Case: Randy Reed Automotive v. Sebelius
5:13-cv-06117 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Filed Date: Oct. 8, 2013
Closed Date: 2014
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
On October 8, 2013, a for-profit corporation filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and the Administrative Procedure Act against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiff believes the Affordable Care Act's requirement that employee health plans provide coverage of contraception violates the business owner's religious freedom. The plaintiff, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, asked the court to rule that the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) contraception insurance mandate is unconstitutional. Specifically, the plaintiff asked for both a preliminary and permanent injunction keeping the government from enforcing the contraception insurance mandate against them.
On November 15, 2013, the plaintiff filed an unopposed motion for preliminary injunction and the defendant filed an unopposed motion to stay proceedings until the resolution of one of either of two cases implicating the same issues, to which the Supreme Court had recently granted writs of certiorari: (1) Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (Tenth Cir. 2013) or (2) Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, 724 F.3d 377 (Third Cir. 2013).
On December 3, 2013, U.S. District Court (Judge Ortrie D. Smith) granted the plaintiff's motion.
On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014), a substantially similar case. In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Alito, the Court held that the HHS regulations imposing the contraceptive mandate violate RFRA, when applied to closely-held for-profit corporations.
In light of this decision, on July 15, 2014, Judge Smith lifted the stay. On September 23, 2014, Judge Smith issued an order continuing the preliminary injunction and directing the parties to file a proposed injunction and judgment. The parties filed their respective proposed injunctions and judgments, and then their replies.
On November 12, 2014, Judge Smith permanently enjoined the defendants from (1) enforcing the ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement, (2) assessing any penalties or fines for noncompliance, and (3) taking any other actions based on noncompliance with the requirement. The case was then dismissed.
Summary Authors
Mallory Jones (3/15/2014)
Elizabeth Greiter (11/8/2017)
Related Cases
Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius, Western District of Oklahoma (2012)
Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (2012)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5078596/parties/randy-reed-automotive-inc-v-sebelius/
Smith, Ortrie D. (Missouri)
Schowengerdt, Dale (Arizona)
Bennett, Michelle Renee (District of Columbia)
Delery, Stuart F. (District of Columbia)
Ricketts, Jennifer (District of Columbia)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5078596/randy-reed-automotive-inc-v-sebelius/
Last updated June 19, 2026, 6:23 a.m.
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Contraception Insurance Mandate
Key Dates
Filing Date: Oct. 8, 2013
Closing Date: 2014
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
A for-profit corporation that believed the ACA's insurance contraception mandate violates the owner's religious freedom.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Federal
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Defendant Type(s):
Facility Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Constitutional Clause(s):
Other Dockets:
Western District of Missouri 5:13-cv-06117
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed
Relief Granted:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Content of Injunction:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Basis:
Reproductive rights:
Case Summary of Randy Reed Automotive v. Sebelius, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/13455/ (last updated 11/8/2017).