Filed Date: Sept. 4, 2013
Closed Date: 2014
Clearinghouse coding complete
On September 4, 2013, a for-profit company filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of D.C. against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the Administrative Procedure Act. and the First Amendment. The plaintiff, represented by the Thomas More Society, asked the court for an exception to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate requiring employers to provide health insurance coverage of contraception. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that providing insurance coverage of contraception would violate the deeply held, Catholic religious beliefs of the corporation's owners.
On September 25, 2013, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion for preliminary injunction and stayed the case. The court initially ordered a stay until the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in Gilardi v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The district court kept the stay in place until after the Supreme Court's ruling in Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius on June 30, 2014.
In Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court held that the version of the contraceptive services mandate in place at that time was a violation of the plaintiff's rights under the RFRA. Based on that ruling and the parties' joint status report, on October 27, 2014 the district court entered a permanent injunction and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, enjoining defendants from enforcing the version of the contraception mandate at issue in Hobby Lobby against the plaintiffs in this case. The parties were instructed to meet and confer on attorneys' fees and costs. The most recent status report in following that order was entered on December 17, 2014.
Summary Authors
Mallory Jones (1/31/2014)
Kate Craddock (7/24/2016)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13132332/parties/barron-industries-inc-v-sebelius/
Jackson, Ketanji Brown (District of Columbia)
Mersino, Erin Elizabeth (Michigan)
Pruski, Jacek (District of Columbia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13132332/barron-industries-inc-v-sebelius/
Last updated Feb. 28, 2025, 12:43 p.m.
State / Territory: District of Columbia
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Contraception Insurance Mandate
Key Dates
Filing Date: Sept. 4, 2013
Closing Date: 2014
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Christian owners of a for-profit corporation, who feel that covering contraception conflicts with their religious beliefs.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Closely-held (for profit) corporation
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (District of Columbia), Federal
U.S. Department of the Treasury (District of Columbia), Federal
U.S. Department of Labor (District of Columbia), Federal
Facility Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief:
Content of Injunction:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Basis:
Reproductive rights: