Case: Foster-Bey v. Sampson

2:05-cv-71318 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: April 5, 2005

Closed Date: 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 5, 2005, Michigan inmates, represented by attorneys and students with the University of Michigan Clinical Law Program, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, alleging that changes to the Michigan parole law and policies made in 1992 ("life means life") precluded any meaningful review of their life sentences, thereby effectively converting them into mandatory life sentences in violation of the Ex Post Facto and the Due Process Clauses of t…

On April 5, 2005, Michigan inmates, represented by attorneys and students with the University of Michigan Clinical Law Program, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, alleging that changes to the Michigan parole law and policies made in 1992 ("life means life") precluded any meaningful review of their life sentences, thereby effectively converting them into mandatory life sentences in violation of the Ex Post Facto and the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that as a result of the changed parole policies: (1) their parole had been reviewed every other year, but now only every five years; (2) they were no longer entitled to an in-person hearing; (3) written reasons for denial are no longer required, but were before; (4) "a statement of no interest or a pass-over" was no longer considered a formal Parole Board decision subject to judicial review; and (5) the Parole Board changed from an independent entity to one under the direct authority of Michigan's executive department. Plaintiffs named as defendants the Michigan Department of Corrections and the Michigan Parole Board. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as class certification.

In an unpublished opinion, The Court (Judge Nancy G. Edmunds) refused to waive the filing fee based on plaintiffs' impoverished financial status. Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40135 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 19, 2005).

Defendants moved to dismiss the case on various grounds, including failure to state a claim, statute of limitations bar and qualified immunity. The Court (Judge Edmunds) granted the defendants' motion in part and dismissed plaintiffs' Due Process claim, holding that there was no liberty interest in parole. The Court denied the motion was as to plaintiffs' ex post facto claim, allowing litigation to continue on that issue. Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun, 2005 WL 2010181, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40869 (E.D.Mich. Aug 18, 2005)

On October 26, 2005, The Court (Judge Edmunds) granted plaintiffs' motion for class certification, defining the class as all parolable life inmates in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections who were convicted before October 1, 1992, and whose parole the "new" parole board has denied, passed over, expressed no interest in pursuing, or otherwise rejected or deferred.

Shortly thereafter, Judge Edmunds disqualified herself, and the action was reassigned to District Judge Marianne O. Battani. Judge Battani later redefined the class as consisting of:

"All parolable lifers in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections who committed crimes (for which they received a parolable life sentence) before October 1, 1992, and whose parole the "new" parole board has denied, passed over, expressed no interest in pursuing, or otherwise rejected or deferred. Excluded from this definition are so-called "drug lifers" who were convicted of distribution or possession of controlled substances, regardless of whether the crime was originally one subject to parolable life or one converted to parolable life at a later time."

The parties then filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the ex post facto claim. The Court (Judge Battani) entered summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, finding that the changes to Michigan's parole policies since October 1, 1992, as applied to non-drug parolable lifers who committed crimes before that date, were unconstitutional. Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95748 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 23, 2007).

On February 7, 2008, the Court (Judge Battani) issued a first remedial injunctive order, directing state officials to begin parole proceedings for the estimated 1000 class members, using the review process that was in place in 1992, prior to the subject changes. The injunction set forth detailed instructions for implementing the parole proceedings and for reporting remediation efforts to the Court.

In March 2008, the defendants appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The defendants appealed the District Court's grant of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, entry of the declaratory judgment and permanent injunction and award of plaintiffs' costs and attorney fees. The plaintiffs cross-appealed the dismissal of their due process claim.

On February 28, 2010, in a published opinion, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and remanded the case to the District Court with instructions to grant the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Sixth Circuit vacated the permanent injunction and reversed the award of plaintiffs' costs and attorney fees. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the District Court's dismissal of plaintiffs' due process claim.

On March 02, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a petition for en banc rehearing. The Sixth Circuit denied the petition on April 04, 2010. On July 23, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. On October 07, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the certiorari petition.

(Updated 03/19/2012)

Summary Authors

Xin Chen (3/20/2012)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4758444/parties/foster-v-rubitschun/


Judge(s)

Battani, Marianne O. (Michigan)

Edmunds, Nancy Garlock (Michigan)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Campbell, Christine M. (Michigan)

Friedman, Leo H. (Michigan)

General, Kevin R.

