Case: Conn v. City of Reno

3:05-cv-00595 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Filed Date: April 28, 2005

Closed Date: 2012

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 28, 2005, Brenda Jean Clustka died by suicide while inside her cell at the Washoe County jail. On November 3, 2005, her daughter and administrator of the estate, represented by two civil rights lawyers, brought a complaint in the District of Nevada (Judge Howard D. McKibben) against the City of Reno, Nevada and two officers of the Reno Police Department. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants performed, participated, aided and/or abetted in acts that led to the death of Ms. Clutska…

On April 28, 2005, Brenda Jean Clustka died by suicide while inside her cell at the Washoe County jail. On November 3, 2005, her daughter and administrator of the estate, represented by two civil rights lawyers, brought a complaint in the District of Nevada (Judge Howard D. McKibben) against the City of Reno, Nevada and two officers of the Reno Police Department. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants performed, participated, aided and/or abetted in acts that led to the death of Ms. Clutska.

The plaintiff alleged that the police officers escorting Ms. Clutska to the jail did not report her apparent earlier attempt to commit suicide while in the back of their police van. The plaintiff brought this action against the police officers for not putting Ms. Clutska on suicide watch and against the City of Reno for not properly training its police officers to deal with this type of situation. The plaintiff alleged a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on the part of the police officers for abridging Ms. Clutska's right to be free from deliberate indifference to risk of suicide. The plaintiff also brought a separate cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Reno for failing to properly train its police officers with respect to their obligation to report suicide attempts by detainees. Plaintiff sought declaratory that these acts were illegal and unconstitutional, injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for these alleged violations. A First Amended Complaint, filed on December 12, 2005, added the estate and Clustka's son as plaintiffs in addition to the daughter.

On August 29, 2006 the defendants, moved for summary judgment, claiming that the plaintiffs could not establish a §1983 claim because they could not show that Ms. Clustka was an objectively serious suicide risk while in custody and that the officers failed to take appropriate steps to protect her. The court agreed that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to Clustka's serious medical needs, or that the conduct of the defendants was the actual cause of Clutska's harm sufficient to constitute liability under §1983. The district court granted the motion for summary judgment and awarded judgment in favor of the defendants on March 8, 2007.

The plaintiffs then appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. On July 24, 2009 the 9th Circuit reversed and remanded the case. Conn v. City of Reno, 572 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). The 9th Circuit (Judge Stephen Reinhardt, Judge Mary M Schroeder, and Judge Dorothy W. Nelson) held that a reasonable jury could find that the police officers were liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for their deliberate indifference to Clustka's serious medical need, and that their actions were a cause in fact and a proximate cause of her suicide.

The defendants petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. In their May 6, 2010 petition, the defendants argued that the Ninth Circuit's decision exacerbated a circuit split over §1983 municipal liability for not training law-enforcement officers to diagnose suicide risk, and that the Ninth Circuit created a new circuit split by erroneously imposing on officers a constitutional duty to diagnose and report suicidal tendencies. On April 4, 2011 the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Connick v. Thompson, 131 S.Ct. 1350 (2011). In Connick, the Supreme Court addressed the liability of a district attorney's office for its prosecutors on a failure-to-train theory under § 1983.

On remand and in consideration of Connick, the Ninth Circuit found that the district court had been correct to hold that the municipality was not liable. On September 6, 2011, the Ninth Circuit reinstated its original opinion except for the part on municipal liability. Conn v. City of Reno, 658 F.3d 897 (D. Nev. 2011). On the district court level, the case then proceeded to trial against the two police officers only.

After a six-day jury trial, with proceedings beginning March 7, 2012, the jury found in favor of the officers. On March 13, 2012, the plaintiffs had objected to the qualified immunity jury instruction:

The jury instruction objected to asks "whether the officers reasonably misapprehended how the law would govern their situation.'' This is a legal question and one the Ninth Circuit has decided. Should the jury find that the officers were indeed deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of Brenda Clustka, then there can be no qualified immunity because the Ninth Circuit found that law clearly established, and the officers cannot have reasonably misapprehended it.
The court denied the objection during the trial proceedings that day. On March 14, 2012, the jury deliberated for approximately three hours before returning a verdict in favor of the defendants. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs.

