Case: Padilla v. Ridge

7:03-cv-00126 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: May 28, 2003

Closed Date: 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 28, 2003, plaintiffs who had been granted the status of lawful permanent resident during their removal proceedings filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas to compel the federal government to provide them with documentation of their permanent resident status in a timely manner. Plaintiffs alleged they applied for their alien registration card ("green card") and temporary proof of their legal permanent resident status in the United States but that the gover…

On May 28, 2003, plaintiffs who had been granted the status of lawful permanent resident during their removal proceedings filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas to compel the federal government to provide them with documentation of their permanent resident status in a timely manner. Plaintiffs alleged they applied for their alien registration card ("green card") and temporary proof of their legal permanent resident status in the United States but that the government had not issued that documentation. Without such documentation, plaintiffs alleged, they were denied employment, travel, educational, and public benefits privileges granted to other legal permanent residents. Plaintiffs asserted claims for violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA"), the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Attorneys with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights under Law of Texas and private law firms, represented the plaintiffs.

On March 31, 2004, the District Court (Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa) certified the case as a class action, over the objection of the government. Plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction was denied.

Thereafter, both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment which were amended and supplemented numerous times. Plaintiffs' complaint likewise underwent numerous amendments. Along with their filings, the parties also notified the Court in July 2004 that substantially identical cases were pending in federal courts in California (Santillan v. Ashcroft, No. 3:04-cv-02686 (N.D. Cal.)) and Florida (Amor v. Ashcroft, No. 1:04-CV-21685 (S.D. Fla.)).

Discovery and litigation continued. On September 9, 2005, the Court (Judge Hinojosa) instructed the parties to refile new motions for summary judgment to address rulings made in the California case, Santillan v. Ashcroft.

At a motion hearing on March 22, 2006, the Court (Judge Hinojosa) granted a motion to stay the case pending Santillan (a certified national class action on the same issue), and set a status conference for early the following year. The Court also denied the cross-motions for summary judgments without prejudice to refiling.

After several continuances, a status conference was held on August 10, 2007 at which time the parties advised the Court that they were still waiting for the resolution to Santillan, but that they were also finalizing a resolution to the Padilla case.

On September 27, 2007, the Court (Judge Hinojosa), noting that the parties had urged little action over the past two years, ordered an indefinite stay of the case pending the resolution of Santillan and inviting the parties to file for reinstatement if a resolution was reached in California that would allow the case to progress.

Meanwhile, the parties had been negotiating, and in December 2007 both they and the parties in Santillan came to an agreement with the federal government. On January 25, 2008, the parties jointly moved to reactive the case and have it transferred to the Northern District of California to facilitate a settlement of both Padilla and Santillan on identical terms.

On February 25, the Court (Judge Hinojosa) granted their motion and the case was transferred to be consolidated with Santillan. On July 22, 2008, the California court approved a settlement for both cases; see the entry on Santillan for more details.

 

Summary Authors

Christopher Schad (6/8/2012)

Anna Brito (11/6/2018)

Related Cases

Santillan v. Mukasey, Northern District of California (2004)

Amor v. U.S. Attorney General, Southern District of Florida (2004)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32083484/parties/do-not-docket-case-has-been-transferred-out-padilla-v-ridge/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Armendariz, David Anton (Texas)

Berra, Joseph Pacifico (Texas)

Coyle, Lynn (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

Bucholtz, Jeffrey S. (District of Columbia)

De Gabrielle, Donald J. Jr. (Texas)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

7:03-cv-00126

Docket (PACER)

Feb. 26, 2008

Feb. 26, 2008

Docket
50

7:03-cv-00126

Order [Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification]

March 31, 2004

March 31, 2004

Order/Opinion
79

7:03-cv-00126

Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint for Mandamus, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Aug. 19, 2004

Aug. 19, 2004

Complaint

7:03-cv-00126

Notice of Final Settlement Agreement

Aug. 24, 2005

Aug. 24, 2005

Notice of Investigation or Suit/Demand Letter

04-02686

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement and Release

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Feb. 7, 2007

Feb. 7, 2007

Settlement Agreement
149

7:03-cv-00126

Joint Motion to Reinstate Case on Active Calendar and to Transfer Case to Northern District of California

Jan. 25, 2008

Jan. 25, 2008

Pleading / Motion / Brief
150

7:03-cv-00126

Order of Reinstatement and Transfer

Feb. 25, 2008

Feb. 25, 2008

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/32083484/do-not-docket-case-has-been-transferred-out-padilla-v-ridge/

Last updated Oct. 7, 2026, 1:07 a.m.

