Case: Gibson v. Himes

1:14-cv-00347 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: April 30, 2014

Closed Date: 2014

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 30, 2014, six same-sex couples filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Ohio U.S. District Court against the State of Ohio. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought a declaration that Ohio laws banning same-sex marriage were in violation of the Constitution, an injunction against enforcing the ban, and an award of compensation for attorney's fees and costs. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that their rights to due process and equal protection had been abridged. The…

On April 30, 2014, six same-sex couples filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Ohio U.S. District Court against the State of Ohio. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought a declaration that Ohio laws banning same-sex marriage were in violation of the Constitution, an injunction against enforcing the ban, and an award of compensation for attorney's fees and costs.

Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that their rights to due process and equal protection had been abridged. The plaintiffs also alleged that they suffered harm by being denied tax and employment benefits that are available to different-sex couples, along with the social stigma of not being allowed to marry.

On April 30, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs then filed a motion for a permanent injunction and declaratory relief on June 28, 2014. However, once the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all states, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015), District Judge Michael R. Barrett entered a final judgment and declaratory judgment that the Ohio laws at issue violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on May 27, 2016. The Court permanently enjoined the defendants from enforcing the state laws. The case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Megan Dolan (6/19/2014)

Eva Richardson (1/7/2019)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4363542/parties/gibson-v-himes/


Judge(s)

Barrett, Michael Ryan (Ohio)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Branch, Jennifer L. (Ohio)

Gerhardstein, Adam Gingold (Ohio)

Attorney for Defendant

Carwile, Tiffany L. (Ohio)

Coontz, Bridget C (Ohio)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:14-cv-00347

Southern District of OH (U.S.)

May 27, 2016

May 27, 2016

Docket
1

1:14-cv-00347

Verified Complaint for Temporary Restraining Order and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

April 30, 2014

April 30, 2014

Complaint
27

1:14-cv-00347

Final Judgment and Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction

May 27, 2016

May 27, 2016

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4363542/gibson-v-himes/

Last updated Dec. 18, 2024, 3:43 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Ohio

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Same-Sex Marriage

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 30, 2014

Closing Date: 2014

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs consist of six same-sex couples who are denied the right to marry in the state of Ohio.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State of Ohio, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Preliminary relief request withdrawn/mooted

Order Duration: 2014 - None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Marriage

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Sexual orientation

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

LGBTQ+:

LGBTQ+