Case: Jeanine B. v. Doyle

2:93-cv-00547 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: June 1, 1993

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On June 1, 1993, Children's Rights, the ACLU, and private co-counsel filed this class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services and the Milwaukee County Department of Human Services. The complaint alleged abuse and neglect of children in the Milwaukee child-welfare system, inadequate investigations into abuse and neglect, lack of services, improper foster care placement, and high casewo…

On June 1, 1993, Children's Rights, the ACLU, and private co-counsel filed this class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services and the Milwaukee County Department of Human Services. The complaint alleged abuse and neglect of children in the Milwaukee child-welfare system, inadequate investigations into abuse and neglect, lack of services, improper foster care placement, and high caseworker caseloads. The plaintiffs alleged violations of state law and federal law, including the Adoption Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 620-28, 670-79(a); Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), 42 U.S.C. § 5101-5106(a); Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12121-12150; and Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794.

In early 1995, the court granted the state defendants' motion to dismiss claims as to the state defendants brought under 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(15) of the Adoption Assistance Act and under the Rehabilitation Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Additionally, the Court certified the class of plaintiffs as children who are in foster care in Milwaukee County, and children about whom the county Department of Human Services received reports of abuse or neglect. Jeanine B. v. Thompson, 877 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. Wisc. 1995).

The case then proceeded towards a trial bifurcated into a liability stage and a remedy stage. However, during preparations for trial in 1995, the Wisconsin state Legislature passed a provision that required the state Department of Health and Social Services to propose a plan for state takeover of the Milwaukee County child welfare system by 1998. In light of the legislative action, the Court denied the state defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on constitutional issues, adjourned the trial date, and required the parties to determine whether the law provided interim relief and how relief affected the liability and remedial aspects of the case.

After both plaintiffs and defendants provided a series of briefings to the Court, the plaintiffs moved for preliminary injunction in February 1997. The plaintiffs claimed that the pending state takeover would only exacerbate problems in Milwaukee County's child welfare system. In response, the Court denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction under CAPTA. Jeanine B. v. Thompson, 967 F. Supp. 1104 (E.D. Wisc. 1997).

In 1998, the Court dismissed as moot the plaintiffs' claims against the county and proceeded with discovery for trial. After extensive discovery, the plaintiffs filed a supplemental complaint in 1999 and a second supplemental complaint in 2000. Trial was set for 2003. In September 2002, however, the parties reached a settlement agreement that provided for phased improvements to the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, which included decreased caseworker caseloads, elimination of shelter placements, and special diagnostic/assessment centers for children.

The parties modified the settlement agreement in 2003 and again in 2012, although the main substance of the agreement remained the same. The agreement is to remain in force until the defendants are in full compliance with its terms and the Court terminates jurisdiction. Attorneys' fees have been awarded to the plaintiffs in the amount of $950,000. As of the date of this summary, monitoring continues.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Homan (11/25/2012)

Dan Whitman (11/29/2015)

Eva Richardson (7/10/2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4623199/parties/b-v-governor-wi/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Bloodhart, Ann K (Minnesota)

Dorsky, Daniel S. (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Peter C. (Wisconsin)

Barnett, Paul L (Wisconsin)

Burke, Mary E. (Wisconsin)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:93-cv-00547

Docket [PACER]

Jeanine B v. Doyle

Jan. 29, 2019

Jan. 29, 2019

Docket
1

2:93-cv-00547

Complaint

Jeanine B. v. Thompson

June 1, 1993

June 1, 1993

Complaint
65

2:93-cv-00547

Federal Supplement

Jeanine B. v. Thompson

March 2, 1995

March 2, 1995

Order/Opinion
196

2:93-cv-00547

Federal Supplement

Jeanine B. v. Thompson

June 9, 1997

June 9, 1997

Order/Opinion
517

2:93-cv-00547

Modified Settlement Agreement

Nov. 14, 2003

Nov. 14, 2003

Settlement Agreement
531

2:93-cv-00547

Order

B. v. Doyle

May 23, 2005

May 23, 2005

Order/Opinion
538

2:93-cv-00547

Decision and Order

Nov. 17, 2006

Nov. 17, 2006

Order/Opinion
541

2:93-cv-00547

Decision and Order

May 3, 2007

May 3, 2007

Order/Opinion
543

2:93-cv-00547

Order

Jeanine B v. Doyle

Dec. 17, 2007

Dec. 17, 2007

Order/Opinion
545

2:93-cv-00547

Consent Order

B. v. Doyle

April 18, 2008

April 18, 2008

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4623199/b-v-governor-wi/

Last updated Oct. 29, 2026, 7:42 p.m.

