Case: Baby Neal v. Casey

2:90-cv-02343 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: April 4, 1990

Closed Date: 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This class action involving neglected and abused children placed in Philadelphia's foster care system was filed on April 4, 1990, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel and Children's Rights, Inc. and American Civil Liberties Union, sought class action certification as well as declaratory and injunctive relief against the Governor of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, President Judge of County C…

This class action involving neglected and abused children placed in Philadelphia's foster care system was filed on April 4, 1990, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel and Children's Rights, Inc. and American Civil Liberties Union, sought class action certification as well as declaratory and injunctive relief against the Governor of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, President Judge of County Court of Common Pleas, Mayor of Philadelphia, and Department of Human Services, claiming that the defendants responsible for the operation and administration of DHS failed to comply with statutory and constitutional requirements that protect and serve children in the child welfare system. The plaintiffs alleged that the state violated their rights under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, the First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and state law.

Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that systematic deficiencies prevented DHS from: providing protective service investigations; monitoring and supervising children in state custody; providing safe and secure foster care placements; providing written case plans; providing necessary medical, psychiatric, psychological, and educational services; and planning for the return of children to their families or planning to find alternative permanent placements for the children. These deficiencies were, they said, caused by insufficient number of trained caseworkers; insufficient number of medical, psychiatric, psychological, and educational service providers; insufficient number of trained foster parents; insufficient number of placements for children who need more structured environments than foster homes; insufficient number of potential adoptive parents; and inadequate policies and procedures.

On January 6, 1992, the plaintiff's class certification was denied by the district court. In addition, the court stated that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the Next Friends were acting with "a good faith interest" in the children's welfare. The plaintiffs filed a Motion for Reconsideration for class certification and, in the alternative, a Motion to Certify Subclasses on March 20, 1992. The Motion for Reconsideration was denied and the court noted that it could not rule on the Motion to Certify Subclasses at the time. However, the court did grant the plaintiffs' Motion for Substitution of New Next Friends. 1992 WL 58311.

On April 13, 1993, the defendants filed for summary judgment, and the district court partially ruled in their favor. The district court ruled that individuals are not granted a private right of enforcement under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 or the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. The district court also granted defendant's motion for summary judgment regarding the plaintiffs' claims that their constitutional right to a relationship free from unwarranted governmental interference has been violated and claims that the plaintiffs have a constitutional right to the least restrictive placement. The defendants' motion for summary judgment regarding the Rehabilitation Act, the Disabilities Act, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Procedural Due Process Clause were denied. 821 F.Supp. 320.

In May of 1993, the plaintiffs renewed their Motion of Certification for Subclasses. On October 13, 1993, the district court denied the Motion. The court opined that the injunction plaintiffs sought, which consisted of addressing "specific case-by-case deficiencies" of DHS, was not "appropriate" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2). 151 F.R.D. 282 (E.D. Pa. 1993). While the motion was pending, fourteen children intervened (the Third Circuit later noted that this constituted a demonstration that "children in DHS's custody and care continued to be harmed by DHS's failure to provide legally mandated child welfare services." 43 F.3d 48 (3rd Cir. 1994).)

The plaintiffs again sought reconsideration; however, the district court denied the motion and "forbade" the plaintiffs from pursuing further class certification motions. The case was scheduled for trial, but, by 1994, most of the individual service needs of the plaintiffs were met or resolved, and the parties settled the remaining claims, while preserving the plaintiffs' right to appeal class certification denial.

After being denied class and sub-class certification many times, the plaintiffs appealed to the Third Circuit. The Third Circuit reversed the district court's ruling and remanded the case, stating that the plaintiffs satisfied all requirements under Rule 23 and that forcing DHS to comply with state and constitutional mandates would constitute relief applicable to the entire class. The fact that the plaintiffs sought only injunctive and declaratory relief, rather than damages, also enhanced the "appropriateness" of class certification. In addition, the Third Circuit opined that the district court abused its discretion by denying the class certification. 43 F.3d 48 (3rd Cir. 1994).

On December 7, 1995, the plaintiffs filed for a Motion of Reconsideration regarding the district court's April 13, 1993 Order, which granted in part the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs sought reinstatement of their claims under the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. The district court denied the Motion, stating that the Motion was untimely and baseless. 1995 WL 728589.

According to the docket sheet, the plaintiffs and city defendants filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement on October 5, 1998, and the court granted preliminary approval the following November. The remaining defendants also reached settlement agreements with the plaintiffs. From mid-November of 1998 to September of 2001, the court approved all settlement agreements between plaintiffs and defendants.

Summary Authors

Alice Liu (4/3/2013)

People


Judge(s)

Becker, Edward Roy (Pennsylvania)

Cowen, Robert E. (New Jersey)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Chawaga, Stephen Paul (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

Booth, Christopher R. (Pennsylvania)

Brown, Marianne (Pennsylvania)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:90-cv-02343

Docket

July 1, 2005

July 1, 2005

Docket
116

2:90-cv-02343

Opinion

March 20, 1992

March 20, 1992

Order/Opinion

1992 WL 58311

176

2:90-cv-02343

Opinion

April 13, 1993

April 13, 1993

Order/Opinion

821 F.Supp. 320

188

2:90-cv-02343

Opinion

Neal v. Casey

Oct. 13, 1993

Oct. 13, 1993

Order/Opinion

151 F.R.D. 282

94-01381

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Dec. 15, 1994

Dec. 15, 1994

Order/Opinion

43 F.3d 48

230

2:90-cv-02343

Opinion

Neal v. Ridge

Dec. 7, 1995

Dec. 7, 1995

Order/Opinion

1995 WL 728589

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2025, 8:03 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 4, 1990

Complaint. filing fee $ 120 receipt # 293452 (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
2 April 4, 1990

PLFFS' COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF MARCIA LOWRY PRO HAC VICE , AFFIDAVIT. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
3 April 4, 1990

PLFFS' COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR ADMISSION OF ROBIN DAHLBERG PRO HAC VICE , AFFIDAVIT. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
4 April 4, 1990

PLFFS' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
5 April 4, 1990

MOTION AND ORDER APPOINTING GEORGE SAULINO TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT UPON DEFTS ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JOSEPH S. LORD III ) 4/4/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
April 4, 1990

Summons(es) exit − Given to: counsel 4/4/90 (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
6 April 9, 1990

Affidavit of Service of GEORGE SAULINO re: certain facts. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
7 April 12, 1990

ORDER REASSIGNING FROM THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE JOSEPH S. LORD III TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER . ( SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT MICHAEL E. KUNZ ) 4/13/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
9 April 23, 1990

DEFT HONORABLE EDWARD J. BRADLEY'S MOTION TO DISMISS , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
10 April 26, 1990

PLFFS' UNCONTESTED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFT HONORABLE BRADLEY , CERTIFICATION, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
April 30, 1990

ORDER THAT TIME WITHIN WHICH PLFFS SHALL RESPOND TO [9−1] MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFT HONORABLE EDWARD J. BRADLEY IS EXTENDED TO 5/31/90 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 4/30/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
11 May 1, 1990

STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE TIME FOR DEFTS GOV. CASEY AND SECRETARY WHITE TO ANSWER IS EXTENDED UNTIL 5/24/90 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 5/2/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/05/1990)

PACER
May 1, 1990

THERE IS NO PAPER #12 OR #13 FILED IN THIS CASE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
14 May 14, 1990

ORDER VACATING [8−1] ORDER REASSIGNING FROM THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY . ; ORDER THAT CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER TO CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE RAYMOND J. BRODERICK . ( SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT MICHAEL E. KUNZ ) 5/14/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
15 May 23, 1990

MOTION OF LOCAL 2186 and LOCAL 2187 TO INTERVENE AS PARTY PLFFS MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Complaint attached). (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
16 May 30, 1990

ORDER VACATING [14−1] ORDER REASSIGNING CASE FROM THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JUDGE RAYMOND J. BRODERICK ; FURTHER ORDERED CASE IS RESTORED TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY. ( SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT MICHAEL E. KUNZ ) 5/31/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
17 May 31, 1990

Plffs' answer to [9−1] MOTION TO DISMISS (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
18 June 1, 1990

STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT TIME DEFTS HAVE TO ANSWER IS EXTENDED UNTIL 6/4/90 . ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 6/1/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
19 June 22, 1990

Plffs' Memorandum in opposition to [15−1] MOTION OF LOCAL 2186 and LOCAL 2187 TO INTERVENE AS PARTY PLFFS (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
20 June 25, 1990

MOTION OF GOVERNOR CASEY &SECRETARY WHITE TO STAY CONSIDERATION OF PLFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
21 June 25, 1990

