Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
12,707 cases
Ordered by
PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Flinn v. City of Evanston

1:24-cv-04269 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 23, 2024

This is a lawsuit challenging an Evanston, Illinois program that offers reparations to Black Americans for past housing discrimination.  On May 23, 2024, six individuals filed this putative class action lawsuit against the City of Evanston in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. They challenged the city's Restorative Housing Program, an initiative to compensate Black residents for housing discrimination they or their ancestors faced between 1919 and 1969 via $25,000 pa…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Women's Life Care Center v. Ellison

0:24-cv-04250 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Nov. 22, 2024

Closed Date: Aug. 27, 2025

On November 22, 2024, Women’s Life Care Center, Dakota Hope Clinic, and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, together with several doctors and mothers, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against state officials including Attorney General Keith Ellison and Governor Tim Walz, as well as abortion providers and clinics, including Planned Parenthood branches. The plaintiffs argued that the Fourteenth Amendment protects a mother’s constitutional r…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Mennonite Church USA v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

1:25-cv-00403 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 11, 2025

This case is one of several challenging a January 20, 2025, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policy (outlined in a document termed the “Huffman Memorandum”) that rescinded the Federal Government’s longstanding policy not to conduct immigration enforcement in “protected areas,” such as churches and schools. The previous policy, outlined in a 2021 DHS memorandum, had specified that agents were to refrain, to the fullest extent possible, from engaging in law enforcement actions near or i…

Preliminary Injunction Denied

Appeal Pending

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
ACLU v. U.S. Social Security Administration

1:25-cv-01217 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 21, 2025

This case challenged denials of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests regarding the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) access to sensitive personal data held by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Plaintiff, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), submitted similar FOIA requests to over 40 federal agencies, many of which acknowledged and/or complied with the request or granted it expedited processing. SSA did not provide plaint…

Motion for Emergency or Preliminary Relief Pending

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Walmart Inc

2:25-cv-01480 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2025

On September 25, 2025, EEOC brought suit against Walmart in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. In their complaint, the EEOC alleges that Defendant Walmart Inc. discriminated against employees with intellectual disabilities who worked in Walmart’s retail store in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, by subjecting them to workplace harassment on the basis of disability, and by denying one of them a reasonable accommodation and constructively discharging him on the basis of disabilit…

Case Is Ongoing

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Rodriguez v. Coeytaux

3:25-cv-00225 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: July 20, 2025

This is a lawsuit both seeking damages against a California doctor who mailed abortion medication into Texas that was used to terminate two pregnancies and challenging his ability to continue to send such medication into the state. On July 20, 2025, plaintiff filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. He sought to prevent the defendant from providing additional abortion medication to his partner and anyone else on behalf of a proposed class of all current …

Case Is Ongoing

EDUCATION
Grabowski v. Arizona Board of Regents

4:19-cv-00460 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 16, 2019

This case involves allegations of discrimination based on sexual orientation within college athletics. On September 16, 2019, a student athlete at the University of Arizona filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, claiming he was subjected to bullying by his teammates due to their perception that he was gay. Despite informing the university about the harassment, the plaintiff contended that the school failed to take any action. Further, the plaintiff was subseq…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
United States v. State of Minnesota

0:25-cv-03798 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On September 29, 2025, the U.S. government brought suit against Minnesota and Minnesota state officials to stop them from enforcing state and local laws that impede the Executive from enforcing federal immigration laws, especially as they pertain to Exec. Order 14,287, Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens and Exec. Order 14,159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. This case is ongoing.

Case Is Ongoing

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Luevano v. Ezell

1:79-cv-00271 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Jan. 29, 1979

Closed Date: Aug. 1, 2025

This is a long-standing case about equal employment in the federal civil service. The case was originally brought in 1979 by nonprofit counsel against the then Director of the Officer of Personnel Management (OPM) as a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The applicants had filed suit, claiming that the Professional and Administrative Career Examination (PACE) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Plaintiffs alleged that PACE, …

Case Dismissed (Voluntary)

CRIMINAL JUSTICE (OTHER)
Betances v. Fischer

1:11-cv-03200 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: May 11, 2011

On May 11, 2011, three individuals given extrajudicial sentences of post-release supervision filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The named defendants were the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) and the New York State Division of Parole (DOP). They claimed that the defendants administratively assigned sentences of post-release supervision (PRS) and that only a judge could impose an additio…