Case: C.H. v. Payne

1:09-cv-01574 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Dec. 22, 2009

Closed Date: 2011

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 22, 2009, four groups of foster parents and children directly receiving foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments from the Indiana Department of Child Services ("DCS"), filed a law suit against DCS and its director ("Payne") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU of Indiana and private counsel, asked the court for injunctive relief, alleging that the DCS violated Title IV-…

On December 22, 2009, four groups of foster parents and children directly receiving foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments from the Indiana Department of Child Services ("DCS"), filed a law suit against DCS and its director ("Payne") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU of Indiana and private counsel, asked the court for injunctive relief, alleging that the DCS violated Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 670, et seq. Specifically, the plaintiffs asked the District Court to enjoin DCS from implementing a 10% reduction in foster care and adoption assistance payments.

The plaintiffs alleged that DCS unlawfully reduced foster care and adoption assistance payments. DCS receives money from the federal government through Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 670, et seq., from which monthly payments are made to foster parents and adoptive parents. DCS had enacted a 10% reduction in these payments, effective in January of 2010. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 673(a)(3), the amount of foster care and adoption assistance payments must be determined by considering the circumstances of the adopting parents and the needs of the child being adopted. The plaintiffs contended that the 10% reduction violated this provision because the reduction was motivated by budgetary constraints and not the individual assessments families receiving the payments or the general costs of providing care for the children in question.

On December 22, 2009, the plaintiffs moved to certify as a class all foster parents and children directly receiving foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments from DCS. On January 25, 2010, the District Court (Judge Sarah Evans Barker) granted the motion, certifying the claims of C.H. plaintiffs to proceed as a class action.

On December 28, 2010, the Indiana Association of Residential Child Care Agencies ("IARCCA"), the plaintiff in a separate action against DCS seeking to enjoin the 10% payment reduction, made an unopposed motion to consolidate cases. On January 25, 2010, the district court granted the motion to consolidate the case filed by IARCCA.

On January 20, 2010, the district court issued a preliminary injunction stopping the planned 10% reduction in foster care and adoption assistance payments. DCS appealed this preliminary injunction to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on February 18, 2010. This appeal was dismissed.

On February 9, 2011, the parties executed a settlement agreement. The agreement stipulated that DCS would cease its effort to reduce foster care payments. Further, the agreement required DCS to continue to provide foster care maintenance payments of at least $25 a day until it established a method of computing the costs that satisfied the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 673(a)(3). DCS was not precluded by the settlement agreement from reducing foster care payments once it had established a new method of computing such payments. The agreement allowed foster parents to challenge the new rates once they were established through the application of the new method of payment calculation. The agreement further provided that DCS pay $104,812 in attorneys' fees and costs.

On February 25, 2011, the the district court approved a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, which dismissed with prejudice the claims made by C.H. against Payne and vacated the Court's Preliminary Injunction. On the same day, the court dismissed without prejudice the claim by IARCCA against Payne. The Joint Stipulation of Dismissal provided that the claims made in the Complaint could not be reopened unless DCS breached the Settlement Agreement or applicable law before 30 days after the new rates went into effect.

On November 30, 2011, the plaintiffs filed notice of intent to reopen litigation, alleging that the defendants had violated provisions of the settlement agreement. Because DCS scheduled decreases to the rates at which it would reimburse service providers, overall coverage of treatment provided to children would decrease. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint and an application for a preliminary injunction in December 2011.

At the court's suggestion, the plaintiffs moved in May 2012 to enforce the settlement agreement along with a motion for a preliminary injunction. The parties held a series of pretrial settlement conferences before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore in May and June 2012. By late June, the parties agreed to stipulations to resolve the pending motions by agreeing to withdraw them. The parties officially reported a settlement and the case was officially dismissed in November 2012.

Summary Authors

Mark Scoville (3/22/2011)

Chelsea Rinnig (3/1/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4824944/parties/h-v-payne/


Judge(s)

Barker, Sarah Evans (Indiana)

Dinsmore, Mark. J. (Indiana)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Falk, Kenneth J. (Indiana)

Attorney for Defendant

Cowgur, Anne L. (Indiana)

Isenberg, Betsy M (Indiana)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:09-cv-01574

Docket

March 2, 2011

March 2, 2011

Docket
1

1:09-cv-01574

Original Complaint

Dec. 22, 2009

Dec. 22, 2009

Complaint
10

1:09-cv-01574

Motion to Certify Class

Dec. 22, 2009

Dec. 22, 2009

Pleading / Motion / Brief
21

1:09-cv-01574

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Jan. 10, 2010

Jan. 10, 2010

Complaint
48

1:09-cv-01574

ENTRY GRANTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

CH v. Payne

Jan. 26, 2010

Jan. 26, 2010

Order/Opinion

683 F.Supp.2d 865

76

1:09-cv-01574

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Approve Form and Manner of Notice to the Class and Motion to Set Case for Fairness Hearing

Nov. 19, 2010

Nov. 19, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
88

1:09-cv-01574

Joint Stipulation of Dismissal

Feb. 25, 2011

Feb. 25, 2011

Settlement Agreement
94

1:09-cv-01574

Notice of Intent to Re-Open Litigation and Request for Hearing

Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Pleading / Motion / Brief
96

1:09-cv-01574

Amended and Supplemental Verified Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Dec. 8, 2011

Dec. 8, 2011

Complaint
97

1:09-cv-01574

Application for Preliminary Injunction

Dec. 8, 2011

Dec. 8, 2011

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4824944/h-v-payne/

Last updated July 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m.

Docket for: H. v. PAYNE
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Dec. 22, 2009

COMPLAINT against JAMES W. PAYNE, filed by R. H., N. M. S., J. J.(#1), T. S., D. S., C. H., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), J. S., J. J.(#2), S. H.(#1), S. H.(#2), A. H., B. H., N. J. S. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1- Letter regarding changes in monthly payments.)(JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
2 Dec. 22, 2009

CIVIL COVER SHEET, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S. (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
3 Dec. 22, 2009

RECEIPT #IP016037 in the amount of $ 350.00 (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
4 Dec. 22, 2009

Summons Issued as to JAMES W. PAYNE. (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
5 Dec. 22, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth J. Falk on behalf of Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S. (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
6 Dec. 22, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by Gavin Minor Rose on behalf of Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S. (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
7 Dec. 22, 2009

MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JD) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
8 Dec. 22, 2009

MOTION to Proceed by Anonymous Name, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit C.H. and R.H., # 2 Affidavit D.S. and J.S., # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
9 Dec. 22, 2009

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 8 MOTION to Proceed by Anonymous Name, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
10 Dec. 22, 2009

MOTION to Certify Class, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
11 Dec. 22, 2009

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 10 MOTION to Certify Class, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

RECAP
12 Dec. 24, 2009

RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by R. H., N. M. S., J. J.(#1), T. S., D. S., C. H., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), J. S., J. J.(#2), S. H.(#1), S. H.(#2), A. H., B. H., N. J. S.. JAMES W. PAYNE served on 12/23/2009. (Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 12/24/2009)

RECAP
13 Dec. 28, 2009

Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases, filed by Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Laramore, Jon) (Entered: 12/28/2009)

RECAP
14 Dec. 29, 2009

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

RECAP
15 Dec. 29, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Christoff on behalf of Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Christoff, David) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

RECAP
16 Dec. 29, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Kramer Ricchiuto on behalf of Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Ricchiuto, Anne) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

RECAP
17 Dec. 29, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by James J. Hutton on behalf of Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Hutton, James) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

RECAP
18 Dec. 29, 2009

NOTICE of Appearance by Betsy M. Isenberg on behalf of Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

RECAP
19 Dec. 30, 2009

ENTRY Following Telephone Conference: On December 29, 2009, the parties appeared telephonically by counsel for a status conference in the above two causes of action. Subject to the Court's approval, all parties agreed that pre-trial proceedings in the two causes of action can be consolidated, without prejudice to any party's right to insist upon separate trials. The parties contemplate taking one deposition in advance of any preliminary injunction hearing, which they expect to be completed sometime during the next week. The parties jointly requested, and the Magistrate Judge recommends, that the District Judge schedule a half-day preliminary injunction hearing one afternoon during the week of January 18, 2010. They parties also agreed to simultaneously submit prehearing briefs, briefs which the Magistrate Judge recommends be due five days before the preliminary injunction hearing. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/30/2009.(SWM) (Entered: 12/30/2009)

RECAP
20 Dec. 31, 2009

SCHEDULING ORDER. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report regarding the telephone status conference in the above matters on 12/29/09, the Court now sets an evidentiary hearing for 1/20/2010 at 09:30 AM in room #216 before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. The parties shall file any prehearing briefs and stipulations no later than 1/15/2010. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/31/2009.(LBK) (Entered: 12/31/2009)

RECAP
21 Jan. 10, 2010

AMENDED COMPLAINT against JAMES W. PAYNE, filed by T. S., C. H., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), S. H.(#2), A. H., R. H., N. M. S., J. J.(#1), D. S., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), J. S., B. H., S. H.(#1), J. J.(#2), N. J. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/10/2010)

RECAP
22 Jan. 10, 2010

Amended MOTION for Adult Plaintiffs to Proceed by Anonymous Name, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit (H. family), # 2 Affidavit (S. family), # 3 Affidavit (K. family), # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/10/2010)

RECAP
23 Jan. 10, 2010

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 22 Amended MOTION for Adult Plaintiffs to Proceed by Anonymous Name, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/10/2010)

RECAP
24 Jan. 10, 2010

MOTION to Certify Class (Renewed), filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/10/2010)

RECAP
25 Jan. 10, 2010

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 24 MOTION to Certify Class (Renewed), filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/10/2010)

RECAP
26 Jan. 12, 2010

NOTICE of Appearance by April Edwards Sellers on behalf of Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Sellers, April) (Entered: 01/12/2010)

RECAP
27 Jan. 12, 2010

ORDER granting pltfs' 8 and 22 Motion(s) to Proceed by Anonymous Names and Motion to Seal Affidavits Containing Actual Names (see Order for details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/12/2010. (SWM) (Entered: 01/12/2010)

RECAP
28 Jan. 13, 2010

STIPULATION to Certification of Cause as Class Action, re 24 MOTION to Certify Class (Renewed), filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/13/2010)

RECAP
29 Jan. 13, 2010

SEALED Affidavits of Adult Plaintiffs, re 27 Order on Motion, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit (C.H. and R.H.), # 2 Affidavit (D.S. and T.S.), # 3 Affidavit (H.K.))(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/13/2010)

RECAP
30 Jan. 15, 2010

STIPULATION, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit State Plan, # 2 Exhibit USDA Report, # 3 Exhibit Hitting the MARC, # 4 Exhibit Foster Care Notice, # 5 Exhibit Adoption Assitance Notice, # 6 Exhibit Foster parent listing)(Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
31 Jan. 15, 2010

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
32 Jan. 15, 2010

NOTICE Designation of Evidence - Part 1, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Dep. of Weinberg), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Part 1 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis), # 3 Exhibit 2 (Part 2 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis)) (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
33 Jan. 15, 2010

NOTICE Designation of Evidence - Part 2, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2 (Part 3 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Part 4 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis)) (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
34 Jan. 15, 2010

RESPONSE in Opposition re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
35 Jan. 15, 2010

NOTICE Designation of Evidence - Part 3, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2 (Part 5 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Part 6 of 6) (Aff. of DePanfilis)) (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
36 Jan. 15, 2010

NOTICE Designation of Evidence - Part 4, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3 (Supp. Aff. of H.K.), # 2 Exhibit 4 (Aff. of Campbell), # 3 Exhibit 5 (Aff. of Howard), # 4 Exhibit 6 (Supp. Aff. of C.H. and R.H.), # 5 Exhibit 7 (Aff. of Thurston), # 6 Exhibit 8 (Supp. Aff. of D.S. and T.S.), # 7 Exhibit 9 (Aff. of Mark and Michelle Pratt), # 8 Exhibit 10 (Aff. of Gwin), # 9 Exhibit 11 (Aff. of Hodge), # 10 Exhibit 12 (Aff. of Cunningham), # 11 Exhibit 13 (Aff. of Sullen), # 12 Exhibit 14 (Aff. of Lehman), # 13 Exhibit 15 (Aff. of Sherman), # 14 Exhibit 16 (Aff. of Nicley), # 15 Exhibit 17 (Aff. of Greene), # 16 Exhibit 18 (Aff. of Upton), # 17 Exhibit 19 (Aff. of Goff), # 18 Exhibit 20 (Aff. of Akamu), # 19 Exhibit 21 (Aff. of Brown), # 20 Exhibit 22 (Aff. of M. Williams), # 21 Exhibit 23 (Aff. of Fowler), # 22 Exhibit 24 (Aff. of G. Williams)) (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/15/2010)

RECAP
37 Jan. 18, 2010

NOTICE Supplemental Designation of Evidence, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 25 (Add'l Excerpts from Dep. of Weinberg)) (Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/18/2010)

RECAP
38 Jan. 19, 2010

Amended MOTION of Adult Plaintiffs to Proceed by Anonymous Name (Second), filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/19/2010)

RECAP
39 Jan. 20, 2010

NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Christoff, David) (Entered: 01/20/2010)

RECAP
40 Jan. 20, 2010

MOTION to Amend/Correct 21 Amended Complaint Substitute Attached Corrected Amended Complaint for First Amended Complaint to Correct Typographical Error, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Corrected First Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Corrected First Amended Complaint (Exh. 1), # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Gavin) (Entered: 01/20/2010)

RECAP
42 Jan. 20, 2010

STIPULATION regarding Admissibility of exhibits, filed by Plaintiffs A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (MAC) (Entered: 01/22/2010)

RECAP
41 Jan. 21, 2010

MINUTE ENTRY for January 20, 2010. Evidentiary hearing on Plaintiffs' motions for preliminary injunction held and concluded. The preliminary relief requested by the plaintiffs, Docket No. 14, was granted in accordance with the Court's ruling from the bench. A separate, written ruling will follow. The Unopposed Motion to Consolidate for pretrial purposes, but not for trial, Docket No. 13, was granted. A separate, written ruling will follow. The Court accepted the Stipulation filed in 1:09-cv-1574 regarding the status of the CH Plaintiffs to proceed as four distinct classes pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. A separate, written ruling formally certifing the classes will follow. Given the Court's acceptance of the Stipulation, no rulings are required on the motions filed in 1:09-cv-1547 at Docket Nos. 10 and 24 . The Court accepted the IARCCA's original memorandum filed in 1:09-cv-1580 at Docket No. 14. Therefore, no ruling is required on the Motion to Amend/Correct filed at Docket No. 16 . (Hearing recorded by Laura Howie-Walters, Court Reporter). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/21/2010. (PGS) (Entered: 01/21/2010)

RECAP
43 Jan. 21, 2010

ORDER granting pltfs' 38 Amended Motion to proceed by anonymous name and Motion to seal affidavits (see Order for details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/21/2010. (SWM) (Entered: 01/22/2010)

RECAP
44 Jan. 25, 2010

ORDER Granting re 13 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). The parties shall file all future pleadings, motions, and other documents in Cause No. 1:09-cv-1574 SEB-JMS only, utilizing the consolidated caption shown. (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/25/2010.(MAC) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

RECAP
45 Jan. 25, 2010

ORDER CERTIFYING Claims of C.H. Plaintiffs to Proceed as a Class Action. Kenneth J. Falk and Gavin M. Rose of the ACLU of Indiana are hereby appointed class counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/25/2010.(MAC) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

RECAP
46 Jan. 25, 2010

ORDER granting plaintiffs' 40 Motion to Amend/Correct First Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/25/2010. (MAC) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

RECAP
47 Jan. 26, 2010

AMENDED COMPLAINT against JAMES W. PAYNE, filed by T. S., C. H., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), S. H.(#2), A. H., R. H., N. M. S., J. J.(#1), D. S., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), J. S., B. H., S. H.(#1), J. J.(#2), N. J. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(MAC) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

RECAP
48 Jan. 26, 2010

ORDER Granting re 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by N. M. S., A. H., J. J., N. J. S., D. S., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), T. S., S. H., J. S., R. H., B. H., C. H. PRELIMINARY INJU NCTION took effect at the conclusion of the hearing on January 20, 2010, by order of the Court and shall remain in effect and extend until further order of the Court or, in any event, no later than a final ruling on the merits (See Order). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/26/2010.(MAC)

RECAP
49 Feb. 2, 2010

AMENDED ENTRY granting a preliminary injunction-This entry is amended to correct a typographical error on page 25 of the prior entry issued on 1/26/10. With the exception of that one word correction, this entry is in all other respects identical to the prior entry. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/2/2010.(CBU) (Entered: 02/02/2010)

RECAP
50 Feb. 4, 2010

ANSWER to 1 Complaint, filed by JAMES W. PAYNE.(Christoff, David) (Entered: 02/04/2010)

RECAP
51 Feb. 5, 2010

ENTRY regarding CMP and Initial Pretrial Conference. SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/6/2010 09:00 AM in room #361 before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. The CMP is due no later than 7 days prior to the iptc (see Entry for other details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/5/2010.(SWM) (Entered: 02/05/2010)

RECAP
52 Feb. 16, 2010

ANSWER to 47 Amended Complaint, filed by JAMES W. PAYNE.(Christoff, David) (Entered: 02/16/2010)

RECAP
53 Feb. 18, 2010

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 49 Entry, 48 Order, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Christoff, David) (Entered: 02/18/2010)

RECAP
54 Feb. 18, 2010

DOCKETING STATEMENT by JAMES W. PAYNE re 53 Notice of Appeal (Christoff, David) (Entered: 02/18/2010)

RECAP
55 Feb. 18, 2010

SEVENTH CIRCUIT APPEAL INFORMATION SHEET re 53 Notice of Appeal - Instructions for Attorneys - Parties' Short Record, Instructions, and Designation of Record information attached. (TMA) (Entered: 02/18/2010)

RECAP
56 Feb. 18, 2010

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 53 Notice of Appeal. - for Court of Appeals Use Only. (TMA) (Entered: 02/18/2010)

RECAP
57 Feb. 18, 2010

USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455 receipt number IP16834 re 53 Notice of Appeal filed by JAMES W. PAYNE. (cc: USCA) (TMA) (Entered: 02/19/2010)

RECAP
58 Feb. 18, 2010

USCA Case Number 10-1394 for 53 Notice of Appeal filed by JAMES W. PAYNE. (Attachments: # 1 Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice)(TMA) (Entered: 02/19/2010)

RECAP
59 Feb. 25, 2010

NOTICE of FILING of OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held before Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 01/20/2010. (Howie-Walters, Laura) (Entered: 02/25/2010)

RECAP
60 Feb. 25, 2010

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 01/20/2010, before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura Howie-Walters, Telephone number (317) 632-3422. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Statement due 3/18/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/26/2010. (Howie-Walters, Laura) Released on 5/26/2010 (LBK). (Entered: 02/25/2010)

RECAP
61 Feb. 26, 2010

DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., R. H., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), S. H.(#2), S. H.(#1), H.K., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), J. J.(#1), J. J.(#2), JAMES W. PAYNE, D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D. re 53 Notice of Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Civil Docket for 1:09cv1574, # 2 Exhibit B - Civil Docket for 1:09cv1580)(Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 02/26/2010)

RECAP
62 March 5, 2010

MOTION to Stay of Preliminary Injunction, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of James W. Payne, # 2 Affidavit of Lisa Rich)(Hutton, James) (Entered: 03/05/2010)

RECAP
63 March 5, 2010

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 62 MOTION to Stay of Preliminary Injunction, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Hutton, James) (Entered: 03/05/2010)

RECAP
64 March 18, 2010

RESPONSE in Opposition re 62 MOTION to Stay of Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiffs C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., H.K., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D.. (Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/18/2010)

RECAP
66 March 18, 2010

SCHEDULING ENTRY: The Court hereby converts the initial pretrial currently set for April 6, 2010 is now moved from 9:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and converted to a status conference to address case status and case disposition. A client representative with settlement authority is required to attend in person. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/18/2010.(SWM) (Entered: 03/19/2010)

RECAP
65 March 19, 2010

RESPONSE in Opposition re 62 MOTION to Stay of Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Excerpts from Public Law 182)(Sellers, April) (Entered: 03/19/2010)

RECAP
67 March 29, 2010

ENTRY for 3/29/2010: The magistrate judge has been advised that the parties have been involved in settlement discussions at the 7th Circuit, and does not wish to interfere with that process or cause unnecessary duplication of effort. Accordingly, the parties shall submit - not file - a joint report concerning the progress of those discussions, and the parties positions whether the conference set for April 6 should be reset as a status conference only, or whether continued discussions concerning settlement should be held. Issued by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/29/2010.(SWM) (Entered: 03/30/2010)

RECAP
68 April 6, 2010

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson: Status Conference held on 4/6/2010. The status and development of the action were discussed, and as a result of this conference the following Entry is made pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The magistrate judge and the parties discussed the case status generally, and the potential for agreed resolution specifically. Outstanding discovery was also discussed, and the parties were reminded of their obligations to use best efforts to resolve discovery disputes without Court involvement. Parties are to report the status of their negotiations to the magistrate judge by April 20, 2010. (SWM) (Entered: 04/07/2010)

RECAP
69 April 26, 2010

SCHEDULING ENTRY: Settlement Conference set for 5/6/2010 01:00 PM in room #361 before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Parties shall appear by counsel and in person and shall submit (not file) a confidential statement to the magistrate judge setting forth their respective settlement positions on or before May 4, 2010. Issued by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/26/2010.(SWM) (Entered: 04/26/2010)

RECAP
70 April 29, 2010

ENTRY FOR APRIL 29, 2010. The settlement conference set for May 6, 2010 is VACATED AND RESET for May 11, 2010, at 9:00 A.M. in Room 361, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis,Indiana. All deadlines and requirements set forth in the Courts order of April 26, 2010, docket number 69, setting the settlement conference remain in effect. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/29/2010.(MRI) (Entered: 04/29/2010)

RECAP
71 May 11, 2010

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson: Settlement Conference reconvened on 5/11/2010. Conference held and case is resolved as to the C.H. plaintiff class, not as to the IARCCA claims. IARRCA and Defendants remain in negotiations about long and short term issues, but defendants desire the litigation to proceed. Defendants motion to stay injunction [dkt. 62] is ripe for ruling. (MAC) (Entered: 05/12/2010)

RECAP
72 May 18, 2010

Letter from Severns & Stinson, Attorneys at Law regarding referral for assistance of adoption issues. (MAC) (Entered: 05/18/2010)

RECAP
73 May 27, 2010

ORDER denying defendants 62 Motion to Stay. Defendants Motion is MOOT with respect to C.H. group of plaintiffs and DENIES with respect to the IARCCA. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/27/2010. (MAC) (Entered: 05/28/2010)

RECAP
74 June 16, 2010

Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson no longer assigned to the case. Please include the new case number (1:09-cv-1574-SEB-DML), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (TMA) (Entered: 06/16/2010)

RECAP
75 Nov. 19, 2010

STIPULATION to Fully Settle Action Following Notice to the Class and Subject to Class Approval and Court Order Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by Plaintiffs C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., H.K., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D.. (Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/19/2010)

RECAP
76 Nov. 19, 2010

MOTION to Approve Form and Manner of Notice to the Class and Motion to Set Case for Fairness Hearing, filed by Plaintiffs C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., H.K., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Class Notice)(Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/19/2010)

RECAP
77 Dec. 10, 2010

ORDER GRANTING 76 Motion to Approve Form and Manner of Notice to the Class Action and Motion to Set for Fairness Hearing; SCHEDULING ORDER: Fairness Hearing set for 2/23/2011 10:00 AM in room #216, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Therefore, the class notice attached the Motion shall be given to the class as follows: Posted notice in all offices of the Department of Child Services. In newspapers of general circulation in Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Evansville, Gary, New Albany and Richmond. Futhermore that no earlier than 30 days following the initial posting and publication of the notice, plaintiffs' attorneys shall file their report with this Court as to the results of the class notice. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/10/2010.(CKM) (Entered: 12/13/2010)

RECAP
78 Dec. 18, 2010

Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch no longer assigned to the case. Please include the new case number (1:09-cv-1574-SEB-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD) (Entered: 12/18/2010)

RECAP
79 Feb. 8, 2011

MOTION to Withdraw Appearance of James J. Hutton, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 02/08/2011)

RECAP
80 Feb. 8, 2011

MOTION to Withdraw Appearance of David S. Christoff, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 02/08/2011)

RECAP
81 Feb. 8, 2011

REPORT of Class Counsel in CH v. Payne Following Notice to the Class by C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., R. H., R. H.(on thier own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated), S. H.(#2), S. H.(#1), H.K., J. J.(#3, minor children by their next friends), J. J.(#1), J. J.(#2), D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D.. (Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/08/2011)

RECAP
82 Feb. 9, 2011

Submission of Proposed Order, filed by Plaintiffs C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., H.K., J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Falk, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/09/2011)

RECAP
83 Feb. 9, 2011

ORDER GRANTING 79 Motion to Withdraw Appearance of James J. Hutton. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by the Court that the appearance of James J. Hutton be withdrawn and that Deputy Attorney General Betsy M. Isenberg, continue to represent the Defendants and their interests. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/9/2011. (CKM) (Entered: 02/09/2011)

RECAP
84 Feb. 9, 2011

ORDER GRANTING 80 Motion to Withdraw Appreance of David S. Christoff. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by the Court that the appearance of David S. Christoff be withdrawn and that Deputy Attorney General Betsy M. Isenberg, continue torepresent the Defendants and their interests. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/9/2011. (CKM) (Entered: 02/09/2011)

RECAP
85 Feb. 24, 2011

STIPULATION of Dismissal, filed by Plaintiffs C.W., A. H., B. H., C. H., C. H., C. H., R. H., R. H., R. H., S. H., S. H., H.K., IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"), J. J., J. J., J. J., D. S., D. S., J. S., N. M. S., N. J. S., T. S., S.D., Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Laramore, Jon) (Entered: 02/24/2011)

RECAP
86 Feb. 25, 2011

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/23/2011. On February 23, 2011, the parties appeared by counsel for a hearing, in accordance with Fed.R. Civ. P. 23(e), for the Court to consider the proposed settlement of the claims brought by the C.H. plaintiffs against James W. Payne. The Court found that the proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate pursuant to Rule 23(e) and that approval of the parties settlement was therefore appropriate. A separate order will issue. (Court Reporter Laura Howie-Walters.) (MAC) (Entered: 02/28/2011)

RECAP
87 Feb. 25, 2011

ORDER Approving re 75 Stipulation between parties in C.H. v. PAYNE. as fair, reasonable and adequate pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Fed.R.Civ.P. and Dismissing the action pursuant to the Stipulation.This case shall be dismissed with prejudice, subje ct to the terms of the Stipulation, as soon as defendant files with the Court proof that the pending appeal in the Seventh Circuit has been dismissed and this Order shall be deemed to be immediately effective as of that date (S.O.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/25/2011. (MAC)

RECAP
88 Feb. 25, 2011

ORDER Approving re 85 Stipulation of Dismissal. The parties hereby stipulate, and this Court hereby orders, that the claims brought by IARCCA against DCS in this lawsuit including, without limitation, those claims made in paragraphs 13 through 38 o f IARCCA's Verified Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief ("Complaint") are dismissed without prejudice and that the claims made in the Complaint cannot be reopened, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2 above. (S.O.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/25/2011.(MAC)

RECAP
89 Feb. 28, 2011

MANDATE of USCA as to 53 Notice of Appeal filed by JAMES W. PAYNE - Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b), filed by counsel for the appellants on February 28, 2011 IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). (No record to be returned.) (TMA) (Entered: 03/01/2011)