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:05-cv-71318

Docket [PACER]

Foster v. Sampson

April 22, 2010

April 22, 2010

Docket

08-01371

Docket (6th Circuit)

Foster v. Booker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Oct. 7, 2010

Oct. 7, 2010

Docket
1

2:05-cv-71318

Class Action Complaint

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

April 5, 2005

April 5, 2005

Complaint
5

2:05-cv-71318

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

April 19, 2005

April 19, 2005

Order/Opinion

2005 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 40135

44

2:05-cv-71318

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

Aug. 18, 2005

Aug. 18, 2005

Order/Opinion

2005 WL 2010181

102

2:05-cv-71318

Order Dismissing Claims Against the Defendants in their Individual Capacities and Amending the Case Caption

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

Sept. 28, 2005

Sept. 28, 2005

Order/Opinion
106

2:05-cv-71318

Order Granting Class Certification

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

Oct. 26, 2005

Oct. 26, 2005

Order/Opinion
109

2:05-cv-71318

Order

Henderson v. Rubitschun

Feb. 6, 2006

Feb. 6, 2006

Order/Opinion

1:06-cv-13274

Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiff's Objections, Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and Dismissing Case

Henderson v. Rubitschun

June 5, 2007

June 5, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 40634

142

2:05-cv-71318

Amended Order of Class Certification

Foster-Bey v. Rubitschun

July 3, 2007

July 3, 2007

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4758444/foster-v-rubitschun/

Last updated Oct. 29, 2026, 7:22 p.m.

Docket for: Foster v. Rubitschun
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 5, 2005

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with exhibits 1-7, Receipt No. IFP. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation)(JPur, ) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

RECAP
2 April 5, 2005

MOTIONS to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation)(JPur, ) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

RECAP
3 April 5, 2005

MOTION for Class Certification by plaintiffs. (JPur, ) (Entered: 04/06/2005)

RECAP
4 April 11, 2005

Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Gerald Hessell.(JPur2, ) (Entered: 04/12/2005)

RECAP
5 April 19, 2005

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Kenneth Foster,, John Alexander,, Gerald Hessell,, Waymon Kincaid,, Robert Weisenauer,, William Sleeper,, Eric McCullum,. Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 04/19/2005)

RECAP
6 April 27, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs of 1 Complaint. (DPer, ) (Entered: 04/29/2005)

RECAP
7 April 27, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs of 1 Complaint. (DPer, ) (Entered: 04/29/2005)

RECAP
13 May 10, 2005

NOTICE of filing fee paid in full. (DPer, ) (Entered: 05/13/2005)

RECAP
8 May 12, 2005

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Frank J. Monticello appearing on behalf of all defendants.(Monticello, Frank) (Entered: 05/12/2005)

RECAP
9 May 12, 2005

MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Opinion)(Monticello, Frank) (Entered: 05/12/2005)

RECAP
10 May 12, 2005

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kevin R. Himebaugh appearing on behalf of all defendants.(Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 05/12/2005)

RECAP
11 May 12, 2005

MOTION Hold Motion for Class Certification in Abeyance re 3 MOTION to Certify Class with Brief in Support by all defendants. (Monticello, Frank) (Entered: 05/12/2005)

RECAP
12 May 12, 2005

MOTION to Stay Discovery with Brief in Support by all defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Discovery)(Monticello, Frank) (Entered: 05/12/2005)

RECAP
14 May 12, 2005

LETTER from Robert Weisenauer. (DPer, ) (Entered: 05/16/2005)

RECAP
15 May 17, 2005

FEE Received in the amount of $35.71 for Partial Payment of Filing Fee by John Alexander - Receipt No. 5591-AA (JPur, ) (Entered: 05/17/2005)

RECAP
16 May 18, 2005

NOTICE of hearing on 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support, 11 MOTION Hold Motion for Class Certification in Abeyance re 3 MOTION to Certify Class with Brief in Support, 12 MOTION to Stay Discovery with Brief in Support. Motion Hearing set for 6/29/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 05/18/2005)

RECAP
17 May 19, 2005

NOTICE of filing fee paid in full by Robert Weisenauer (NHoll, ) (Entered: 05/19/2005)

RECAP
18 May 19, 2005

NOTICE of Filing Fee paid in full by John Alexander. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 05/20/2005)

RECAP
19 June 1, 2005

RESPONSE to 12 MOTION to Stay Discovery with Brief in Support filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit First Interrogatories)(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 06/01/2005)

RECAP
20 June 1, 2005

RESPONSE to 11 MOTION Hold Motion for Class Certification in Abeyance re 3 MOTION to Certify Class with Brief in Support filed by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 06/01/2005)

RECAP
21 June 1, 2005

Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 06/01/2005)

