Case: Boyd v. Greenville County

6:06-cv-02339 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina

Filed Date: Aug. 22, 2006

Closed Date: 2008

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 22, 2006, a group of 25 inmates and pretrial detainees filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, claiming to have been infected with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ("MRSA") while they were incarcerated at the Greenville County Detention Center ("Jail") in South Carolina. MRSA is a flesh eating bacteria that can cause debilitating open sores, pain, and death. Staph infections, including the MRS…

On August 22, 2006, a group of 25 inmates and pretrial detainees filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, claiming to have been infected with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ("MRSA") while they were incarcerated at the Greenville County Detention Center ("Jail") in South Carolina. MRSA is a flesh eating bacteria that can cause debilitating open sores, pain, and death. Staph infections, including the MRSA strain, are generally spread through close skin-to-skin contact and in places with crowded living conditions and poor hygiene. Plaintiffs alleged that the poor sanitation of the Jail together with the deliberate indifference of Jail officials to preventing infectious disease led to their exposure, effectively violating their Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and punitive damages, and class certification.

The case was assigned to District Court Judge G. Ross Anderson, Jr. According to the PACER docket, the parties engaged in discovery and Defendants eventually moved for summary judgment. Prior to any ruling on Defendants' motion, however, the parties advised the Court that they had reached a settlement. On March 4, 2008, the Court (Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe) held a fairness hearing and approved the settlement. While the settlement documents were not available through the PACER docket, news accounts reported that Greenville County agreed to pay $80,000 to settle the case.

We have no further information on this case.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (3/10/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4716095/parties/boyd-v-greenville-county-of/


Judge(s)

Anderson, George Ross Jr. (South Carolina)

Catoe, William M. Jr. (South Carolina)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dunaway, Thomas Whitfield III (South Carolina)

Attorney for Defendant

Groves, Charles Michael (South Carolina)

Harter, Russell W. Jr. (South Carolina)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

6:06-cv-02339

Docket [PACER]

March 10, 2008

March 10, 2008

Docket
1

6:06-cv-02339

Complaint; Jury Trial Demanded

Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

Complaint
54

6:06-cv-02339

Order

March 4, 2008

March 4, 2008

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4716095/boyd-v-greenville-county-of/

Last updated Aug. 19, 2025, 5:08 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
22

ORDER denying 16 Motion to Intervene Signed by Judge G Ross Anderson Jr on 5/15/07.(gkra, )

May 15, 2007

May 15, 2007

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: South Carolina

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 22, 2006

Closing Date: 2008

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

25 inmates and/or pretrial detainees at the Greenville County Detention Center in South Carolina filed a civil rights case claiming to have been infected with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Greenville County (Greenville), County

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Medical care, general

Skin Infections