MOTION OF GOVERNOR CASEY &SECRETARY WHITE TO DISMISS , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
June 25, 1990

Appendix in support of Motion to Dismiss. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
June 28, 1990

ORDER THAT [9−1] MOTION OF DEFT BRADLEY TO DISMISS IS DENIED ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 6/29/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
23 July 2, 1990

PLFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ONE−WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
24 July 5, 1990

Amended complaint (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
July 5, 1990

Amended complaint summons exit (given to counsel 7/6/90) (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
25 July 10, 1990

Plffs' reply to DEFTS GOVERNOR CASEY &SECRETARY WHITE'S [20−1] MOTION TO STAY OF PLFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
July 10, 1990

ORDER THAT [15−1] MOTION OF LOCAL 2186 and LOCAL 2187 TO INTERVENE AS PARTY PLFFS IS DENIED ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 7/11/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
July 10, 1990

ORDER THAT PLFFS' [23−1] MOTION FOR ONE−WEEK EXTENSION IS GRANTED; PLFFS' RESPONSE SHALL BE SERVED ON 7/17/90 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 7/11/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
26 July 16, 1990

PLFFS' MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE−WEEK EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
27 July 20, 1990

GOVERNOR CASEY &SECRETARY WHITE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO PLFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS , AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
28 July 23, 1990

Withdrawal of appearance of CHARLES S. JOHNS, Esq. and Appearance of A. TAYLOR WILLIAMS for DEFENDANT EDWARD J. BRADLEY, President Judge of Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
29 July 25, 1990

Plffs' Memorandum in opposition to Commonwealth Defts' [21−1] MOTION TO DISMISS (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
30 July 25, 1990

Amended Certificate of service to plffs' memorandum in opposition to Commonwealth defts' motion to dismiss. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
31 July 25, 1990

INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION , MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
July 25, 1990

Appendix in support of [29−1] Memorandum in opposition. (fe) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
32 July 27, 1990

Answer by EDWARD J. BRADLEY (Attorney ) to amended complaint (fe) Modified on 09/18/1990 (Entered: 09/18/1990)

PACER
July 27, 1990

Crossclaim by DEFENDANT EDWARD J. BRADLEY against DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE (fe) Modified on 09/18/1990 (Entered: 09/18/1990)

PACER
33 Aug. 2, 1990

Appearance by RICHARD J. GOLD for DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER (fe) (Entered: 09/21/1990)

PACER
Aug. 6, 1990

ORDER GRANTING [26−1] MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE−WEEK EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS &PLFFS' SHALL SERVE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY 7/24/90( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 08/06/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/21/1990)

PACER
Aug. 6, 1990

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICAITON IS STAYED FOR 60 DAYS PENDING DISCOVERY AS TO ALLEGED CLASS PLAINTIFFS &RESOLUTION OF DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 08/06/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/21/1990)

PACER
Aug. 7, 1990

ORDER GRANTING [27−1] MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO PLFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTING [27−2] MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND &DEFT SHALL SERVE RESPONSE BY 8/17/90( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 08/06/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/21/1990)

PACER
34 Aug. 10, 1990

Memorandum by PLAINTIFF BABY NEAL, PLAINTIFF KAREEM AND KENT H, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM AND JOSEPH H, PLAINTIFF MARCELLA B, PLAINTIFF SHERRY G, PLAINTIFF JOHN, JEAN, JACOB, PLAINTIFF ALICIA P, PLAINTIFF MANUEL I, PLAINTIFF TAMARA AND CARL I, PLAINTIFF JANE L in opposition to [31−1] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (fe) (Entered: 09/21/1990)

PACER
35 Aug. 13, 1990

Appearance of Nancy B.G. Lassen, Esq. for Intervenor District Council 47, American Federation of State 47, American Federation of State County &Municipal Employees, AFL−CIO. (fe) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
36 Aug. 13, 1990

MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE. (fe) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
37 Aug. 16, 1990

STIPULATION &ORDER, EXTENDING TIME FOR W. GOODE, JOAN M. REEVES &MAXINE TUCKER ARE GRANTED TO , RESPONSE TO MOTION reset to 8/27/90 for [31−1] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 08/16/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
38 Aug. 17, 1990

Reply by DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY, DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR. to response to [21−1] MOTION TO DISMISS (fe) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
39 Aug. 27, 1990

Memorandum of defts in opposition to [36−1] MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
40 Aug. 27, 1990

Answer to complaint and crossclaim by DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE (Attorney ) against JOHN F. WHITE JR., ROBERT P. CASEY (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
41 Aug. 27, 1990

Response to by DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE [36−1] MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN, [31−1] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
Aug. 27, 1990

Response to by DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE [36−1] MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
42 Aug. 30, 1990

Brief by PLAINTIFF JANE L, PLAINTIFF TAMARA AND CARL I, PLAINTIFF MANUEL I, PLAINTIFF JOHN, JEAN, JACOB, PLAINTIFF SHERRY G, PLAINTIFF MARCELLA B, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM AND JOSEPH H, PLAINTIFF KAREEM AND KENT H, PLAINTIFF BABY NEAL, PLAINTIFF ALICIA P in opposition to [36−1] MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
Sept. 13, 1990

ORDER DENYING [31−1] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 09/13/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
Sept. 13, 1990

ORDER DENYING [36−1] MOTION TO INTERVENE BY MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 09/13/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
43 Sept. 17, 1990

Answer by JOHN F. WHITE JR., ROBERT P. CASEY to [0−1] CROSS claim of City Defts. (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
45 Oct. 5, 1990

MOTION by DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY &TO STAY CONSIDERATION OF PLFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
46 Oct. 10, 1990

Notice of appeal by MOVANT LOCAL 2186, MOVANT LOCAL 2187 . Fee Status: $105.00 Appeal record due on 11/9/90 Copies to JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY , Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk, and MARIANNE E. BROWN, RICHARD J. GOLD, MICHAEL MUSHLIN, MARY E. KOHART, STEFAN PRESSER, LAWRENCE J. FOX, MARCIA R. LOWRY, STEPHEN P. CHAWAGA, JEROME J. SHESTACK, NANCY B.G. LASSEN (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
47 Oct. 10, 1990

Copy of Clerk's notice to USCA re: [46−1] appeal . (fe) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
Oct. 16, 1990

Notice of Docketing ROA from USCA Re: [46−1] appeal USCA NUMBER: 1759 . 10/17/90 (fe) (Entered: 10/17/1990)

PACER
48 Oct. 23, 1990

MEMORANDUM RE: [0−1] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE signed by JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY 10/24/90 entered and copies mailed (fe) Modified on 10/24/1990 (Entered: 10/24/1990)

PACER
49 Oct. 24, 1990

Appearance by DORIS M. LEISCH &RICHARD J. GOLD for DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE; jury demand (fe) (Entered: 10/25/1990)

PACER
50 Oct. 24, 1990

Notice of appeal by MOVANT AFSCME DISTRICT COUN . Fee Status: 105.00 Appeal record due on 11/23/90 Copies to JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY , Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk, and MARIANNE E. BROWN, DORIS M. LEISCH, RICHARD J. GOLD, MICHAEL MUSHLIN, MARY E. KOHART, STEFAN PRESSER, LAWRENCE J. FOX, MARCIA R. LOWRY, STEPHEN P. CHAWAGA, JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY, A. TAYLOR WILLIAMS, CHARLES W. JOHNS, JEROME J. SHESTACK, GUY VILIM, NANCY B.G. LASSEN (fe) (Entered: 10/25/1990)

PACER
51 Oct. 24, 1990

Copy of Clerk's notice to USCA re: [50−1] appeal . (fe) Modified on 10/25/1990 (Entered: 10/25/1990)

PACER
Oct. 30, 1990

Notice of Docketing ROA from USCA Re: [50−1] appeal USCA NUMBER: 90−1785 . 10/29/90 (fe) (Entered: 10/31/1990)

PACER
Nov. 2, 1990

RECCORD COMPLETE FOR PURPOSES OF APPEAL (cjc) (Entered: 11/02/1990)

PACER
52 Nov. 19, 1990

Answer by W. WILSON GOODE to [0−1] CROSS claim of Judicial Deft Edward J. Bradley (fe) (Entered: 11/20/1990)

PACER
53 Nov. 19, 1990

ORDER GRANTING [45−1] MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY &TO STAY CONSIDERATION OF PLFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION UNTIL 1/7/91, reset DISCOVERY DUE FOR 1/7/91 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 11/20/90 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 11/20/1990)

PACER
54 Jan. 4, 1991

MOTION by DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY , TO STAY CONSIDERATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 01/04/1991)

