Case: Ramos v. SimplexGrinnell LP

1:07-cv-00981 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: March 7, 2007

Closed Date: June 17, 2016

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In February 2007, fifteen current and former employees of SimplexGrinnell LP, who performed electrical and sprinkler work, including installation, maintenance, inspection, testing, repairs, and replacement of fire alarms and security systems on various public works projects throughout New York, filed this class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County. They claimed that SimplexGrinnell failed to pay its employees in accordance with the Prevailing Wage Act, New …

In February 2007, fifteen current and former employees of SimplexGrinnell LP, who performed electrical and sprinkler work, including installation, maintenance, inspection, testing, repairs, and replacement of fire alarms and security systems on various public works projects throughout New York, filed this class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County. They claimed that SimplexGrinnell failed to pay its employees in accordance with the Prevailing Wage Act, New York Labor Law § 220. Pursuant to the Prevailing Wage Act, New York Labor Law § 220, public works contracts -- i.e., contracts with state or local governmental agencies to perform construction, maintenance and repair of public buildings -- which provide that all laborers will be paid prevailing wages.

The plaintiffs filed the case in state court, but on March 7, 2007, SimplexGrinnell moved the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn Division. Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold was assigned to the case.

In 2008, the plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint adding further specification to claim relating to sprinkler and suppression work, and added a named plaintiff.

After nearly three years of discovery, the plaintiffs filed motions for class certification and summary judgment on March 18, 2010. The plaintiffs sought certification of a class defined as follows: "[A]ll laborers, workmen and mechanics who furnished labor to SimplexGrinnell on non-federal public works projects in the State of New York at any time from February 6, 2001[, or from July 14, 2001 for sprinkler work] until the final judgment in this matter, and who . . . have not been paid prevailing wages and benefits as required by law." The plaintiffs sought summary judgment for the class and damages in the total sum of $16 million. On March 25, 2010, the defendant filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.

On June 21, 2011, in a published Memorandum & Order, the Court granted the plaintiffs' motion for class certification. 796 F.Supp.2d 346. The Court expressly held that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes did not warrant a different result. The court also granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to fire alarm testing and inspection work and plaintiffs' fifth cause of action. The Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.

The defendants filed a motion for reconsideration or a second motion for summary judgment, but that motion was denied on October 4, 2011. Shortly thereafter, the parties agreed to engage in private mediation through November 15, 2011 and to suspend the litigation schedule during that time. Over the next few months, even after the November deadline, the parties continued to work on a settlement and reported regularly to the Court on their progress.

On June 29, 2012, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation and Agreement Regarding Class Action Settlement of Claims Other Than "Testing and Inspection Claims." The Agreement set the settlement amount at $5,525,000 and the amount of the employer's share of payroll taxes to be paid on the settlement shares. The Agreement also allowed for deductions from the settlement amount with court approval for fees and other expenses. The Agreement provided that each class member, excluding the eighteen individuals who previously opted out of the class, receive a share of the settlement proceeds based on the conclusions of David L. Crawford's Expert Report allocating damages. A settlement administrator was to notify all class members of this settlement agreement. Shortly thereafter, the Clerk issued a judgment explaining that the settlement had been accepted.

As it states in its title, the settlement did not cover the testing and inspection claims, and on December 7, 2012, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court's grant of summary judgment on those claims. In a December 4, 2014 Opinion, the Court of Appeals vacated the June 21 memorandum and order in part and remanded the case. 773 F.3d 394. The Court certified two questions on this appeal: (1) “whether a court should give deference not only to an agency’s substantive interpretation of a statute arising from an unrelated proceeding but also to its decision to enforce that interpretation only prospectively”; and (2) “whether contracts committing parties to pay prevailing wages pursuant to section 220 of the New York Labor Law (‘NYLL’) need to specify—when the scope of the statute’s coverage is unclear to the parties—what particular work the prevailing wages will be paid for."

The Court of Appeals answered the first question narrowly, holding that it "will not give the agency more deference than it claims for itself" and based on the fact that the agency had renounced any claim to deference in this litigation, the agency's decision to construe section 220 to cover testing and inspection work only prospectively deserved no deference. As to the second question, the Court of Appeals held that "[a]n agreement to comply with a statute is an agreement to comply with it as correctly interpreted, whether or not the interpretation was known to the parties at the time of the contracting." 21 N.E.3d 237 (N.Y. 2014)

Back in the Second Circuit, based on these answers, the district court's decision granting the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims relating to testing and inspection work were vacated and the case was remanded to District Court.

