Case: Valdivia v. Davis

2:94-cv-00671 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: May 2, 1994

Closed Date: July 2, 2013

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 2, 1994, a group of California parolees filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of California. Specifically, plaintiffs challenged California's parole revocation procedures under the Fourteenth Amendment and alleged that the state violated their due process rights. On December 1, 1994, the Court (Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton) certified a class defined as California parolees (1) who are at lar…

On May 2, 1994, a group of California parolees filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of California. Specifically, plaintiffs challenged California's parole revocation procedures under the Fourteenth Amendment and alleged that the state violated their due process rights.

On December 1, 1994, the Court (Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton) certified a class defined as California parolees (1) who are at large; (2) who are in custody as alleged parole violators awaiting revocation of their parole status; or (3) who are in custody having been found in violation of parole.

For the next several years, the parties engaged in prolonged discovery. On June 13, 2002, the Court granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs, holding that California's parole revocation system failed to safeguard plaintiffs' due process rights under Morrissey, 408 U.S. 481, 487-90 (1972). The Court's order emphasized that, in order to ensure adequate due process, probable cause hearings must be both accurate and promptly-held. Valdivia v. Davis, 206 F.Supp. 2d 1068 (E.D. Cal. 2002). Four months later, on October 18, 2002, the Court ordered defendants to file a proposed remedial plan to address the identified due process violations.

On March 17, 2003, defendants presented their proposed Valdivia Remedial Plan (VRP), which added a preliminary Probable Cause Hearing (PCH) to the parole revocation process. Plaintiffs filed objections to the VRP related to the timing and substance of the PCH. On July 23, 2003, the Court set forth the following minimum standards for hearing: that they be conducted by a neutral decision-maker, that parolees have an opportunity to present documentary evidence and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and that the hearing's results be documented in a written report. Valdivia v. Davis, July 23, 2003.

In November 2003, the parties filed a stipulated order for permanent injunctive relief, which the Court approved in March 2004; this injunction included for alternative sanctions for minor parole violations, a PCH within 10 days after a parolee is notified of charges, a revocation hearing no later than 35 days after a parole hold is placed, and appointment of attorneys to represent all parolees facing revocation proceedings.

The parties then fought for years over compliance issues:

  • Defendants moved, successfully, for the appointment of a Special Master, and on December 16, 2005, the Court appointed Chase Riveland to the position. The Special Master has subsequently filed thirteen reports with the court addressing the implementation of the VRP.
  • On June 9, 2005, the Court found defendants in violation of the permanent injunction by virtue of a policy decision to prohibit the consideration and use of electronic in-home detention (EID) and substance abuse treatment control units as sanctions in lieu of parole revocation.
  • On August 31, 2005, the Court ordered that parolees' counsel receive access to information in their client's parole field files without any limitations or restrictions on disclosing the information to the parolee based on perceived risk of harm to the parolee's mental health.
  • On September 15, 2006, the Court ordered the case related to L.H. v. Schwarzenegger, 2:06-cv-02042-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal.).
  • On November 13, 2006, the Court ordered implementation of the recommendations contained in the Special Master's 9/14/06 report, including improving their information systems and maintaining the infrastructure needed for self-monitoring. The Court noted that the information system changes should be coordinated with the changes already underway pursuant to a court order from Armstrong v. Schwarzenegger, 4:94-cv-02307-CW (N.D. Cal.).
  • On April 4, 2007, the Court entered a stipulated order requiring defendants to take certain steps to ensure timely compliance with the remedial sanctions provisions of the permanent injunction. These steps included, among others, adding more beds as part of the In Custody Drug Treatment Program (ICDTP), increasing the number of operational EID units, as well as distributing information regarding their updated policies and procedures.
  • On January 14, 2008, the Court ordered that defendants undertake, in consultation with plaintiff attorneys and the special master, efforts to afford due process to parolees who appear too mentally ill to participate in parole revocation proceedings.
  • On March 25, 2008, the Court adopted the report and recommendations of the Special Master, which held that use of hearsay evidence in parole revocation proceedings would be limited by parolee's confrontation rights as established by controlling law. Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger, 548 F.Supp.2d 852 (E.D. Cal. 2008). This decision was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. 603 F.Supp.2d 1275 (E.D. Cal 2009).
  • On August 7, 2008, the Court ordered specific procedures for Defendants upon taking custody of parolees who may have mental health problems. This order was prompted by a motion submitted jointly by plaintiff classes in this case and Coleman v. Schwarzenegger.
  • On April 12, 2010, the district court found Defendants in substantial compliance with the injunction's requirements regarding designation of information as confidential, consideration of remedial sanctions at each step, remedial sanctions order requirements for female parolees, and out of county transfers.
  • On December 2, 2010 the district court held that the defendants had met the requirements of the court's April 4, 2007 order and the return to custody assessment step of the revocation process for all facilities, including Los Angeles County Jail. Moreover, the court found defendants in violation of the November 13, 2006 order concerning information system changes. Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger, 2010 WL 4983396 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010).
  • On May 13, 2011, the Court found the Defendants in substantial compliance with the injunction's requirements that Plaintiffs' counsel have access to the information reasonably necessary to monitor compliance and that Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase the Return to Custody Assessment at the PCH.