PACER
55 Jan. 22, 1991

Response to by PLAINTIFF JANE L, PLAINTIFF TAMARA AND CARL I, PLAINTIFF MANUEL I, PLAINTIFF JOHN, JEAN, JACOB, PLAINTIFF SHERRY G, PLAINTIFF MARCELLA B, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM AND JOSEPH H, PLAINTIFF KAREEM AND KENT H, PLAINTIFF BABY NEAL, PLAINTIFF ALICIA P [54−1] MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY (fe) (Entered: 01/23/1991)

PACER
56 Jan. 30, 1991

ORDER GRANTING [54−1] MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY [54−2] MOTION TO STAY CONSIDERATION IS STAYED FOR 90 DAYS OR UNTIL 4/8/91 DISCOVERY IS EXTENDED FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS OR UNTIL 4/8/91 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 1/31/91 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 02/01/1991)

PACER
57 Feb. 4, 1991

ORDER SO THAT COURT'S DOCKET OF PENDING MOTIONS MAY BE CLEARED, DEFT'S MOTION OF 6/25/90 IS MOOT SINCE THE COURT ON 1/30/91 EXTENDED TIME FOR CLASS DISCOVERY UNTIL 4/8/91 &CONSIDERATION OF PLFFS' [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION IS STAYED UNTIL THAT DATE AS WELL ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) (fe) (Entered: 02/05/1991)

PACER
58 Feb. 6, 1991

STIPULATION &ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIALITY ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 2/6/91 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 02/06/1991)

PACER
59 March 8, 1991

Answer by JOHN F. WHITE JR., ROBERT P. CASEY to amended complaint (fe) (Entered: 03/08/1991)

PACER
60 March 8, 1991

Answer by ROBERT P. CASEY to [0−1] CROSS claim (fe) (Entered: 03/08/1991)

PACER
61 March 27, 1991

MOTION by DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY, DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR. FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (mc) (Entered: 03/28/1991)

PACER
62 March 27, 1991

MOTION by PLAINTIFF JANE L, PLAINTIFF TAMARA AND CARL I, PLAINTIFF MANUEL I, PLAINTIFF JOHN, JEAN, JACOB, PLAINTIFF SHERRY G, PLAINTIFF MARCELLA B, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM AND JOSEPH H, PLAINTIFF KAREEM AND KENT H, PLAINTIFF BABY NEAL TO COMPEL , FOR SANCTIONS MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (mc) (Entered: 03/28/1991)

PACER
63 March 27, 1991

ORDER GRANTING [61−1] MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. THE DEPOSITION OF SEC. WHITE OR HIS DESIGNATED OFFICIAL SHALL NOT BE TAKEN AS TO PROPOSED PLANS FOR THE TAKE OVER OF CHILD WELFARE SERVICES IN PHILA., ETC. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 3/28/91 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (mc) (Entered: 03/28/1991)

PACER
64 March 27, 1991

MOTION BY PLAINTIFF JANE L, PLAINTIFF TAMARA AND CARL I, PLAINTIFF MANUEL I, PLAINTIFF JOHN, JEAN, JACOB, PLAINTIFF SHERRY G, PLAINTIFF MARCELLA B, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM AND JOSEPH H, PLAINTIFF KAREEM AND KENT H, PLAINTIFF BABY NEAL, PLAINTIFF ALICIA P TO COMPEL DEPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jmp) (Entered: 03/28/1991)

PACER
65 April 4, 1991

MOTION BY ALL PLFFS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 04/04/1991)

PACER
66 April 5, 1991

MOTION BY PLAINTIFF ALL PLFFS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 04/08/1991)

PACER
67 April 8, 1991

Request by PLAINTIFF ALL PLFFS for withdrawal of [62−1] MOTION TO COMPEL, [62−2] MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (fe) (Entered: 04/09/1991)

PACER
68 April 8, 1991

Memorandum by DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY in opposition to [66−1] MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (fe) (Entered: 04/09/1991)

PACER
69 April 8, 1991

STIPULATION &ORDER EXTENDING TIME , CITY DEFTS RESPONSE TO MOTION RESET TO 4/11/91 FOR [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION (SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY) 4/9/91 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 04/09/1991)

PACER
70 April 8, 1991

Affidavit of Jerome J. Shestack Re: certain facts (fe) (Entered: 04/09/1991)