A small amount of litigation occurred after trial over the defendants' awards for costs. In an order of September 19, 2012, the court found that as the defendants prevailed on all claims, they were entitled to an award of all allowable costs. In response to the plaintiffs' argument that the court should deny costs because of the plaintiffs' indigency and the the fact that it was a case of substantial public importance, effecting an immediate change in the way suicide threats were handled locally. Considering these circumstances, the court adjusted the costs to reflect the plaintiffs' economic circumstances and the desire not to chill future plaintiffs from bringing actions raising substantial constitutional issues, reducing the costs awarded to the defendants by fifty percent. The case is now closed.

Summary Authors

David Priddy (7/7/2011)

Kenneth Gray (8/1/2013)

Sarah McDonald (8/18/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6032876/parties/charla-conn-v-city-of-reno/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Campbell, Jack D. (Nevada)

Christensen, Donald L. (Nevada)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Bibas, Stephanos (Pennsylvania)

Byers, Jacqueline J. (District of Columbia)

Etzkorn, Lars (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

07-15572

Supreme Court Docket

City of Reno v. Conn

Supreme Court of the United States

July 6, 2010

July 6, 2010

Docket

3:05-cv-00595

Docket

April 29, 2013

April 29, 2013

Docket
2-2819237

3:05-cv-00595

Complaint

Nov. 3, 2005

Nov. 3, 2005

Complaint
16

3:05-cv-00595

First Amended Complaint

Dec. 12, 2005

Dec. 12, 2005

Complaint
49

3:05-cv-00595

Motion for Summary Judgment

Aug. 29, 2006

Aug. 29, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
53

3:05-cv-00595

Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

Sept. 25, 2006

Sept. 25, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
58

3:05-cv-00595

Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment

Oct. 13, 2006

Oct. 13, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
62

3:05-cv-00595

Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment

March 8, 2007

March 8, 2007

Order/Opinion

07-15572

Appellants' Opening Brief

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aug. 6, 2007

Aug. 6, 2007

Pleading / Motion / Brief

07-15572

Appellees' Answering Brief

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sept. 27, 2007

Sept. 27, 2007

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6032876/charla-conn-v-city-of-reno/

Last updated Oct. 29, 2026, 9:12 p.m.

Docket for: Charla Conn v. City of Reno
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 3, 2005

MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT civil cover sheet (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
2 Nov. 3, 2005

COMPLAINT and jury demand (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
3 Nov. 3, 2005

MOTION TO DISMISS mtn for partial S/J against Ds-Ashton and Robertson (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
4 Nov. 3, 2005

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE obo P. (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
5 Nov. 3, 2005

SUMMONS ISSUED as to D-City of Reno (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
6 Nov. 3, 2005

SUMMONS ISSUED as to D-David Robertson (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
7 Nov. 3, 2005

SUMMONS ISSUED as to D-Ryan Ashton (Entered: 11/04/2005)

RECAP
12 Nov. 16, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiff Charla Conn, Defendant City of Reno. City of Reno served on 11/18/2005. (WJ, ) (Entered: 12/05/2005)

RECAP
13 Nov. 16, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiff Charla Conn, Defendant David Robertson. David Robertson served on 11/9/2005. (WJ, ) (Entered: 12/05/2005)

RECAP
14 Nov. 16, 2005

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiff Charla Conn, Defendant Ryan Ashton. Ryan Ashton served on 11/9/2005. (WJ, ) (Entered: 12/05/2005)

RECAP
8 Nov. 21, 2005

STIPULATION - DPSO by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. (JAR, ) (Entered: 11/22/2005)

RECAP
9 Nov. 21, 2005

STIPULATION - to ext time for Ds to file answr or responsive pldg and to oppose S/J by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson, Plaintiff Charla Conn. (JAR, ) (Entered: 11/22/2005)

RECAP
10 Nov. 30, 2005

SCHEDULING ORDER pursuant to Stipulated Discovery Plan and Sscheduling Order; Discovery Cut-Off: May 20, 2006; Dispositive Motions: June 19, 2006; Joint Pretrial Order: July 19, 2006.Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 11/30/05. (HJ, ) (Entered: 11/30/2005)

RECAP
11 Nov. 30, 2005

ORDER ON STIPULATION re 9 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to File Answer or Responsive Pleading and to Oppose Summary Judgment Motion; Defendants have to and including December 12, 2005, in which to file an Answer or responsive pleading; Defendants have to and including March 24, 2006, in which to file their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 11/30/2005. (HJ, ) (Entered: 11/30/2005)

