The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?
The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?
Thank you!
Filed Date: Dec. 20, 2004
Closed Date: 2005
Clearinghouse coding complete
On December 20, 2004, and inmate at the California State Prison at San Quentin filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the California Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the District of California. The plaintiff, who was scheduled to be executed by lethal injection, asked the court to enjoin the defendants from carrying out the execution, arguing that the lethal injection procedure inflicts unnecessary pain and torture in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.
On January 7, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Judge Jeremy Fogel) denied the plaintiff the requested relief, holding that he brought the lawsuit in order to unnecessarily delay the execution. Beardslee v. Woodford, No. 04-5381, 2005 WL 40073. The plaintiff appealed. On January 14, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision and denied the plaintiff's request for a stay of execution, finding that the inmate had failed to establish a likelihood that he would be conscious during administration of the lethal drugs. Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2005). The plaintiff appealed. On January 18, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court declined the petition for certiorari. Beardslee v. Woodford, 543 U.S. 1096 (2005).
Donald J. Beardslee was executed on January 19, 2005 by lethal injection.
Summary Authors
Kristen Sagar (8/27/2007)
For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4180031/parties/beardslee-v-woodford/
Fogel, Jeremy D. (California)
O'Connor, Sandra Day (District of Columbia)
Lubliner, Steven Samuel (California)
Anderson, Robert R. (California)
Engler , Gerald A. (California)
Gillette , Dane R. (California)
Lockyer, Bill (California)
Matthais, Ronald Stephen (California)
Fogel, Jeremy D. (California)
O'Connor, Sandra Day (District of Columbia)
Lubliner, Steven Samuel (California)
Anderson, Robert R. (California)
Engler , Gerald A. (California)
Gillette , Dane R. (California)
Lockyer, Bill (California)
Matthais, Ronald Stephen (California)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4180031/beardslee-v-woodford/
Last updated Sept. 3, 2022, 3:10 a.m.
State / Territory: California
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Dec. 20, 2004
Closing Date: 2005
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
A death-sentenced prisoner under the supervision of the California Department of Corrections alleging that his execution pursuant to California's lethal injection protocol would violate his constitutional rights
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
California Department of Corrections, State
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Availably Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Defendant
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Issues
Death Penalty: