Case: United States v. Edward Rose & Sons, Inc.

3:01-cv-00040 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Jan. 18, 2001

Closed Date: 2010

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On January 18, 2001, the United States filed a complaint under the Fair Housing Act and the American with Disabilities Act against the Edward Rose Construction, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff sought injunctive, declaratory, and monetary relief. On September 3, 2002, the United States initiated a related lawsuit against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The defendants were develo…

On January 18, 2001, the United States filed a complaint under the Fair Housing Act and the American with Disabilities Act against the Edward Rose Construction, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff sought injunctive, declaratory, and monetary relief. On September 3, 2002, the United States initiated a related lawsuit against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

The defendants were developers, builders, and operators of rental apartment complexes in the Northern District of Indiana and numerous additional locations. These complexes contained multi-family dwellings, built after the effective date of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C). Plaintiff claimed that defendants' pattern and practice of failing to design these dwellings so that that were readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities violated rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619; Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§12181-12189; and qualified as discrimination against a person or group of persons under Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§12181-12189.

On September 3, 2002, the parties agreed to resolve both the Indiana and Michigan cases without an evidentiary hearing or findings of fact.

On September 30, 2005, the plaintiffs presented a consent order to the court, which Judge Allen Sharp signed on October 3rd. Under the Consent Order, the defendants agreed to retrofit 49 apartment complexes in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, Virginia, and Nebraska to enhance their accessibility to individuals with physical disabilities. The agreement affected more than 5,400 ground floor apartments. The consent decree also required the defendants to pay $1,060,000 to a fund for those who may have been harmed by the lack of accessibility features at the complexes. The consent order terminated in 2010, and the case is now closed.

Contemporaneous with the submission of the Consent Order, the parties stipulated to the transfer of the Untied States' claim against the defendants in the Indiana Action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The Michigan Consent Order is separate and resolves the claims raised by both the Michigan and Indiana actions against all Defendants.

Summary Authors

Denise Heberle (8/2/2012)

Related Cases

United States v. Edward Rose & Sons, Eastern District of Michigan (2002)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attrorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/21847962/parties/united-states-v-edward-rose-constr/


Judge(s)

Cherry, Paul R. (Indiana)

Sharp, Allen (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Acosta, R. Alexander (District of Columbia)

Ashcroft, John (District of Columbia)

Boyd, Ralph F. Jr. (District of Columbia)

Cremin, Kevin M. (New York)

Gaeta, Joseph R. (District of Columbia)

Handley, Harvey L. (District of Columbia)

Johnson, Clifford D. (Indiana)

Keveney, Sean R. (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Cherry, Paul R. (Indiana)

Sharp, Allen (Indiana)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Acosta, R. Alexander (District of Columbia)

Ashcroft, John (District of Columbia)

Boyd, Ralph F. Jr. (District of Columbia)

Cremin, Kevin M. (New York)

Gaeta, Joseph R. (District of Columbia)

Handley, Harvey L. (District of Columbia)

Johnson, Clifford D. (Indiana)

Keveney, Sean R. (District of Columbia)

Magagna, Joan A. (District of Columbia)

Meyer-Fong, Ming-Yuen (District of Columbia)

Moran, Timothy (District of Columbia)

Richmond, Erin M. (District of Columbia)

Rosenbaum, Steven H. (District of Columbia)

Schlozman, Bradley (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Ankers, Norman C. (Michigan)

Baker, Frederick M (Michigan)

Brackenridge, Dean R (Indiana)

Cataldo, Sheri B (Michigan)

Cook, Michael C. (Indiana)

Dimos, James (Indiana)

Duerr, Patrick T (Michigan)

Fullenkamp, Joseph R. (Indiana)

Gleeson, Kevin J. (Michigan)

Gorman, Tara K (District of Columbia)

Hanback, Christopher (District of Columbia)

Himsel, Jane Ann (Indiana)

Maher, Timothy J (Indiana)

O'Hara, John M. (Michigan)

Sandler, Andrew L. (District of Columbia)

Smith, Brigham C. (Michigan)

Spaziano, Jennifer (California)

Vetne, J Thomas (Indiana)

Walton, Garry L. (Michigan)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:01-cv-00040

Docket

United States v. Edward Rose Construction Company

Jan. 18, 2001

Jan. 18, 2001

Docket
24

3:01-cv-00040

First Amended Complaint

United States v. Edward Rose Construction Company

Aug. 31, 2002

Aug. 31, 2002

Complaint

Case Summary

United States v. Edward Rose Constr. CO.

