REPLY memorandum by defendants in support of the motions of defendant Norton to dismiss and for summary judgment [30-1]. (maf) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

Dec. 15, 1995

Dec. 15, 1995

42

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Edward A. Bobrick concerning motion for summary judgment [30-1]. (maf) (Entered: 01/19/1996)

Jan. 18, 1996

Jan. 18, 1996

44

OBJECTIONS of defendant Norton to the Magistrate Judge's 01/18/96 Report and Recommendation [42-1] (Attachments). (maf) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

Feb. 1, 1996

Feb. 1, 1996

45

MINUTE ORDER of 3/13/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo: Document number 14-1, motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, is terminated as the motion has been converted into a motion for summary judgment. No notice (maf) (Entered: 03/14/1996)

March 13, 1996

March 13, 1996

ORAL MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file first amended complaint in open court . (maf) (Entered: 03/15/1996)

March 14, 1996

March 14, 1996

46

MINUTE ORDER of 3/14/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick: Status hearing held; continued to 04/08/96 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff's oral motion for leave to file first amended complaint in open court [0-1] is granted. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 03/15/1996)

March 14, 1996

March 14, 1996

47

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff; jury demand terminating defendant McCary, defendant Hardin-Hunt; adding Lynette Hardin, Denise Hunt; Notice of filing. (maf) Modified on 03/15/1996 (Entered: 03/15/1996)

March 14, 1996

March 14, 1996

48

ANSWER, affirmative defenses and jury demand by defendant City of Chicago to the amended complaint; Notice of filing. (maf) (Entered: 03/19/1996)

March 18, 1996

March 18, 1996

49

MINUTE ORDER of 3/19/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo: The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate motion to dismiss counts I, III, IV, V and VI of plaintiff's complaint [11-1] as the motion was converted into a motion for summary judgment which was decided on 03/14/96. No notice (maf) (Entered: 03/20/1996)

March 19, 1996

March 19, 1996

50

MINUTE ORDER of 3/25/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo: Order entered on 03/14/96 is amended to correct the information on the front side of the minute order as follows: Defendants' motion to dismiss (11-1) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claims in count III under Fifth and Ninth Amendments against Ms. Hunt, Ms. Hardin and Ms. McCarty are dismissed. Counsel to note that document number (30-1) is pending. Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 03/25/1996)

March 25, 1996

March 25, 1996

51

MINUTE ORDER of 3/25/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo: Order entered on 03/19/96 is amended to correct the document number as follows: the correct document number to be terminated is (14-1) rather than (11-1). Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 03/25/1996)

March 25, 1996

March 25, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 4/8/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 5/28/96 . Defendant, Norton's answer to the original complaint is to stand as their answer to the amended complaint, without objection. Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 04/08/1996)

April 8, 1996

April 8, 1996

ORAL MOTION by plaintiff to amend the complaint . (maf) (Entered: 05/28/1996)

May 28, 1996

May 28, 1996

53

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file instanter her motion for leave to file second amended complaint ; Notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 06/27/1996)

June 26, 1996

June 26, 1996

54

MINUTE ORDER of 6/26/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Granting plaintiff's motion for leave to file instanter her motion for leave to file second amended complaint [53-1]. Briefing schedule set on 05/28/96 to stand. Status hearing held; continued to 10:00 a.m. on 7/29/96. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 06/27/1996)

June 26, 1996

June 26, 1996

55

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to amend complaint (fce) (Entered: 06/27/1996)

June 26, 1996

June 26, 1996

56

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion for leave to amend complaint [55-1] (Attachment). (fce) (Entered: 06/27/1996)

June 26, 1996

June 26, 1996

57

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER. (vmj) (Entered: 07/08/1996)

July 3, 1996

July 3, 1996

58

MINUTE ORDER of 7/3/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo: Defendant's motion for summary judgment [30-1] is granted in part and denied in part. The motion as to count II and VI is granted and accordingly, summary judgment on counts II and VI is entered in favor of defendant Norton. The motion as to count IV is denied. Enter memorandum opinion and order. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 07/08/1996)

July 3, 1996

July 3, 1996

59

AGREED MOTION by defendant Chgo, Cty of for entry of a protective order ; Amended notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 07/25/1996)

July 3, 1996

July 3, 1996

62

MOTION by defendant Donald V Norton to reconsider order denying his motion to dismiss or , for summary judgment on remaining count of complaint (Attachment); Notice of motion (smm) (Entered: 08/06/1996)

July 22, 1996

July 22, 1996

60

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER (fce) (Entered: 07/25/1996)

July 24, 1996

July 24, 1996

61

MINUTE ORDER of 7/24/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : Granting City of Chicago's agreed motion for entry of a protective order [59-1]. Enter protective order. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 07/25/1996)

July 24, 1996

July 24, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 7/26/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset to 10:00 7/30/96 . Telephone notice (tmh) (Entered: 07/26/1996)

July 26, 1996

July 26, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 7/26/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset to 10:00 8/2/96 . Telephone notice (tmh) (Entered: 07/26/1996)

July 26, 1996

July 26, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 8/1/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset to 10:00 8/9/96 . Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 08/01/1996)

