Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
94 cases, 893 documents
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Hugo Martin Recinos-Recinos v. Express Forestry Inc.

2:05-cv-01355 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Filed Date: April 7, 2005

Closed Date: June 22, 2009

On April 7, 2005, attorneys with the Immigrant Justice Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on behalf of over 300 predominantly Guatemalan and Mexican migrant workers, admitted to work in the U.S. pursuant to H-2B temporary foreign worker visa program, who planted trees and performed other forestry-related activities for Express Forestry Inc. Plaintif…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Kassman v. KPMG LLP

1:11-cv-03743 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: June 2, 2011

Closed Date: June 22, 2022

On June 2, 2011, a female former manager filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against KPMG LLP, a large accounting and professional services firm. The plaintiff asserted claims of gender discrimination under the Equal Pay Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and state and local laws. Represented by private counsel, she sought permanent injunctive relief and damages for gender-based employment discrimination. The case was as…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Comite De Jornaleros De Rancho Cucamonga Y Upland v. City of Cucamonga & City of Upland

5:02-cv-01010 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 19, 2002

Closed Date: Jan. 30, 2004

On September 19, 2002, an organization representing day laborers filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the City of Cucamonga and the City of Upland. Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants had passed ordinances in 2001 to enforce anti-solicitation at one street corner, located at the cities’ boundary, and that the defendants were violating the First Amendment rights of day laborers by enforcing the ordinances. Plaintiffs were repres…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Society of St. Vincent De Paul of Santa Clara v. City of Los Altos

5:02-cv-00847 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Feb. 19, 2002

Closed Date: Aug. 19, 2004

On February 19, 2002, an organization representing day laborers filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(a), and 2201, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of Los Altos, California. Plaintiffs claimed that the City was violating the First Amendment rights of day laborers by enforcing an ordinance that made it unlawful for any person occupying any unparked vehicle, or any person standing, sitting, walkin…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Comite De Jornaleros De Glendale v. City of Glendale

2:04-cv-03521 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: May 9, 2004

Closed Date: March 5, 2009

On May 19, 2004, an organization of day laborers filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(a), and 2201, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of Glendale, California. Plaintiffs claimed that the City was violating the First Amendment rights of day laborers by enforcing an ordinance that made it unlawful to stand on the sidewalk and solicit “employment, business, or contributions of money or other property…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach

2:04-cv-09396 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Nov. 16, 2004

Closed Date: April 25, 2012

On November 16, 2004, two day laborers organizations filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(a), and 2201, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of Redondo Beach, California. Plaintiffs claimed that the City violated the First Amendment rights of day laborers by enforcing an ordinance making it unlawful to stand on the sidewalk and solicit “employment, business, or contributions from an occupant of any m…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Fairley v. McDonald's Corporation

1:20-cv-02273 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: April 10, 2020

Case Ongoing

On April 10, 2020, plaintiffs, a current employee of McDonalds and a former employee of McDonalds, represented by private counsel, filed a putative class action lawsuit against McDonald’s, on behalf of themselves and all women who work at McDonald’s corporate owned and operated restaurants in Florida. The lawsuit alleged a pattern of unchecked sexual harassment at 100 restaurants in Florida. The case was originally assigned to Judge Virginia M. Kendall and Magistrate Judge Beth W. Jantz, but wa…
POLICING
Medrano v. Allee

1:67-cv-00036 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: 1967

Closed Date: 1974

This case concerns Texas’s selective law enforcement against picketing Mexican-American farm workers in the 1960s. In 1966 and 1967, the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (“UFW”), encouraged Mexican-American farm laborers in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas to join the union and strike for greater economic benefits. The strike resulted in daily picketing, destruction of farm and railroad property, and violen…
LABOR RIGHTS
Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation

2:22-cv-12761 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Nov. 15, 2022

Case Ongoing

The Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (“Petitioner”) filed this petition for a preliminary injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), along with a labor union representing Starbucks' employees, against Starbucks in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on November 15, 2022. The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith.  Petitioner claimed that Starbucks engaged in unfair labor practices within the…
LABOR RIGHTS
McKinney v. Starbucks Corporation

2:22-cv-02292 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: May 10, 2022

Case Ongoing

On May 10, 2022, M. Kathleen McKinney, the regional director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, filed a lawsuit against the Starbucks Corporation on behalf of the NLRB in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The petition alleged that the Starbucks Corporation engaged in acts violating Sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The lawsuit was filed in the wake of increasing tensions between the staff and management of a Memphis, Tenn…