Following this decision, the parties reported that they again intended to pursue private mediation. They were ordered to submit a joint report on the status of their efforts to reach a settlement by April 1, 2015, or promptly upon the completion of mediation, whichever came first. The parties finally reached a settlement on February 27, 2015, which was formally approved by the Court on April 24, 2015. This Agreement included a provision providing that the defendant would make changes to its payment practices and, to the extent it has not paid prevailing wages to its workers for testing and inspection work, would commence paying such wages to all its workers for all testing and inspection work done on fire alarms or sprinkler systems in NY on "public works." This change was to be implemented within 15 days of the primary approval of this agreement, and payment to be made retroactive to May 1, 2015, for all testing and inspection work not paid from that date to the implementation of this agreement.

The settlement amount was set at $9,500,000, plus the amount of the employer's share of the payroll taxes, and allowed for deductions from the settlement amount for fees and other expenses. A settlement administrator was to notify all class members of this settlement agreement.

On April 29, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a motion to extend the time allowed to locate class members with uncashed settlement checks--there were 59 such class members, who had failed to cash checks totaling $176,000. Because the settlement agreement explicitly provided that any unclaimed money would revert to the defendant, the Magistrate Judge Gold denied this motion on June 17, 2016. The case is closed.

Summary Authors

Xin Chen (7/31/2011)

Saeeda Joseph-Charles (12/29/2016)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4319175/parties/ramos-v-simplexgrinnell-lp/


Judge(s)

Gold, Steven M. (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Coughlin, Kerin E. (New York)

Fay, Raymond C. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Capozzola, Dominick Cameron (New Jersey)

Copus, David Allen (New Jersey)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:07-cv-00981

Docket

June 17, 2016

June 17, 2016

Docket
56

1:07-cv-00981

First Amended Class Action Complaint

July 14, 2008

July 14, 2008

Complaint
109-2

1:07-cv-00981

Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions for Class Certification and Summary Judgment

March 18, 2010

March 18, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
111-2

1:07-cv-00981

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - Part I

March 25, 2010

March 25, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
111-3

1:07-cv-00981

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - Part II

March 25, 2010

March 25, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
154

1:07-cv-00981

Memorandum and Order [Granting Motion to Certify in Part, Granting Motion for Summary Judgment in Part, and denying Daubert Motion]

June 21, 2011

June 21, 2011

Order/Opinion

796 F.Supp.2d 346

161

1:07-cv-00981

Memorandum and Order [Denying Defendant's Motion for Pre Motion Conference]

Aug. 2, 2011

Aug. 2, 2011

Order/Opinion

2011 WL 3472341

164

1:07-cv-00981

Supplemental Expert Report

Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report
168

1:07-cv-00981

Memorandum and Opinion [Denying Defendant's Application for Leave to Bring Motion for Reconsideration or a Second Motion for Summary Judgment]

Oct. 4, 2011

Oct. 4, 2011

Order/Opinion

2011 WL 4710814

228-3

1:07-cv-00981

Joint Stipulation and Agreement Regarding Class Action Settlement

June 29, 2012

June 29, 2012

Settlement Agreement

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4319175/ramos-v-simplexgrinnell-lp/

Last updated Aug. 21, 2025, 12:26 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County by SimplexGrinnell LP ( Filing fee $ 350) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet # 2 declar# 3 proof) (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 03/07/2007)

2 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

3 declar

View on PACER

4 proof

View on PACER

March 7, 2007

March 7, 2007

RECAP
2

NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer A. Rygiel-Boyd on behalf of SimplexGrinnell LP (notification declined) (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 03/07/2007)

March 7, 2007

March 7, 2007

PACER
3

First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed with plaintiff's consent by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Rygiel-Boyd, Jennifer) (Entered: 03/14/2007)

March 14, 2007

March 14, 2007

PACER

ORDER granting 3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer SimplexGrinnell LP answer due 3/30/2007. So Ordered by Magistrate JudgeSteven M. Gold on 3/14/2007. (Vasquez, Lea)

March 14, 2007

March 14, 2007

PACER
4

SCHEDULING ORDER Attached:Initial Conference set for 5/3/2007 at 2:00 PM in 13D South before Magistrate-Judge Steven M. Gold. (Vasquez, Lea) (Entered: 03/16/2007)

March 16, 2007

March 16, 2007

PACER
5

ANSWER to Complaint by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Rygiel-Boyd, Jennifer) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

PACER
6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SimplexGrinnell LP re 5 Answer to Complaint (Rygiel-Boyd, Jennifer) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

PACER
7

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice David A. Copus by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Clarke, Melonie) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

April 24, 2007

April 24, 2007

PACER
8

FILING FEE: $ 25.00, receipt number 338346 for David A. Copus. (Clarke, Melonie) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

April 24, 2007

April 24, 2007

PACER

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Ordered by Judge Steven M. Gold on 4/24/2007. (Clarke, Melonie)

April 24, 2007

April 24, 2007

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Steven M. Gold : Initial Conference Hearing held on 5/3/2007. Menken and Bierman for plaintiffs, Copus and Capozzola for defendant. The setting of a case management schedule will be deferred until the next conference to permit counsel additional time to investigate certain fundamental underlying facts, including whether the contracts at issue had prevailing wage schedules attached. Counsel agree that no potential class members will be approached by defendant, and none presented with releases of claims that might be asserted in this lawsuit, for at least one week, and that counsel will either agree on the circumstances under which releases may be sought and obtained or advise this court within one week that they are unable to do so. Plaintiffs may issue subpoenas to obtain contracts and attached schedules, if any, from non-parties. Defendant will promptly advise plaintiff whether any surety companies provided bonds in connection with any of the contracts at issue in this case. NEXT CONFERENCE: MAY 31 AT 2 PM. (Vasquez, Lea)

May 4, 2007

May 4, 2007

PACER
9

Letter requesting change in conference time by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 05/25/2007)

May 25, 2007

May 25, 2007

PACER

ORDER re 9 Letter, filed by Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Breno Zimerer, Jaime Oy Arvide, Jose Luis Maldonado, Frank Rodriguez, Omar Florez, Jose Fernandez, Randy Wray, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr., Nacim Bennekaa, Chris Maietta, Roberto Ramos. The conference previously scheduled for 2:30 p.m. on May 31st will instead be held at 10:00 a.m. at counsels' request. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 5/29/2007. (Vasquez, Lea)

May 29, 2007

May 29, 2007

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Steven M. Gold : Status Conference held on 5/31/2007. Menken for plaintiffs, Copus for defendant. The parties will complete their automatic disclosures by June 29, serve interrogatories and document demands by July 16 and responses by August 15, and complete fact discovery by December 31. Plaintiffs will either amend their complaint, or state that they do not intend to do so, by June 29, and file their demand for a jury trial by that same date. NEXT CONFERENCE: JANUARY 10, 2008, AT 10 AM. Counsel shall be prepared to state their position on settlement, with principals present or available by telephone, to articulate the basis for any anticipated summary judgment motions, and to state whether they will agree to assignment of this case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including jury trial and entry of final judgment. (Vasquez, Lea)

June 1, 2007

June 1, 2007

PACER
10

DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 06/29/2007)

June 29, 2007

June 29, 2007

PACER
11

Letter in compliance with Magistrate Judge Gold's Order by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 06/29/2007)

June 29, 2007

June 29, 2007

PACER
12

Letter with proposed order by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 07/03/2007)

July 3, 2007

July 3, 2007

PACER

ORDER re 12 Letter, filed by Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Breno Zimerer, Jaime Oy Arvide, Jose Luis Maldonado, Frank Rodriguez, Omar Florez, Jose Fernandez, Randy Wray, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr., Nacim Bennekaa, Chris Maietta, Roberto Ramos : The parties' proposed order is hereby entered by the court. Ordered by Judge Steven M. Gold on 07/05/07. (Gold, Steven)

July 5, 2007

July 5, 2007

PACER
13

Letter seeking assistance with discovery. by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 08/31/2007)

Aug. 31, 2007

Aug. 31, 2007

PACER

SCHEDULING ORDER:An in-person discovery conference will be held at 11:30 on September 11, 2007 before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold in courtroom 13-D. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 9/3/2007. (Vasquez, Lea)

Sept. 3, 2007

Sept. 3, 2007

PACER
14

Proposed Pretrial Order Regarding Confidentiality of Discovery Materials by SimplexGrinnell LP (Attachments: # 1 Cover letter for proposed order) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 09/11/2007)

Sept. 11, 2007

Sept. 11, 2007

PACER
15

NOTICE of Appearance by Dominick Cameron Capozzola on behalf of SimplexGrinnell LP (aty to be noticed) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 09/11/2007)

Sept. 11, 2007

Sept. 11, 2007

PACER

ORDER re 14 Proposed Pretrial Order filed by SimplexGrinnell LP, entering the proposed order as an order of the court. Ordered by Judge Steven M. Gold on 09/11/07. (Gold, Steven)

Sept. 11, 2007

Sept. 11, 2007

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Steven M. Gold : Discovery Hearing held on 9/11/2007. Menken for plaintiffs, Copus for defendants. Defendant will file protective order, which the court will enter, in its current form, without prejudice to plaintiff's right to seek relief if they believe defendants are abusing the right to designate documents as confidential. (Vasquez, Lea)

Sept. 12, 2007

Sept. 12, 2007

PACER
16

Letter Seeking a Conference by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F) (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 12/14/2007)

Dec. 14, 2007

Dec. 14, 2007

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold:Status Conference held on 1/10/2008. Menken and Rozger for plaintiffs, Copus and Capozzola for defendants. By January 24, plaintiffs will provide a letter setting forth their complaints about the adequacy of defendants' privilege log; defendants shall supplement their log and provide the verification in issue by February 7. Defendants, by January 24, will produce, or provide prompt dates to inspect, documents responsive to items 11, 12, 19, 23, and 25-27 from plaintiffs' first document demands, and will produce those items not yet provided that are responsive to plaintiffs' second set of document demands. Discovery will be concluded by April 30. NEXT CONFERENCE, IN-PERSON: MAY 9, 2008 AT 11:00 AM. (Vasquez, Lea)

Jan. 11, 2008

Jan. 11, 2008

PACER
17

Letter to Magistrate Judge Gold by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

March 4, 2008

March 4, 2008

PACER
18

Letter to Magistrate Judge Gold by SimplexGrinnell LP (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 03/05/2008)

March 5, 2008

March 5, 2008

PACER
19

SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Conference has been scheduled for 3/19/2008 at 2:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Counsel are to refer to the attached Order for further information. (Vasquez, Lea) (Entered: 03/14/2008)

March 14, 2008

March 14, 2008

PACER
20

Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference to March 18 or March 21 by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 03/14/2008)

March 14, 2008

March 14, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The telephone conference wil be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, March 21, 2008. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 3/17/2008. (Vasquez, Lea)

March 17, 2008

March 17, 2008

PACER
21

Letter regarding March 21, 2008 telephone conference by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Finlon, Kristen) (Entered: 03/20/2008)

March 20, 2008

March 20, 2008

PACER
22

Letter Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 03/24/2008)

March 24, 2008

March 24, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold:Telephone Conference held on 3/21/2008. (1) Depositions noticed by plaintiffs of defendant's witnesses will be held where the witnesses reside. Reasonable travel expenses of plaintiff's counsel will be a taxable cost in the event plaintiffs obtain a judgment. (2) Defendant will response to the payment issue raised in the letter filed by plaintiffs on March 20th by March 25th, and the court will hold an in-person conference to resolve the issue, at 3:00 p.m. on March 28, 2008. (3) If plaintiffs seek leave to file an amended complaint, they shall submit a pre-motion conference application by April 4th. (Tape #FTR 10:32-10:56.) (Vasquez, Lea)

March 24, 2008

March 24, 2008

PACER
23

Letter to Magistrate Judge Steven M Gold by SimplexGrinnell LP (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 03/25/2008)

March 25, 2008

March 25, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold:Status Conference held on 3/28/2008. Menken for plaintiffs, Copus for defendants. With respect to the issues raised by plaintiffs and defendants in their respective letters of March 20 and 25, docket entries 21 and 23, it is hereby ordered that defendants are to hold the additional funds due to named plaintiffs as a result of the audit conducted by defendants until April 11, 2008. Any authorizations or instructions received by defendant by that date, directing that the funds due to any particular plaintiff be paid to counsel, will be honored. If, with respect to any individual named plaintiff, no such authorization or instructions are received by that date, the payment due to that plainitiff shall be made directly to him or her. (Vasquez, Lea)

March 29, 2008

March 29, 2008

PACER
24

Letter Responding to Plaintiffs' Request for a Pre-Motion Conference by SimplexGrinnell LP (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/02/2008)

April 2, 2008

April 2, 2008

PACER
25

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Made via Letter Request) by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/02/2008)

April 2, 2008

April 2, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 25 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Counsel shall advise the court whether they seek to proceed with the conference currently set for May 9, or whether they prefer to adjourn that conference until a date after the completion of discovery. The conference will proceed as scheduled on May 9 absent an order adjourning it. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 04/03/08. (Gold, Steven)

April 3, 2008

April 3, 2008

PACER
26

APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, SimplexGrinnell LP, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez re Telephone Conference,, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, 30(b)(6) deposition notice, # 2 Exhibit B, email between counsel, # 3 Exhibit C, 2/28/08 letter from Defendants' counsel, # 4 Exhibit D, 2/29/08 letter from Defendants' counsel, # 5 Exhibit E, 3/4/08 letter to Magistrate Gold, # 6 Exhibit 3/21/08 text only order) (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 04/04/2008)

April 4, 2008

April 4, 2008

PACER
27

Consent MOTION for Leave to File Additional Briefing Relating to Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate Judge Steven Gold's March 24, 2008 Order by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/04/2008)

April 4, 2008

April 4, 2008

PACER
28

ORDER granting 27 Motion for Leave to File; Deft will file a Response to Plaintiffs' Objections on or before 4/25/08; Plaintiffs will file a Reply on or before 5/5/08; So Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 4/9/08. (Fernandez, Erica) (Entered: 04/11/2008)

April 11, 2008

April 11, 2008

PACER
29

Joint MOTION to Adjourn Conference Presently Set for May 9, 2008 by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/11/2008)

April 11, 2008

April 11, 2008

PACER
30

ORDER: Plaintiffs' request is referred to Mag Gold. It is within Judge Gold's discretion to hold or deny a pre-motion conference. Any motion for leave to amend is referred to Mag Gold to hear and determine. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 4/15/08. (Fernandez, Erica) (Entered: 04/16/2008)

April 16, 2008

April 16, 2008

PACER
31

SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephone conference has been scheduled for 4/23/2008 at 2:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Counsel are to refer to the attached Order for further information. (Vasquez, Lea) (Entered: 04/17/2008)

April 17, 2008

April 17, 2008

PACER
32

Letter to Magistrate Judge Gold by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 04/18/2008)

April 18, 2008

April 18, 2008

PACER

SCHEDULING ORDER: The Telephone Conference set for 4/23/08 will instead be held on 4/28/2008 at 3:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold. Future requests for adjournment must be filed as MOTIONS but may remain in letter form. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 4/18/2008. (Vasquez, Lea)

April 18, 2008

April 18, 2008

PACER
33

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 26 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court,, filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/25/2008)

April 25, 2008

April 25, 2008

PACER
34

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 26 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court,, EXHIBIT A IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM (Docket Entry 33) filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 04/25/2008)

April 25, 2008

April 25, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold:Telephone Conference held on 4/28/2008. Rozger for plaintiffs, Copus and Capozzola for defendants. Plaintiffs will file their motion for leave to amend the complaint by May 9, addressing inter alia the issues discussed today. Defendant's opposition is due May 23, and plaintiff's reply is due June 3. The motion will be decided on the papers unless oral argument is requested. (Vasquez, Lea)

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER
35

REPLY to Response to Motion re 27 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Additional Briefing Relating to Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate Judge Steven Gold's March 24, 2008 Order Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate's Order filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate's Order) (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 05/05/2008)

May 5, 2008

May 5, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 29 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The conference previously scheduled for May 9th will instead be held at 10:00 a.m. on September 8, 2008. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 5/7/2008. (Vasquez, Lea)

May 7, 2008

May 7, 2008

PACER
36

MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bruce Menken, # 2 Exhibit A., documents produced by defendants, # 3 Exhibit B, proposed amended complaint, # 4 Exhibit C, Declaration of Rogelio Smith, # 5 Exhibit D., letter from defense counsel, # 6 Exhibit E., declaration of Shawn Love, # 7 Memorandum in Support) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 05/09/2008)

May 9, 2008

May 9, 2008

PACER
37

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 36 MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 05/23/2008)

May 23, 2008

May 23, 2008

PACER
38

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Opposition re 36 MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-C, # 2 Exhibit D, part one, # 3 Exhibit D, part two, # 4 Exhibit D, part three) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 05/23/2008)

May 23, 2008

May 23, 2008

PACER
39

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Opposition re 36 MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, (Affidavit of David Copus) filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 05/23/2008)

May 23, 2008

May 23, 2008

PACER
40

MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B., # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit J, # 9 Exhibit K) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 06/03/2008)

June 3, 2008

June 3, 2008

PACER
41

REPLY in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Grunfeld Affirmation in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend, # 2 Exhibit A to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 3 Exhibit B to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 4 Exhibit C to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 5 Exhibit D to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 6 Exhibit E to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 7 Exhibit F to Grunfeld Affirmation, # 8 Exhibit G to Grunfeld Affirmation) (Grunfeld, Nicole) (Entered: 06/03/2008)

June 3, 2008

June 3, 2008

PACER
42

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 40 MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/05/2008)

June 5, 2008

June 5, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 42 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 40 MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting Response due by 6/9/2008. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/5/2008. (Vasquez, Lea)

June 5, 2008

June 5, 2008

PACER
43

RESPONSE in Opposition re 40 MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Christie Hext, # 2 Declaration of John Moretto, # 3 Declaration of David Copus) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/09/2008)

June 9, 2008

June 9, 2008

PACER
44

Letter regarding email discovery dispute by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Grunfeld, Nicole) (Entered: 06/11/2008)

June 11, 2008

June 11, 2008

PACER
45

ORDER: On this appeal, plaintiffs renew arguments made before Judge Gold. They fail to show that his conclusion was clearly erroneous, contrary to law, or an abuse of his broad discretion in resolving discovery disputes. Their appeal is denied, and Judge Gold's order is affirmed. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 6/9/08. (Fernandez, Erica) (Entered: 06/12/2008)

June 12, 2008

June 12, 2008

PACER
46

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 06/23/2008)

June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

PACER
47

Letter MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/23/2008)

June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

PACER
48

Letter MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ATTACHMENT TO LETTER MOTION) by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/23/2008)

June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

PACER
49

Letter MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Compel by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/23/2008)

June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

PACER
50

RESPONSE in Opposition re 48 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ATTACHMENT TO LETTER MOTION), 47 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A., Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B, email from defense counsel) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 06/24/2008)

June 24, 2008

June 24, 2008

PACER
51

Letter in response to Defednant's request for leave to file motion to compel by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - NYS Dept of Labor Opinion Letter, # 2 Exhibit B - Department of Labor Bureau of Public Work Case Contacts Report, # 3 Exhibit C - SimplexGrinnell/NYS Office of Mental Hygiene Contract) (Grunfeld, Nicole) (Entered: 06/24/2008)

June 24, 2008

June 24, 2008

PACER
52

RESPONSE in Opposition re 46 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 06/26/2008)

June 26, 2008

June 26, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. In light of the volume of documents produced and the various disputes between the parties concerning payment for electronic discovery, location of depositions, and the plaintiffs' efforts to amend their complaint, plaintiffs' application for additional time to complete discovery is reasonable. Because the current schedule does not cut off discovery until August 15, however, the ninety-day extension sought does not seem necessary. DISCOVERY IS EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 17, 2008. THE CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SET FOR SEPTEMBER 8 IS ADJOURNED TO OCTOBER 29, 2008 at 2:00 PM. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 06/30/08. (Gold, Steven)

June 30, 2008

June 30, 2008

PACER

ORDER: I will hear argument on the various motions pending before me at 3:00 pm on July 11, 2008. It appears that the motions pending before me are (1) Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint, docket entries 36, 37 and 41; (2) Defendant's motion to compel plaintiffs to produce documents relating to their work for other employers, docket entries 49 and 51; and (3) Plaintiffs' motion seeking to require defendant to bear the cost of electronic discovery, docket entries 40 and 43. If there are other motions pending, or if additional documents have been submitted in support of the pending motions listed above, counsel shall promptly so inform the court. Although the parties seem to have stated their positions in detail with respect to motions (2) and (3) above in the letters they have already submitted, they also seem to seek leave to file formal memoranda in connection with these motions. Any additional submissions in connection with the above-referenced pending motions, should the parties wish to make them, shall be limited to ten pages and filed simultaneously no later than July 7, 2008. Replies limited to five pages may be submitted by July 9, 2008. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 07/02/08. (Gold, Steven)

July 2, 2008

July 2, 2008

PACER
53

REPLY in Support re 40 MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting, 36 MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, 7/1/08 letter to defense counsel, # 2 Exhibit B, Defendant's privilege log, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 07/07/2008)

July 7, 2008

July 7, 2008

PACER
54

REPLY in Opposition re 40 MOTION for Discovery and cost shifting, 36 MOTION to Amend/Correct Telephone Conference, filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 07/09/2008)