RECAP
15 Dec. 12, 2005

MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. Responses due by 12/30/2005. (JMA) (Entered: 12/12/2005)

RECAP
16 Dec. 12, 2005

1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson, filed by Charla Conn.(WJ, ) (Entered: 12/15/2005)

RECAP
17 Dec. 22, 2005

Submission of PROPOSED stipulation ofr P to resopnd to D's motion to dism (1st req) filed by Plaintiff Charla Conn. (WJ, ) (Entered: 12/22/2005)

RECAP
18 Dec. 23, 2005

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Howard D. McKibben, U.S. District Judge on 12/23/2005. By Deputy Clerk: Michael Large. The Stipulation for extension of time 17 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until 2/20/06 to file an opposition to 15 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/20/2006. (AF, ) (Entered: 12/23/2005)

RECAP
19 Feb. 21, 2006

RESPONSE to 15 MOTION to Dismiss; filed by Plaintiff Charla Conn. Replies due by 3/7/2006. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 02/21/2006)

RECAP
20 March 2, 2006

NOTICE by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson of Change of Responsible Attorney (Skau, Creighton) (Entered: 03/02/2006)

RECAP
21 March 3, 2006

REPLY to Response to 15 MOTION to Dismiss; filed by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. (Skau, Creighton) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

RECAP
22 March 20, 2006

PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Charla Conn First Amended Proposal; Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Proposed Order. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 03/20/2006)

RECAP
23 March 20, 2006

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER re 22 First Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan & Scheduling Order; Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Discovery due by 7/31/2006. Motions due by 8/30/2006. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. (HJ, ) (Entered: 03/20/2006)

RECAP
24 March 28, 2006

NOTICE of Trial Setting:Jury Trial set for 2/6/2007 at 9:00 AM (two-week stacked calendar) in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. The deadline to schedule a settlement conference is 8/30/2006. The magistrate judge shall conduct the settlement conference at a convenient time prior to trial (no image attached)(BS, ) (Entered: 03/28/2006)

RECAP
25 March 28, 2006

ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss, see ord for spec. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/28/06. (JAR, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006)

RECAP
26 March 30, 2006

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Howard D. McKibben, U.S. District Judge on 3/30/2006. By Deputy Clerk: Bette Stewart. Pursuant to the approved stipulation of the parties 23 withdrawing plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment 3, the briefing schedule for the motion for partial summary judgment set forth in the order 25 is vacated. (no image attached) (BS, ) (Entered: 03/30/2006)

RECAP
27 March 30, 2006

NOTICE of Trial Setting: Upon agreement of the parties, the Jury Trial set for 2/6/2007 is continued to 3/20/2007 at 09:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. (no image attached)(BS, ) (Entered: 03/30/2006)

RECAP
28 April 17, 2006

First ANSWER to 16 Amended Complaint by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson.(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 04/17/2006)

RECAP
29 April 25, 2006

EX PARTE DOCUMENT Application for Order Declaring Charla Conn the "Next of Kin" for the Purpose of Obtaining Mental Health Records for her Deceased Mother Brenda Clustka; Order filed by Plaintiff Charla Conn. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 04/25/2006)

RECAP
30 April 25, 2006

ORDER re 29 Ex Parte Application for Order Declaring Charla Conn the "Next of Kin" for the Purpose of Obtaining Mental Health Records for Her Deceased Mother Brenda Clustka filed by Charla Conn. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 4/25/2006. (HJ, ) (Entered: 04/25/2006)

RECAP
31 May 11, 2006

STIPULATION Second Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan; Proposed Order by Plaintiff Charla Conn. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 05/11/2006)

RECAP
32 May 11, 2006

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER re 31 Second Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/31/2006. Motions due by 8/30/2006. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/29/2006. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 5/11/2006. (HJ, ) (Entered: 05/11/2006)

RECAP
33 June 7, 2006

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Robert A. McQuaid Jr., U.S. Magistrate Judge on 6/7/2006. By Deputy Clerk: GMM. A Discovery hearing is set on the Court's calendar for Tuesday, June 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.(no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 06/07/2006)

RECAP
34 June 8, 2006

SUPPLEMENT re 33 Minute Order, ; Matters ToBe Addressed At Discovery Hearing by Plaintiff Charla Conn. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 06/08/2006)

RECAP
35 June 13, 2006

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Discovery Hearing held on 6/13/2006 before Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr.. Crtrm Administrator: GMM; Pla Counsel: Terri Keyser-Cooper; Def Counsel: Jack Campbell; Court Reporter/FTR #: FTR; Time of Hearing: 9:53 a.m. to 10:31:23 a.m.. The Court addresses the parties and advises them that he has reviewed Ms. Keyser-Cooper's filing regarding this hearing and ensures that Mr. Campbell has seen the filing. The parties present their respective arguments to the Court. The Court finds that while the probable cause form is discoverable, that form not being a form in Defendants' control, Plaintiff will need to obtain it elsewhere. The Court orders that a protective order regarding the IA reports will be submitted for review and approval and thereafter, those requested reports will be provided to Plaintiff's counsel. The Court further orders that, in light of Mr. Campbell's assurances that the forty (40) named witnesses are not going to be called upon to testify, Plaintiff's request for the evidence is Denied as moot. There being nothing further, the Court adjourns.(no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 06/14/2006)

RECAP
36 June 15, 2006

STIPULATION re Protective Order; Proposed Order by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 06/15/2006)

RECAP
37 June 19, 2006

ORDER ON STIPULATION re 36 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 6/19/2006. (HJ, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006)

RECAP
38 June 21, 2006

MOTION to Compel MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, EXPEDITED HEARING REQUESTED; EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 by Plaintiff Charla Conn. Responses due by 7/9/2006. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 06/21/2006)

RECAP
39 June 27, 2006

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Robert A. McQuaid Jr., U.S. Magistrate Judge on 6/27/2006. RE: 38 MOTION to Compel MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, EXPEDITED HEARING REQUESTED; EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 filed by Charla Conn, Motion Hearing set for 7/27/2006 09:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. The parties have been telephonically notified.(no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 06/27/2006)

RECAP
40 June 29, 2006

RESPONSE to 38 MOTION to Compel MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, EXPEDITED HEARING REQUESTED; EXHIBITS 1 AND 2; filed by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. Opposition to Motion to Compell Testimony and Requests for Sanctions Replies due by 7/13/2006. (Attachments: # 1)(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 06/29/2006)

RECAP
41 July 6, 2006

REPLY to Response to 38 MOTION to Compel MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, EXPEDITED HEARING REQUESTED; EXHIBITS 1 AND 2; filed by Plaintiff Charla Conn. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 07/06/2006)

RECAP
42 July 24, 2006

STATEMENT of Plaintiffs re Further Matters to Address at Hearing of July 27, 2006, before The Honorable Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. re 39 Minute Order Setting Hearing on Motion, ; by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

RECAP
43 July 27, 2006

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 7/27/2006 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Rosemary Damron; Pla Counsel: Diane Vaillancourt, via phone; Def Counsel: Jack Campbell; Court Reporter/FTR: FTR 8:55 a.m. - 9:36 a.m.; Time of Hearing: 8:55 a.m.. RE: 38 MOTION to Compel MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, EXPEDITED HEARING REQUESTED; EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 filed by Charla Conn, is granted in part and denied in part. See attached minutes. (RD) (Entered: 07/27/2006)

RECAP
44 Aug. 1, 2006

Submission of PROPOSED ORDER on 43 Motion Hearing,, ; filed by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Revised Protective Order Pursuant to the Court's Instructions)(Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 08/01/2006)

RECAP
45 Aug. 1, 2006

PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY OF CERTAIN MATERIALS re 44 . Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 8/1/2006. (HJ, ) (Entered: 08/01/2006)

RECAP
46 Aug. 1, 2006

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Robert A. McQuaid Jr., U.S. Magistrate Judge on 8/1/2006. By Deputy Clerk: GMM. A Discovery Hearing is set on the Court's calendar for Tuesday, August 1, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. The parties have been telephonically notified. (no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 08/01/2006)

RECAP
47 Aug. 1, 2006

EX PARTE DOCUMENT to 43 Motion Hearing,, ; Renewed Motion to Compel Production of Evidence Underlying Arrests Pursuant Filed Pursuant to Court's Invitation, Exhibits 1-3 filed by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 08/01/2006)

