Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citations

Citation 1

Citation 2

Citation 3

Search for:
234 cases, 1280 documents
Ordered by
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Jock v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.

1:08-cv-02875 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: March 18, 2008

Case Ongoing

On March 18, 2008, sixteen current and former female employees of Sterling Jewelers, Inc., filed a putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Sterling, a large jewelry retailer. The case was assigned to District Judge Jed Sol Rakoff. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sued under under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e), the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. § 206(d)), and the Age Discrimination in Employm…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Mete v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, and Cooper v. New York State Office of Mental Health

5:92-cv-00169 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York

Filed Date: Feb. 5, 1992

Closed Date: July 12, 2000

Introduction This Clearinghouse record summarizes two Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) cases against two New York State agencies. the Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD), and the Office of Mental Health (OMH). We group them together because they were consolidated on appeal. The OMRDD Case On February 5, 1992 several former employees of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD) brought a class action lawsuit …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Karlo v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC.

2:10-cv-01283 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2010

Closed Date: 2017

On September 29, 2010, a class of male employees 50 years of age or older filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621, against Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for lost compensation in front pay and back pay, attorneys' fees and costs, declaratory and injunctive relief, lost pension benefits, and liquidated damages, claimin…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Engers v. AT&T

2:98-cv-03660 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed Date: Aug. 5, 1998

Closed Date: June 22, 2011

AT&T changed its pension plan in November 1997, which allegedly resulted in younger employees receiving more benefits than older employees previously had, while the pension benefits for older employees were reduced. On August 5, 1998, the plaintiff filed this class-action lawsuit in the District Court of New Jersey bringing 17 claims for relief alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), ERISA, and state law. The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief req…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Thiessen v. General Electric Capital Corp.

2:96-cv-02410 | U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas

Filed Date: Sept. 23, 1996

Closed Date: Dec. 18, 2002

On September 23, 1996, an employee of General Electric filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiff sued Montgomery Ward Credit Services, a subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation. The plaintiff, represented by private counsel, sought injunctive relief, alleging violations of the the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We had difficulty finding all sources of relief sought from available…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Breen v. Mineta

1:05-cv-00654 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 31, 2005

Case Ongoing

On March 31, 2005, several current or former employees of the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") who were forty years old or older filed this age discrimination lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, against the FAA and the U.S. Department of Transportation ("DOT"). The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and alleged that the FAA and DOT discriminated against them by targeting their jobs for outs…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Rabin v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

4:16-cv-02276 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 27, 2016

Case Ongoing

On April 27, 2016, the plaintiff, a certified public accountant over the age of forty, filed this class and collective action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff sued PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.) and California state law. The plaintiff, represented by Outten & Golden LLP, the AARP Foundation, and the Liu Law Firm, sought injunctive and monetary relief, claimi…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
CODING IN PROCESS
TROWBRIDGE v. INSTITUTE FOR BASIC

1:98-cv-03529 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: May 11, 1998

Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2003 WL 21143086 (E.D.N.Y. 2003).suit brought under ADEA, the Labor Management Relations Act § 301, and §§ 1983 and 2000e
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION

3:06-cv-01732 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 22, 2006

Closed Date: March 25, 2014

The Dallas district office of the EEOC filed this complaint against the Exxon Mobil Corporation on September 22, 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. EEOC alleged that Exxon Mobil violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) by prohibiting pilots, including the complainants in this case, from piloting corporate planes once they reached the age of sixty. Exxon Mobil forced the complainants under the company's policy into involuntary retirement. The EEOC…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Sharr v. NCS Pearson, Inc.

3:02-cv-01513 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Nov. 7, 2002

Closed Date: 2006

The plaintiffs in this case were former employees of Huntleigh USA Corporation who worked as screeners at Portland International Airport and were not retained as employees when airport screeners became federal employees. They filed suit individually and as a putative class on November 2, 2002, against NCS Pearson, Inc. and the Department of Transportation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. Nothing in the record indicates that the suit was ever certified as a class action, bu…