On November 4, 2008, California voters passed Proposition 9, which altered a number of the parameters for the parole revocation systems that had been mandated by the VRP. Plaintiffs moved to enjoin enforcement of portions of Proposition 9 as conflicting with the VRP; defendants cross-moved to modify the VRP to conform to the new law. After hearing, the Court denied the defendants' motion and granted plaintiffs' motion in substantial part. Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger, 603 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (E.D. Cal. 2009). On appeal, the Ninth Circuit held that the court erred by failing to make an express determination that Proposition 9 violated constitutional rights or that the injunction was necessary to remedy a constitutional violation. Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger, 599 F.3d 984 (9th Cir. 2010). On remand, the Court determined several aspects of Proposition 9 were unconstitutional and ultimately granted plaintiffs' motion to enforce the VRP, with some modifications. Valdivia v. Brown, 2012 WL 219342 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012).

In April of 2011, California transferred substantial responsibilities for the parole system to county authorities and state courts. On July 2, 2013, the Court found that the statutory realigned rendered this case moot and directed the parties to file their final motions for fees and costs. On December 17, 2013, the Ninth Circuit dismissed all pending appeals as moot.

This case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Timothy Shoffner (10/12/2012)

Tifani Sadek (10/2/2014)

Related Cases

L.H. v. Schwarzennegger, Eastern District of California (2006)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4161514/parties/valdivia-v-schwarzenegger/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Aljens, Erika C. (Pennsylvania)

Baldwin, Holly MacLeish (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Acquisto, Stephen (California)

Anderson, Robert R. (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Adams, Mark F. (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:94-cv-00671

08-15889

12-15457

12-15492

95-80113

Docket [PACER]

Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

April 23, 2014

April 23, 2014

Docket
1

2:94-cv-00671

CIVIL COMPLAINT-CLASS ACTION FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR DAMAGES

Cervantes v. California

May 2, 1994

May 2, 1994

Complaint
76

2:94-cv-00671

Order [certifying P class]

Cervantes v. California

Nov. 29, 1994

Nov. 29, 1994

Order/Opinion
540

2:94-cv-00671

Order {Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss}

Sept. 8, 2000

Sept. 8, 2000

Order/Opinion
664

2:94-cv-00671

Order [granting partial summary judgment to Pl.]

June 13, 2002

June 13, 2002

Order/Opinion

206 F.Supp.2d 1068

709

2:94-cv-00671

Order [certifying Def's interlocutory appeal re: 6/13/02 order]

Aug. 29, 2002

Aug. 29, 2002

Order/Opinion
714

2:94-cv-00671

FIFTH AMENDED CIVIL CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Valdivia v. Wilson

Sept. 13, 2002

Sept. 13, 2002

Complaint
742

2:94-cv-00671

Order [that Def. serve proposed remedial plan]

Oct. 17, 2002

Oct. 17, 2002

Order/Opinion
796

2:94-cv-00671

Order [ruling on P's objections to D's proposed remedial plan]

July 23, 2003

July 23, 2003

Order/Opinion

2:94-cv-00671

Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunctive Relief

Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

Nov. 19, 2003

Nov. 19, 2003

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4161514/valdivia-v-schwarzenegger/

Last updated Aug. 24, 2026, 7:12 p.m.