Docket for: B v. Governor WI
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 June 1, 1993

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued) (ers, )

RECAP
2 June 1, 1993

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST by plaintiffs (ers, )

RECAP
3 June 3, 1993

LETTER from Law Clerk Terri Zeller to Counsel saying that if Plaintiffs want this Court to consider the injunction relief, a separate preliminary injunction motion must be filed. (ers, ) (Entered: 06/04/1993)

RECAP
4 June 22, 1993

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds Granting Atty Jorgensen an extension of 20 days, until 7/12/93 to file & serve the answer of the Milwaukee County Defts to the Complaint (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 06/23/1993)

RECAP
5 June 22, 1993

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds - Granting the Stipulation filed on 6/18/93. See Stipulation for details. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 06/23/1993)

RECAP
6 July 1, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to certify Class Action (ers, ) (Entered: 07/02/1993)

RECAP
7 July 1, 1993

BRIEF by plaintiffs in support of motion to certify Class Action [6-1] w/ attachments (ers, ) (Entered: 07/02/1993)

RECAP
8 July 2, 1993

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Koneazny saying that the names of 2 of the plaintiffs who were identified in the Complaint were accidently omitted on the caption page. (ers, )

RECAP
9 July 8, 1993

LETTER from Assistant Attorney General Mary Woolsey Schlaefer confirming that the State Defts request that their deadline to answer be extended to 7/22/93 is Granted. (ers, )

RECAP
10 July 14, 1993

RESPONSE To Consent To Proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by defendant F Thomas Ament, defendant Thomas Brophy (R) (ers, )

RECAP
11 July 14, 1993

ANSWER by defendant F Thomas Ament, defendant Thomas Brophy to [1-1] (ers, )

RECAP
12 July 20, 1993

MOTION & ORDER ENLARGING BRIEF LIMITS by Judge J. P. Stadtmueller for Judge Reynolds (cc: all counsel) (cad, ) (Entered: 07/22/1993)

RECAP
13 July 22, 1993

MOTION by state defendants to dismiss (wied, )

RECAP
14 July 22, 1993

BRIEF by state defendants in support of motion to dismiss [13-1] (wied, )

RECAP
15 July 22, 1993

MOTION by state defendants for stay of proceedings on pltfs' motion for class certification pending decision of the state defendants' motion to dismiss complaint, in the alternative to extend time to respond to motion for class certification (wied, )

RECAP
16 July 22, 1993

CERTIFICATE (wied, )

RECAP
17 July 22, 1993

CERTIFICATE of service. (wied, )

RECAP
18 July 26, 1993

RESPONSE To Consent To Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by defendant Tommy Thompson, defendant Gerald Whitburn (R) (ers, )

RECAP
19 July 28, 1993

RESPONSE To Consent To Proceed Before a US Magisrate Judge by plaintiff (R) (ers, ) (Entered: 07/29/1993)

RECAP
20 July 28, 1993

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds DENYINGmotion for stay of proceedings on pltfs' motion for class certification pending decision of the state defendants' motion to dismiss complaint [15-1], GRANTING motion to extend time to respond to motion for class certification [15-2] On or before 8/16/93, Defts Thompson & Gerald Whitburn shall file & serve a response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class certification (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 07/29/1993)

RECAP
21 Aug. 4, 1993

NOTICE of hearing ; Scheduling Conference Call set for 9/1/93 at 10:00 a.m. (cc: all counsel) (ers, )

RECAP
22 Aug. 16, 1993

LETTER from plaintiffs by Atty Christopher Dunn notifying the Court that the state Defts have agreed to grant the Plaintiffs an extension of 10 days until 8/26/93 to file their response. (ers, )

RECAP
23 Aug. 16, 1993

BRIEF by State defendants in opposition to Plaintiffs motion to certify Class Action [6-1] (ers, )

RECAP
24 Aug. 20, 1993

STATUS REPORT by plaintiffs (ers, ) (Entered: 08/23/1993)