RECAP
22 June 1, 2005

RESPONSE to 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Johnson# 2 Exhibit Curtis)(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 06/01/2005)

RECAP
23 June 6, 2005

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages- Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 06/06/2005)

RECAP
24 June 6, 2005

ORDER granting 11 Motion to hold plaintiffs' motion for class certification in abeyance and granting 12 Motion to Stay discovery, and cancelling hearing.- Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 06/06/2005)

RECAP
31 June 8, 2005

NOTICE of filing fee paid in full by William Sleeper. (DPer, ) (Entered: 07/07/2005)

RECAP
25 June 9, 2005

REPLY to Response re 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support filed by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment)(Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 06/09/2005)

RECAP
26 June 9, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso re 25 Reply to Response to Motion,. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 06/09/2005)

RECAP
27 June 15, 2005

REPLY to Response re 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support CORRECTED REPLY with Proof of Service filed by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 06/15/2005)

RECAP
28 June 24, 2005

NOTICE of hearing on 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support, 3 MOTION to Certify Class. Motion Hearing re-set for 7/13/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 06/24/2005)

RECAP
29 July 6, 2005

MOTION to Reassign Case and/ or consolidation by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 07/06/2005)

RECAP
30 July 6, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 07/06/2005)

RECAP
July 13, 2005

Minute Entry -Motion Hearing held on 7/13/2005 re 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support filed by Patricia L. Caruso,, John S. Rubitschun,, James Quinlan,, Charles Braddock,, Marianne Samper,, Miguel Berrios,, James Atterberry,, Barbara Sampson,, Stephen DeBoer,, Enid Livingston,, Artina Hartman, before Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (Court Reporter Suzanne Jacques) (CHem, )

32 July 14, 2005

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support together with Certificate of Service filed by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 07/14/2005)

RECAP
33 July 15, 2005

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 32 Supplemental Brief, Response filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Motion and Brief for Rehearing# 2 Exhibit Hill Opinion)(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 07/15/2005)

RECAP
34 July 15, 2005

ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION for John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso: Leo H. Friedman added. Attorney Frank J. Monticello terminated. Substituted Appearance of Counsel.(Friedman, Leo) (Entered: 07/15/2005)

RECAP
35 July 15, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso re 34 Attorney Substitution, Substituted Appearance of Counsel. (Friedman, Leo) (Entered: 07/15/2005)

RECAP
36 July 21, 2005

ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing to 9 Motion to Dismiss. Response due: 8/1/2005. Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 07/21/2005)

RECAP
37 July 25, 2005

STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Filing Supplemental Briefs by Kenneth Foster.(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 07/25/2005)

RECAP
38 Aug. 1, 2005

MOTION for enlargement of time to file objections to order of consolidation by Anthony Lynch. (DPer, ) (Entered: 08/02/2005)

RECAP
39 Aug. 10, 2005

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 32 Supplemental Brief, motion to dismiss filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - No Way Out)(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 08/10/2005)

RECAP
40 Aug. 15, 2005

RESPONSE to 36 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading with Certificate of Service by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Hill Opinion)(Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 08/15/2005)

RECAP
41 Aug. 16, 2005

[STRICKEN AS OF 8/17/2005] REPLY to Response re 12 MOTION to Stay Discovery with Brief in Support, 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support filed by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) Modified on 8/18/2005 (NHoll, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2005 (NHoll, ). (Entered: 08/16/2005)

RECAP
42 Aug. 17, 2005

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 32 Supplemental Brief,, 39 Supplemental Brief Corrected Version filed by Kenneth Foster. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit No Way Out)(Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 08/17/2005)

RECAP
43 Aug. 17, 2005

ORDER Striking 41 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Kenneth Foster. Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 08/18/2005)

RECAP
44 Aug. 18, 2005

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss- Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 08/18/2005)

RECAP
45 Aug. 18, 2005

ORDER granting 38 Motion to Extend time to file objections to consolidation to 9/2/2005. - Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 08/18/2005)

RECAP
46 Aug. 19, 2005

MOTION for Reconsideration re 44 Order on Motion to Dismiss -Motion for Partial Reconsideration with Brief in Support and Certificate of Service by all defendants. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 08/19/2005)

RECAP
47 Aug. 22, 2005

ORDER denying 46 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by Honorable Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem, ) (Entered: 08/22/2005)

RECAP
48 Aug. 26, 2005

Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to James Clark re 47 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 08/29/2005)