Docket for: DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT. Padilla v. Ridge
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 28, 2003

COMPLAINT for Mandamus by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud filed; FILING FEE $ 150 RECEIPT # 720098 (part 1 of 2) (bgarces) (Entered: 05/28/2003)

RECAP
1 May 28, 2003

MOTION for declaratory and injunctive relief by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Motion Docket Date 6/17/03 [1-1] motion, filed. (part 2 of 2) (bgarces) (Entered: 05/28/2003)

RECAP
2 May 28, 2003

Order setting Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference on 2:30 7/9/03 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa and Order to Disclose Interested Persons, filed. () Parties notified. (bgarces) (Entered: 05/28/2003)

RECAP
May 28, 2003

SUMMONS issued for Atty Gen John Ashcroft; US Atty Office; Office of District Counsel/Harlingen; Office of District Counsel/Houston; Office of District Counsel/San Antonio (bgarces) (Entered: 05/28/2003)

PACER
May 28, 2003

SUMMONS issued for Atty Gen John Ashcroft; US Atty Office; Office of District Counsel/Harlingen; Office of District Counsel/Houston; Office of District Counsel/San Antonio (bgarces)

3 June 11, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 06/13/2003)

RECAP
4 June 18, 2003

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 06/18/2003)

RECAP
5 June 19, 2003

RETURN OF SERVICE executed 6/9/03 as to Atty Gen John Ashcroft; filed; Govt's Answer due on 7/9/03 (bgarces) (Entered: 06/26/2003)

RECAP
6 June 19, 2003

RETURN OF SERVICE executed 6/5/03 filed as to Office of District Counsel Houston District (bgarces) (Entered: 06/26/2003)

RECAP
7 June 19, 2003

RETURN OF SERVICE executed 6/5/03 filed as to Office of District Counsel Harlingen District (bgarces) (Entered: 06/26/2003)

RECAP
8 June 19, 2003

RETURN OF SERVICE executed 6/10/03 filed as to US Atty Office (bgarces) (Entered: 06/26/2003)

RECAP
9 June 19, 2003

RETURN OF SERVICE executed 6/3/03 filed as to Office of District Counsel San Antonio District (bgarces) (Entered: 06/26/2003)

RECAP
10 June 30, 2003

JOINT DISCOVERY/Case Management Plan by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 07/01/2003)

RECAP
11 July 2, 2003

MOTION for Joseph P. Berra to appear pro hac vice by Teresa D. Padilla, et al Plaintiffs, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

RECAP
12 July 3, 2003

ORDER granting [11-1] motion for Joseph P. Berra to appear pro hac vice, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 07/03/2003)

RECAP
July 9, 2003

Memo to File: In−Chambers conference held; Court encouraged the parties to try to resolve these matters amongst themselves; resetting scheduling conference for 4:00 9/3/03 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa (bgarces) (Entered: 07/18/2003)

PACER
July 9, 2003

Memo to File: In-Chambers conference held; Court encouraged the parties to try to resolve these matters amongst themselves; resetting scheduling conference for 4:00 9/3/03 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa (bgarces)

13 July 22, 2003

MOTION for class certifiation by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Motion Docket Date 8/11/03 [13-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 07/22/2003)

RECAP
14 July 22, 2003

BRIEF by Teresa D. Padilla, Jose Luis Guzman, Maria Eva Guzman, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Isaias Toscano Montemayor, Isaul Toscano Montemayor, Isael Toscano Montemayor, Marianela Polnick, Anselmo Medina Remigio, Yomi Bombata, Robert Celovsky, Sahchart Tancoomtong, Ricardo Romero-Cabrera, Yorline Romero-Yanez, Divyeshbhai G. Bhakta, Isaac S. Galicia-Gonzalez, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud in support of [13-1] motion for class certifiation, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 07/22/2003)

RECAP
15 July 22, 2003

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Mandamus, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief by Teresa D. Padilla, et al amending [1-1] complaint, filed. (bgarces) Modified on 07/25/2003 (Entered: 07/22/2003)