RECAP
25 Aug. 26, 1993

BRIEF by plaintiff IN OPPOSITION to State Defts motion to dismiss [13-1] (ers, )

RECAP
26 Aug. 27, 1993

REPLY BRIEF by plaintiff in support of motion to certify Class Action [6-1] (ers, )

RECAP
27 Sept. 1, 1993

HEARING MINUTES: ; Discovery ddl set for 6/3/94 ; Motion filing ddl set for 6/10/94 ; Pretrial conference 8/30/94 at 2:00 p.m. ; Trial set for 9/13/94 at 10:00 a.m. ; Est 3 weeks. Status hearing held 9/1/93 (ers, ) (Entered: 09/02/1993)

RECAP
28 Sept. 2, 1993

ORDER Following Scheduling Conference by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds See above dates. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 09/07/1993)

RECAP
29 Sept. 9, 1993

REPLY BRIEF by State Defendants in support of motion to dismiss [13-1] (ers, )

RECAP
30 Sept. 29, 1993

SUR REPLY BRIEF by plaintiffs to State Defts Reply Brief (ers, )

RECAP
31 Jan. 18, 1994

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Dunn calling the Court to a recent Decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that is relevant to the state Defendants pending motion to Dismiss w/ attached slip opinion which is in Judges File (ers, ) (Entered: 01/19/1994)

RECAP
32 Jan. 21, 1994

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by Daniel S. Dorsky (ers, )

RECAP
33 Jan. 27, 1994

LETTER From Mary Schlaefer in response to Plaintiffs' 1/14/94 letter regarding the Seventh Circuit holding in Miller v Whitburn (ers, )

RECAP
34 Feb. 2, 1994

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Dunn calling your attention to a recent decision from another District Court that deals w/ the enforceability of the Adoption Assistance & Child Welfare Act & thus is relevant to the State Defts' pending motion to Dismiss. (ers, ) (Entered: 02/03/1994)

RECAP
35 Feb. 4, 1994

MOTION by Plaintiff, County Defendants for order to Appoint the National Council on Crime & Delinquency as an expert (ers, ) (Entered: 02/07/1994)

RECAP
36 Feb. 16, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff to compel the Production of Documents (ers, )

RECAP
37 Feb. 16, 1994

BRIEF by plaintiff IN SUPPORT of motion to compel the Production of Documents [36-1] (ers, )

RECAP
38 Feb. 17, 1994

NOTICE of hearing on motion to compel the Production of Documents [36-1] 2:00 3/1/94, setting hearing on motion for order to Appoint the National Council on & Delinquency as an expert [35-1] 2:00 3/1/94 (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 02/18/1994)

RECAP
39 Feb. 25, 1994

BRIEF by State defendants IN OPPOSITION to Plaintiffs' & County Defts motion for order to Appoint the National Council on Crime & Delinquency as an expert [35-1] (ers, )

RECAP
40 March 1, 1994

HEARING MINUTES: The Plaintiffs & County Defendants Joint Motion to appoint a rule 706 expert is denied, although the parties are free to agree on an expert. The county Defendants & Plaintiffs shall prepare a scheduling order re: the production of documents by the County Defts & shall file that draft order on or before 3/7/94. (ers, ) (Entered: 03/04/1994)

RECAP
41 March 11, 1994

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds : That Plaintiffs and County Defendants enter into a Joint Stipulation to designate experts. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 03/16/1994)

RECAP
42 March 22, 1994

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds : That the terms of the Stipulation shall govern the completion of production of documents in response to the Plaintiffs 12/14/94 request for production of documents. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 03/23/1994)

RECAP
43 April 7, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff to amend the Scheduling Order (ers, )

RECAP
44 April 7, 1994

BRIEF by plaintiff IN SUPPORT of motion to amend the Scheduling Order [43-1] (ers, )

RECAP
45 April 8, 1994

LETTER from defendants respectfully requesting that the Court vacate the current scheduling order & hold further scheduling in abeyance until the Court has had an opportunity to rule on the pending motion to dismiss. (ers, ) (Entered: 04/11/1994)

RECAP
46 April 28, 1994

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds per Ms. Schlaefer's letter Vacating Scheduling Order of 9/2/93. ; Scheduling Conference reset for 5/19/94 at 10:00 a.m (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 05/02/1994)