Docket for: Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger
ECF Number Date Description Link
664 June 13, 2002

ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERING motion for partial summary judgment by plaintiffs [606-1] GRANTED, (cc: all counsel) (ndd)

RECAP
999 Feb. 12, 2004

LETTER to court from Gerald Haskin is in favor of the settlement (ndd) (Entered: 02/13/2004)

RECAP
1032 March 8, 2004

LETTER to court from Donald R Miller requesting the governor's address and a parolee handbook (ndd) (Entered: 03/09/2004)

RECAP
1033 March 8, 2004

MINUTES of Final Approval and Fairness Hearing before Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton: no objectors present in court; court finds settlement fair and appropriate; settlement is approved [819-1]; GRANTED further status conference SET for 10:00 5/24/04 C/R C Bodene (ndd) (Entered: 03/09/2004)

RECAP
1034 March 9, 2004

[TERMINATED - see 1863 Order] STIPULATED ORDER for Permanent Injunctive Relief by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERED that the court finds that this is not a "civil case with respect to prison conditions," as those terms are defined and applied in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), and that therefore this order is not governed by the PLRA; dfts, their agents, employees and successors in office are ordered to comply with all the terms stated in this order (see order for details) (cc: all counsel) (ndd) Modified on 11/21/2013 (Michel, G). (Entered: 03/09/2004)

RECAP
1035 March 10, 2004

Motion to intervene by Lorenzo Arteaga (ndd) (Entered: 03/11/2004)

RECAP
1036 March 10, 2004

LETTER to court from Juan Franco Jr seeking help from the court to reduce his sentence (ndd) (Entered: 03/11/2004)

RECAP
1037 March 11, 2004

MOTION to reset motion to intervene and motion for production of unconstitutionally and falsely imprisoned material witness by Lorenzo Arteaga (ndd) (Entered: 03/12/2004)

RECAP
1038 March 12, 2004

LETTER to court from Brent D Vaughn Alves Sr suggestions re the revoketion process (ljr) (Entered: 03/15/2004)

RECAP
1039 March 15, 2004

LETTER to court from several parolees regarding settlement proposal (mdk) (Entered: 03/16/2004)

RECAP
1040 March 15, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Armando Rodriguez regarding case (mdk) (Entered: 03/16/2004)

RECAP
1041 March 15, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Tracy Walker regarding case (mdk) (Entered: 03/16/2004)

RECAP
1042 March 16, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Bill Stokes regarding case (nac) (Entered: 03/17/2004)

RECAP
1043 March 17, 2004

ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K Karlton: Notice entitled "Motion to Intervene" [1035-1] DENIED; any future filings by Mr Arteaga shall be placed in file and DISREGARDED; Clerk directed to serve copy of this Order on Lorenzo Arteaga (E-66703) (cc: all counsel) (mm1) (Entered: 03/17/2004)

RECAP
1044 March 17, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERING the stipulated order for permanent injunctive relief GRANTED; By 05/24/04 the parties are ordered to lodge with the court a proposed form of final notice to pltfs Class which shall also resolve the two issues remaining for resolution; The status conference set for 05/03/04 VACATED (cc: all counsel) (nac) (Entered: 03/17/2004)

RECAP
1050 March 18, 2004

LETTER to court from counsel for plaintiff regarding Proposed Order Granting Final Approval of Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunctive Relief [0-0] (ndd) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
March 18, 2004

LODGED [proposed] order granting final approval of stipulated order for permanent injunctive relief (mdk)

March 18, 2004

LODGED Document: Propoed Order Granting Final Approval lodged on 3/18/04 (NOT TO BE SIGNED PER JUDGE) (ndd)

March 19, 2004

LODGED Stipulation and Proposed Order regarding Motion for reasonable attorneys' fees an expenses by defendants (ndd)

1045 March 22, 2004

LETTER to court from Charlie Zawtow requesting a transcript of the hearing and asking how revocation hearing is going to change (ndd) (Entered: 03/23/2004)

RECAP
1046 March 22, 2004

ORDER from 9th Circuit appeal [798-1] DISMISSED (ndd) (Entered: 03/23/2004)

RECAP
1047 March 22, 2004

NOTICE of Redesignation of counsel for service by defendants (ndd) (Entered: 03/23/2004)

RECAP
1048 March 24, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERED that the 4/2/04 date for a motion for reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses and the subsequent dates for response, reply and the 6/7/04 hearing are VACATED; in addition, the time for submitting a bill of costs is suspended as to taxable costs incurred by plts' counsel, to allow costs to be sought concurrently with attorneys' fees and expenses; status conference re attorneys' fees and expenses is SET for 10:00 6/7/04 with a joint status conference statement due on 5/28/04 (cc: all counsel) (ndd) (Entered: 03/24/2004)

RECAP
1049 March 25, 2004

NOTICE regarding copy of Complaint from case CIV.S-04-0277 GEB GGH P (ordered to be filed in this case by GGH) (mm1) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

RECAP
1051 March 26, 2004

LETTER to court from Craig Ogans re his false charges (ndd) (Entered: 03/29/2004)

RECAP
1052 March 26, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Lorenzo Arteaga entitled "petition for rehearing of order and motion for new trial" (mdk) (Entered: 03/29/2004)

RECAP
1053 March 30, 2004

LETTER to court from Tonia Kennard re her medical problem (ndd) (Entered: 03/31/2004)

RECAP
1054 April 2, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Allen Hope regarding this case (nac) (Entered: 04/05/2004)

RECAP
1055 April 5, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Kenneth Dawson regarding the settlement (nac) (Entered: 04/06/2004)

RECAP
1056 April 7, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Leonardo Muro Cervantes regarding the settlement (nac) (Entered: 04/08/2004)

RECAP
April 12, 2004

LODGED Proposed Protective Order re plaintiffs' lead counsel's time records (ndd)

1057 April 13, 2004

PROTECTIVE ORDER Re Plts' Lead Counsel's Time Records by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERED that Time runs, summaries and all information contained therein (the "Fee/Costs Information:) shall, as to dfts, be regarded as confidential and subject to this protective order; plts' lead counsel may designate any Fee/Cost Information which is filed with the court for filing under seal; dfts, their counsel and their outside experts or consultants, shall not reveal this fee/Cost Information in any manner to any person other than those listed in paragraph 2 (See order for details) (cc: all counsel) (ndd) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

RECAP
1058 April 22, 2004

LETTER to court from Robert Biggs requesting information re the new revocation hearing law, half time laws and laws to come in the month of June (ndd) (Entered: 04/23/2004)

RECAP
1059 April 26, 2004

LETTER to court from Solin P League requesting help from the court to protect him from being harmed by parole officers (ndd) (Entered: 04/26/2004)

RECAP
1060 May 3, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Robert Ross regarding case (mdk) (Entered: 05/03/2004)

RECAP
1061 May 7, 2004

LETTER to court from Raile Tilley informed the court that there is a discrepancy concerning the time to bring a parolee to the BPT Board and the actual time happened to him, 100 days (ndd) (Entered: 05/10/2004)

RECAP
1062 May 12, 2004

LETTER to court from Harry Stephen requesting for more information re the case and the date of settlement (ndd) (Entered: 05/13/2004)

RECAP
May 21, 2004

LODGED stipulation and proposed order regarding motion for reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses by dfts (nac)

May 24, 2004

LODGED stipulation and proposed order regarding current lead counsels' motion for reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses (mdk)

May 24, 2004

LODGED Stipulation and Order re Final Notice to plt class by plaintiffs (ndd)

1063 May 25, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERING status conference currently set for 6/7/04 regarding attorney's fees VACATED ; the motion for pltfs' attorney's fees and expenses shall be briefed and argued according to the following schedule: motion due by 7/12/04, dfts' opposition due by 8/2/04, pltfs' reply due by 8/16/04, and hearing shall be on 8/23/04 (cc: all counsel) (mdk) (Entered: 05/25/2004)

RECAP
1064 May 26, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERED that the 5/24/04 status conference is VACATED ; the notices to plt Class attached hereto as Exh A and B shall be published in the manner described in this stipulation and dfts shall file and serve an affidavit affirming that they published the Notice as required in this order by no later than 6/24/04 (cc: all counsel) (ndd) (Entered: 05/26/2004)

RECAP
1065 May 27, 2004

LETTER to court from Richard A Mongeon apprised the court that BOP disregarding any and all agreements in this case (ndd) (Entered: 05/28/2004)

RECAP
1067 May 28, 2004

LETTER to court from Donald Hooker requesting info on this case (hk) (Entered: 06/01/2004)

RECAP
1066 June 1, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERING status conference RESET from 6/1/04 to 1:30 9/13/04 regarding attorneys' fees and expenses, with a joint status conference statement due on 9/3/04 (cc: all counsel) (mdk) (Entered: 06/01/2004)

RECAP
1068 June 2, 2004

LETTER to court from prisoner Glen Helen asking for information be sent to him regarding case (mdk) (Entered: 06/03/2004)

RECAP
1069 June 4, 2004

LETTER to court from Hortenda Hernandez requesting information to the case (ndd) (Entered: 06/07/2004)

RECAP
1070 June 4, 2004

LETTER to court from G Powell requesting information re the case, Constitution and Bill of Rights (ndd) (Entered: 06/07/2004)

RECAP
1071 June 14, 2004

LETTER to court from Richard A Mongeon requesting a copy of the settlement of this case (ndd) (Entered: 06/15/2004)

RECAP
1072 June 18, 2004

LETTER to court from Jorge E Mendoza Escutio requesting help to appeal his case (ndd) (Entered: 06/21/2004)

RECAP
1073 June 18, 2004

LETTER to court from William Rocha re his situation and requesting help (ndd) (Entered: 06/21/2004)

RECAP
1074 June 24, 2004

REQUEST by inmate Richard Mongeon for stipulated order for permanent injunctive relief to enforce case (mdk) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
1075 June 24, 2004

LETTER to court from counsel for plaintiffs requesting a hearing on shortened time be scheduled on 6/28/04 1:30pm regarding Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunctive [1034-1]; letter from plts' counsel to dfts' counsel attached (ndd) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
1076 June 24, 2004

LETTER to court from M Valdez requesting information re this case (ndd) (Entered: 06/28/2004)

RECAP
June 24, 2004

LODGED Amendment to Stipulation and Proposed Order re Final Notice to plt class (ndd)

1077 June 28, 2004

MINUTES of Implementation of Remedial Plan before Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton: Court is in receipt of letters re Implentation of remedial plan; parties have reached an impasse re implementation; court addresses both sides; dfts requested a 45 day extension of the 7/1/04 deadline parties stipulated to; plt opposes request; Cynthia Curry (senior staff counsel for Dept of General Services) takes the stand to address the court; Terry Farmer (Chief counsel for Board of Prison Terms) addresses the court, Mich Brady (Project Manager for Youth and Adult Correctional Agency) addresses the court; Glenn Fait (Associate Dean - Special counsel for McGeorge School of Law) addresses the court; dfts propose a meet and confer with opposing counsel and a further status in a week; court grants the request; Further Status conference SET for 1:30 7/7/04 C/R C Bodene (ndd) (Entered: 06/29/2004)

RECAP
1079 June 29, 2004

TRANSCRIPT of 6/28/04 hearing on Implementation to remedial plan by C/R C Bodene (ndd) (Entered: 06/30/2004)

RECAP
1078 June 30, 2004

AMENDMENT STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ORDERED that the parties have agreed to amend the 5/26/04 stipulation and Order re Final Notice to plt class [1064-2] in the following respects: the Notice shall be completely disseminated to the Class no later than 45 days after dfts receive all Notice materials for reproduction; for members of the class who are California parolees in custody as alleged parole violators, the distribution of the short written Notice stated in paragraph 3(2)(3) and (d) of the 5/26 Stipulation and Order shall be done during a 30-day period only (Notice Period); no later than 30 days after the end of the Notice Period, dfts must file and serve on plts' counsel an affidavit affirming that they have published the Notice as required by the 5/26 Stipulation and Order and this Amendment to the Stipulation and Order (cc: all counsel) (ndd) (Entered: 06/30/2004)

RECAP
1080 June 30, 2004

LETTER to court from Paul Pacheco that he's been in prison for 65 days and he has not been to parole screening (ndd) (Entered: 06/30/2004)

RECAP
1081 July 1, 2004

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION on shortened time for order finding dfts in violation of permanent injunction by plaintiffs ; motion TO BE HEARD by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton ; Motion Hearing Set For 7/7/04 1:30pm (ndd) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
1082 July 1, 2004

DECLARATION of Michael W Bien in support of plts' Motion on shortened time for order finding dfts in violation of permanent injunction [1081-1] (ndd) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
1083 July 1, 2004

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES by dfts (bd) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
1084 July 1, 2004

ADDENDUM TO POLICIES AND PROCEDURES by dfts [1083-1] (bd) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

RECAP
1085 July 2, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate Grace Peterson thanking the court for the information provided regarding this case (nac) (Entered: 07/06/2004)

