Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
53 cases, 252 documents
Ordered by
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
CODING IN PROCESS
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Miner

2:19-cv-00238 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: April 10, 2019

Closed Date: June 27, 2022

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) Planned Parenthood sued Utah in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, alleging that Utah's 18-week abortion ban was unconstitutional.
EDUCATION
Gordon v. Jordan School District

2:17-cv-00677 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: June 23, 2017

Case Ongoing

On June 23, 2017, six parents of schoolchildren who attend schools within the Jordan, Granite, and Canyons School Districts in Utah filed this class action lawsuit against their respective school districts, those districts’ superintendents, and the Utah High School Activities Association (UHSAA) in the U.S. District Court for Utah. The lead plaintiff helped start a recreational-girls only tackle football league, which had approximately 200 participants in spring 2017. Plaintiffs alleged sex dis…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
CODING IN PROCESS
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. State of Utah

220903886 | Utah state trial court

Filed Date: June 25, 2022

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) After Roe was overruled, Utah's trigger ban went into effect. Planned Parenthood filed this lawsuit to challenge the abortion ban on state grounds.
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Garbett v. Herbert

2:20-cv-00245 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: April 13, 2020

Case Ongoing

NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker. According to their summary as of 11/19/2020, After a request to modify the signature gathering requirements to permit electronic signatures, a candidate seeking the Republican party nomination for gubernatorial election brought action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Utah's Governor and Lieutenant Governor, asserting that state's voter signat…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY

2:05-cv-00546 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: June 30, 2005

Closed Date: 2009

The EEOC's Phoenix district office sued Micron Technology on June 30, 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. The EEOC's complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act when it discriminated against the intervenor, who intervened in October 2005, based on physical disability (deafness) and national origin. The parties entered into a consent decree on February 27, 2007, which stipulated that the defendant would pay the complaina…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. LBW Investments, L.L.C. d/b/a JB's

2:01-cv-00439 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: June 15, 2001

Closed Date: 2009

In June 2001, the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit, along with the US and Salt Lake City Attorney's Office, against LBW investments, Summit Family Restaurants, Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, JB's Family Restaurants and CKE Restaurants, all doing business as JB's Family Restaurants, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Utah alleging sexual discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complain…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. HAMLET DEVELOPMENT

2:06-cv-00751 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: Sept. 11, 2006

Closed Date: 2009

The Phoenix District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Hamlet Development Corp., Hamlet Homes Corp., Stirling Mortgage Corp., and Diversified Habitats 1, LLC (an integrated enterprise doing business as the Hamlet Companies) in the United States District Court for the District of Utah in September 2006. The complaint alleged that a female employee was sexually harassed and subjected to retaliatory discharge for opposing the harassment. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Salt Lake City repr…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Granite Mill & Fixtures Company

2:04-cv-00923 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: 2007

In September 2004 the U.S. Attorney's Office and Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Granite Mill & Fixture Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, alleging discrimination on the basis of national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant failed to address harassing speech directed at the complainant based upon his national origin, Mexican. Following discovery and sev…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. BODY FIRM AEROBICS d/b/a GOLD'S GYM

2:03-cv-00846 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Closed Date: 2008

The Phoenix District Office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, against Body Firm Aerobics d/b/a Gold's Gym. The complaint, filed in September 2003, alleged sex and pregnancy discrimination, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that Defendant had sexually harassed the charging parties and then retaliated against one of them for complaining about the harassment, by construc…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC V. CONVERGYS CORPORATION

2:05-cv-00814 | U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2005

Closed Date: 2009

In September 2005, the Phoenix District Office and Denver Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Convergys Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, female, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant paid the commplainants less than their male counterparts for performing the same task. Following some discovery, the parties settl…