RECAP
47 May 5, 1994

DECISION AND ORDER: by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds ; Scheduling Conference CANCELLED The Court shall, sua sponte, order that the parties submit briefs on the issue of what effect, if any, these amendments have on governor Thompson & secretary Whitburn's (State Defts) motion to Dismiss. That the State Defts sshall file & serve a submission on the issue on or before 10 days from the date of this Order; that the Plaintiffs shall file & serve a responsive submission on or before 7 days from the date they are served w/ the State Defts' submission; & that the State Defts' submission; & that the State Defts shall reply on or before 4 days from the date they are served w/ the Plaintiffs responsive submission. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 05/06/1994)

RECAP
48 May 11, 1994

LETTER from State Defendants attorney Mary Woolsey Schlasfer requesting that the Court grant the state defts an extension till 5/25/94 to file their brief. (ers, ) (Entered: 05/12/1994)

RECAP
49 May 11, 1994

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds that the parties joint request for an extension is Granted. The state Defendants shall file their brief on or before 6/6/94. The State Defndants shall reply on or before 6/10/94. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 05/12/1994)

RECAP
50 May 25, 1994

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED by STATE DEFENDANTS in support of their Motion to Dismiss. (ers, )

RECAP
51 June 2, 1994

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Anne Murdaugh saying that as of 5/31/94 she is withdrawing as counsel of record in this matter. (ers, )

RECAP
52 June 6, 1994

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to State Defendants' Supplemental Brief in support of their motion to Dismiss (ers, ) (Entered: 06/07/1994)

RECAP
53 June 10, 1994

SECOND REPLY by State defendants in Support of their Motion to Dismiss (ers, )

RECAP
54 June 14, 1994

LETTER from plaintiffs by Atty Dunn calling the Court to recent decisions from 2 federal courts of appeals that bear upon the state defendants' pending motion to Dismiss (ers, )

RECAP
55 June 27, 1994

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Dunn asking the Court to take provisions into account in resolving the State Defts motion to Dismiss (ers, ) (Entered: 06/28/1994)

RECAP
56 July 7, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff for order to permit Discovery against State Defts & For Scheduling Conference (ers, )

RECAP
57 July 7, 1994

BRIEF by plaintiff IN SUPPORT of motion for order to permit Discovery against State Defts & For Scheduling Conference [56-1] (ers, )

RECAP
58 Nov. 10, 1994

LETTER from plaintiff by Atty Dunn requesting a pretrial conference. (ers, ) (Entered: 11/14/1994)

RECAP
59 Nov. 28, 1994

LETTER from defendant by Atty Schlaefer responding to Plaintiffs 11/9/94 letter regarding the effect of piblic Law 103-432 on the state defendants motion to dismiss & requesting that the court rule on Pltfs Rule 6.07 motion to permit the plaintiffs to proceed w/ discovery against the state defendants (ers, )

RECAP
60 Jan. 4, 1995

LETTER from plaintiffs' counsel re: certification of a class actiion (wied, ) (Entered: 01/05/1995)

RECAP
61 Jan. 23, 1995

NOTICE of hearing setting hearing on motion for order to permit Discovery against State Defts & For Scheduling Conference [56-1] 10:00 2/3/95, setting hearing on motion to dismiss [13-1] 10:00 2/3/95, setting hearing on motion to certify Class Action [6-1] 10:00 2/3/95 (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 01/24/1995)

RECAP
62 Feb. 8, 1995

LETTER from State Defendants by Atty Schlaefer requesting the Court grant the state Defts until 2/28/95 to file their answer (ers, )

