Case: Claybrooks v. American Broadcasting Companies

3:12-cv-00388 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

Filed Date: April 18, 2012

Closed Date: 2013

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 18, 2012, two African-American men who had unsuccessfully applied to be cast as The Bachelor in the ABC television program of the same name filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, under § 1981 and Cal. Civ. §§ 51, 51.5 against ABC. The complaint was filed as a class action, with plaintiffs seeking to sue on behalf of the class of all people of color who had unsuccessfully applied to star as either The Bachelor or The Bachelor…

On April 18, 2012, two African-American men who had unsuccessfully applied to be cast as The Bachelor in the ABC television program of the same name filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, under § 1981 and Cal. Civ. §§ 51, 51.5 against ABC. The complaint was filed as a class action, with plaintiffs seeking to sue on behalf of the class of all people of color who had unsuccessfully applied to star as either The Bachelor or The Bachelorette. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, alleging that they were the victims of ABC's racial discrimination. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that ABC has intentionally and as a matter of corporate policy refused to cast people of color in the role of the Bachelor and Bachelorette for all 23 seasons of the two programs.

On October 15, 2012, the Court (Judge Trauger) dismissed the case with prejudice on the grounds that applying anti-discrimination provisions to casting decisions would threaten the content of various television networks and their ability to target certain demographic groups and that it would chill protected speech.

On November 11, 2012, the plaintiffs moved to alter the judgment and to file an amended complaint. On April 4, 2013, both motions were denied.

Summary Authors

Christopher Schad (5/24/2012)

Katherine Reineck (2/21/2016)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4383458/parties/claybrooks-v-american-broadcasting-companies-inc/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Barrett, George E. (Tennessee)

Best, Zachary W. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Bryant, Kenneth M. (Tennessee)

Grubbs, Shelby R. (Tennessee)

Kurtz, Ryan A. (Georgia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:12-cv-00388

Docket [PACER]

Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

Docket
1

3:12-cv-00388

Class Action Complaint for Damages

April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

Complaint
102

3:12-cv-00388

Order

Claybrooks v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

Order/Opinion

898 F.Supp.2d 986

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4383458/claybrooks-v-american-broadcasting-companies-inc/

Last updated Dec. 18, 2024, 6:26 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Public Accommodations/Contracting

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 18, 2012

Closing Date: 2013

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

two African American men who unsuccessfully applied to be cast as The Bachelor in the ABC television program of the same name and, if the class is certified, all people of color who unsuccessfully applied to star in the role The Bachelor or The Bachelorette

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

State law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet