Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
503 cases, 2389 documents
Ordered by
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Beck v. Boeing Company

2:00-cv-00301 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Feb. 25, 2000

Case Ongoing

On February 25, 2000, 37 individuals filed a class action complaint against Boeing Co. and its subsidiaries and divisions in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The plaintiffs, all female workers at various Boeing facilities, claimed that the company had discriminated against them and asked the court for injunctive relief, back pay, and benefits, alleging that the company had pursued and/or failed to eliminate policies that, while they may have seemed neutr…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. DIAL CORPORATION

1:99-cv-03356 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 20, 1999

Case Ongoing

The Chicago District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against the Dial Corporation, who makes soap and other hygiene products, in May 1999, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The suit was based on sexual harassment and retaliation claims in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The docket indicates that the parties had numerous discovery motions, mostly protective orders and orders to compel, and two individuals intervened. The defendant f…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis

1:02-cv-06832 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2002

Case Ongoing

On September 25, 2002, female employees of CB Richard Ellis filed a lawsuit against their employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs alleged that they had been discriminated against on the basis of their gender and asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory and punitive damages. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that there was a s…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Kosen v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.

1:02-cv-00082 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: Jan. 17, 2002

Case Ongoing

On January 17, 2002, a class action suit was brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) et seq. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, were former financial advisors and financial advisor applicants of Defendant American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. and its affili…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Hartman v. Albright

1:77-cv-02019 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 25, 1977

Case Ongoing

On November 25, 1977, Carolee Brady Hartman filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 against the United States International Communication Agency (the "Agency"), formerly known as the United States Information Agency, in the United States District Court, District of Columbia. Hartman, represented by both private and public counsel, asked the court for injunctive relief and damages, claiming that the Agency's hiring, promotion, and salary practices constituted patterns or practices of discrim…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

2:04-cv-00866 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: April 15, 2004

Closed Date: April 12, 2008

In April 2004, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, a national railroad, and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. A female complainant intervened in the case. The complaints alleged that the defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (sex). Specifically, the female claimed that she was subjected to inappropriate comments, pornography, and indecent expo…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. RLS Inc., d/b/a "SEBO's Do-It-Center"

2:04-cv-02066 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: Sept. 14, 2008

In September 2004, the Seattle District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against RLS, Inc., d/b/a Sebo's Do-It-Center, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The complaint alleged that the defendant subjected the charging party, a female employee, and other similarly situated female employees to a sexually hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, resulting in the constructive discharge of the charging party. The chargi…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Jerry Chambers Chevrolet, Inc.

2:03-cv-00080 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Jan. 15, 2003

Closed Date: March 8, 2008

EEOC's Seattle, WA office filed this Title VII lawsuit alleging sexual harassment and retaliation against the defendant Jerry Chambers Chevrolet Inc. The defendant operated a car dealership in Bellingham, WA. The lawsuit was filed at the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle) on 01/15/2003. EEOC alleged on behalf of a former female employee that she was subject to a sexually hostile work environment and was constructively discharged due to lack of corre…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Hannah Motors Company

3:03-cv-05531 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Oct. 6, 2003

Closed Date: March 30, 2008

The EEOC's Seattle district office sued Hannah Motors Company and an offending manager, on October 6, 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The EEOC's complaint alleged that the defendants violated Title VII when they discriminated against the two intervenors, who intervened in December 2003, based on sex (female) by creating a hostile work environment, discharged one in retaliation for her complaint about her treatment, and constructively discharged the other…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. HIGHLAND FRUIT GROWERS

2:03-cv-03132 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Closed Date: Feb. 14, 2009

The Seattle District Office of the EEOC brought this Title VII suit against High Fruit Growers, Inc. in September 2003, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. The complaint alleged that the defendant subjected the charging parties to sexual harassment because of their sex (female). The charging parties intervened in the suit in July 2004, and the case settled by entry of a consent decree in February 2005. The four year consent decree required the defendant to pay…