PACER
71 April 9, 1991

Letter from Mary E. Kohart, Esq. re: Motion to compel and for Sanctions is withdrawn. (mc) (Entered: 04/10/1991)

PACER
73 April 22, 1991

Response by DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE [65−1] MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, memo (fe) (Entered: 04/22/1991)

PACER
74 May 3, 1991

Reply Memorandum by PLFFS in support of [65−1] MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (fe) (Entered: 05/03/1991)

PACER
75 May 3, 1991

ORDER THAT DEFTS SHALL HAVE 45 DAYS OR UNTIL 6/10/91 TO EXAMINE THE TRANSCRIPT OF MARCIA R. LOWRY AND IDENTIFY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE COURT SHALL RULE AND TO CONDUCT FURTHER DISCOVERY FROM OTHER SOURCES FRO WHICH THE REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY BE AVAILABLE; DEFTS BRIEF SHALL BE FILED WIHTIN 10 DAYS OR BY 6/20/91; AND PLFFS' REPLY WILL FOLLOW WITHIN 30 DAYS OR BY 7/22/91 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT F. KELLY ) 5/6/91 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (fe) (Entered: 05/06/1991)

PACER
76 June 19, 1991

MOTION BY MOVANT JUVENILE LAW CENTER, MOVANT PHILA CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH FOR LEAVE TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(Amicus Curiae Brief attached) (mc) (Entered: 06/19/1991)

PACER
77 June 20, 1991

Response by DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE in opposition to [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION, memo (fe) (Entered: 06/24/1991)

PACER
78 June 20, 1991

Memorandum by DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY in opposition to [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION (fe) (Entered: 06/24/1991)

PACER
79 June 21, 1991

Withdrawal of appearance by RICHARD J. GOLD for DEFENDANT MAXINE TUCKER, DEFENDANT JOAN M. REEVES, DEFENDANT W. WILSON GOODE (fe) (Entered: 06/24/1991)

PACER
80 June 25, 1991

MOTION BY MOVANT SUPPORT CENTER FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED AS AMICUS CURIAE AND FILE A BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CERTIFICATION AS CLASS ACTION BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 06/25/1991)

PACER
81 June 25, 1991

Response by DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY to [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION (fe) (Entered: 06/25/1991)

PACER
82 June 28, 1991

MOTION BY MOVANT CHILD, YOUTH AND FAM TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 06/28/1991)

PACER
83 July 1, 1991

Notice of joinder by Honorable E. J. Bradley re: plff's request for class certification (fe) (Entered: 07/01/1991)

PACER
84 July 22, 1991

Reply Memorandum by ALL PLFFS in furer support of [4−1] MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION (fe) Modified on 07/22/1991 (Entered: 07/22/1991)

PACER
July 22, 1991

Appendix VOL 1 &2 to reply memo in further support of plffs' motion for class certification. (fe) Modified on 07/22/1991 (Entered: 07/22/1991)

PACER
85 July 25, 1991

MOTION BY DEFENDANT JOHN F. WHITE JR., DEFENDANT ROBERT P. CASEY TO STRIKE FROM RECORD CERTAIN AFFIDAVITS AND VERIFICATIONS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, OPEN DISCOVERY ON PLFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (fe) (Entered: 07/26/1991)

PACER
86 Aug. 2, 1991

MOTION BY MOVANT LOCAL 2186, MOVANT LOCAL 2187 TO PARTICIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE, MEMORANDUM, BRIEF,

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 4, 1990

Closing Date: 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are abused and neglected children placed in the custody of Philadelphia's Department of Human Services.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU National (all projects)

Children's Rights, Inc.

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

Mayor of Philadelphia

State

Children and Youth Division of the Philadelphia Department of Human Services

Department of Human Services of the City of Philadelphia

Department of Public Welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Governor of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Other

President Judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 620 et seq.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2:90-cv-02343

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 94-01381

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Adoption

Classification / placement

Education

Failure to train

Family abuse and neglect

Family reunification

Foster care (benefits, training)

Funding

Individualized planning

Juveniles

Neglect by staff

Parents (visitation, involvement)

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Reassessment and care planning

Record-keeping

Relative caretakers

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Benefits (Source):

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act

Disability and Disability Rights:

Least restrictive environment

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

HIV/AIDS

Policing:

Inadequate citizen complaint investigations and procedures

Recommended Citation