July 9, 2008

July 9, 2008

PACER
55

SCHEDULING ORDER: Pre motion conference scheduled for 9/9/2008 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 6D South before Judge Nina Gershon. All parties involved in the action are directed to appear at this conference, whether or not they are involved in the proposed motion(s). The parties are reminded to adhere to the Individual Motion Practices of Judge Nina Gershon which are attached. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 7/10/2008. (Joe, Victor) (Entered: 07/10/2008)

July 10, 2008

July 10, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 36 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; denying 40 Motion for Discovery; denying 49 Motion for Leave to File. See minute entry of today's date for additional details and qualifications, and the minutes of today's proceedings for a statement of the reasons for each ruling. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 07/11/08. (Gold, Steven)

July 11, 2008

July 11, 2008

PACER
56

AMENDED COMPLAINT against SimplexGrinnell LP, filed by all plaintiffs. (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 07/14/2008)

July 14, 2008

July 14, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold:Motion Hearing held on 7/11/2008 re 40 MOTION for Discovery, 36 MOTION to Amend. (1) Counsel will submit a letter by July 25 informing the court whether they have been able to resolve by agreement the issues raised by the premotion conference letters submitted to Judge Gershon, particularly in light of the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Cox v Nap Construction. (2) Defendant's motion to compel information about plaintiffs' other employment is denied, except that defendant may inquire at plaintiffs' depositions about plaintiffs' other work and whether plaintiffs were paid prevailing wages. In no event may defendant contact any plaintiffs' current employer absent prior application to the court. (3) Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of Hext's emails at defendant's expense is denied without prejudice to the discovery and reapplication discussed on the record today, except that plaintiffs may designate two days for which defendant will restore the Hext emails at its own expense. The purpose of this discovery is to help determine whether each of defendant's back-up tapes reflects all email traffic to date that has not been deleted, or only the email traffic transmitted or received on the date of the tape. (4) Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend is granted for reasons stated on the record. Defendant will answer the amended complaint in twenty days. Plaintiffs' alarm and detection claims relate back to the date of the original complaint, but plaintiffs' sprinkler system and fire suppression claims do not. (5) The conference previously set for October 29 will proceed as scheduled absent further application to the court. (Tape #3:02-3:58.) (O'Connor, Erin)

July 14, 2008

July 14, 2008

PACER
57

Letter re pre-motion conference pending before Judge Gershon by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 07/25/2008)

July 25, 2008

July 25, 2008

PACER
58

ANSWER to 56 Amended Complaint by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 08/04/2008)

Aug. 4, 2008

Aug. 4, 2008

RECAP
59

MOTION for Discovery or for pre-motion conference by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 09/04/2008)

Sept. 4, 2008

Sept. 4, 2008

PACER
60

Transcript of Proceedings held on 7/11/2008, before Judge Gold. Court Reporter/Transcriber Aria Transcription, Telephone number 215-767-7700. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/29/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/9/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/8/2008. (Sanders, Melanie) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
61

RESPONSE to Motion re 59 MOTION for Discovery or for pre-motion conference filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 09/09/2008)

Sept. 9, 2008

Sept. 9, 2008

PACER

SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephone conference will be held at 3:00 p.m. on September 15th to address plaintiff's motion filed September 4th. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to arrange the call with all parties as well as confirm with defendants counsel that they are aware of this conference date and time. Requests for adjournment will not be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference on consent of all parties. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 9/10/2008. (Vasquez, Lea)

Sept. 10, 2008

Sept. 10, 2008

PACER

Minute Order for telephone conference held on September 16, 2008 before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold: DENYING 59 Plaintiff's motion to compel deposition of defendant's general counsel, Mr. D'Orsi for reasons stated on teh record. Upon the joint application of the parties, discovery is extended to December 15, 2008. THE CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 19TH IS ADJOURNED TO JANUARY 6, 2009 AT 10:00 A.M.. (Tape #FTR 3:03-3:14 Courtroom 13-A.) (Vasquez, Lea)

Sept. 16, 2008

Sept. 16, 2008

PACER
62

Letter to District Judge Nina Gershon by SimplexGrinnell LP (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 10/20/2008)

Oct. 20, 2008

Oct. 20, 2008

PACER
63

ORDER OF RECUSAL. Senior Judge Nina Gershon recused. Case reassigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry for all further proceedings. Ordered by Chief Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 10/22/2008. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 10/23/2008)

