Case: Johnson v. Martin

2:00-cv-00075 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: March 28, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 28, 2000, an incarcerated member of the Melanic Islamic Palace of the Rising Sun, a non-profit religious organization, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Western District of Michigan under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 29 U.S.C. § 2000cc (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)) against the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). The plaintiff, in pro per, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that the …

On March 28, 2000, an incarcerated member of the Melanic Islamic Palace of the Rising Sun, a non-profit religious organization, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Western District of Michigan under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 29 U.S.C. § 2000cc (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA)) against the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). The plaintiff, in pro per, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that the MDOC violated his rights under the Due Process Clause, First Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, and under the RLUIPA with the total ban against Melanic literature in Michigan prisons.

The dispute in this case arose when the MDOC classified the Melanic Islamic Palace of the Rising Sun and its incarcerated members (Melanics) as a security threat group. As a result, Melanic members had to renounce their membership or face a higher security classification. If a prisoner is designated a member of a security threat group, the prisoner is prohibited from possessing documents, materials, symbols, colors or pictures of the group.

In January 2000, incarcerated Melanics were given seven business days to dispose of or turn over all materials evidencing Melanic membership. The MDOC also began to reject mailings of Melanic writings to incarcerated individuals. Plaintiffs allege the Melanic writings that they were ordered to relinquish and are prohibited from possessing are essential to the practice of their religion.

On September 21, 2001, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley) consolidated two previously filed suits. On April 29, 2002, the District Court (Judge Richard Alan Enslen) granted class certification, limited to injunctive relief. On April 25, 2003, the Court (Judge Enslen) granted class certification, for the purpose of determining liability, to current prisoners of the MDOC who were members of the Melanics on January 7, 2000, and whose religious materials were confiscated after January 7, 2000 or who could not possess Melanic materials after January 7, 2000.

On December 7, 2005, the Court (Judge Enslen) found Plaintiffs were entitled to injunctive relief under the RLUIPA and the Court enjoined Defendant from totally banning Melanic literature from MDOC institutions. On May 15, 2006, the Court (Judge Enslen) granted Plaintiffs requested attorneys' fees in part.

Summary Authors

Lori Arakaki (10/9/2014)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4678316/parties/johnson-v-martin/


Judge(s)

Enslen, Richard Alan (Michigan)

Greeley, Timothy P. (Michigan)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Campbell, Christine M. (Michigan)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Gross, Charles R. (Michigan)

Hasson, Kevin J. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:00-cv-00075

Docket [PACER]

Nov. 5, 2012

Nov. 5, 2012

Docket
161

2:00-cv-00075

Opinion

Sept. 26, 2002

Sept. 26, 2002

Order/Opinion

223 F.Supp.2d 820

363

2:00-cv-00075

0:01-00515

Order

Jan. 3, 2005

Jan. 3, 2005

Order/Opinion
377

2:00-cv-00075

0:01-00515

Opinion

Dec. 7, 2005

Dec. 7, 2005

Order/Opinion

2005 WL 3312566

391

2:00-cv-00075

0:01-00515

Opinion

Jan. 30, 2006

Jan. 30, 2006

Order/Opinion

2006 WL 223108

401

2:00-cv-00075

0:01-00515

Opinion (granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motions for attorney's fees)

May 15, 2006

May 15, 2006

Order/Opinion

2006 WL 1361771

423

2:00-cv-00075

Order

Oct. 5, 2007

Oct. 5, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 2917244

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4678316/johnson-v-martin/

Last updated July 4, 2025, 2:54 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
377

OPINION; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

Dec. 7, 2005

Dec. 7, 2005

RECAP
391

OPINION; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

Jan. 30, 2006

Jan. 30, 2006

RECAP
401

OPINION; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

May 15, 2006

May 15, 2006

RECAP
423

ORDER denying 413 plaintiffs' motion to enforce judgment and to conduct evidentiary hearing; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

Oct. 5, 2007

Oct. 5, 2007

RECAP
428

ORDER denying 425 plaintiffs' motion to modify language of injunction; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)

Jan. 7, 2008

Jan. 7, 2008

RECAP

Case Details