RECAP
48 Aug. 1, 2006

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Discovery Hearing held on 8/1/2006 before Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr.. Crtrm Administrator: GMM; Pla Counsel: Diane Vaillancourt; Def Counsel: Jack Campbell; Court Reporter/FTR #: FTR #1:30 p.m. to 1:43 p.m.; Time of Hearing: 1:30 p.m.. The Court addresses the parties and explains the purpose of this hearing is at Ms. Vaillancourt's request and it is about her concern of not having the appropriate documents necessary to complete the doctors' depositions scheduled for Monday, August 7, 2006. The parties present their respective arguments to the Court. The Court advises counsel that one of the inherent problems of attending depositions by telephone is not being able to view documents that are presented for the first time at the deposition and that decision should not prejudice the attending parties by making them wait for the document(s) in question to be faxed and reviewed. The Court will not order that counsel for Defendants comply with this request. The Court advises the parties that Plaintiffs' counsel has just this day filed a Renewed Motion to Compel Production of Evidence Supporting Plaintiff?s Arrest of March 19, 2005 47 and, although Defendants have not yet had a chance to review the Motion, the Court GRANTS it. Defendants' counsel advises the Court that he and Ms. Vaillancourt had just discussed this issue, that he was unaware that a motion had been filed and that he has already contacted the appropriate person to ascertain if the photographs exist and, if so, will provide same to Plaintiffs. The Court further orders that if there are no photographs, an affidavit of the custodian of such evidence stating there are no photographs will be filed. Ms. Vaillancourt again asks for Dr. Chappell's report that at the last hearing Mr. Campbell had agreed to provide. Mr. Campbell advises the Court that although he was given two weeks within which to comply with that request, he will provide the information as soon as it is prepared. Ms. Vaillancourt inquires as to the Court's availability on Monday, August 7, 2006 in case problems arise at the depositions. The Court advises the parties that he will be available. There being nothing further, the Court adjourns.(no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 08/01/2006)

RECAP
49 Aug. 29, 2006

MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. Responses due by 9/16/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit # 4 Exhibit # 5 Exhibit)(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 08/29/2006)

RECAP
50 Sept. 13, 2006

ORDER Scheduling Settlement Conference: Settlement Conference set for 10/23/2006 09:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr.. The settlement conference statements shall be received in RAM chambers, Room 405, not later than 4:00 pm on 10/19/06. Signed by Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr. on 9/13/06. (WJ, ) (Entered: 09/15/2006)

RECAP
52 Sept. 22, 2006

ORDER STRIKING FILED DOCUMENT(S); P has filed an oppo brief exceeding the page limit; Pleading 51 is stricken; P shl hv 15 dys frm the dt of this ord to file a pleading complying with the rule; in addition P has filed the oppo pldg and nearly 400 pgs as exhibits under seal w/o obtaining leave of crt. Parties shl hv 15 dys to show cause why those docs should not be unsealed, see ord for spec. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/22/06. (JAR, ) (Entered: 09/22/2006)

RECAP
53 Sept. 25, 2006

RESPONSE to 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment; filed by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. Replies due by 10/9/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service # 2 Index of Exhibits# 3 Exhibit 1-4# 4 Exhibit 5-8# 5 Exhibit 9-11# 6 Exhibit 12-14# 7 Exhibit 15-17# 8 Exhibit 18-21# 9 Exhibit 24-26)(Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 09/25/2006)

RECAP
55 Sept. 25, 2006

MOTION to Extend Time regarding dispositive matter Request for Extension of Time to Reply by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. (Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 09/25/2006)

RECAP
56 Sept. 26, 2006

ORDER: D's mtn for extn 55 is granted. Ds shall have until 10/20/06, to file a reply to P's opposition. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/26/06. (WJ, ) (Entered: 09/27/2006)

RECAP
57 Oct. 10, 2006

NOTICE of Hearing: A Telephonic Status Conference is scheduled for Thursday, 10/19/2006 at 11:00 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. The courtroom deputy, Gina Mugnaini, shall initiate the conference call. At least two days in advance of the hearing, counsel shall notify Ms. Mugnaini of the numbers where they may be reached for the conference call. IT IS SO ORDERED.(no image attached)(RD) (Entered: 10/10/2006)

RECAP
58 Oct. 13, 2006

REPLY to Response to 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment; filed by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit # 4 Exhibit)(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 10/13/2006)