RECAP
63 Feb. 16, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds That the STATE DEFENDANTS's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. That State Defendants motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs claim brought under the U.S. Constitution is DENIED. That the State Defendants Motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs claims brought under the balance of 42 U.S.C. 671 & 42 U.S.C. 627 is DENIED. That the State defendants Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' claims brought under 42:U.S.C 671(a)(15) of the Adoption Assistance Act is GRANTED. That the State Defendants motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under the Child Abuse Prevention act 42 U.S.C. 5106a is DENIED. That the State Defendants motions to Dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under the Rehabilitation Act & the Americans w/ Disabilities act are GRANTED. That the Plaintiffs motion to certify the Class is GRANTED & 2 subclasses shall be certified as follows: Children who are in foster care custody in Milwaukee County & who come into foster care custody in Milwakee County & Children who are not in foster care custody in Milwaukee county, but about whom the County Department of Human Services has received reports of abuse or neglect & Children who become the object of such reports. That Discovery shall commence in this case immediately, & the Plaintiffs shall disclose their expert witnesses on or before 7 days from the date of the Court's oral order. That a trial to the Court shall begin on 5/16/95 at 10:00 a.m. That a Final Pretrial Conference shall begin on 5/16/95 at 10:00 a.m. That a decision & Order shall be issued more fully explaining the Court's Orders contained herein. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 02/17/1995)

RECAP
64 Feb. 28, 1995

ANSWER by defendant Tommy Thompson & Richard Lorang to [1-1] (ers, )

RECAP
65 March 2, 1995

DECISION AND ORDER: by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds That it was Ordered on 2/3/95 & 2/16/95 that the State Defendants' motion to Dismiss was GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. That the State Defendants motion to Dismiss the constitutional claims against them was DENIED. That the State Defendants motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C was GRANTED as to 671(a)(15) & DENIED as to all other parts. The State Defendants motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. 677 was GRANTED. The State Defendants' motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs Claims under 42 U.S.C. 627 was DENIED. That the State Defendants motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. 5106a(b) was DENIED. That the State Defendants motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs claims under the Rehabilitation & the Disabilities Act was GRANTED as to the State Defendants. Also that the Plaintiffs motion to certify the class is GRANTED, & 2 Subclasses was to be certified as follows. (1) Children who are in Foster Care custody in Milwaukee County & who come into Foster Care in Milwaukee County & (2) Children who are not in Foster Care custody in Milwaukee County, but about whom the County Department of Human Services has received reports of abuse or neglect, & Children who become the object of such reports. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 03/06/1995)

RECAP
66 April 4, 1995

MOTION by State Defendants Tommy Thompson & Richard Lorang TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL w/ attachments (ers, )

RECAP
67 April 4, 1995

AFFIDAVIT of Mary Woolsey Schlaefer re [66-1] (ers, )

RECAP
68 April 4, 1995

AFFIDAVIT of Bruce A. Olsen (ers, )

RECAP
69 April 10, 1995

BRIEF by plaintiff IN OPPOSITION to motion TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL [66-1] (ers, )

RECAP
70 April 11, 1995

LETTER from defendant by Atty Schlaefer regarding 2 matters relating to the state defendants pending motion for continuance (ers, )

RECAP
71 April 11, 1995

AFFIDAVIT of Peter C. Anderson (ers, )

RECAP
72 April 12, 1995

HEARING MINUTES: GRANTING motion TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL & this Case is Bifurcated into a Liabilty Stage & a Remedy stage [66-1] ; The Liability Trial set 10/24/95 at 10:00 a.m. (ers, ) (Entered: 04/13/1995)

RECAP
73 April 12, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds. That Defts motion to Continue the trial is Granted & this case is BIFURCATED into a liability stage & a remedy Stage ; Discovery ddl set 9/30/95 ; Motion filing ddl set 7/14/95 ; Pretrial conference set 10/6/95 at 2:00 p.m. court Trial on 10/24/95 at 10:00 a.m. on the issue of liability. Est 3 weeks. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 04/13/1995)

RECAP
74 May 3, 1995

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING To Amend the Existing Scheduling Order of 4/12/95 by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds : Trial date remains the same. (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 05/05/1995)

RECAP
75 May 5, 1995

CERTIFICATE Of Service (ers, )

RECAP
76 June 12, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge John W. Reynolds That this case shall be Returned to the Clerk of Court for Reassignment to another Article 111 Judge Case RANDOMLY REASSIGNED to Judge Rudolph T. Randa (cc: all counsel) (ers, ) (Entered: 06/13/1995)

RECAP
77 July 3, 1995

MOTION by Tommy Thompson to extend to file expert witness list (bjp, ) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

RECAP
July 7, 1995

MARGINAL ORDER by Judge Rudolph T. Randa granting motion to extend to file expert witness list [77-1] (cc: all counsel) (bjp, )