RECAP
16 July 25, 2003

ORDER striking [13-1] motion for class certification, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/25/2003)

RECAP
17 July 29, 2003

Opposed MOTION class certification by Teresa D. Padilla, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Alexandros Karkanis, Joel Martinez-Lara, Roberto Carlos Cruz Granados, Carol Carson, Maria Guadalupe Hernandez-Hernandez, Gerardo Carmona-Rojas, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez, Motion Docket Date 8/18/03 [17-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 07/29/2003)

RECAP
18 July 29, 2003

BRIEF by Teresa D. Padilla, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Alexandros Karkanis, Joel Martinez-Lara, Roberto Carlos Cruz Granados, Carol Carson, Maria Guadalupe Hernandez-Hernandez, Gerardo Carmona-Rojas, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez in support of [17-1] motion class certification, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 07/29/2003)

RECAP
19 Aug. 1, 2003

NOTICE of Withdrawal of Leticia M. Saucedo by Teresa D. Padilla, Jaime Sanchez Maldonado, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 08/01/2003)

RECAP
20 Aug. 5, 2003

MOTION to dismiss with incorporated points and authorities by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, Motion Docket Date 8/25/03 [20-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 08/06/2003)

RECAP
21 Aug. 20, 2003

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [17-1] motion class certification, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 08/20/2003)

RECAP
22 Aug. 25, 2003

RESPONSE by Teresa D. Padilla, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Alexandros Karkanis, Joel Martinez-Lara, Roberto Carlos Cruz Granados, Carol Carson, Maria Guadalupe Hernandez-Hernandez, Gerardo Carmona-Rojas, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez to [20-1] motion to dismiss, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 08/25/2003)

RECAP
23 Aug. 26, 2003

MOTION for preliminary injunction by Teresa D. Padilla, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Alexandros Karkanis, Joel Martinez-Lara, Roberto Carlos Cruz Granados, Carol Carson, Maria Guadalupe Hernandez-Hernandez, Gerardo Carmona-Rojas, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez, Motion Docket Date 9/15/03 [23-1] motion, filed. (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 08/26/2003)

RECAP
24 Aug. 26, 2003

MEMORANDUM by Teresa D. Padilla, Anita De Alva Mascorro, Roberto Carrera, Hector Maldonado, Ayman Mustafa Ali Mahmoud, Rosa Moreno Moreno, Alexandros Karkanis, Joel Martinez-Lara, Roberto Carlos Cruz Granados, Carol Carson, Maria Guadalupe Hernandez-Hernandez, Gerardo Carmona-Rojas, Pedro Perales-Gonzalez in support of [23-1] motion for preliminary injunction, filed (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 08/26/2003)

RECAP
25 Sept. 3, 2003

Initial Pretrial Conference held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa; Ct clerk: Sylvia Martinez; ERO: Tony Tijerina; Apps: Javier Maldonado; Joseph Berra; Lisa Putnam; Court grants the motion to dismiss as to the eight individuals whose claims are now moot but denies the motion as to the other five individuals; parties to file further briefing on the issue of typicality by 9/15/03 as to the motion for class certification; dft to file a response to the motion for preliminary injunction by 9/15/03; Motion hearing on both motions before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa set for 2:30 10/14/03 (bgarces) (Entered: 09/04/2003)

RECAP
26 Sept. 15, 2003

SUPPLEMENT to [17-1] motion for class certification by Teresa D. Padilla; et al, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 09/15/2003)

RECAP
27 Sept. 15, 2003

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [23-1] motion for preliminary injunction, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 09/15/2003)

RECAP
28 Sept. 22, 2003

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT for Mandamus, Declaratory and Injunctive Releif by Teresa D. Padilla filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 09/22/2003)

RECAP
29 Sept. 22, 2003

Unopposed MOTION for leave to file Second Amended Complaint by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 09/22/2003)

RECAP
30 Sept. 22, 2003

ORDER striking [28-1] amended complaint, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 09/23/2003)

RECAP
Sept. 22, 2003

File 1 consist of pleadings 1 − 27 (bgarces) (Entered: 09/22/2003)

PACER
Sept. 22, 2003

File 1 consist of pleadings 1 - 27 (bgarces)

31 Sept. 26, 2003

ORDER granting [29-1] motion for leave to file Second Amended Complaint, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 09/26/2003)

