Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citations

Citation 1

Citation 2

Citation 3

Search for:
246 cases, 1509 documents
Ordered by
DISABILITY RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Mooneyhan v. Husted

3:12-cv-00379 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Nov. 6, 2012

None
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Krummen v. City of North College Hill, Ohio

1:13-cv-00193 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: March 21, 2013

Closed Date: June 26, 2013

None
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Preterm-Cleveland v. Himes

1:18-cv-00109 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Feb. 15, 2018

Case Ongoing

Ohio House Bill 214 (“the Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Act criminalized performing abortions if the provider knew that one reason for the decision to terminate the pregnancy was a fetal indication of Down syndrome. Three nonprofits, including Planned Parenthood; the owner and operator of a women’s medical center; and a licensed physician (“the plaintiffs”) brought this case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on February 15, 2018, alleging that th…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
CODING IN PROCESS
United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, #38

67-00575 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

Filed Date: 1967

None
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
CODING IN PROCESS
Robinson v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group Inc.

107118 | Ohio state trial court

Filed Date: Oct. 15, 2001

None
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. LaRose

2:20-cv-03843 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: July 31, 2020

Closed Date: May 20, 2021

This case challenged Ohio’s signature matching policy when processing election ballots. On July 31, 2020, the League of Women Voters of Ohio, the Ohio A. Phillip Randolph Institute, and two adversely affected individuals filed a complaint against Ohio’s Secretary of State in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The plaintiffs alleged (1) that the state’s signature matching practices for absentee ballot applications constituted an impermissible burden on the right to vote, (2) …
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CODING IN PROCESS
Arizona v. Biden

3:21-cv-00314 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Nov. 18, 2021

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) This suit, substantially similar to Arizona v. Department of Homeland Security, concerns the Biden Administration's change in immigration enforcement guidance.

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

State of Arizona v. Biden

Nov. 18, 2021

Order: (1) Denying Defendants’ Motion to Transfer (DOC. NO. 7); (2) Lifting the Stay on Briefing of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; and (3) Setting a Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

State of Arizona v. Biden

Dec. 6, 2021

Order: (1) Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (DOC. NO. 29); (2) Granting the States’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (DOC. NO. 4); and (3) Enjoining Enforcement of the Permanent Guidance (DOC. NO. 4-1) as Described Herein

State of Arizona v. Biden

March 22, 2022

Order Denying Defendants’ Emergency Motion for an Administrative Stay (DOC. NO. 45)

State of Arizona v. Biden

March 23, 2022

Order: (1) Denying Defendants’ Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal (DOC. NO. 49); and (2) Denying Defendants’ Motion for an Administrative Stay (DOC. NO. 50)

State of Arizona v. Biden

March 31, 2022

see 6 additional documents
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Ford Motor Company

1:04-cv-00845 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Dec. 27, 2004

Closed Date: June 15, 2008

This case is about an apprenticeship test that had a disparate impact on Black apprenticeship applicants. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed this lawsuit on December 27, 2004, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Filing on behalf of thirteen Black individuals and a class of similarly situated Black apprenticeship test takers, the EEOC alleged that the individuals' employer, the Ford Motor Company, as well as their union, the United Automobile, Aerospac…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Amaya-Cruz v. Adducci

1:20-cv-00789 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

Filed Date: April 10, 2020

Closed Date: Dec. 17, 2021

COVID-19 Summary: This habeas action was filed on April 10, 2020 by four medically vulnerable Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees at the Geauga and Seneca County Jails, seeking release from detention in light of COVID-19. On April 13, the plaintiffs filed an amended petition, adding six new similarly situated plaintiffs. In April 2020, the Court granted preliminary relief and ordered the release of three of the original plaintiffs, while it denied relief for the remaining named plaint…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Hodges

1:15-cv-00568 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Sept. 1, 2015

Case Ongoing

Two individual healthcare providers, represented by attorneys at the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and Gerhardstein & Branch, brought this § 1983 suit in September 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to challenge new state regulations that imposed restrictions on abortion clinics. Plaintiffs in this case were the last two health clinics in southwest Ohio offering abortion procedures: Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio (PPSWO) and Women’s Medical Group Professional Co…