RECAP
59 Oct. 19, 2006

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Status Conference held on 10/19/2006 before Judge Robert A. McQuaid Jr.. Crtrm Administrator: GMM; Pla Counsel: Terri Keyser-Cooper; Def Counsel: Jack Campbell; Court Reporter/FTR #: FTR # 11:00 a.m. to 11:04 am; Time of Hearing: 11:00 a.m.. The Court addresses the parties and explains the purpose of this hearing is to determine whether or not there is any real interest in having the scheduled settlement conference. Mr. Campbell advises the Court that defendants wish to proceed to trial in this matter and that any settlement offer would be minimal. In light of this information, the Court orders that the Settlement Conference set for Monday, October 23, 2006 at 9:00 a.m is therefore VACATED. There being nothing further, the Court adjourns.(no image attached) (GMM, ) (Entered: 10/19/2006)

RECAP
60 Jan. 2, 2007

NOTICE of Change of Address by Terri Keyser-Cooper. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 01/02/2007)

RECAP
61 Jan. 25, 2007

NOTICE: The jury trial set for March 20, 2007 is vacated and shall be reset at an appropriate time following decision on the pending dispositive motion(s). (no image attached)(BS, ) (Entered: 01/25/2007)

RECAP
62 March 8, 2007

ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. See order for spec. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/8/07. (JW ) (Entered: 03/08/2007)

RECAP
63 March 8, 2007

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiffs. Signed by Clerk Lance S Wilson on 3/8/07. (JW ) (Entered: 03/08/2007)

RECAP
64 March 12, 2007

BILL OF COSTS by Defendants Ryan Ashton, City of Reno, David Robertson. Tax or object to Bill of Costs by 3/27/2007. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit)(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 03/12/2007)

RECAP
65 March 25, 2007

OBJECTION to 64 Bill of Costs; and Request for Diminished Award; Exh 1 & 2 filed by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 03/25/2007)

RECAP
66 April 3, 2007

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 62 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 63 Judgment by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 528095. (Attachments: # 1 Ninth Circuit Docketing Statement# 2 Statement of Representation# 3 Order Appealed From# 4 Judgment Appealed From)(Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 04/03/2007)

RECAP
67 April 4, 2007

TRANSMITTAL of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 66 Notice of Appeal,. (DRM, ) (Entered: 04/04/2007)

RECAP
68 April 11, 2007

TRANSMITTAL RETURN of Notice of Appeal from USCA re 66 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 07-15572. (JW ) (Entered: 04/12/2007)

RECAP
69 April 11, 2007

USCA ORDER for Time Schedule as to 66 Notice of Appeal (JW ) (Entered: 04/12/2007)

RECAP
70 May 2, 2007

CLERK'S MEMORANDUM REGARDING TAXATION OF COSTS re 64 Bill of Costs. Total Amount Allowed: $5,178.65. (JW ) (Entered: 05/02/2007)

RECAP
71 May 2, 2007

COSTS TAXED in amount of $ $5,178.65 against Charla Conn, et al.. (JW ) (Entered: 05/02/2007)

RECAP
72 May 11, 2007

ORDER of USCA as to 66 Notice of Appeal: SETTING ASSESMENT CONFERENCE, telephonic June 11, 2007 at 10:00 am Pacific time.(DRM, ) (Entered: 05/11/2007)

RECAP
73 May 14, 2007

MOTION for Re-Taxation of Costs (70] [71) by Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. Responses due by 6/1/2007. (Vaillancourt, Diane) Modified on 5/15/2007 to correct link. (BLG). (Entered: 05/14/2007)

RECAP
74 June 7, 2007

VACATED PER # 152 ORDER : ORDER : ORDERED the 73 MOTION for Re-Taxation of Costs is administratively closed and may be reopened upon the filing of any notice of remititur in this action. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/7/2007. See ord for spec. (DRM, ) Modified on 9/19/2012 to denote VACATED (DRM). (Entered: 06/07/2007)

RECAP
75 Sept. 5, 2007

ORDER of USCA as to 66 Notice of Appeal, scheduling time to file answering brief. (DRM) (Entered: 09/05/2007)

RECAP
76 July 24, 2009

OPINION of USCA dtd 7/24/2009 as to 66 Notice of Appeal. USDC REVERSED AND REMANDED. USCA Case #07-15572. (PM) (Entered: 07/27/2009)

RECAP
77 Aug. 14, 2009

ORDER of USCA as to 66 Notice of Appeal, filed by Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. USCA Case Number 07-15572. Plaintiffs-Appellants shall file a response to Defendants-Appellees' petition for rehearing en banc. (KO) (Entered: 08/14/2009)