Aug. 1, 1996

Aug. 1, 1996

63

MINUTE ORDER of 8/5/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo :Defendant Norton's motion to reconsider order denying his motion to dismiss or [62-1], for summary judgment on remaining count of complaint is denied [62-2]. Defendant said it had additional evidence. Defendant, however, chose the time to file its motion for summary judgment. Mailed notice (smm) (Entered: 08/06/1996)

Aug. 5, 1996

Aug. 5, 1996

64

MINUTE ORDER of 8/9/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held; continued to 10:00 a.m. 9/6/96. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint [55-1] is granted as stated in open court. Defendant, City of Chicago's oral motion for leave to file a response to the second amended complaint is granted as stated in open court [0-1]. Response is to be filed by 8/19/96. Mailed notice (smm) (Entered: 08/12/1996)

Aug. 9, 1996

Aug. 9, 1996

65

AMENDMENT by plaintiff Jane Doe to amended complaint [47-1]; Notice of filing. (smm) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

Aug. 13, 1996

Aug. 13, 1996

66

ANSWER, affirmative defenses, by defendant Chgo, Cty of; jury demand to the second amended complaint; Notice of filing. (smm) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

Aug. 14, 1996

Aug. 14, 1996

67

MINUTE ORDER of 8/19/96 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : Document number 55-1 is to be terminated as moot. No notice (smm) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

Aug. 19, 1996

Aug. 19, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 9/6/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset to 10:00 9/9/96 . Telephone notice (tmh) (Entered: 09/06/1996)

Sept. 6, 1996

Sept. 6, 1996

68

ORDER (smm) (Entered: 09/11/1996)

Sept. 9, 1996

Sept. 9, 1996

ORAL MOTION by plaintiff Jane Doe to voluntarily dismiss Federal defendant, Donald V. Norton with prejudice and without costs . (smm) (Entered: 09/11/1996)

Sept. 9, 1996

Sept. 9, 1996

69

MINUTE ORDER of 9/9/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held; continued to 10:00 a.m. 11/25/96. Plaintiff's oral motion and by agreement of the parties to voluntarily dismiss Federal defendant, Donald V. Norton with prejudice and without costs is granted as stated in open court [0-1]. Enter order. All fact discovery to close 11/18/96, with the exception of policy experts for both sides. Medical exam of plaintiff to completed by 11/18/96. Mailed notice (smm) (Entered: 09/11/1996)

Sept. 9, 1996

Sept. 9, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 11/25/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 12/23/96 . Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 11/25/1996)

Nov. 25, 1996

Nov. 25, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 12/23/96 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 2/28/97 . Fact discovery ordered closed on 2/28/97 . Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 12/23/1996)

Dec. 23, 1996

Dec. 23, 1996

SCHEDULE set on 2/27/97 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing reset from 10:00 2/28/97 to 10:00 3/10/97 . Mailed notice. Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 02/27/1997)

Feb. 27, 1997

Feb. 27, 1997

SCHEDULE set on 3/10/97 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 3/25/97 . Fact discovery is complete. Mailed notice (tmh) (Entered: 03/10/1997)

March 10, 1997

March 10, 1997

70

MINUTE ORDER of 3/25/97 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : Status hearing held and continued to 07/07/97 at 10:00 a.m. Fact discovery to close 04/25/97. Plaintiff to disclose experts by 05/16/97. Defendants to depose plaintiff's expert witness by 05/30/97. Defendants to disclose experts by 07/20/97. Plaintiff to depose defendants' expert witness by 07/07/97. All discovery to close 07/07/97. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 03/29/1997)

March 25, 1997

March 25, 1997

71

MINUTE ORDER of 5/6/97 by Hon. Edward A. Bobrick: Parties have reached a settlement in this case and will present a stipulation to Judge Bucklo by 06/05/97. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Status hearing set or 07/07/97 is hereby stricken. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. Mailed notice (hp) Modified on 05/08/1997 (Entered: 05/08/1997)

May 6, 1997

May 6, 1997

72

MINUTE ORDER of 5/6/97 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : Plaintiff's counsel having advised the court that this case is settled, this actionis hereby dismissed with leave to reinstate within thirty days. After that date, the dismissal will be with prejudice. Any pending motion in this case is terminated as moot. Status hearing set for 07/07/97 is vacated. terminating case Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 05/08/1997)

May 6, 1997

May 6, 1997

73

STIPULATION to dismiss. (lal) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

May 23, 1997

May 23, 1997

74

RULE 41 STIPULATION to voluntarily dismiss Detective James Contino. (lal) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

May 23, 1997

May 23, 1997

75

RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT agreement filed by Ilene Thomas (lal) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

May 23, 1997

May 23, 1997

76

AGREED ORDER of dismissal. (lal) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

May 28, 1997

May 28, 1997

77

MINUTE ORDER of 5/28/97 by Hon. Elaine E. Bucklo : Pursuant to Rule 41 Stipulation, Detective James Contino is hereby dismissed with prejudice from this case, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Pursuant to stipulation to dismiss, this case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees in accordance with the terms of the Release and Settlement and the Agreed Order of Dismissal. This court retains jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the Release and Settlement Agreement. Mailed notice (lal) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

May 28, 1997

May 28, 1997

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 6, 1995

Closing Date: May 28, 1997

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Mother who was arrested in her home alleging violations of various of her constitutional rights and state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and assault

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of Chicago (Chicago), City

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Unreasonable search and seizure

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General:

Search policies

Strip search policy

Affected Gender:

Female