Oct. 22, 2008

Oct. 22, 2008

PACER
64

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery for the purpose of taking the deposition of Christopher Alund, by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 12/19/2008)

Dec. 19, 2008

Dec. 19, 2008

PACER
65

RESPONSE in Opposition re 64 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery for the purpose of taking the deposition of Christopher Alund, filed by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 12/22/2008)

Dec. 22, 2008

Dec. 22, 2008

PACER

ORDER granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Although defendants object on the grounds that plaintiffs failed to comply with the deadlines set by the court, plaintiffs have satisfactorily explained that they seek to take discovery beyond the previously set deadline because of recent events. Moreover, defendants have not identified any prejudice they will suffer if discovery is extended to permit the single remaining deposition plaintiffs seek to conduct. Counsel shall confer and attempt to agree on a prompt date for the Alund deposition, and shall advise the court as soon as possible if they seek to adjourn the conference set for January 6 in light of the extension of time to complete discovery. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 12/22/08. (Gold, Steven)

Dec. 22, 2008

Dec. 22, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for Status Conference held on 1/6/2009 before Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold: Menken and Rozger for plaintiffs, Copus and Capozzola for defendants. (1) Counsel report that they have completed fact depositions and most of fact discovery, but that they intend to confer on January 9 with respect to certain outstanding interrogatories and document demands. If all remaining issues concerning fact discovery are not resolved by then, counsel may file a motion to compel no later than January 23. (2) Plaintiffs report that they intend to move for class certification and partial summary judgment, and defendants report that they intend to move for summary judgment and dismissal on preemption grounds. Counsel shall file premotion conference applications pursuant to Judge Irizarry's motion practices by February 6. (3) Counsel shall promptly contact my chambers if they seek a settlement conference or agree to consent to reassignment of this matter to a magistrate judge for all purposes. (Vasquez, Lea)

Jan. 7, 2009

Jan. 7, 2009

PACER
66

Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File motions to compel and pre-motion letter applications for class certification and summary judgment/dismissal by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Menken, Bruce) (Entered: 01/13/2009)

Jan. 13, 2009

Jan. 13, 2009

PACER

ORDER granting 66 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Counsel may contact my chambers at any time to schedule a settlement conference. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 1/15/2009. (Gold, Steven)

Jan. 15, 2009

Jan. 15, 2009

PACER
67

CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 01/20/2009)

Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

PACER

ORDER re 67 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by SimplexGrinnell LP -- The parties have consented by stipulation to submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge assigned to this matter for all purposes. The stipulation is SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/20/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)

Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

PACER

Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold added. Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry no longer assigned to case. (Vaughn, Terry)

Jan. 22, 2009

Jan. 22, 2009

PACER
68

Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 02/04/2009)

Feb. 4, 2009

Feb. 4, 2009

PACER

ORDER granting 68 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Steven M. Gold on 2/4/2009. (Gold, Steven)

Feb. 4, 2009

Feb. 4, 2009

PACER
69

MOTION to Compel Further Discovery Responses by SimplexGrinnell LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1-4, # 2 Exhibits 5-7, # 3 Exhibits 8-9, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibits 12-13) (Capozzola, Dominick) (Entered: 02/12/2009)

Feb. 12, 2009

Feb. 12, 2009

PACER
70

MOTION to Compel by Chris Maietta, Randy Wray, Rogelio Smith, Agban Agban, Yadira Gonzalez, Maximo Estrella, Jr, Jaime Oy Arvide, Nacim Bennekaa, Breno Zimerer, Omar Florez, Roberto Ramos, Frank Rodriguez, Jose Luis Maldonado, Jose Fernandez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, Crandall deposition, # 7 Exhibit G, spreadsheet, # 8 Exhibit H, email correspondence, # 9 Exhibit I, correspondence with counsel, # 10 Exhibit J, corrspondence from defense counsel, # 11 Exhibit K, 1-26-09 privilege log, # 12 Exhibit L, 1-29-09 privilege log, # 13 Exhibit M, proposed subpoena) (Rozger, Jason) (Entered: 02/12/2009)

Feb. 12, 2009

Feb. 12, 2009

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Post-WalMart decisions on class certification

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 7, 2007

Closing Date: June 17, 2016

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Fifteen current and former employees of Defendant who performed electrical and sprinkler work on various public works projects throughout the state.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

SimplexGrinnell LP, Private Entity/Person

Defendant Type(s):

Sanitation/Public Works

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 14,000,000

Order Duration: 2015 - 2016

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Pay / Benefits