RECAP
78 Jan. 14, 2010

ORDER of USCA dtd 1/14/2010 as to 66 Notice of Appeal. Appellee's motion for extension of time to file a motion to stay mandate, until 1/22/2010, is GRANTED. USCA case #07-15572 . (DRM) (Entered: 01/14/2010)

RECAP
79 Jan. 27, 2010

ORDER of USCA dtd 1/27/2010 as to 66 Notice of Appeal (USCA Case Number 07-15572). Appellee's motion for a 90-day stay of the issuance of the mandate pending application for writ of certiorari is granted. If such a petition is filed, the stay shall continue until final disposition by the Supreme Court. (PM) (Entered: 01/27/2010)

RECAP
80 March 17, 2010

ORDER of USCA dtd 3/17/2010 as to 66 Notice of Appeal. The mandate is stayed until May 8, 2010 pending the Appellees filing of a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. If such a petition is filed, the stay shall continue until final disposition by the Supreme Court. USCA case #07-15572 .(DRM) (Entered: 03/17/2010)

RECAP
81 March 26, 2010

NOTICE - Letter from USSC Clerk to USCA Clerk dtd 3/22/2010 extending time within which petition for cert may be filed to May 7, 2010. USSC Application No. 09A882. USCA case #07-15572 . (DRM) (Entered: 03/26/2010)

RECAP
82 April 5, 2011

NOTICE - Letter from USSC Clerk to USCA Clerk dated 04/04/2011. The petition for a writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The judgment is vacated, and the case is REMANDED to the USCA, Ninth Circuit, for further consideration in light of Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ____ (2011). The judgment or mandate of the USSC will not issue for at least twenty-five days pursuant to Rule 45. Should a petition for rehearing be filed timely, the judgment or mandate will be further stayed pending this Court's action on the petition for rehearing. USCA Case No. 07-15572. re 66 Notice of Appeal. (MLC) (Entered: 04/05/2011)

RECAP
83 April 22, 2011

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, dtd 4/22/2011 as to 66 Notice of Appeal. Supplemental briefing set. USCA case 07-15572 . (DRM) (Entered: 04/25/2011)

RECAP
84 April 29, 2011

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit as to 66 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 07-15572. Appellants' unopposed motion for an extension of time until 5/20/2011 to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED. Supplemental briefs from both parties will now be due on 5/20/2011. (MLC) (Entered: 04/29/2011)

RECAP
85 May 9, 2011

ORDER of USSC dtd 5/6/2011 granting petition of writ of certiorari; vacating judgment; and remanding to 9th Circuit for further consideration in the light of Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ___ (2011) re USCA Case 07-15572. USSC Case No. 09-1361. (DRM) (Main Document 85 replaced on 5/9/2011) (DRM). Modified on 5/9/2011 to correct USCA case no. and to bold case no. text(DRM). (Entered: 05/09/2011)

RECAP
86 Sept. 8, 2011

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit dtd 9/6/2011, as to 66 Notice of Appeal (USCA Case No. 07-15572). USCA orders that the USDC's decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. (PM) (Entered: 09/08/2011)

RECAP
87 Sept. 12, 2011

USCA ORDER dtd 9/12/0211. Costs taxed in amount of $ 574.30 against Appellees Ashton and Robertson only. USCA case 07-15572 . (DRM) (Entered: 09/12/2011)

RECAP
88 Oct. 13, 2011

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to 66 Notice of Appeal (USCA Case No. 07-15572). Appellants' unopposed motion to transfer consideration of attorneys' fees to the district court is hereby GRANTED. (KO) (Entered: 10/13/2011)

RECAP
89 Oct. 14, 2011

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to 66 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 07-15572. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. (MLC) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

RECAP
90 Oct. 24, 2011

MANDATE of USCA, Ninth Circuit, dtd 10/24/2011 as to 86 USCA Order Affirming in part and Reversing in part re USCA Case 07-15572. Costs awarded to the appellant in the amount of $574.30. (DRM) (Entered: 10/25/2011)

RECAP
91 Oct. 25, 2011

ORDER on 90 USCA Mandate. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/25/2011. (DRM) (Entered: 10/25/2011)

RECAP
92 Oct. 25, 2011

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of The Honorable Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/25/2011. By Deputy Clerk: Paris Rich. IT IS ORDERED, a Status Conference is set for Wednesday, 11/2/2011 at 10:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PR) (Entered: 10/25/2011)