No Court

Aug. 25, 2004

Aug. 25, 2004

Other

State of Indiana Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice

United States of America v. Edward Rose & Sons, Inc.

No Court

Aug. 25, 2004

Aug. 25, 2004

Other
261

3:01-cv-00040

Consent Decree

United States v. Edward Rose Construction Company

Oct. 3, 2005

Oct. 3, 2005

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/21847962/united-states-v-edward-rose-constr/

Last updated July 29, 2022, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed by USA (jld). (Entered: 01/22/2001)

Jan. 18, 2001

Jan. 18, 2001

PACER

SUMMONS issued as to defendant Edward Rose Constr, defendant Occidental Dev Co (Jerry Speedy) (smp)

Jan. 22, 2001

Jan. 22, 2001

PACER
2

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Edward Rose Constr on 1/25/01 (smp) (Entered: 02/13/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

PACER
3

RETURN OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Occidental Dev Co on 1/25/01 (smp) (Entered: 02/13/2001)

Feb. 12, 2001

Feb. 12, 2001

PACER
4

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp Written Status report due 6/15/01 so this case may move forward Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 05/30/2001)

May 29, 2001

May 29, 2001

PACER
5

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff USA by Harvey L Handley (jld) (Entered: 06/15/2001)

June 14, 2001

June 14, 2001

PACER
6

STATUS REPORT by plaintiff USA (jld) (Entered: 06/15/2001)

June 14, 2001

June 14, 2001

PACER
7

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp Further Status report due 1/31/02 so that this case may move forward Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 01/07/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

PACER
8

STATUS REPORT by plaintiff USA (jld) (Entered: 01/30/2002)

Jan. 30, 2002

Jan. 30, 2002

PACER
9

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Edward Rose Constr, defendant Occidental Dev Co by Joseph R Fullenkamp, Timothy J Maher (smp) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 20, 2002

May 20, 2002

PACER
10

ANSWER by defendant Edward Rose Constr, defendant Occidental Dev Co to complaint [1-1] (smp) (Entered: 05/21/2002)

May 20, 2002

May 20, 2002

PACER
11

NOTICE: before Judge Allen Sharp ;Pretrial conference set 2:00 6/6/02 w/consent form (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 05/23/2002)

May 23, 2002

May 23, 2002

PACER
12

MOTION by defendant for attorney Christopher B Hanback, Tara K Gorman to appear pro hac vice (jld) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER

FILING FEE PAID: on 6/5/02 in the amount of $ 60.00, receipt # 3307872. (jld)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER
13

MOTION by defendants for attorney Andrew L Sandler, Jennifer Spaziano to appear pro hac vice (jld) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER

FILING FEE PAID: on 6/5/02 in the amount of $ 60.00, receipt # 3307812. (jld)

June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

PACER
14

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for attorney Christopher B Hanback, Tara K Gorman to appear pro hac vice [12-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 6, 2002

June 6, 2002

PACER
15

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for attorney Andrew L Sandler, Jennifer Spaziano to appear pro hac vice [13-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 6, 2002

June 6, 2002

PACER
16

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff USA by Ming-Yuen Meyer-Fong (jld) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 6, 2002

June 6, 2002

PACER
17

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: before Judge Allen Sharp, All Discovery ddl set for 6/30/03 ; Designation of experts/reports due from both sides by 1/6/03; amend to pleadings set 9/3/02 to add any new parties (no extensions) ; Case referred to Mag. Nuechterlein for a settle conf (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 6, 2002

June 6, 2002

PACER
18

ORDER OF REFERRAL by Judge Allen Sharp referring case to Mag. Nuechterlein for a settle conf; Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 06/06/2002)

June 6, 2002

June 6, 2002

PACER
19

JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties (jld) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

July 11, 2002

July 11, 2002

PACER
20

ORDER FOR TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE by Mag J Christopher A. Nuechterlein Telephonic Status conference set for 2:45 9/9/02 (South Bend time) before Mag J Christopher A. Nuechterlein to schedule settlement conference; Court to make necessary arrangements Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

Aug. 14, 2002

Aug. 14, 2002

PACER
21

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff USA by Erin Meehan Richmond (jld) (Entered: 08/26/2002)

Aug. 26, 2002

Aug. 26, 2002

PACER
22

MOTION by plaintiff USA for leave to file amended complaint to include an additional 10 apartment complexes and additional defendants (jld) (Entered: 08/30/2002)

Aug. 30, 2002

Aug. 30, 2002

PACER

RECEIPT of original and copies of proposed First Amended Complaint (jld)

Aug. 30, 2002

Aug. 30, 2002

PACER
23

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for leave to file amended complaint to include an additional 10 complexes and additional defendants [22-1] Number of 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 09/04/2002)

Aug. 31, 2002

Aug. 31, 2002

PACER
24

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff USA; adding Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co, Gary Weaver, Eckert/Wordell, Dorchen/Martin Assoc (jld) (Entered: 09/05/2002)

Aug. 31, 2002

Aug. 31, 2002

Clearinghouse
25

ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Mag J Christopher A. Nuechterlein settlement conference 9:30 11/13/02 (South Bend time) before Mag J Christopher A. Nuechterlein; confidential Settlement report due 11/8/02 Number of pages: 4 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

PACER
26

MOTION by plaintiff USA to compel defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and for expedited review (jld) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

PACER
27

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff USA of authorities in support of motion to compel defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and for expedited review [26-1] (jld) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

PACER
28

MOTION by plaintiff USA for telephonic conference addressing plaintiff's motion to compel (jld) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 19, 2002

Sept. 19, 2002

PACER
29

RESPONSE by defendants Edward Rose Constr, Occidental Dev Co in opposition to motion for telephonic conference addressing plaintiff's motion to compel [28-1], to motion to compel defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and for expedited review [26-1] (jld) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 20, 2002

Sept. 20, 2002

PACER
30

NOTICE: before Judge Allen Sharp finding the motion for telephonic conference addressing plaintiff's motion to compel [28-1] moot., regarding [26-1] ; Hearing on motion to compel set for 1:30 9/24/02 (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 09/20/2002)

Sept. 20, 2002

Sept. 20, 2002

PACER
31

MOTIONS ORAL ARGUMENT: before Judge Allen Sharp; Counsel agree that inspection of 14 properties in amended complaint will be inspected by 11/13/02; finding the motion to compel defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and for expedited review [26-1] moot. (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 09/24/2002)

Sept. 24, 2002

Sept. 24, 2002

PACER
32

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Gary Weaver by Michael C Cook, Jane Ann Himsel (jld) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

Oct. 3, 2002

Oct. 3, 2002

PACER
33

ANSWER by defts Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co, Occidental Dev Co to 1st amended complaint [24-1] (jld) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

PACER
34

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc by J Thomas Vetne (jld) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 7, 2002

Oct. 7, 2002

PACER
35

MOTION by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc for attorney Kevin J Gleeson to appear pro hac vice (jld) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

PACER
36

MOTION by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc for attorney Sheri B Cataldo to appear pro hac vice (jld) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

PACER
37

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for attorney Kevin J Gleeson to appear pro hac vice [35-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

PACER
38

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for attorney Sheri B Cataldo to appear pro hac vice [36-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

PACER

TRANSCRIPT filed no. of volumes: 1 for dates: 9/24/02 Court Reporter: Loretta M Spromberg (jld)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

PACER
39

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Eckert/Wordell on 9/20/02 (jld) (Entered: 10/17/2002)

Oct. 16, 2002

Oct. 16, 2002

PACER
40

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc on 9/16/02 (jld) (Entered: 10/17/2002)

Oct. 16, 2002

Oct. 16, 2002

PACER
41

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Gary Weaver on 9/25/02 (jld) (Entered: 10/17/2002)

Oct. 16, 2002

Oct. 16, 2002

PACER
42

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Edward Rose & Sons on 9/18/02 (jld) (Entered: 10/17/2002)

Oct. 16, 2002

Oct. 16, 2002

PACER
43

MOTION by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc for more definite statement (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
44

BRIEF by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc in support of motion for more definite statement [43-1] (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
45

NOTICE OF HEARING by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc on Motion for More Definite Statement to be set by the Court (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
46

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
47

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc of Motion for More Definite Statement, Brief in Support & Notice of Hearing (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
48

MOTION by defendant Eckert/Wordell for attorney Garry :L Walton to appear pro hac vice (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
49

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Gary Weaver by James Dimos (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
50

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion for attorney Garry L Walton to appear pro hac vice [48-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER

PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID: on 10/23/02 in the amount of $ 30.00, receipt # 3310175. (jld)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

PACER
51

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff USA in opposition to deft Dorchen/Martin's motion for more definite statement [43-1] (jld) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

Nov. 1, 2002

Nov. 1, 2002

PACER
52

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Eckert/Wordell, by Garry L Walton (jld) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Nov. 5, 2002

Nov. 5, 2002

PACER
53

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE by Eckert/Wordell (jld) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Nov. 5, 2002

Nov. 5, 2002

PACER
54

ANSWER by defendant Eckert Wordell Architects to first amended complaint [24-1] (jld) Modified on 11/08/2002 (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Nov. 5, 2002

Nov. 5, 2002

PACER
55

ANSWER by defendant Gary Weaver to first amended complaint [24-1] (jld) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

Nov. 19, 2002

Nov. 19, 2002

PACER
56

NOTICE: before Judge Allen Sharp regarding [43-1] Oral Argument set for 4:00 12/19/02 (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 26, 2002

Nov. 26, 2002

PACER
57

MOTION by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc to advance time for oral argument on motion for more definite statement from 4:00 to 1:30 on 12/19/02 (jld) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 5, 2002

Dec. 5, 2002

PACER
58

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion to advance time for oral argument on motion for more definite from 4:00 to 1:30 on 12/19/02 [57-1] hearing on motion for more definite statement reset for 1:30 12/19/02 (South Bend time) Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 6, 2002

Dec. 6, 2002

PACER
59

MAIL Returned [56-2] addressed to plaintiff USA (jld) (Entered: 12/10/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

PACER
60

MOTION by plaintiff USA to compel the Rose defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and to produce documents (jld) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

PACER
61

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff USA in support of motion to compel the Rose defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and to produce documents [60-1] (jld) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

PACER
62

GOOD FAITH CERTIFICATE to accompany its motion to compel by plaintiff USA (jld) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

PACER
63

MOTION by defendants Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co, Occidental Dev Co, Gary Weaver, Eckert/Wordell, Dorchen/Martin Assoc to extend ddl for defendatns to exchange expert disclosures and request for expedited hearings on 12/19/02 at 1:30 (jld) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

PACER
64

RESPONSE by plaintiff USA in opposition to motion to extend ddl for defendants to exchange expert disclosures and request for expedited hearings on 12/19/02 at 1:30 [63-1] (jld) (Entered: 12/19/2002)

Dec. 18, 2002

Dec. 18, 2002

PACER
65

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Gary Weaver by Dean R Brackenridge (jld) (Entered: 12/19/2002)

Dec. 19, 2002

Dec. 19, 2002

PACER
66

MOTIONS ORAL ARGUMENT: before Judge Allen Sharp granting motion to extend ddl for defendatns to exchange expert disclosures request for expedited hearings on 12/19/02 at 1:30 [63-1], denying motion for more definite statement [43-1] Expert reports and disclosures for Pltf & Defts to 4/1/03 and to 6/30/03 to file rebuttal or opposition to such (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 12/19/2002)

Dec. 19, 2002

Dec. 19, 2002

PACER

TRANSCRIPT of Oral Argument filed no. of volumes: 1 for dates: 12/19/02 Court Reporter: Loretta M Spromberg (jld)

Dec. 23, 2002

Dec. 23, 2002

PACER

TRANSCRIPT filed no. of volumes: 1 for dates: 11/13/02 11/14/02 Settlement Conference - Court Reporter: Geneva L Sones (slm)

Dec. 23, 2002

Dec. 23, 2002

PACER
67

OPPOSITION by defendants Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co, Occidental Dev Co to motion to compel the Rose defendants permit entry upon land for inspection and to produce documents [60-1] (jld) (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

PACER
68

MAIL Returned [66-2] addressed to plaintiff USA (Housing & Civil Enforcement Section) (rmn) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 2, 2003

Jan. 2, 2003

PACER
69

ANSWER by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc to amended complaint [24-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 3, 2003

Jan. 3, 2003

PACER
70

Affirmative Defense filed by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 3, 2003

Jan. 3, 2003

PACER
71

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Dorchen/Martin Assoc of Answer to Amended Complaint & Affirmative Defenses (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 3, 2003

Jan. 3, 2003

PACER
72

MOTION by plaintiff USA for leave to file second amended complaint (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

PACER

RECEIPT of proposed second amended complaint (jld)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

PACER
73

MOTION by plaintiff USA to compel the Rose Defendants to Respond to the USA's request for production of documents No 1 (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

PACER
74

MEMORANDUM of Authorities by plaintiff USA in support of motion to compel the Rose Defendants to Respond to the USA's request for production of documents No 1 [73-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/06/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

PACER
75

SUPPLEMENT by defendants Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co re motion response [67-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/07/2003)

Jan. 6, 2003

Jan. 6, 2003

PACER
76

NOTICE: before Judge Allen Sharp regarding [73-1], regarding [72-1], regarding [60-1] All motions oral argument hearing set in Lafayette, IN for 4:00 1/24/03 (cc: all counsel) (saj) (Entered: 01/07/2003)

Jan. 7, 2003

Jan. 7, 2003

PACER
77

MOTION by defendants' the Rose Companies to change the hearing date on pending motions from 1/24/03 to 1/22/03 (rmn) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

PACER
78

ORDER by Judge Allen Sharp granting motion to change the hearing date on pending motions from 1/24/03 to 1/22/03 [77-1] Hearing reset to 10:30 1/22/03 (CST/Hammond time) before Judge Allen Sharp in the 4th floor courtroom in the Hammond Federal Building Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

PACER
79

REPLY by plaintiff USA to response/opposition to motion to compel the Rose defendants to permit entry upon land for inspection and to produce documents [60-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/14/2003)

Jan. 13, 2003

Jan. 13, 2003

PACER
80

RESPONSE in Opposition by defendants Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co to motion for leave to file second amended complaint [72-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 21, 2003

Jan. 21, 2003

PACER
81

RESPONSE by defendants Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co in Opposition to motion to compel the Rose Defendants to Respond to the request for production of documents No 1 [73-1] (jld) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 21, 2003

Jan. 21, 2003

PACER
83

MAIL Returned [76-2] addressed to plaintiff USA c/o atty Harvey L Handley (jld) (Entered: 01/23/2003)

Jan. 21, 2003

Jan. 21, 2003

PACER
82

MOTIONS ORAL ARGUMENT: before Judge Allen Sharp ; Court heard oral argument, granting motion for leave to file second amended complaint [72-1] - all claims of nature in this case must be included in second amended complaint which is to include claims in US District Court in EDMI, Motions to compel will be referred to Mag. Nuechterlein. (saj) (Entered: 01/23/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

PACER
84

ORDER OF REFERRAL TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A SPECIFIC MOTION by Judge Allen Sharp referring case to Mag J Christopher A Nuechterlein for the disposition of the motions to compel. Number of pages: 1 (cc: Mag J Nuechterlein, all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

Jan. 27, 2003

Jan. 27, 2003

PACER
85

MOTION by plaintiff USA for reconsideration of order conditionally granting motion for leave to file amended complaint (jld) (Entered: 01/28/2003)

Jan. 27, 2003

Jan. 27, 2003

PACER

TRANSCRIPT filed no. of volumes: 1 for dates: 1/22/03 Court Reporter: Loretta Spromberg (jld)

Jan. 28, 2003

Jan. 28, 2003

PACER
86

MAIL Returned [78-1], [78-2] addressed to Harvey Handly for plaintiff USA (jld) (Entered: 01/31/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

PACER
87

UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff USA to dismiss without prejudice its motion to compel the Rose defendants to respond to the USA's request for production No 1 (jld) (Entered: 01/31/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

PACER
88

OPPOSITION by defendants Edward Rose Constr, Edward Rose & Sons, Edward Rose of IN, Edward Rose & Assoc, Edward Rose Dev Co to motion for reconsideration of order conditionally granting motion for leave to file amended complaint [85-1] (jld) (Entered: 02/03/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

PACER
89

ORDER by Mag Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein granting motion to dismiss without prejudice its motion to compel Rose defendants to respond to the USA's request for production No 1 [87-1] dismissing the motion to compel the Rose Defendants to Respond to the USA's request for production of documents No 1 [73-1] Number of pages: 1 (cc: all counsel) (jld) (Entered: 02/03/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

PACER
90

MAIL Returned [82-1] addressed to Harvey L Handley (jld) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

Feb. 4, 2003

Feb. 4, 2003

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Indiana

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 18, 2001

Closing Date: 2010

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Edward Rose Construction Co., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2005 - 2010

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Housing Sales/Rental

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)