RECAP
July 6, 2004

LODGED stipulation and [proposed] order for periodic collection of attorneys' fees and costs (mdk)

1086 July 7, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton: MOTION HEARING DATE of 7/7/04 VACATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to pltfs' renoticing, re motion on shortened time for order finding dfts in violation of permanent injunction by pltfs [1081-1], scheduling conference VACATED (cc: all counsel) (mdk) (Entered: 07/07/2004)

RECAP
1088 July 7, 2004

LETTER to court from counsel Michael Bien regarding stipulation and request that the hearing set for 7/7/04 be taken off calendar [1086-2] (mdk) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
1087 July 8, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton GRANTING periodic collection of attorneys' fees and costs (See Order for Details) (cc: all counsel) (mdk) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
1089 July 8, 2004

LETTER to court from inmate William Rocha regarding his concerns (mdk) (Entered: 07/09/2004)

RECAP
1203 May 3, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/3/05: The court to continue plts' motion for civil contempt 1176 to 5/12/05 9:30am in Courtroom No. 4. The court hereby grants the dfts' 1196 Ex Parte Application for Order to Shorten Time on their motion to appoint a special master. A hearing on dft's motion is now set for 5/23/2005 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Plts are directed to FILE an opposition or statement of non-opposition not later than 5/12/05. The dfts may FILE a reply brief not later 5/13/05. (See Order for details) (Duong, D)

RECAP
1216 May 31, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 5/27/05: This Court has read the proposed stipulated order filed 5/24/05 1215 and finds that it properly sets forth the agreements reached in the Settlement conference. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the proposed stipulated order be approved and ordered by the District Court. (Sherman, T) (Modified by M. Krueger on 5/31/05)

RECAP
1217 June 1, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER re Policies and Procedures for Designating information as confidential in parole revocation proceedings signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/1/05. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1218 June 9, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/8/05 ORDERING MOTION for Order Regarding Violation of Permanent Injunction, and for Order to Show Cause Re Contempt 1176 GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part as follows: The dfts are in violation of the Permanent Injunction Order by virture of the elimination of the remedial sanctions of Electronic Monitoring and SATCUs; 2) The removal of the CCRCs is not in violation of the Permanent Injunction Order; and 3) Dfts will not be held in contempt. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
1220 June 17, 2005

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 1219 signed by Judge Morrison C. England Jr. for Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/17/05: The time is extended to 7/22/05 to file a proposed reference and method of selecting a Special Master.(Duong, D)

RECAP
1222 July 14, 2005

JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/14/05 ORDERING that plts' motions are SUBMITTED.(Duong, D)

RECAP
1224 July 26, 2005

STIPULATED and ORDER re 1223 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/25/05 GRANTING the extension of time to file a proposed reference to 8/12/05. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1226 Aug. 4, 2005

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/4/05. (Dotson, B)

RECAP
1230 Aug. 16, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER re Special Master Order of Reference signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/15/05. (See Order for details).(Duong, D)

RECAP
1233 Aug. 19, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees ad Costs for the First Quarter of 2005 and Resolving Disputed Attorneys' Fees from the Second Quarter of 2004 re 1231 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/18/05 ORDERING that it is confirmed that $481,256.27, plus interest is due and collectable as of 45 days from the date of entry of this order. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1236 Sept. 1, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/31/05 ORDERING that parolees' counsel shall receive access to information in their client's parole field files w/out any limitations or restrictions on disclosing the information to the parolee based on perceived risk of harm to the parolee's mental health under Cal. Health and Safety Code Sec. 123115(b). Dfts, in delivering such material, may note its sensitive character and urge counsel to use discretion in determining whether to discuss its contents with a client. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
1238 Sept. 16, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/15/05 re 1237 ORDERING that the court prefers a list of three candiates for Special Master, from which the court will choose one. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1240 Nov. 2, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/1/05 ORDERING that is confirmed that $541,133.62 is due and collectable as of 45 days from the date of this order. Modified on 11/2/2005 (Caspar, M).

RECAP
1245 Dec. 16, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/16/05 APPOINTING Chase Riveland as Special Master. Clerk to add Mr. Riveland to the court's service list.(Matson, R)

RECAP
1246 Dec. 19, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/19/05 re 1244 ORDERING that $498,931.72 is due and collectable s of 45 days from the date of entry of this order. Daily interest runs from 12/5/05 at the rate of 4.39%. (Duong, D) Modified on 12/19/2005 (Duong, D).