RECAP
93 Oct. 26, 2011

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Robert C. Jones, on 10/26/2011. IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb for all further pretrial proceedings within his jurisdiction. Magistrate Judge Robert A McQuaid, Jr. no longer assigned to case. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:05-cv-595-HDM-WGC. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

RECAP
94 Nov. 2, 2011

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Status Conference held on 11/2/2011 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. Crtrm Administrator: Paris Rich; Pla Counsel: Terry Keyser-Cooper and Diane Vaillancourt (telephonically); Def Counsel: Jack Campbell; Court Reporter: Kathryn French; Time of Hearing: 9:55 AM to 10:03 AM; Courtroom: 4; Counsel are present as indicated. The Court and counsel confer regarding a Trial setting in this matter. IT IS ORDERED, Jury Trial is set for Monday, 3/5/2012 at 9:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. Calendar Call is set for Wednesday, 2/22/2012 at 9:30 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. Proposed Jury Instructions and Proposed Voir Dire shall be due by Monday, 2/27/2012. At the request of the parties, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, this matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge William Cobb for purposes of a Settlement Conference to be set at a date and time convenient to the Court and counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PR) Modified on 11/2/2011 (PR). (Entered: 11/02/2011)

RECAP
95 Nov. 7, 2011

NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Diane K. Vaillancourt on behalf of Plaintiffs Charla Conn, Dustin Conn. Notice of Association of Peter C. Wetherall, Esq. (Vaillancourt, Diane) (Entered: 11/07/2011)

RECAP
96 Nov. 8, 2011

STIPULATION to Vacate Settlement Conference: Order by Defendants Ryan Ashton, David Robertson. (Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 11/08/2011)

RECAP
97 Nov. 8, 2011

ORDER APPROVING 96 STIPULATION TO VACATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties jointly request that the order for settlement conference be VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/8/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM) (Entered: 11/08/2011)

RECAP
98 Dec. 14, 2011

MOTION/REQUEST for order re conflicting costs awards and plaintiffs experts testify at trial via video conferencing NOTICE by Plaintiff Charla Conn COMBINED: (1) REQUEST FOR ORDER RE CONFLICTING COSTS AWARDS; AND (2) REQUEST TO HAVE PLAINTIFFS EXPERTS TESTIFY AT TRIAL VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-6)(Keyser-Cooper, Terri) Modified on 12/15/2011 to activate motion. (BLG). (Entered: 12/14/2011)

RECAP
Dec. 15, 2011

NOTICE of Docket Correction to 98 Notice event changed to reflect MOTION rather than notice 98 NOTICE by Plaintiff Charla Conn COMBINED: (1) REQUEST FOR ORDER RE CONFLICTING COSTS AWARDS; AND (2) REQUEST TO HAVE PLAINTIFFS EXPERTS TESTIFY AT TRIAL VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-6)(Keyser-Cooper, Terri). If you have any questions please contact Quality Control at 775-686-5707. (no image attached)(BLG)

99 Dec. 16, 2011

First MOTION to Expedite EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED HEARING RE: COMBINED (1) REQUEST FOR ORDER RE CONFLICTING COSTS AWARDS; AND (2) REQUEST TO HAVE PLAINTIFFS EXPERTS TESTIFY AT TRIAL VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING by Plaintiff Charla Conn. Motion ripe 12/16/2011. (Keyser-Cooper, Terri) (Entered: 12/16/2011)

RECAP
100 Dec. 16, 2011

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of The Honorable Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/16/2011. By Deputy Clerk: Paris Rich. IT IS ORDERED, Motion Hearing Re: 99 Emergency Request for Expedited Hearing is set for Tuesday, 12/20/2011 at 10:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PR) (Entered: 12/16/2011)

RECAP
101 Dec. 19, 2011

MOTION for Leave to File Amended Expert Disclosure by Defendants Ryan Ashton, David Robertson. Motion ripe 12/19/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Campbell, Jack) (Entered: 12/19/2011)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Nevada

Case Type(s):

Policing

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 28, 2005

Closing Date: 2012

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Children and estate of a woman who committed suicide while in a Reno, Nevada jail

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City of Reno, Nevada

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

District of Nevada 3:05-cv-00595

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 07-15572

Supreme Court of the United States 09-1361

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Failure to train

Recommended Citation