78 July 14, 1995

MOTION by Gerald Whitburn, Tommy Thompson to extend time to file dispositive motions (wied, )

RECAP
July 14, 1995

MARGINAL ORDER by Judge Rudolph T. Randa granting motion to extend time to file dispositive motions [78-1] ; Motion filing ddl set for 7/28/95 (cc: all counsel) (wied, )

85 July 28, 1995

REQUEST by Tommy Thompson for extension of time to file dispositive motions with ORDER extending time to 7/28/95 (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/02/1995)

RECAP
79 July 31, 1995

MOTION by Tommy Thompson for partial summary judgment (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
80 July 31, 1995

BRIEF in support of motion for partial summary judgment [79-1] (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
81 July 31, 1995

PROPOSED ff submitted by Tommy Thompson, State defendants (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
82 July 31, 1995

AFFIDAVIT/VERIFICATION of Linda Hisgen (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
83 July 31, 1995

AFFIDAVIT/VERIFICATION of William Fiss (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
84 July 31, 1995

AFFIDAVIT/VERIFICATION of Mary Woolsey Schlaefer (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
86 Aug. 2, 1995

REQUEST for amendment of scheduling order with attached ORDER granting request (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/11/1995)

RECAP
87 Aug. 14, 1995

ORDER by Judge Rudolph T. Randa. IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1), that Joseph Leean be, and hereby is, substituted for Richard Lorang, former Acting Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services, as a defendant in this action. (cc: all counsel) (wied, ) (Entered: 08/15/1995)

RECAP
88 Aug. 23, 1995

STATUS REPORT by Christopher Dunn (bjp, )

RECAP
89 Aug. 24, 1995

HEARING MINUTES: ; Discovery ddl 10/31/95 ; Pretrial conference 11/13/95 ; Trial 11/27/95 ; Status hearing held 8/24/95 (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/25/1995)

RECAP
90 Aug. 24, 1995

ORDER following sched. conference, see hrgmin for deadlines by Judge Rudolph T. Randa (cc: all counsel) (bjp, ) (Entered: 08/25/1995)

RECAP
91 Aug. 28, 1995

UNOPPOSED REQUEST by plaintiff for holding briefing in abeyance (bjp, )

RECAP
92 Aug. 28, 1995

BRIEF by plaintiff in support of holding briefing in abeyance (bjp, )

RECAP
93 Aug. 29, 1995

ORDER that the deadline for filing of opposition brief to State Defts' motion for partial sumjgmm is extended to 9/30/95 by Judge Rudolph T. Randa (cc: all counsel) (bjp, ) (Entered: 09/01/1995)

RECAP
94 Sept. 25, 1995

MOTION by plaintiff Jeanine B for order to hold in further abeyance consideration of the state defts' motion for partial summary judgment (bet, ) Modified on 09/29/1995

RECAP
95 Sept. 25, 1995

BRIEF by plaintiffs in support of motion for order to hold in further abeyance consideration of the state defts' motion for partial summary judgment [94-1] (bdr, ) (Entered: 09/29/1995)

RECAP
96 Oct. 11, 1995

MOTION by plaintiffs for order to hold in further abeyance consideration of the state defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (bet, )

RECAP
97 Oct. 11, 1995

BRIEF by plaintiffs in support of motion for order to hold in further abeyance consideration of the state defendants' motion for partial summary judgment [96-1] (bet, )

RECAP
98 Oct. 11, 1995

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiffs (bet, )

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wisconsin

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 1, 1993

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Children in foster care in Milwaukee County, and children about whom the county Department of Human Services received reports of abuse or neglect

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Children's Rights, Inc.

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

County

Milwaukee County Department of Human Services

State

Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 620 et seq.

Adoption Assistance Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 670 et seq.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.

Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Wisconsin 2:93-cv-00547

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 97-01982

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Monitoring

Preliminary relief denied

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: $950,000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Adoption

Assault/abuse by staff

Classification / placement

Conditions of confinement

Counseling

Emergency shelter

Failure to supervise

Failure to train

Family abuse and neglect

Family reunification

Foster care (benefits, training)

Juveniles

Neglect by staff

Placement in shelters

Siblings (visitation, placement)

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Timeliness of case assignment

Benefits (Source):

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act

Disability and Disability Rights:

Depression

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)

Recommended Citation