RECAP
32 Sept. 26, 2003

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Teresa D. Padilla, Alexandros Karkanis, amending [1-1] complaint; adding Elizabeth Aubrecht, Eden Garza, Eden Garza Cadena, Maria de la Luz Mata, Mansour R. Mansour, Maria Reyna Bosquez, Santos Cardoso, Saed Abdel Hadi Ismail Shelbayeh, Mario Domiguez, Rafael Hernandez Lopez, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 09/26/2003)

RECAP
33 Oct. 3, 2003

REPLY by Teresa D. Padilla to response in opposition to [23-1] motion for preliminary injunction, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 10/03/2003)

RECAP
34 Oct. 6, 2003

ANSWER by Tom Ridge, Hipolito Acosta to second amended complaint for mandamus, declaratory and injunctive relief, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 10/06/2003)

RECAP
35 Oct. 10, 2003

Position in RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta to Supplement to [17-1] motion class certification, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 10/10/2003)

RECAP
36 Oct. 14, 2003

Motion Hearing held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa; Ct clerk: Sylvia Martinez; ERO: Tony Tijerina; Apps: Javier Maldonado; Joseph Berra; Lisa Putnam; motion for class certification addressed; the Court will certify the class but advises pltf that the present proposed order for giving notice to the class members is not adequate; pltf to file a proposed order by 11/7/03; dft can respond by 11/17/03; setting status conference for 4:00 11/25/03 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa at which time they can also discuss if a hearing on the preliminary injunction is still necessary and how long the hearing will take; at pltf's counsel request and w/no opposition from the dft, the Court instructs the clerk to keep docket number 28 as the live pleading and not docket number 32. (bgarces) (Entered: 10/16/2003)

RECAP
37 Nov. 7, 2003

Proposed Class Certification Order and NOTICE to the Class by Teresa D. Padilla, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 11/07/2003)

RECAP
38 Nov. 17, 2003

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta to [17-1] motion class certification and notice to the class, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 11/17/2003)

RECAP
39 Nov. 25, 2003

Unopposed MOTION for continuance of Nov. 25, 2003 Status Conference by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

RECAP
Nov. 25, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa; 11/25/03 hearing cancelled; parties notified. (bgarces) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

PACER
Nov. 25, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa granting [39−1] motion for continuance of Nov. 25, 2003 Status Conference (bgarces) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

PACER
Nov. 25, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa; 11/25/03 hearing cancelled; parties notified. (bgarces)

Nov. 25, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa granting [39-1] motion for continuance of Nov. 25, 2003 Status Conference (bgarces)

40 Dec. 12, 2003

Unopposed MOTION for leave to file Third Amended Complaint by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 12/16/2003)

RECAP
Dec. 31, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa setting status conference for 4:00 1/26/04 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ; parties notified. (bgarces) (Entered: 12/31/2003)

PACER
Dec. 31, 2003

ORAL ORDER of Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa setting status conference for 4:00 1/26/04 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ; parties notified. (bgarces)

41 Jan. 26, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa; C Clerk: Sylvia Martinez; ERO: Tony Tijerina; Apps: Javier Maldonado; Lisa Putnam; Court grants [40-1] motion for leave to file Third Amended Complaint; parties instructed to try to work something out with regards to the proposed order giving notice to the class members and this to be filed by 2/18/04; setting status conference 4:00 2/24/04 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ; Court grants oral request for extension of discovery and will issue a docket control order. (bgarces) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
42 Jan. 26, 2004

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by Teresa D. Padilla amending [32-1] amended complaint, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
43 Jan. 27, 2004

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 5/3/04 ; motions for extension of time to complete discovery 4/2/04; Deadline for filing all dispositive motions 5/13/04 ; Deadline for filing non-dispositive motions 5/13/04 ; Pretrial order to be submitted on or before 6/3/04 ; Final Pretrial Conference 2:30 6/10/04 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa, entered. Parties notified. ( Signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) Modified on 01/28/2004 (Entered: 01/28/2004)

RECAP
44 Feb. 9, 2004

ANSWER by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta to third amended complaint, filed. (bgarces) Modified on 02/18/2004 (Entered: 02/09/2004)