RECAP
51 Aug. 26, 2005

Sealed Matter (B).(DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
49 Aug. 29, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs re 1 Complaint upon Patricia Caruso. (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
50 Aug. 29, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs Anthony Lynch, James Clark, Holley Davis, Johnathan Martin, Billy Ray Abernathy, Brian Hagood, Brian Luckett, Timothy Ganderson of complaint served upon John Rubitschun. (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
52 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. James Atterberry served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
54 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Charles Braddock served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
55 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Stephen DeBoer served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
56 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Artina Hartman served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
57 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Marianne Samper served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
58 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Barbara Sampson served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
59 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Enid Livingston served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
60 Aug. 29, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. James Quinlan served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
53 Aug. 30, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed. Miguel Berrios served on 8/12/2005, answer due 9/1/2005 (DTyle, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005)

RECAP
61 Aug. 31, 2005

RESPONSE to 38 MOTION TO EXTEND for Severance of Claims filed by Kenneth Foster. (Reingold, Paul) (Entered: 08/31/2005)

RECAP
62 Sept. 1, 2005

NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin R. Himebaugh on behalf of John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 09/01/2005)

RECAP
63 Sept. 6, 2005

RESPONSE to 38 MOTION TO EXTEND and to Lynch-Bey Plaintiffs' Motion for Severance of Claims filed by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 09/06/2005)

RECAP
64 Sept. 6, 2005

MOTION for Severance of Claims by Anthony Lynch. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

RECAP
65 Sept. 12, 2005

RESPONSE to 3 MOTION to Certify Class with Certificate of Service filed by John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Charles Braddock, Stephen DeBoer, Enid Livingston, James Quinlan, Marianne Samper, Barbara Sampson, Artina Hartman, Patricia L. Caruso. (Himebaugh, Kevin) (Entered: 09/12/2005)

RECAP
96 Sept. 12, 2005

MOTION to Intervene as Plaintiff's by Larissa Barclay, Cassandra Barlow, Onie C. Bradford, Loretta Bradley, Annie Jackson, Kyle Jackson, Lutricia Long, Ernestine Lynch, Vicki Davis Mack. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/19/2005)

RECAP
66 Sept. 13, 2005

NOTICE of Filing Rule 5 Materials by Anthony Lynch. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
67 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Supreme Court Case No. 04-00031-AA-C30.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 67 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
68 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Department of Corrections.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 68 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
69 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Copy of Letter from State of Michigan, Dept. of Corrections.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
70 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Petition for Judicial Review; Ingham County Circuit Court.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 70 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
71 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 71 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
72 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 72 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
73 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 73 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
74 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 74 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
75 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
76 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 76 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
77 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 77 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
78 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 78 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
79 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 79 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
80 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 80 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
81 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 81 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
82 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - State of Michigan, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 82 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
83 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham Coounty Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 83 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
84 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 84 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
85 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 85 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
86 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Thirtieth Judicial Circuit Court, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
87 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Court of Appeals, Case No. 04-31-AA.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
88 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Court of Appeals, Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 88 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
89 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Court of Appeals, Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 89 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
90 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Court of Appeals Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 90 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
91 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Ingham County Circuit Court Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 91 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
92 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Court of Appeals, Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
93 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Letter to Michigan Supreme Court by Lynch.(NHoll, ) (Main Document 93 replaced on 8/27/2010) (SSch). (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
94 Sept. 13, 2005

STATE Court Record - Michigan Supreme Court Case No. 257290.(NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
95 Sept. 13, 2005

EX PARTE REQUEST for leave to file brief exceeding 20 page limitation by all plaintiffs. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

RECAP
97 Sept. 22, 2005

AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Anthony Lynch. (DPer, ) (Entered: 09/23/2005)

RECAP
98 Sept. 23, 2005

EX PARTE NOTICE of intent to file motion to intervene as plaintiff's by Melvin Gunn. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/26/2005)

RECAP
99 Sept. 23, 2005

MOTION to Strike Responses and/or MOTION for More Definite Statement by all plaintiffs. (NHoll, ) (Entered: 09/26/2005)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Michigan

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 5, 2005

Closing Date: 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All parolable life inmates in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections who were convicted before 10/1/92, and whose parole the “new” parole board has denied, passed over, expressed no interest in pursuing, or otherwise rejected or deferred.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Michigan Clinical Law Program

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Michigan Department of Corrections

Michigan Parole Board

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Ex Post Facto

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Michigan 2:05-cv-71318

Eastern District of Michigan 1:06-cv-13274

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 08-01478

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 08-01371

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 08-01626

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 08-01372

Supreme Court of the United States 10-5004

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General/Misc.:

Parole grant/revocation

Recommended Citation