RECAP
Feb. 28, 2011

MANDATE of USCA as to HU 53 UH Notice of Appeal filed by JAMES W. PAYNE - Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b), filed by counsel for the appellants on February 28, 2011 IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). (No record to be returned.) (TMA) (Entered: 03/01/2011)

PACER
90 March 2, 2011

NOTICE Regarding Dismissal of Appeal, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE (Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 03/02/2011)

RECAP
March 2, 2011

NOTICE Regarding Dismissal of Appeal , filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE (Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 03/02/2011)

PACER
91 April 8, 2011

ENTRY - In accordance with Local Rule 79.1(b), the Clerk released to Gavin Rose, counsel for the C.H. Plaintiffs, two binders containing exhibits utilized at the January 20, 2010, hearing on the Plaintiffs respective motions for preliminary injunction. (S.E.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/8/2011.(CKM) (Entered: 04/08/2011)

RECAP
92 April 11, 2011

ENTRY - In accordance with Local Rule 79.1(b), the Clerk released to Rick Abdon with Baker & Daniels one binder containing exhibits utilized at the January 20, 2010, hearing on the Plaintiffs' respective motions for preliminary injunction titled as follows: 1. Evidence in Support of Plaintiff IARCCA's Memorandum in Support of Application for Preliminary Injunction (marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit C). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/11/2011.(CKM) (Entered: 04/11/2011)

RECAP
93 Aug. 5, 2011

CLOSED DISMISSED - ORDER CLOSING CASE: In accordance with the Court's rulings at Docket Nos. 87 and 88 and the Notice filed at Docket No. 90, the Clerk is directed to close this case on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/5/2011.(DWH) (Entered: 08/05/2011)

RECAP
94 Nov. 30, 2011

NOTICE of Intent to Re-Open Litigation and Request for Hearing, filed by Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA") (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Settlement Agreement, # 2 Exhibit B - DCS Rate Bulletins, # 3 Exhibit C - Sample Rate Letter) (Sellers, April) (Entered: 11/30/2011)

RECAP
95 Dec. 8, 2011

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance of Betsy Isenberg, filed by Defendant JAMES W. PAYNE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Isenberg, Betsy) (Entered: 12/08/2011)

RECAP
96 Dec. 8, 2011

*** WITHDRAWN PER ORDER DATED 7/9/2012 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT (Amended and Supplemental Verified Complaint) against All Defendants, filed by IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Settlement Agreement, # 2 Exhibit B - Provider Manuals)(Laramore, Jon) Modified on 7/10/2012 (SWM). (Entered: 12/08/2011)

RECAP
97 Dec. 8, 2011

*** WITHDRAWN PER ORDER DATED 7/9/2012 *** MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Laramore, Jon) Modified on 7/10/2012 (SWM). (Entered: 12/08/2011)

RECAP
98 Dec. 8, 2011

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 97 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff IARCCA, an Association of Children and Family Services ("IARCCA"). (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of C. Graham (Ex. A), # 2 Exhibit 1 to C. Graham Aff. (2011 PCG Memo), # 3 Exhibit 2 to Graham Aff. (2010 PCG Study), # 4 Exhibit B - Settlement Agreement, # 5 Exhibit C - Provider Manuals, # 6 Exhibit D - Bulletins, # 7 Exhibit E - CWLA Study, # 8 Affidavit Ermeti (Ex. F), # 9 Affidavit Gleitz (Ex. G), # 10 Affidavit Doppler (Ex. H), # 11 Affidavit Samuel (Ex. I), # 12 Affidavit Pierce (Ex. J))(Laramore, Jon) (Entered: 12/08/2011)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Indiana

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 22, 2009

Closing Date: 2011

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Four classes of litigants consisting of foster parents and children directly receiving foster care maintenance payments or adoption assistance payments from the Indiana Department of Child Services

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Indiana Department of Child Services

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Adoption Assistance Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 670 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Indiana 1:09-cv-01574

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Amount Defendant Pays: $104,812

Issues

General/Misc.:

Foster care (benefits, training)

Funding

Recommended Citation