RECAP
45 Feb. 18, 2004

(Opposed) Proposed Class Certifcation Order by Teresa D. Padilla, filed (bgarces) Modified on 02/18/2004 (Entered: 02/18/2004)

RECAP
46 Feb. 19, 2004

Continued RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [17-1] motion class certification and proposed class certification order filed (bgarces) (Entered: 02/20/2004)

RECAP
Feb. 20, 2004

File 2 consist of pleadings 1 − 43 (bgarces) Modified on 02/20/2004 (Entered: 02/20/2004)

PACER
Feb. 20, 2004

File 2 consist of pleadings 1 - 43 (bgarces) Modified on 02/20/2004

47 Feb. 24, 2004

MOTION for David Armendariz to appear pro hac vice by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 02/27/2004)

RECAP
48 Feb. 24, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa; Ct Clerk: Sylvia Martinez; ERO: Tony Tijerina; Apps: Javier Maldonado; David Armendariz; Lisa Putnam; Court grants [47-1] motion for David Armendariz to appear pro hac vice the Court will be signing some form of order in this case and will discuss the order with the parties via a telephone conference call; setting telephone conference for 3:50 3/29/04 before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ; to be initiated by the Court. (bgarces) (Entered: 02/27/2004)

RECAP
49 March 29, 2004

Tele-Conference held before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa; Ct Clerk: Sylvia Martinez; ERO: Carmel Phelps; Apps: Javier Maldonado; Lisa Putnam; the court reviews w/the parties the proposed class certification order; after some discussion the Court will enter an order; the Court denies [23-1] motion for preliminary injunction; there is presently a pretrial conference set for 6/10/04 at which time the Court will address the permanent injunction. (bgarces) (Entered: 03/30/2004)

RECAP
March 29, 2004

Deadline updated; mooting [1−1] motion for declaratory and injunctive relief (bgarces) (Entered: 03/30/2004)

PACER
March 29, 2004

Deadline updated; mooting [1-1] motion for declaratory and injunctive relief (bgarces)

50 March 31, 2004

ORDER granting [17-1] motion class certification to the extent that the case is to be maintained as a class action comprised as stated in this order, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 03/31/2004)

RECAP
51 April 19, 2004

(MOTION) Notice of withdrawal of Joseph P Barrera by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 5/9/04 [51-1], filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 04/20/2004)

RECAP
52 April 21, 2004

ORDER granting [51-1] motion withdrawal of Joseph P Barrera, entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 04/21/2004)

RECAP
53 May 5, 2004

Opposed MOTION for leave to file Fourth Amended Complaint by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 5/25/04 [53-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 05/05/2004)

RECAP
54 May 5, 2004

Opposed MOTION to compel answers to requests for interrogatories and requests for production of documents and things by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 5/25/04 [54-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 05/05/2004)

RECAP
55 May 5, 2004

MEMORANDUM by Teresa D. Padilla in support of [54-1] motion to compel answers to requests for interrogatories and requests for production of documents and things, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 05/05/2004)

RECAP
56 May 7, 2004

Unopposed MOTION to extend the motion deadline by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, Motion Docket Date forthwith, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 05/10/2004)

RECAP
57 May 11, 2004

ORDER resetting Deadline for filing all dispositive motions 6/14/04 ; Deadline for filing non-dispositive motions 6/14/04 ; Pretrial order to be submitted on or before 7/29/04 ; Final Pretrial Conference 2:30 8/5/04 granting [56-1] motion to extend the motion deadline before Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa, entered. Parties notified. ( Signed by Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa ) (bgarces) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

RECAP
58 May 18, 2004

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [53-1] motion for leave to file Fourth Amended Complaint, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 05/19/2004)

RECAP
59 May 18, 2004

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [54-1] motion to compel answers to requests for interrogatories and requests for production of documents and things, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 05/19/2004)

RECAP
60 May 27, 2004

REPLY by Teresa D. Padilla to response in opposition to [53-1] motion for leave to file Fourth Amended Complaint, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 05/27/2004)

RECAP
61 May 27, 2004

REPLY by Teresa D. Padilla to response to [54-1] motion to compel answers to requests for interrogatories and requests for production of documents and things, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 05/27/2004)

RECAP
62 June 1, 2004

SUPPLEMENT to Memorandum in Support of [54-1] motion to compel answers to requests for interrogatories and requests for production of and things by Teresa D. Padilla, filed. (exhibits located in separate folder/not imaged) (bgarces) (Entered: 06/01/2004)