RECAP
1251 Jan. 31, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/30/06 ORDERING Virginia L. Morrison and Nancy M. Campbell APPOINTED as Deputy Special Masters. (Carlos, K)

RECAP
1253 Feb. 3, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 02/02/06. ORDERING Defendants to deposit, within 30 days of the date of this Order, the sum of $500,000 with the Clerk of this Court as an interim payment of costs, which shall be invested in an interest-bearing account.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
1255 March 10, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/9/06 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to pay to Chase Riveland the amount of $32,754.87 in accordance with the attached statement. A copy of this order shall be served on the Financial Dept. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1257 March 30, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/27/06 ORDERING that there is no provision in the Stipulated Judgment for enforcement by individual class members and the motion 1256 is therefore DENIED. Clerk shall serve a copy of the attached motion on class counsel.(Duong, D)

RECAP
1260 April 11, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/7/06 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to pay to Chase Riveland in the amount of $23,732.11 in accordance with the attached statement. (cc: CFS). (Duong, D)

RECAP
1264 May 5, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/5/06 ORDERING that: the clerk is DIRECTED to pay to Chase Riveland, Valdivia Special Master, the amount of $17,570.40 in accordance with the attached statement; and a copy of this order shall be served on SAC Financial.(cc: SAC Financial) (Brown, T)

RECAP
1265 May 8, 2006

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 05/05/06: The court declines to relate cases CIV-S-94-0671 LKK GGH and CIV-S-06-0823 DFL DAD. (Warren, P)

RECAP
1268 May 15, 2006

ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/11/06 ORDERING 1266 Pltfs' fees and costs of $451,521.78, plus interest are due and collectable as of 45 days from the date of entry of this Order. Daily interest runs from 3/13/06 at the rate of 4.80%. (Girgis, C)

RECAP
1271 May 26, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/24/06 ORDERING that the Motion to amend the "Stipulated order for permanent injunctive relief" is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
1273 June 7, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/6/2006 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to pay to Chase Riveland, Valdivia Special Master, the amount of $23,121.87 in accordance with the statement. A copy of this order shall be served on the CFS. (Duong, D)

RECAP
1279 June 14, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/14/06: The Special Master's request for an extension of time is granted. The First Report of the Special Master shall be filed on or before September 16, 2006. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
1280 June 15, 2006

ORDER Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the 1st Quarter of 2006 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/14/06. It is ORDERED that pltfs' fees and costs of $510,883.93, plus interst, are due and collectable as of 45 days from the date of entry of this Order. Daily interest runs from June 8, 2006 at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. Section 1961. (Brown, T)

RECAP
1287 July 6, 2006

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/5/2006 GRANTING 1285 Stipulation and Proposed Order Motion to re-schedule hearing currently set for 8/7/2006 to 8/28/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Matson, R)

RECAP
1288 July 6, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/6/2006 GRANTING 1286 Stipulation and Proposed Order extending time to file motion to compel regarding disputed attorneys' fees and costs for 2005. (Matson, R)

RECAP
1291 July 28, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 07/28/06.: The Clerk is directed to pay to Chase Riveland, Valdivia Special Master, the amount of $36,208.48 in accordance with the attached statement; a copy shall be served on the Financial Dept of the Court. (cc: Financial Dept)(Kirkpatrick, S)

RECAP
1292 Aug. 2, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/1/06: The Clerk is DIRECTED to pay to Chase Riveland, Valdivia Special Master, the amount of $20,593.15 in accordance with the attached statement; a copy of this order shall be served on the Financial Dept. of this court. (cc: Financial)(Brown, T)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

California's Prisoners' Rights Bar article

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 2, 1994

Closing Date: July 2, 2013

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

(1) California parolees at large; (2) California parolees in custody, as alleged parole violators, and who are awaiting revocation of their state parole; and (3) California parolees who are in custody, having been found in violation of parole and who have been thereupon sentenced to prison custody.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Prison Law Office

Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld

Youth Law Center

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

State of California

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of California 2:94-cv-00671

Eastern District of California 2:94-cv-00761

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 08-15889

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 12-15457

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 12-15492

Eastern District of California 95-80113

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Goals (e.g., for hiring, admissions)

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Order Duration: 2003 - 2013

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Classification / placement

Conditions of confinement

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Over/Unlawful Detention (facilities)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Mental health care, general

Recommended Citation