Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
47 cases, 48 documents
Ordered by
JAIL CONDITIONS
United States v. County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriff [USDOJ CRIPA Case]

2:15-cv-05903 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Aug. 5, 2015

On June 6, 1996, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) notified Los Angeles County that it intended to investigate conditions in the Los Angeles County Jail system (the Jails) pursuant to the Civil Rights of the Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA). In August of 1996, the DOJ toured the Jails with correctional mental health experts. The investigation found that the Jails were failing to provide care meeting constitutional standards to mentally ill inmates. On September 5, 1997, the DOJ…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Bull v. City and County of San Francisco

3:03-cv-01840 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 23, 2003

Closed Date: 2013

On April 23, 2003, nine plaintiffs, acting through private attorneys, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the strip search policy of the City and County of San Francisco ("CCSF"). Specifically, Plaintiffs alleged that, under CCSF policy, all prisoners who were placed in the general jail population at the CCSF's jails were subjected to strip and visual body cavity searches, with those refusing to consent be…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Jones'el v. Berge

3:00-cv-00421 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2000

Closed Date: 2008

On September 25, 2000, prisoners confined at the Supermax Correctional Institution in Boscobel, Wisconsin, and the Waupun Correctional Institution in Waupun, Wisconsin, filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin against those prisons. The plaintiffs, represented by court appointed counsel and the University of Wisconsin School of Law, asked the court for declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief, alleging that their va…
JUVENILE INSTITUTION
In re Juvenile Justice Facilities

3:97-cv-00001 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

Filed Date: Jan. 2, 1997

Closed Date: Dec. 31, 2003

This case was part of the collection of § 1983 inmate cases that had been pending in the Louisiana federal courts, challenging the operation and conditions of confinement in the Louisiana prison system and in parish and city jails through Louisiana. See the cases categories PC-LA, JC-LA and JI-LA of this collection.Judge Frank J. Polozola of the U.S. District Court Middle District of Louisiana presided over many of the Louisiana prison and jail cases. In an effort to better manage those cases…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. LOCKHEED MARTIN GLOBAL TELECOMMUNIC

8:05-cv-00287 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2005

Closed Date: 2008

On January 31, 2005, the Baltimore office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) against Lockheed Martin Corporation and Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The EEOC alleged that the defendants had violated the rights of a complainant by conditioning her severance pay on the withdrawal of a complaint that she had filed against them with the EEOC. The EEOC further…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

1:01-cv-00299 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: March 5, 2001

Closed Date: June 30, 2004

The Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, against Daimlerchrysler Corporation, a car dealership. The complaint was filed in March 2001, but we do not have access to this document. The charging party intervened in May 2001. The EEOC and Defendants agreed to a consent decree in September 2003, but the intervenor plaintiff and Defendants went on to trial in June 2004, in which there was a jury verdict for the…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. HARBERT-YEARGIN INC.

1:97-cv-01112 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: May 1, 1997

Closed Date: Oct. 30, 2002

In May 1997 the Memphis Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Harbert-Yeargin Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However it appears from the Annual Report that the complaint alleged the defendant allowed male employees to be subjected to a sexually hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The complainant interven…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION (d/b/a FORT DODGE ANIMAL HEALTH)

3:00-cv-03079 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2000

Closed Date: April 1, 2002

In September 2000, the Milwaukee District Office of the EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa, against American Home Products Corporation, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Several private plaintiffs intervened in the case, which was subsequently consolidated with another case brought by a private party (3:00-cv-03046). Motions by both the defendant and the intervening plaintiffs for summary judgment were de…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Disability Law Center v. Massachusetts Department of Correction

1:07-cv-10463 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: March 8, 2007

Closed Date: 2017

On March 8, 2007, the Disability Law Center ("DLC") filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12131, and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §794 against the Massachusetts Department of Correction ("DOC"). The DLC is the agency designated by the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act, 42 U.S.C. §§10801 et seq. to pursue legal, administrative, and oth…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Williams v. Mohawk Industries

4:04-cv-00003 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: Jan. 6, 2004

Closed Date: Aug. 19, 2010

On January 6, 2004, current and former employees of Mohawk Industries Inc., a giant carpet and rug manufacturer, filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia, alleging that Mohawk engaged in a massive scheme to hire undocumented immigrants for the express purpose of depressing employee wages.In furtherance of their scheme, defendants were alleged to have: traveled to border towns to recruit undocumented immigrants to work in their plants, provided transpo…