RECAP
63 June 14, 2004

MOTION for summary judgment by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 7/4/04 [63-1] motion, filed. (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 06/16/2004)

RECAP
64 June 14, 2004

MEMORANDUM by Teresa D. Padilla in support of [63-1] motion for summary judgment, filed. (Exhibits located in separate expandable file, not imaged.) (mjmarroquin) Modified on 06/16/2004 (Entered: 06/16/2004)

RECAP
65 June 14, 2004

OPPOSED MOTION for leave to file Their Fifth Amended Complaint by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 7/4/04 [65-1], filed. (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 06/16/2004)

RECAP
66 June 14, 2004

Opposed MOTION to amend Class Certification Order by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 7/4/04 [66-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

RECAP
67 June 14, 2004

MOTION for summary judgment with incorporated points and authorities by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, Motion Docket Date 7/4/04 [67-1] motion, filed. (bgarces) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

RECAP
June 18, 2004

File 3 consist of pleadings 44 − 65 (bgarces) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

PACER
June 18, 2004

File 3 consist of pleadings 44 - 65 (bgarces)

68 June 25, 2004

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [65-1] motion for leave to file Their Fifth Amended Complaint, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
69 June 25, 2004

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [66-1] motion to amend Class Certification Order, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
70 June 25, 2004

RESPONSE by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta in opposition to [67-1] motion for summary judgment, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
71 July 1, 2004

RESPONSE by Teresa D. Padilla in opposition to [67-1] motion for summary judgment, filed (part 1 of 2) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
71 July 1, 2004

Further support by Teresa D. Padilla of [63-1] motion for summary judgment, filed. (part 2 of 2) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
72 July 1, 2004

REPLY by Teresa D. Padilla to opposition to [65-1] motion for leave to file Their Fifth Amended Complaint, and to opposition [66-1] motion to amend Class Certification Order, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
73 July 14, 2004

JOINT MOTION to cancel Joint Pretrial Order & Pretrial Conference Deadlines by Teresa D. Padilla, Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, filed (bgarces) (Entered: 07/14/2004)

RECAP
74 July 19, 2004

Response by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta to opposition to [67-1] motion for summary judgment, filed (part 1 of 3) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
74 July 19, 2004

SUPPLEMENT to [67-1] motion for summary judgment by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, filed. (part 2 of 3) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
74 July 19, 2004

NOTICE to the Court of Substantially Indentical Cases in California and Florida by Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, filed (part 3 of 3) (bgarces) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

RECAP
July 20, 2004

File 4 consist of pleadings 66 to 73 (bgarces) (Entered: 07/20/2004)

PACER
July 20, 2004

File 4 consist of pleadings 66 to 73 (bgarces)

75 July 23, 2004

OPPOSED MOTION to strike Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment; Supplement to Defendants' motion for summary judgment; and Notice to the Court of substantially identical cases in California and Florida and the accompanying declaration of Janis Ann Sposato, dated July 16, 2004 by Teresa D. Padilla, Motion Docket Date 8/12/04 [75-1] motion, filed. (mjmarroquin) (Entered: 07/23/2004)

RECAP
July 29, 2004

Proposed joint pre−trial order received from Teresa D. Padilla, Tom Ridge, Eduardo Aguirre Jr., Kenneth Pasquarell, Michael Trominski, Sharon J Hudson, Hipolito Acosta, Alexandros Karkanis, Elizabeth Aubrecht, Eden Garza, Eden Garza Cadena, Maria de la Luz Mata, Mansour R. Mansour, Maria Reyna Bosquez, Hector Santos Cardoso, Saed Abdel Hadi Ismail Shelbayeh, Mario Domiguez, Rafael Hernandez Lopez (bgarces) (Entered: 07/30/2004)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 28, 2003

Closing Date: 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons who were or will be granted lawful permanent residentstatus in removal proceedings in the Harlingen, Houston and San Antonio Districts of the BCIS and to whom BCIS fails to issue temporary documentation evidencing their status.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

MALDEF

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

U.S. Attorney General's Office

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Texas 7:03-cv-00126

Northern District of California 04-02686

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

General/Misc.:

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Discrimination Basis:

Immigration status

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Status/Classification

Recommended Citation